Quantcast

Rave this if wish Obama would be impeached and think he is destroying the country

Teri- Oregon 2013/02/20 00:49:51
Related Topics: Obama, Impeached
You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Dawn 2013/02/28 00:06:54
    Dawn
    +2
    I rave!

  • Proggy 2013/02/26 21:57:48
    Proggy
    you re number one

    There's your rave pal!
  • 1776gwash 2013/02/24 23:23:20
    1776gwash
    +1
    He should be impeach along with the other scumbags on the Supreme Court and those in Congress that supported and started these phony wars. He is responsible for murdering about 4500 people that is known. He is just another scumbag Fascist.
  • Lobster Man 2013/02/24 21:32:22
  • mac9 2013/02/24 15:55:03
    mac9
    +1
    If only......
  • wutever 2013/02/24 14:17:29
    wutever
    +2
    I think they should impeach him from this country
  • Antichrist 2013/02/24 06:49:09
    Antichrist
    +2
    He does my bidding, bow your heads
  • ¤Creepy Lumberjack¤ >-QC-< 2013/02/24 02:15:41
    ¤Creepy Lumberjack¤ >-QC-<
    +1
    What is destroying America is the fact that everytime he tries to improve his people's life, congress (aka republicans) vote against all of propositions for the sole purpose of being "right" all the time.
  • sue 2013/02/24 01:37:19
    sue
    +1
    impeach him
  • Jere 2013/02/24 00:53:59
    Jere
    My biggest possible 10-4
  • Sal Monella ~PWCM~JL 2013/02/23 22:56:26
    Sal Monella ~PWCM~JL
    +1
    We can rave you all we want but it'll do nothing for the effort.

    The US Senate is CONTROLLED by the progressive communists. They can't even get a budget passed. Until that changes, Onana will NOT be impeached. Ever.
  • 1776gwash Sal Mon... 2013/02/24 23:26:44
    1776gwash
    The Senate is Controlled by the "Fascists" and it is called the Demorepublican Party. Run by the Corporatist State. The Federal Reserve basically runs everything, who owns the currency it says it right on the top of your fiat currency in you wallet. You know what it is a private corporation.
  • Sal Mon... 1776gwash 2013/02/25 00:45:13
    Sal Monella ~PWCM~JL
    Like the OMB, being manipulated daily by the WH and the DNC
  • bronxboba 2013/02/23 20:39:46
    bronxboba
    +3
    Being a liberal advocating social programs and policies that favor urban America is not an impeachable offense!
  • Brandie 2013/02/23 18:02:38
    Brandie
    +4
    He should have never become president.
  • ALofRI 2013/02/23 16:57:12
    ALofRI
    +6
    Can't do that. Going by all the polls that have Obama rated at over 50%, as well as the voting landslide that elected him for the SECOND time, and against ALL the voting intimidation and suppression set up BY the RWNJ's! Oh, and, by the way, his personal popularity is over 60, while his wife is over 70%! YOU are on the wrong side of history!

    Try going to "historical ratings of Presidents" as click on any of the "independent" studies of Presidential historians. You'll find Obama around 15th place...(after his FIRST term) FAR ahead of Ol' Dubya who has now dropped to somewhere between 39th and, well, somewhere in the worst 5 between 39 and 44.

    It's CONGRESS that should be "impeached", with the lowest ratings in history, for trying to insist on pushing an agenda that "WE the PEOPLE" DO NOT WANT!
  • C. C. Rider 2013/02/23 16:46:32
    C. C. Rider
    +6
    LMAO HEy, you had a chance to just vote him out dear....And that fell flat on YOUR FACE and IN YOUR FACE.
    What? You cons no longer believe in the right to vote? Cons, always ANTi AMERICAN

