Rave if you think Republican Rep. Joe Walsh of Illinois was WRONG for suggesting double-amputee Iraq veteran Tammy Duckworth not a ‘true hero’
Republican Rep. Joe Walsh of Illinois is under fire this Fourth of July for complaining that his Democratic challenger, a veteran who lost her legs in Iraq, talks too much about her military service.
Tammy Duckworth, a Black Hawk pilot, was awarded the Purple Heart after her helicopter was hit by an RPG in 2004. She lost her legs and some use of her right arm in the explosion.
At a town hall meeting on Sunday, Walsh complained that he is “running against a woman who, I mean my God, [military service] is all she talks about.”
The first-term congressman also suggested that Duckworth is not a “true hero,” while comparing her unfavorably to Arizona Sen. John McCain.
Read More: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/republica...
Top Opinion
-
FAWKES' NOOSE ~ ΔTX 2012/07/05 03:37:35Yes, Republican Representative Joe Walsh was WRONG






















I worry about people who have a need to keep re-stating the obvious. Focus on current issues.
And it is one thing to thank military veterans and another thing for veterans to solicit thanks/pity for themselves. You are not required to thank vets and for the most part the people who want you to thank vets are non-vets. I don't care what you do either way.
I don't and IMHO many of those most truly worthy of special recognition don't. (And I am certainly not putting myself in that group)
For people my age who were subjected to a discriminatory draft system it is a nice gesture. Many of us were not asked to join the military-we were forced, simply because we were 18-26 year old males. So the govt who required that threw a little bone.
Regardless of what the employer, or govt in this case, does, there is no obligation for other people to follow the lead of that employer or govt.
As I previously stated, if the govt wants to offer an incentive to sign up, then fine. But you don't have to follow the govt's lead and thank veterans or vote for a veteran. And the govt can give you a 10pt advantage on govt jobs but does not require all employers to offer the same advantage. There is nothing in any law that says that veterans will get 100,000 votes added. I don't see your logic at all. The government can not mandate citizens to do anything.
I can not believe that you are actually saying that veterans should automatically get a bunch of extra votes. It is ironic that the current presidential election is the first in at least 66 years in which neither candidate is a veteran. That is sad but I am not in favor of messing with the democracy of one man one vote.
Edit: I did not hear Walsh saying that Tammy should get no special treatment. What I got from it is that they should be discussing current issues so the citizens can make an informed decision. An accident that happened 8 years ago may indicate something about character which is fine and important but there are other issues.
My principles don't change based on some silly partisanship.
(there is no reason why you should but I am curious whether you gave them 10%)
Furthermore, there are many different reasons for joining the military, some more selfless than others. For someone who has been in the military as long as she has, Tammy seems to have a rather weak set of military awards and honors, according to Wikipedia. Especially for an officer as officers get awards like candy sometimes. A friend of mine got his Purple Heart while returning from a visit to the local whore house in Vietnam. Getting badly wounded is not grounds for being elected to Congress.
This will be the first Presidential election of my lifetime that neither candidate has served in the military. Every Republican candidate prior to Romney served, since 1950.