RAVE If You Know That SH Teabaggers Will Be Making Lame Excuses When President Obama Wins Reelection.
Che Guevara - Hero
2012/09/15 13:43:25
|
|
|||||
|
34 votes
|
|
16% | ||
|
12 votes
|
|
5% | ||
|
24 votes
|
|
11% | ||
|
149 votes
|
|
68% | ||
RAVE If You Know That SH Teabaggers Will Be Making Lame Excuses When President Obama Wins Reelection.
Top Opinion
-
Magus BN-0 2012/09/15 17:28:06
stunned silence for about 20 sec and then every rationalization they can think of why it was not their fault...
it was a fluke, they'll say... it was ACORN (even tho they no longer exist)....it was the blacks, gays, latinos, and (gasp) WOMEN who "threw" the election to Obama...
they telegraph everything they are going to do from MILES away.
You and Che must 69 each other - you both like to frequent the same polls - you know - the ones that don't give those with dissenting opinions a choice.
They've never let the "fraud" bs end since 2008 so excuse is pretty worn out..
NBP is another ignorant right-wing lie, please turn off Fox News...
http://www.newshounds.us/2011...
Adams, you may recall, is the ex-DOJ employee whose allegation that Attorney General Eric Holder failed to prosecute a couple of thuggish New Black Panther Party members for voter intimidation because of Holder's own racial bias toward black people was much ballyhooed by Fox in the summer of 2010. What Adams always failed to mention – and Hannity didn't either – is that no voters at all in the predominantly black precinct ever came forward to allege intimidation. The complaints came from white Republican poll watchers, who have given no evidence they were registered to vote in that precinct. You can read about this case in an excellent post on the Main Justice website.
Furthermore, Adams is a Republican operative who, as Main Justice noted, was hired by the Bush administration “in the Civil Rights Division Voting Section under a process the DOJ Inspector General later d...
NBP is another ignorant right-wing lie, please turn off Fox News...
http://www.newshounds.us/2011...
Adams, you may recall, is the ex-DOJ employee whose allegation that Attorney General Eric Holder failed to prosecute a couple of thuggish New Black Panther Party members for voter intimidation because of Holder's own racial bias toward black people was much ballyhooed by Fox in the summer of 2010. What Adams always failed to mention – and Hannity didn't either – is that no voters at all in the predominantly black precinct ever came forward to allege intimidation. The complaints came from white Republican poll watchers, who have given no evidence they were registered to vote in that precinct. You can read about this case in an excellent post on the Main Justice website.
Furthermore, Adams is a Republican operative who, as Main Justice noted, was hired by the Bush administration “in the Civil Rights Division Voting Section under a process the DOJ Inspector General later determined was improperly influenced by politics."
http://www.washingtonpost.com...
The Justice Department’s Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) has concluded an investigation finding that politics played no role in the handling of the New Black Panther Party case, which sparked a racially charged political fight.
After reviewing thousands of pages of internal e-mails and notes and conducting 44 interviews with department staff members, the OPR reported that “department attorneys did not commit professional misconduct or exercise poor judgment” and that the voter-intimidation case against the Panthers was dismissed on “a good faith assessment of the law” and “not influenced by the race of the defendants.”
http://www.politico.com/news/...
A member of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights criticized his panel’s investigation of voter intimidation allegations by the New Black Panther Party as a “solely partisan” probe.
Michael Yaki, a Democrat who was appointed to the commission in February 2005, suggested his panel’s investigation was being “fueled” by the Republican Party. He also defended the Department of Justice, which has been accused of politicization for dropping a January 2009 civil suit against the New Black Panther Party.
The controversy stems from video captured on Election Day 2008 of two men outside a Philadelphia polling place, in what critics contend was a threatening pose. The issue has become a cause célèbre on Fox News and on conservative blogs.
The seven Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee have asked Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), the panel’s chairman, for a hearing into the matter.
“The call by Senate Republicans is just another part of the witch-hunt, star chamber, you name it, that the right wing is using to create race as another wedge issue in the midterm elections,” he wrote in POLITICO’s Arena
http://www.politico.com/news/...
A conservative dismisses right-wing Black Panther 'fantasies'
A scholar whom President George W. Bush appointed as vice chairwoman of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, Abigail Thernstrom has a reputation as a tough conservative critic of affirmative action and politically correct positions on race.
But when it comes to the investigation that the Republican-dominated commission is now conducting into the Justice Department’s handling of an alleged incident of voter intimidation involving the New Black Panther Party — a controversy that has consumed conservative media in recent months — Thernstrom has made a dramatic break from her usual allies.
“This doesn’t have to do with the Black Panthers; this has to do with their fantasies about how they could use this issue to topple the [Obama] administration,” said Thernstrom, who said members of the commission voiced their political aims “in the initial discussions” of the Panther case last year..
“My fellow conservatives on the commission had this wild notion they could bring Eric Holder down and really damage the president,” Thernstrom said in an interview with POLITICO.
The criticism has focused attention not just on Thernstrom, a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, but on the partisan nature of the Civil Rights Commission and on a story that, like the controversy over the anti-poverty group ACORN, has raged almost completely outside the mainstream media.
The facts of the case are relatively simple. Two men were captured on a video standing outside a polling place in a black Philadelphia neighborhood on Election Day in 2008. One of the men had a nightstick, if an unclear agenda — though a member of the black nationalist New Black Panther Party, he had earlier professed loathing for the Democratic "puppet" candidate, Barack Obama, who went on to overwhelmingly carry that precinct.