    Why don't you finance that ole Goebbles idea and be the first to be a trend setter in not wasting OUR tax dollars on your Whiney ass fit as losers. whiney republivans whiney republivans
  • Lady Wh... C. C. R... 2013/02/23 16:47:22
    Lady Whitewolf
    +5
    AGREED!
  • RTS 2013/02/23 15:40:02
    RTS
    +1
    Everyone go and watch the Skin Diamond, Asa Akira, Jada Stevens, Priya Rai conservative movement. A simple google video search will show you how these women are rising up and showing true republican spirit.
  • obama needs to go 2013/02/23 13:21:21
    obama needs to go
    +1
    Mary Mary is a communist!
  • obama needs to go 2013/02/23 13:19:17
    obama needs to go
    +1
    He's a tyrant! When he does his dirty work, he slips on his condom (it's a mixed brand of ABC, NBC, CNN, MSNBC) and then he screws the American people! The liberal agenda is to brainwash the children of this country to believe that :
    1) this country was founded unjustly and the founders were just rich mean slave owners
    2)guns are bad in any sence, to even make a finger gun is a suspendable offense and they need to be banned
    3) make white people the minority in this country.
    4) attack the wealthy Americans & eventually confiscate all they're wealth threw taxes.
    5) equal distribution of misery called "socialism"
    6) burning of the constatution & bill of rights
    7) collapse private industries
    8) we will resemble the USSR 30yrs ago
    9) our kids won't have any idea of the rights they have lost cause they will have never known them!
  • Mary Mary 2013/02/23 09:52:05
    Mary Mary
    +5
    Rave all you like, he was voted by the people.
  • ddd 2013/02/23 05:52:41
    ddd
    +1
    He bombed Libya without congressional approval. He violated the constitution by unilaterally declaring war, our presidents have been getting away with that in the last few decades and someone should make an example of one. Clinton should have been impeached for bombing Iraq and Sudan, not for Monica Lewinsky.
  • ALofRI ddd 2013/02/23 17:26:57 (edited)
    ALofRI
    +3
    Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld...and others...LIED and attacked a country under those lies. Bush ignored warnings that terrorists were planning an attack on America using planes as missiles, THOUSANDS DIED. THEY LIED to get Congressional approval AND BRIBED to get a miniscule "coalition" to back us. They said IRAQI'S would welcome us as saviors, and that Iraqi oil would pay for the war. Want to impeach something? TRY THAT! It would be FAR easier to do!
  • ddd ALofRI 2013/02/23 20:03:07
    ddd
    +1
    Ha, Bush is out of office. Obama and Bush can both be impeached, so we should make an example of the incumbent.
  • ALofRI ddd 2013/02/24 15:45:37
    ALofRI
    +1
    When Obama does something impeachable it would take less than 24 hours for the haters on the right to bring charges and start a Congressional investigation "in earnest". It has NOT happened! He has done nothing impeachable.
  • ddd ALofRI 2013/02/24 16:54:43
    ddd
    Except for violating the constitution, on numerous occasions.
    Hey, he fallows it occasionally, like the second time around he did not botch the oath of office, the one the constitution says he has to take. I can't think of any other examples.

    Just because all of our presidents are corrupt doesn't mean one isn't guilty. It means we need to make an example of one. If i said bush should be impeached, i would be a hating liberal, When i said i want Obama impeached i am called a hating conservative, If Ross Perot was elected, and for some reason i thought he should have been impeached, i would be called a reform party hater.

    He should be impeached for bombing Libya. Our president does not, and should not, have the constitutional power to declare war whenever he wants. Hell, he didn't even consult the congress when be bombed Libya, which is required under the unconstitutional war powers act. So he somehow managed to violate a law, and the constitution, when they are diametrically opposed to each other.

    As a result of the bombing Libyan has been a huge amount of infighting between rebel groups, they are executing black people, they instituted a constitution based on sharia, and their economy is in shambles. And now the 18% of the population that supported Gadhaffi hates our guts, and ev...




    Except for violating the constitution, on numerous occasions.
    Hey, he fallows it occasionally, like the second time around he did not botch the oath of office, the one the constitution says he has to take. I can't think of any other examples.

    Just because all of our presidents are corrupt doesn't mean one isn't guilty. It means we need to make an example of one. If i said bush should be impeached, i would be a hating liberal, When i said i want Obama impeached i am called a hating conservative, If Ross Perot was elected, and for some reason i thought he should have been impeached, i would be called a reform party hater.

    He should be impeached for bombing Libya. Our president does not, and should not, have the constitutional power to declare war whenever he wants. Hell, he didn't even consult the congress when be bombed Libya, which is required under the unconstitutional war powers act. So he somehow managed to violate a law, and the constitution, when they are diametrically opposed to each other.

    As a result of the bombing Libyan has been a huge amount of infighting between rebel groups, they are executing black people, they instituted a constitution based on sharia, and their economy is in shambles. And now the 18% of the population that supported Gadhaffi hates our guts, and everyone else is really our friend.
    they will have a dictator, again, soon, and all this was unconstitutional.

