SodaHead Celebrates Green Week

Question US

Rasmussen Report: Just 47% Oppose Nationalizing Oil Industry, do you oppose nationalizing the oil industry?

Ihr Hase ~ Radix Libertas June 18, 2008 02:58:10

Just 47% Oppose Nationalizing Oil Industry

Monday, June 16, 2008

A Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that 29% of voters favor nationalizing the oil industry. Just 47% are opposed and 24% are not sure.

The survey found that a plurality of Democrats (37%) believe the oil industry should be nationalized. Just 32% of voters in Barack Obama’s party disagree with that approach. Republicans oppose nationalizing the oil industry by a 66% to 16% margin. Unaffiliated voters are opposed by a 47% to 33% margin.

Nationalization is the process by which the government assumes complete control of a private industry and its assets. It has been a common practice in totalitarian dictatorships, but as recently as 2001 following the 9/11 attacks, the U.S. government nationalized the private airport security industry and moved it under the Transportation Security Administration.

Forty-seven percent (47%) of all voters say that private companies are more likely to solve the nation’s energy problems than a government research program. Thirty percent (30%) disagree and say the government research program is more likely to find the solution. Again, there is a huge partisan divide. Republicans, by a 71% to 15% margin, say private companies are likely to solve the problem. Democrats, by a 40% to 35% margin, say government research programs are the better bet. A modest plurality of unaffiliated voters place their trust the private company approach.

Ideologically, 43% of liberal voters say the government research program is more likely to solve the problem while 31% take the opposite view. Conservatives, by a 68% to 17% margin, say private companies will find the answer. Political moderates are evenly divided.

Just 52% of American voters believe that an oil company should be allowed to keep profits from any alternative energy source it discovers. Twenty-nine percent (29%) say the company should not be allowed to keep such profits while 19% are not sure. Democrats are evenly divided on the question. Republicans by a 4-to-1 margin, and unaffiliated voters by a 2-to-1 margin, say that the companies should be allowed to profit from discoveries that reduce the price of gas and other energy sources.

Thirty-six percent (36%) of voters say that passage of a windfall profits tax on oil companies would lead to higher gas prices. Thirty percent (30%) believe prices would remain about the same and 15% believe a windfall profits tax would lead to lower gas prices. Most liberal say that gas prices would be unchanged or drop.

Seventy-six percent (76%) say that development of new energy sources would do more than higher fuel efficiency standards to bring gas prices down--and keep them down. Just 14% believe higher fuel efficiency standards would be more effective.

Earlier surveys have found that higher gas prices have had a big lifestyle impact on half of all Americans. The number of Americans taking a summer vacation is down sharply this year. Seventy-one percent (71%) expect gas prices to reach $5 a gallon this summer.
I oppose nationalizing private industry
Where is the National Socialist party for me to join!!!
I was hoping for a leader like Hugo Chavez
Nationalizing Oil should have great results, look how great Medicare is going!!!
You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Comment
  • +8 / -1 raves Art June 18, 2008 08:44:34
    Art

    I oppose nationalizing private industry

    Nationalizing? Nationalizing?

    What has become of Americanism?

    Have we all become European-styled thumb suckers aching for the maternal embrace of government like whimpering children?
    View thread
Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Comments
  • +3 raves
    diaverde08-MolecularGastron... June 19, 2008 00:06:04 (edited)
    diaverde08-MolecularGastronomer

    I oppose nationalizing private industry

    You'r pointing the finger at the wrong people! The oil industry is only the people who refine and distribute processed oil in the U.S. The real culprits of rising gas prices exists in the supplying part of the industry and cannot be controled by the government even if the industry was nationalized because they're dealing with multiple other countries. If the U.S. nationalizes it's oil industry, the suppliers still have hundreds of other countries to screw. The best solution is to create more suppliers of oil so that these middlemen will lose their monopoly on the oil-supplying part of the idustry and they will have to lower the price in order to continue competing. Use the law of supply-and-demand against them and there will only be benifit for the consumer and growth for other companies. Look up the Energey Non-Crisis on Google video. It will explain everything.
  • +2 raves
    Coach June 18, 2008 22:29:27
    Coach

    I oppose nationalizing private industry

    Wow, that's all I got to say about that.
    oppose nationalizing private industry wow
  • +4 raves
    Studied June 18, 2008 20:55:55
    Studied

    I oppose nationalizing private industry

    This is America where we practice capitolism, not socialism. Keep the Government out of private business. Guess they could take over Microsoft, Starbucks, etc. and any other company they felt were charging too much. Maybe we should demand the Microsoft programs be $10.00.
  • +3 raves
    Ken "Don't tread on me!" June 18, 2008 19:28:19
    Ken

    Nationalizing Oil should have great results, look how great Medicare is going!!!

