Nationalizing? Nationalizing?
What has become of Americanism?
Have we all become European-styled thumb suckers aching for the maternal embrace of government like whimpering children?
Question US
Rasmussen Report: Just 47% Oppose Nationalizing Oil Industry, do you oppose nationalizing the oil industry?
Ihr Hase ~ Radix Libertas June 18, 2008 02:58:10
- 51 answers
- Read all 265 comments
- +15 raves
Just 47% Oppose Nationalizing Oil Industry
Monday, June 16, 2008
A Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that 29% of voters favor nationalizing the oil industry. Just 47% are opposed and 24% are not sure.
The survey found that a plurality of Democrats (37%) believe the oil industry should be nationalized. Just 32% of voters in Barack Obama’s party disagree with that approach. Republicans oppose nationalizing the oil industry by a 66% to 16% margin. Unaffiliated voters are opposed by a 47% to 33% margin.
Nationalization is the process by which the government assumes complete control of a private industry and its assets. It has been a common practice in totalitarian dictatorships, but as recently as 2001 following the 9/11 attacks, the U.S. government nationalized the private airport security industry and moved it under the Transportation Security Administration.
Forty-seven percent (47%) of all voters say that private companies are more likely to solve the nation’s energy problems than a government research program. Thirty percent (30%) disagree and say the government research program is more likely to find the solution. Again, there is a huge partisan divide. Republicans, by a 71% to 15% margin, say private companies are likely to solve the problem. Democrats, by a 40% to 35% margin, say government research programs are the better bet. A modest plurality of unaffiliated voters place their trust the private company approach.
Ideologically, 43% of liberal voters say the government research program is more likely to solve the problem while 31% take the opposite view. Conservatives, by a 68% to 17% margin, say private companies will find the answer. Political moderates are evenly divided.
Just 52% of American voters believe that an oil company should be allowed to keep profits from any alternative energy source it discovers. Twenty-nine percent (29%) say the company should not be allowed to keep such profits while 19% are not sure. Democrats are evenly divided on the question. Republicans by a 4-to-1 margin, and unaffiliated voters by a 2-to-1 margin, say that the companies should be allowed to profit from discoveries that reduce the price of gas and other energy sources.
Thirty-six percent (36%) of voters say that passage of a windfall profits tax on oil companies would lead to higher gas prices. Thirty percent (30%) believe prices would remain about the same and 15% believe a windfall profits tax would lead to lower gas prices. Most liberal say that gas prices would be unchanged or drop.
Seventy-six percent (76%) say that development of new energy sources would do more than higher fuel efficiency standards to bring gas prices down--and keep them down. Just 14% believe higher fuel efficiency standards would be more effective.
Earlier surveys have found that higher gas prices have had a big lifestyle impact on half of all Americans. The number of Americans taking a summer vacation is down sharply this year. Seventy-one percent (71%) expect gas prices to reach $5 a gallon this summer.
Monday, June 16, 2008
A Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that 29% of voters favor nationalizing the oil industry. Just 47% are opposed and 24% are not sure.
The survey found that a plurality of Democrats (37%) believe the oil industry should be nationalized. Just 32% of voters in Barack Obama’s party disagree with that approach. Republicans oppose nationalizing the oil industry by a 66% to 16% margin. Unaffiliated voters are opposed by a 47% to 33% margin.
Nationalization is the process by which the government assumes complete control of a private industry and its assets. It has been a common practice in totalitarian dictatorships, but as recently as 2001 following the 9/11 attacks, the U.S. government nationalized the private airport security industry and moved it under the Transportation Security Administration.
Forty-seven percent (47%) of all voters say that private companies are more likely to solve the nation’s energy problems than a government research program. Thirty percent (30%) disagree and say the government research program is more likely to find the solution. Again, there is a huge partisan divide. Republicans, by a 71% to 15% margin, say private companies are likely to solve the problem. Democrats, by a 40% to 35% margin, say government research programs are the better bet. A modest plurality of unaffiliated voters place their trust the private company approach.
Ideologically, 43% of liberal voters say the government research program is more likely to solve the problem while 31% take the opposite view. Conservatives, by a 68% to 17% margin, say private companies will find the answer. Political moderates are evenly divided.
Just 52% of American voters believe that an oil company should be allowed to keep profits from any alternative energy source it discovers. Twenty-nine percent (29%) say the company should not be allowed to keep such profits while 19% are not sure. Democrats are evenly divided on the question. Republicans by a 4-to-1 margin, and unaffiliated voters by a 2-to-1 margin, say that the companies should be allowed to profit from discoveries that reduce the price of gas and other energy sources.