    Also he has a kill list, which includes American citizens. He was a constitutional professors, he should know what due process is. He also knows the executive branch can not use the air force's predator drones as his person hitman. Some people need to die for political purposes, that is why David Axelrod, his campaign advisor, sits in on meetings where they decide who to kill.

    Obama is a corrupt murderer, hell he may be worse than Bush. The least we could do is impeach him, we should make an example of somebody.
    (more)
  • ALofRI ddd 2013/02/25 19:36:50
    ALofRI
    Reagan didn't consult congress when HE bombed Libya the FIRST time.
  • ddd ALofRI 2013/02/25 20:22:05
    ddd
    Yeah, and he was a bad president (and thats coming from a libertarian).

    He spent more money on the military, and ran up a deficit. He increased federal spending, conservative my ass.

    He also did not fix the economy with regards to inflation or recession, Paul Volcker did. He put the brakes on inflation, and that always causes recession.

    He also bombed Grenada, and invaded it.

    Nixon invaded Cambodia, Reagan bombed Libya and invaded Grenada, bush declared war on Panama because he felt like it, Clinton bombed a medicine factory in the Sudan and bombed Iraq, and Kosovo. Hell at least Bush got permission to go into Iraq and Afghanistan. Although he he should be impeached for other reasons.

    Sounds like we need to make an example of someone, and our current president is a prime candidate.

    Bombing yemen, neutral ally, without declaration of war.
    Bombing Libya, a country we had no interest in, without a declaration of war. Hell he even violated the war powers act on that one.
    Assassination american citizens overseas with drones, in neutral countries.
    Bombing pakistan, an ally (well, i mean its complicated), but neutral none the less, without authorization.
    Using Drones as his personal political hit team. His campaign managers sits in on those meetings where they decide who to assassinate w...



    Yeah, and he was a bad president (and thats coming from a libertarian).

    He spent more money on the military, and ran up a deficit. He increased federal spending, conservative my ass.

    He also did not fix the economy with regards to inflation or recession, Paul Volcker did. He put the brakes on inflation, and that always causes recession.

    He also bombed Grenada, and invaded it.

    Nixon invaded Cambodia, Reagan bombed Libya and invaded Grenada, bush declared war on Panama because he felt like it, Clinton bombed a medicine factory in the Sudan and bombed Iraq, and Kosovo. Hell at least Bush got permission to go into Iraq and Afghanistan. Although he he should be impeached for other reasons.

    Sounds like we need to make an example of someone, and our current president is a prime candidate.

    Bombing yemen, neutral ally, without declaration of war.
    Bombing Libya, a country we had no interest in, without a declaration of war. Hell he even violated the war powers act on that one.
    Assassination american citizens overseas with drones, in neutral countries.
    Bombing pakistan, an ally (well, i mean its complicated), but neutral none the less, without authorization.
    Using Drones as his personal political hit team. His campaign managers sits in on those meetings where they decide who to assassinate without due process, you know like what it says he has to do in the constitution.

    This guy is worse than Bush, Reagan, and Bush 41 put together. Yes he should be impeached, he violated due process, he uses the air force's drone program as his own political hit team without checks, executes people in foreign countries, and declares war in foreign countries, without due process.

    Clinton should have been impeached for bombing countries he didnt have authorization to do so.
    (more)
  • gldynmd BTO-t-BCRA-F 2013/02/23 05:45:08
  • Darnel 2013/02/23 04:57:25
    Darnel
    +4
    LOL
    Consider: If there was a REASON to impeach him,.. there are thousands on the Right who would've put the premise up and got him out. The fact that all they have is hatred because they can't hack Obama as president

    Obama has been "destroying the country" since he was elected. Funny how it's taking him so long,... how the Stock Market and the Housing industries had returned or exceeded where they were in 2007,.. How unemployment CONTINUES to go down.

    I'm saying you watch too much Fox News or listen to too much Rush Limbaugh if you really believe Obama is destroying America.
  • ddd Darnel 2013/02/23 06:09:19 (edited)
    ddd
    +1
    You are so misguided.