Three Republican poll monitors filed complaints of intimidation — itself a federal crime — but no voters attested to being turned away. The Justice Department, while Bush was still president, investigated the incident and later, after Obama took office, decided that "the facts and the law did not support pursuing" the claims against the party and against a second, unarmed man, Justice spokeswoman Tracy Schmaler said.
But the issue galvanized long-running conservative complaints — including by former Bush administration lawyers — that the government doesn’t take black racism seriously, and the incident has become a huge source of controversy among conservatives.
Fox News and other conservative media outlets have turned the Justice Department’s handling of the case into the subject of the sort of intense, contained interest that’s becoming increasingly common in an age of polarized and ideological media.
The liberal group Media Matters has counted 95 segments on Fox at least partially devoted to the story, much of it driven by “America Live” host Megyn Kelly, who focused on it during 45 segments, including one that discussed whether Fox’s own coverage had been racist..
Don't need Fox there is a real conservative News channel now Blaze TV.
On Dish channel 212 it's terrrific. Obama is to start bashing it very shortly.
As we draw closer to the elections in November, we are learning there are numerous ways to win an election other than by the ballots cast by legal registered voters.
In several state primaries, it was discovered that dead people and non-U.S. citizens had voted. In some states, there are still thousands of dead people and non-citizens on the voter registration rolls. Why, we’ve even read where a guy’s dog that had been dead for two years received a voter registration card in the mail.
And through it all, the Democrats have fought tooth and nail to prevent states from cleaning up their voter registration records and removing dead people and non-citizens. They have also fought long and hard to prevent states from enacting voter ID laws and in some instances the DOJ has declared such laws discriminatory and illegal.
I always have to laugh at the hypocrisy of the Democrats on claiming the voter ID is discriminatory and will prevent poor black people from voting. Those same poor black people have to have some form of ID in order to...
Don't need Fox there is a real conservative News channel now Blaze TV.
On Dish channel 212 it's terrrific. Obama is to start bashing it very shortly.
As we draw closer to the elections in November, we are learning there are numerous ways to win an election other than by the ballots cast by legal registered voters.
In several state primaries, it was discovered that dead people and non-U.S. citizens had voted. In some states, there are still thousands of dead people and non-citizens on the voter registration rolls. Why, we’ve even read where a guy’s dog that had been dead for two years received a voter registration card in the mail.
And through it all, the Democrats have fought tooth and nail to prevent states from cleaning up their voter registration records and removing dead people and non-citizens. They have also fought long and hard to prevent states from enacting voter ID laws and in some instances the DOJ has declared such laws discriminatory and illegal.
I always have to laugh at the hypocrisy of the Democrats on claiming the voter ID is discriminatory and will prevent poor black people from voting. Those same poor black people have to have some form of ID in order to receive all of the government aid and handouts they get, so what makes a voter ID any different? Besides, thousands of Americans have sacrificed their lives and limbs to secure and maintain the right to vote, but not to secure and maintain government entitlements.
In Ohio, there as a push to remove the requirement of needing a permanent mailing address from qualifying to be able to register to vote. Fortunately, that was defeated. Not needing an address or an ID would allow many people to register in numerous places under numerous names and thus allow them to vote numerous times. I strongly suspect that this was the true motivation behind the effort.
Then President Barack Obama used an Executive Order to illegally bypass Congress and grant nearly one million young illegal aliens to avoid deportation and obtain work permits. In the process they would also become eligible to obtain valid state driver’s licenses, which in most states allows you to register to vote even if you are not a citizen. Several states have taken measures to block the driver’s license provision, but most have not.
Let’s not forget the voter intimidation by members of the New Black Panther organization. They were filmed using threats of violence to intimidate voters in 2008, but Eric Holder and the DOJ refused to prosecute them and dropped all charges against them.
Now the Advancement Project has been pressuring Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell and Secretary of State Janet Kelly into making the effort to reinstate the right to vote to convicted felons in their state. They claim to be a ‘multi-racial civil rights organization’ started in 1999. The leaders of the organization have contributed tens of thousands of dollars to the Democratic National Committee and to Obama’s campaign. So it is no wonder they are trying to get voting rights for felons so they can vote for Obama.
According to Advancement Project’s website:
“A spokesperson with the Governor’s office says to date he has restored the right to vote for more than 3,500 felons. Jeff Caldwell said they’re on track to surpass the past governors’ record in Virginia.”
“In recent years he says former Gov. Tim Kaine restored rights to 4,402 felons. Mark Warner restored 3,486 and former Gov. George Allen restored the rights of 460 felons…”
‘“There are 350,000 convicted felons in Virginia that have not yet had their rights restored. This can be a major impact on voting and the elections, from national to state to local,’ said Walker.”
Just a side thought, but if Gov. McDonnell believes these convicted felons have fully paid their debt to society and should be granted the right to vote, what about their right to possess a firearm? I haven’t seen any of the liberal organizations or Democrats fighting to restore those rights, and no wonder since most of them are anti-gun anyway. But let’s face it, if you legally declare someone to have paid their debt for their crime and you start restoring the rights they lost be committing a felony, should not those rights include the right to possess a gun?
Chicago, where Obama started his political career has a long history of corrupt elections. The cities motto for years was if you can win an election legally, steal it any way you can.
In 2008, Obama won Virginia by seven points. At the moment, the polls show the race between Obama and Romney to be much closer. That means that Obama is going to need the vote of every dead person, non-citizen, pet and convicted felon, along with the voter intimidation of New Black Panther members if he wants to secure his victory in November.
Read more: http://godfatherpolitics.com/...