    This is surely meant to be a sarcastic response! Just look at how efficiently the governments, federal, state and local, run the activities they are required to operate! A nationalized oil industry would be an absolute disaster.

    Just look at the travesty mandated ethanol - it takes 1,700 gallons of water and 1 gallon of petro-fuel to produce one gallon of ethanol, and the taxpayers pay for it not only at the pump but in billions of dollars of subsidies, all going to the very largest companies. Ethanol has only 60% of the energy of gasoline, so every time you fill up with E85, or gasoline with any percentage of ethanol, expect your fuel mileage to drop!

    Additionally, the ethanol fiasco has caused food prices to rise, world-wide! Our congress needs to get out of the way and let American oil companies explore and drill in America, where it can be done in an ecologically sound manner. The only control I think would be valid is for an agreement that new American oil is sold in America, on a cost-plus basis, and not on the international market. Oil companies already re-invest a large part of their profits in exploration and development, but government controls have kept them from building a new refinery in the U.S. for three decades!
    re-invest large profits exploration development government controls building refinery decades
  • +6 raves
    kmay June 18, 2008 16:05:31
    kmay

    I oppose nationalizing private industry

    It's UN-CONSTITUTIONAL!

    NO TO OBAMA SOCIALISM!
  • +6 raves
    Icedragon1969 June 18, 2008 15:07:56
    Icedragon1969

    I oppose nationalizing private industry

    I thought we'd already watched as communism fell?
  • +6 raves
    cuz June 18, 2008 13:43:45
    cuz

    I oppose nationalizing private industry

    Pure socialism.
  • +4 raves
    SpecialKrazyK! June 18, 2008 13:37:32
    SpecialKrazyK!

    Nationalizing Oil should have great results, look how great Medicare is going!!!

    I dont know...to me...the goverment is making it worse with it's subsidies.
  • +5 raves
    aace June 18, 2008 11:36:19
    aace

    I oppose nationalizing private industry

    moderated...
  • +3 raves
    Arel June 18, 2008 11:10:26
    Arel

    Nationalizing Oil should have great results, look how great Medicare is going!!!

    How about this.......we secure the oil fields in Iraq and start pumping and sending the oil to the USA to offset the cost of rebuilding Iraq. How is that?
  • +2 raves
    Ken "Do... Arel June 18, 2008 19:30:03
    Ken
    Can't you hear MoveOn.Org screaming "We told you it was about the oil!"?
  • +1 raves
    Arel Ken "Do... June 19, 2008 11:28:48
    Arel
    Do we really care about moveon.org?
  • Ken "Do... Arel June 19, 2008 18:35:52
    Ken
    "We" don't, but "they" do!
  • +1 raves
    Arel Ken "Do... June 19, 2008 18:37:13
    Arel
    true.
  • +4 raves
    Ihr Has... Arel June 18, 2008 20:01:58
    Ihr Hase ~ Radix Libertas
    We could stop exporting the oil we get here....
  • +3 raves
    BITE ME! June 18, 2008 10:57:51
    BITE ME!

    Where is the National Socialist party for me to join!!!

    Whats next???? Can we Nationalize sex too?
  • +1 raves
    Neo BITE ME! June 19, 2008 00:37:13
    Neo
    moderated...
  • +1 raves
    BITE ME! Neo June 19, 2008 00:39:03
    BITE ME!
    Thats one thing the free market cant do....... Its never free!
  • +1 raves
    Neo BITE ME! June 19, 2008 00:47:08
    Neo
    moderated...
  • +1 raves
    BITE ME! Neo June 19, 2008 00:50:52
    BITE ME!
    Got any extra vouchers??
  • +3 raves
    mac - Sockdolager! June 18, 2008 10:38:35
    mac - Sockdolager!

    I oppose nationalizing private industry

    Who the hell are they polling?!?!
  • the kid June 18, 2008 09:06:53
    the kid

    Where is the National Socialist party for me to join!!!

    fuck the oil companies, how many chances do you give the bastards, fuck 'em. it's a national emergency, I can't walk to work
  • +5 raves
    mac - S... the kid June 18, 2008 10:40:58
    mac - Sockdolager!
    That attitude will only envoke Godwin's Law.

    Seriously, think about what you're saying.

    "I can't afford something, so I want *the government* to solve my problems"

    Think about that.
  • +5 raves
    aace the kid June 18, 2008 11:37:54
    aace
    moderated...
  • +8 / -1 raves
    Art June 18, 2008 08:44:34
    Art

    I oppose nationalizing private industry

    Nationalizing? Nationalizing?

    What has become of Americanism?

    Have we all become European-styled thumb suckers aching for the maternal embrace of government like whimpering children?
  • +3 raves
    aace Art June 18, 2008 11:38:17
    aace
    moderated...
  • +1 raves
    steve Art August 06, 2008 23:22:08
    steve
    yes longer lives better health care and more job security.... oh my Europe is scary ;)
    oh and lets not forget 5 weeks paid vacation
  • Art steve August 06, 2008 23:28:53
    Art
    Why don't we just get all the libs to move to the worker's paradise of Europe...why spoil this perfectly good country with socialism?
  • +1 raves
    steve Art August 06, 2008 23:31:13
    steve
    god I would love to be able to get a work visa to Europe.
    especially on the strength of the euro.
    How about all the conservatives break off and make their own country.
    seems to me the most productive parts of the country are where the liberals live
    look at the income between red and blue states and you get back to me on who owns this country ;)
    red states do have lots of frikking pigs though they beat us on the hog factor
  • Art steve August 06, 2008 23:32:48
    Art
    I would love for you to immigrate too or at least turn the Northeast and California into your very own socialist paradise.

    Let's make this happen!

    Just one catch...you socialists can't come back. :)
  • steve Art August 06, 2008 23:37:54
    steve
    come back to what? the middle?
    Here is the deal, without California and the northeast the rest of the states would be f&&ked.
    Just look one time and see where the majority of subsidies go for the federal government; red states get the majority.
    I could live my whole life without the middle
    and if you think I would care to live and stay in Europe I would be fine with it as long as I coudl visit my family every year
    I lived overseas for 3.5 years and I enjoyed it
  • Art steve August 07, 2008 00:27:42
    Art
    >Here is the deal, without California and the northeast the rest of the states would be f&&ked.

    OK, well then you won't mind staying out of our new country then? Cool! (I suspect many refugees from your socialist paradise will be trying to sneak-in.)

    Good for you!...I wish you would stay over there (take a few other socialists with you.)
  • steve Art August 07, 2008 12:18:24
    steve
    yes please you guys break off; what will be funny is the quality of education you will be receiving in jesusLand. Look at where all the top schools are.
    how's this you move to Indiana and I promise to never visit a red state :)
  • Art steve August 07, 2008 18:11:07 (edited)
    Art
    I live in a red state, Nevada. Please never visit.

    I take it as a deep compliment to call red states 'Jesus Land'.

    I would rather live in the land of Jesus than in the land of sodomy and criminal illegal aliens.
  • steve Art August 07, 2008 19:37:57
    steve
    and me just the opposite; ok please do not visit California Washington or the northeast and I promise to never visit Nevada :)
    I would rather live with the tolerant than the intolerant so we will never meet
    oh this makes me laugh; Your state is 49th in education go red states...
    here is the list for you; wonder which states have the best education? :)
    you will be in JesusLand and I will be in Educationland
    http://www.morganquitno.com/e...
  • Art steve August 07, 2008 23:30:28
    Art
    Well I can see 'education' is important to you.

    I would rather be governed by the first 600 ice-road truckers in the phone book than by the faculty of Harvard.

    To find cosmic levels of foolishness, you have to find people that attended graduate school.
  • +1 raves
    steve Art August 08, 2008 14:42:19
    steve
    yes, I am glad you are reaping the benefits of their research.
    Like your computer? I wonder who came up with that idea.

    It's ok to be jealous and lash out at intellectuals just realize most of what you probably use on a daily basis comes form their work
  • Art steve August 08, 2008 15:01:22
    Art
    I didn't know liberals created my computer and all the software running on it.

    This one I ordered from Texas...is that a blue state?

    Those in academia are rarely 'intellectuals'.

    With hubris like this, you must be a teacher.
  • +1 raves
    steve Art August 08, 2008 15:04:02
    steve
    no I am an engineer/infrastructure architect.
    What I meant was your computer was designed by intellectuals whom you seem to disdain.
    Babbage Turing etc
    oh and Turing was gay so a lot of computer theory was developed by a gay man you should revolt and throw yours away
  • Art steve August 08, 2008 15:41:32
    Art
    The reference to 'intellectuals' was yours sir, not mine.

    I do not disdain people of learning but I do disdain the culture of academicians which is decidedly left-wing as is yours.

    Now you are on to gay people.

    Interesting...the lack of focus.

    By your logic, since your freedom is ensured by men with guns (vast majority of which are right of center) you should flee the country.

    You won't...you love being protected by conservative men.
or
Cancel