    Lets start with your first point. He bombed Libya without congressional approval, that is unconstitutional and an impeachable offense. Our president, and his predecessors, have gotten away with unilaterally declaring war recently, so either amend the constitution or make an example of one. People hate the U.S. because Obama and his predecessor pull stunts like that and bomb people. Believe or not, they don't like that.
    PS. They are now executing black people in Libya, and they have a new constitution based on Sharia. Ten bucks says they have a new dictator in a few years, so, so much for that idea. Also a whole lot of pro-gadhaffi people (18% of the population) now hate us. So he made enemies.

    speaking of ten bucks, that is about to becomes worthless. In order to allow an economic recovery interest rates must rise, but that means the government can't pay the interest on the national debt and we get inflation. If interest rates are lower or stay the same, then the Federal Reserve must print the money to keep them low and we get inflation. When the bond market bubble bursts, we get inflation because the government must now print the money to stay solvent. If nothing happens, interest rates will eventually go up, and we get inflation. This is Obama and Bush'...







    You are so misguided.

    Lets start with your first point. He bombed Libya without congressional approval, that is unconstitutional and an impeachable offense. Our president, and his predecessors, have gotten away with unilaterally declaring war recently, so either amend the constitution or make an example of one. People hate the U.S. because Obama and his predecessor pull stunts like that and bomb people. Believe or not, they don't like that.
    PS. They are now executing black people in Libya, and they have a new constitution based on Sharia. Ten bucks says they have a new dictator in a few years, so, so much for that idea. Also a whole lot of pro-gadhaffi people (18% of the population) now hate us. So he made enemies.

    speaking of ten bucks, that is about to becomes worthless. In order to allow an economic recovery interest rates must rise, but that means the government can't pay the interest on the national debt and we get inflation. If interest rates are lower or stay the same, then the Federal Reserve must print the money to keep them low and we get inflation. When the bond market bubble bursts, we get inflation because the government must now print the money to stay solvent. If nothing happens, interest rates will eventually go up, and we get inflation. This is Obama and Bush's fault for borrowing too much damn money so we are in a position where we are, essentially, screwed. Obama borrowed more money than Bush, so don't lay most of this on Bush. This is also why gold is going up, anyone who understands monetary policy is buying gold, land, silver, and foreign stocks.

    Next your housing and stock market. Your stock market argument is true, but very, very, very misleading. No one is investing in the stock market, for the aforementioned reasons (investors know they will be screwed in very short order) so the only ones investing are people managing retirement accounts, which require a minimum dividend to stay in business. People buying stocks has actually gone down, the stock market is in horrible shape. Why is the stock market going up? Google inflation, once again. The government has changed the way inflation is calculated 22 times in the last 20 years, and recently changed the CPI. At the new CPI inflation is around 2-3%, in the old one it is 9.4%, almost in sync with gold, silver, stock, food and oil prices. So despite what Obama may say, Oil prices are, indeed his fault. It sure shows you how his inflation tax always hit the poor and middle class (you know, people on fixed incomes) the most. You would also be inclined to believe this if you visit a grocery store, or google how much money the Fed is printing. Also google quantitative easing, they basically gave a huge pile of cash to Goldman Sachs under the leadership of two guys, one who Obama appointed, and another who Obama re-appointed. Goldman Sachs gave them terrible bond prices (you will get this if you google Quantitative easing), because the guy who oversees QE (quantitative easing) is a former partner at Goldman Sachs, and oversees the QE because he is the head of the New York Fed. Also, they printed the money to do it, which is always a regressive tax as i pointed out.

    Your housing market argument is a horrible one, Why? Housing shouldn't be where it was in 2007, thats indicative of a bubble. Bush got us out of the Dotcom bubble mess by lowering interest rates. Surprise, that causes bubbles, and it burst in 2008, which sucked far worse than the Dotcom Mess. Surprise, Obama is doing the same thing, and through a combination of inflation and trying very, very hard to create a bubble you got your phony recovery. As with creating bubbles to get out of recessions, you suffer later, but all recovery is always lost, and now there is a worse recession in its place. Example: Dotcom-2008.

    Don't kid me on jobs. Population growth is rising faster than job growth, unemployment is going up. However Obama conveniently does not count the people who declare they are no longer looking for work. Factor that in, and we are at 16.4% unemployment (seriously it's that high, and everyone knows it). Count in underemployment (people who can only get part time jobs, or jobs far, far below their skill level) it goes up to around 25%. Job market recovery my ass.