Thirty-six percent (36%) of voters say that passage of a windfall profits tax on oil companies would lead to higher gas prices. Thirty percent (30%) believe prices would remain about the same and 15% believe a windfall profits tax would lead to lower gas prices. Most liberal say that gas prices would be unchanged or drop.
Seventy-six percent (76%) say that development of new energy sources would do more than higher fuel efficiency standards to bring gas prices down--and keep them down. Just 14% believe higher fuel efficiency standards would be more effective.
Earlier surveys have found that higher gas prices have had a big lifestyle impact on half of all Americans. The number of Americans taking a summer vacation is down sharply this year. Seventy-one percent (71%) expect gas prices to reach $5 a gallon this summer.
Loading... 

Top Comment
-
I oppose nationalizing private industry
View thread
SodaHead Hot Trends

I oppose nationalizing private industry
I oppose nationalizing private industry
I oppose nationalizing private industry
Nationalizing Oil should have great results, look how great Medicare is going!!!
Just look at the travesty mandated ethanol - it takes 1,700 gallons of water and 1 gallon of petro-fuel to produce one gallon of ethanol, and the taxpayers pay for it not only at the pump but in billions of dollars of subsidies, all going to the very largest companies. Ethanol has only 60% of the energy of gasoline, so every time you fill up with E85, or gasoline with any percentage of ethanol, expect your fuel mileage to drop!
Additionally, the ethanol fiasco has caused food prices to rise, world-wide! Our congress needs to get out of the way and let American oil companies explore and drill in America, where it can be done in an ecologically sound manner. The only control I think would be valid is for an agreement that new American oil is sold in America, on a cost-plus basis, and not on the international market. Oil companies already re-invest a large part of their profits in exploration and development, but government controls have kept them from building a new refinery in the U.S. for three decades!
I oppose nationalizing private industry
NO TO OBAMA SOCIALISM!
I oppose nationalizing private industry
I oppose nationalizing private industry
Nationalizing Oil should have great results, look how great Medicare is going!!!
I oppose nationalizing private industry
Nationalizing Oil should have great results, look how great Medicare is going!!!
Where is the National Socialist party for me to join!!!
I oppose nationalizing private industry
Where is the National Socialist party for me to join!!!
Seriously, think about what you're saying.
"I can't afford something, so I want *the government* to solve my problems"
Think about that.
I oppose nationalizing private industry
What has become of Americanism?
Have we all become European-styled thumb suckers aching for the maternal embrace of government like whimpering children?
oh and lets not forget 5 weeks paid vacation
especially on the strength of the euro.
How about all the conservatives break off and make their own country.
seems to me the most productive parts of the country are where the liberals live
look at the income between red and blue states and you get back to me on who owns this country ;)
red states do have lots of frikking pigs though they beat us on the hog factor
Let's make this happen!
Just one catch...you socialists can't come back. :)
Here is the deal, without California and the northeast the rest of the states would be f&&ked.
Just look one time and see where the majority of subsidies go for the federal government; red states get the majority.
I could live my whole life without the middle
and if you think I would care to live and stay in Europe I would be fine with it as long as I coudl visit my family every year
I lived overseas for 3.5 years and I enjoyed it
OK, well then you won't mind staying out of our new country then? Cool! (I suspect many refugees from your socialist paradise will be trying to sneak-in.)
Good for you!...I wish you would stay over there (take a few other socialists with you.)
how's this you move to Indiana and I promise to never visit a red state :)
I take it as a deep compliment to call red states 'Jesus Land'.
I would rather live in the land of Jesus than in the land of sodomy and criminal illegal aliens.
I would rather live with the tolerant than the intolerant so we will never meet
oh this makes me laugh; Your state is 49th in education go red states...
here is the list for you; wonder which states have the best education? :)
you will be in JesusLand and I will be in Educationland
http://www.morganquitno.com/e...
I would rather be governed by the first 600 ice-road truckers in the phone book than by the faculty of Harvard.
To find cosmic levels of foolishness, you have to find people that attended graduate school.
Like your computer? I wonder who came up with that idea.
It's ok to be jealous and lash out at intellectuals just realize most of what you probably use on a daily basis comes form their work
This one I ordered from Texas...is that a blue state?
Those in academia are rarely 'intellectuals'.
With hubris like this, you must be a teacher.
What I meant was your computer was designed by intellectuals whom you seem to disdain.
Babbage Turing etc
oh and Turing was gay so a lot of computer theory was developed by a gay man you should revolt and throw yours away
I do not disdain people of learning but I do disdain the culture of academicians which is decidedly left-wing as is yours.
Now you are on to gay people.
Interesting...the lack of focus.
By your logic, since your freedom is ensured by men with guns (vast majority of which are right of center) you should flee the country.
You won't...you love being protected by conservative men.