    He isn't destroying America, he already laid a trap we can't get out of with interest rates and borrowing. I hope you enjoy inflation, because its Obama's fault, and you don't really have a choice.
    (more)
  • Darnel ddd 2013/02/23 08:00:44
    Darnel
    +5
    SMH.
    I'm misguided,.. but people in our government who don't like Obama can't muster up enough reality to get rid of him.
    In reverse order:
    So you don't like our employment improving because for the FIRST TIME in history, population growth is being factored in to the improvement with minimalizing jobs that are gained because of their part time nature,.. like ANY country coming back from an economic crisis appeared full bloom with full time jobs for everyone? NEVER HAPPENED.

    The point on Housing is the FACT that it is Back to BETTER than it was when the bubble popped,.. it is improving as we speak. From what I've read the current admin is taking pains to permenatly fix the problem,.. not go for a quick fix, hence the complaints from others.

    The last thing I heard on the stock market was that the artificial manipulation of it by American big business can no longer be maintained so things will continue to get better regardless of what some want. As more people find gain/employment, as they have more "excess" money, they will once again start buying stock. I find it interesting that whenever gas prices improve,.. the right says that the president has nothing to do with the price,.. but when it gets worse,.. he's directly responsible,.. and in ALL cases he never said he...


    SMH.
    I'm misguided,.. but people in our government who don't like Obama can't muster up enough reality to get rid of him.
    In reverse order:
    So you don't like our employment improving because for the FIRST TIME in history, population growth is being factored in to the improvement with minimalizing jobs that are gained because of their part time nature,.. like ANY country coming back from an economic crisis appeared full bloom with full time jobs for everyone? NEVER HAPPENED.

    The point on Housing is the FACT that it is Back to BETTER than it was when the bubble popped,.. it is improving as we speak. From what I've read the current admin is taking pains to permenatly fix the problem,.. not go for a quick fix, hence the complaints from others.

    The last thing I heard on the stock market was that the artificial manipulation of it by American big business can no longer be maintained so things will continue to get better regardless of what some want. As more people find gain/employment, as they have more "excess" money, they will once again start buying stock. I find it interesting that whenever gas prices improve,.. the right says that the president has nothing to do with the price,.. but when it gets worse,.. he's directly responsible,.. and in ALL cases he never said he had direct control.
    How does changing the way CPI is caculated proves he is responsible for oil prices? The EASIEST way the President could control oil prices is two fold: 1. Declare to the world that the US is going to throw "the doors open" to more domestic drilling. 2. That he sit on both the EPA and the Oil refineries to get more built and stop the games that allows an oil company to charge more where oil is refined than where it is used, Gas prices are proven to be artificially inflated to as much as traffic allows, Past experience has proven this,.. The US threatens to do w/o or drill our own,.. and suddenly the price drops.

    I'm reading what sounds like you expect a fast recovery w/o doing anything, changing anything to make that recovery. EVERYONE got taxed, it was impossible to come back from the mess that started in 2006 that can be traced as bad business as far back as 1992 w/o what we are going thru right now. In fact,.. this is a GENTLE version of what I would've done to get us back on track.
    (more)
  • ddd Darnel 2013/02/23 14:49:23 (edited)
    ddd
    +1
    First thing first.
    No, but if you want to call it a recovery unemployment must be going down. It is going up, and your supporting points are excuses for Obama. I do not want excuses i want a recovery.

    They can be going for a permanent fix in the same was Bush went for a permanent fix to the dotcom bubble burst. Obama is trying extremely hard to create a bubble, that is not wealth, that is not recovery. The fact that our president is creating bubbles and printing so much money reflects itself in prices. Prices going up now is indicative of failure, not a success. Remember the next bubble is always worse, if the Dotcom burst turned into 2008, i would hate to see what 2008 turns into.

    Big business cannot manipulate the stock market, don't kid yourself. Even if they did, most aren't investing in the stock market anymore because Obama is driving the economy into the ground. By "artificial manipulation of the stock market" do you mean they invested in stocks and that had an affect on prices? thats not manipulation, or artificial, that is how it is suppose to work. Also you sound like a Keynesian, google the broken window fallacy.

    Well more people are becoming unemployed, so your theory on why the stock market recovering is not only stupid, but your supporting argument of why Obama is...













    First thing first.
    No, but if you want to call it a recovery unemployment must be going down. It is going up, and your supporting points are excuses for Obama. I do not want excuses i want a recovery.

    They can be going for a permanent fix in the same was Bush went for a permanent fix to the dotcom bubble burst. Obama is trying extremely hard to create a bubble, that is not wealth, that is not recovery. The fact that our president is creating bubbles and printing so much money reflects itself in prices. Prices going up now is indicative of failure, not a success. Remember the next bubble is always worse, if the Dotcom burst turned into 2008, i would hate to see what 2008 turns into.

    Big business cannot manipulate the stock market, don't kid yourself. Even if they did, most aren't investing in the stock market anymore because Obama is driving the economy into the ground. By "artificial manipulation of the stock market" do you mean they invested in stocks and that had an affect on prices? thats not manipulation, or artificial, that is how it is suppose to work. Also you sound like a Keynesian, google the broken window fallacy.

    Well more people are becoming unemployed, so your theory on why the stock market recovering is not only stupid, but your supporting argument of why Obama is promoting a recovery by means of your stupid theory is also wrong. So lets say your theory of how the stock market recovers was true. Unemployment is going up, so that means Obama is a failure. Even if they have "excess money" then they won't invest it in something that is bound to collapse because of Obama.
    Gas prices: It is true, when the president prints money prices always go up. Inflation does not result in lower prices, however the right is not concerned with this, and while they say he is responsible for rising prices, not falling prices, they are right, but for the wrong reasons. The president is doing everything he can to jack up prices, whether he intends for it or not. I am also personally shocked a president would say he is not the cause of high gas prices, in an election year.
    Domestic drilling won't do it, some people are exporting U.S. oil. If he really wants to cut down on prices he should stop printing so much money.

    The CPI being changed shows us they are being deceptive, because high inflation is unpopular. They have to keep inflation around 2-3%, and if they won't stop printing so much money, well they have to change the word inflation. Obama is extremely deceptive on this, notice prices going up: Itunes, the Grocery store, Gas, Stocks, everything.

    Are you seriously saying a business trying to make as much money as possible is manipulation? Profits are an incentive for cutting down on waste, fraud, and abuse. Government should leave them alone, oil companies are entitled to a living regardless of public opinion. The reasoning behind your statement "they charge more where it is refined than where it is used" is a bit vague, how let me answer it. If they are producing it at a loss, that is charity. Let them keep doing that. The reason for discrepancy in price between areas is rent and land values, so it may be you are comparing the cheapest price because your article called oil "fungible".

    The only way oil companies can get away with driving up prices against competition is if the government comes in and protects them from competition, and as such the government institutes monopolies. That is the only way, besides shortages. Obama is doing neither, and he is printing money, so prices are going up.

    "The crisis traced back to 1992" is centered around how Clinton messed with the economy and forced businesses to take on risky loans.

    Yes i would very much expect a fast recovery from any idiot who can read history. Google the great depression of 1920-21. The economy collapsed (because of the fed) and this was initially worse than the great depression. Government did nothing, and if you can't do anything, you can't break anything. Economy recovered in 18 months.
    Great depression rolled along, and government must fix it. Lasted for 19 years, because most historians now put the recovery at 1948.
    Which path is Obama fallowing? Right the one that caused a depression that was 13 times longer.
    (more)
  • mich52 2013/02/23 04:33:13
  • Bali 2013/02/23 01:43:59
    Bali
    +2
    impeached is far too pleasant for the kenyan cricket, i think he should be locked up and the key thrown away.
  • pastafarian 2013/02/22 20:49:13
    pastafarian
    +5
    meh ... I dont know if I want to rave just so a singular sore loser can feel better - much better to deal with it and move on with real plans you may have IMO
  • Embalmer 2013/02/22 20:30:54
  • rusty Embalmer 2013/02/22 21:08:37
    rusty
    +3
    Yeah spending 10 trillion in 4 years was the republican congress. Face facts this guy is more out of control than Bush
  • Embalmer rusty 2013/02/23 00:40:30
    Embalmer
    +6
    Okay Hannity, breakdown that "10 trillion" - put up or shut up - but I know you'll shut up. The fact is you have no idea why the deficit got so high, you're a rotten excuse for an American.

    I don't want opinionated examples - I want amounts - and they'd better damn equal 10 trillion dollars.

    high rotten excuse american opinionated examples damn equal 10 dollars
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 10 Next » Last »

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2014/08/27 17:20:42

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals