This November is going to be a LANDSLIDE in Mitt Romney's favor.
I guarantee it. The future of America is counting on it.
Rasmussen Poll Shows Romney in Two Percent Lead: Could Obama Lose the Popular Vote and Win the Election?
Heisenberg
2012/09/17 20:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
247 votes
|
|
68% | |||
|
116 votes
|
|
32% | |||
RASMUSSENREPORTS.COM reports:
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Monday shows Mitt Romney attracting support from 47% of voters nationwide, while President Obama earns 45% of the vote. Four percent (4%) prefer some other candidate, and four percent (4%) are undecided.
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Monday shows Mitt Romney attracting support from 47% of voters nationwide, while President Obama earns 45% of the vote. Four percent (4%) prefer some other candidate, and four percent (4%) are undecided.
Read More: http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/pol...
Top Opinion
-
dheydrick 2012/09/17 22:47:27
923 Executive Orders in 40 Months
During my lifetime, All Presidents have issued Executive Orders, for reasons that vary, some more than others. When a President issued as many as 30 Ex. Orders during a term in Office, people thought there was something Amiss.
WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT 923 EX. ORDERS IN ONE PART OF ONE TERM
?????? YES, THERE IS A REASON.
IT IS THAT THE PRESIDENT IS DETERMINED TO TAKE CONTROL AWAY FROM THE HOUSE AND
THE SENATE.
Even some Democrats in the House have turned on him, plus a very small number of
Democrat Senators question him.
HE SHOULD BE QUESTIONED. WHAT IS HE REALLY TRYING TO ACCOMPLISH ????
DOES THIS SCARE YOU AS MUCH AS IT DOES Me?
Not really surprising that he appointed "Czars" to be in charge of everything.
Emperor Obama ?
Coming soon to a neighborhood near you.
....THIS IS NOT FUNNY, AND IF YOU VOTE FOR HIM AGAIN, YOU CAN EXPECT MORE!
Remember what he told Russia's Putin: "I'll be more flexible after I'm re-elected".
THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION: Obama has signed 923 Executive Orders in 40 months!
What did Congress do in those 40 months? (The House - considerable. The Senate
-nothing, not even a budget nor allowing any House bill to be considered.) A
whole new order must prevail ...
923 Executive Orders in 40 Months
During my lifetime, All Presidents have issued Executive Orders, for reasons that vary, some more than others. When a President issued as many as 30 Ex. Orders during a term in Office, people thought there was something Amiss.
WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT 923 EX. ORDERS IN ONE PART OF ONE TERM
?????? YES, THERE IS A REASON.
IT IS THAT THE PRESIDENT IS DETERMINED TO TAKE CONTROL AWAY FROM THE HOUSE AND
THE SENATE.
Even some Democrats in the House have turned on him, plus a very small number of
Democrat Senators question him.
HE SHOULD BE QUESTIONED. WHAT IS HE REALLY TRYING TO ACCOMPLISH ????
DOES THIS SCARE YOU AS MUCH AS IT DOES Me?
Not really surprising that he appointed "Czars" to be in charge of everything.
Emperor Obama ?
Coming soon to a neighborhood near you.
....THIS IS NOT FUNNY, AND IF YOU VOTE FOR HIM AGAIN, YOU CAN EXPECT MORE!
Remember what he told Russia's Putin: "I'll be more flexible after I'm re-elected".
THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION: Obama has signed 923 Executive Orders in 40 months!
What did Congress do in those 40 months? (The House - considerable. The Senate
-nothing, not even a budget nor allowing any House bill to be considered.) A
whole new order must prevail in Wash. DC as a result of this next election! Now
look at these:
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 10990 allows the government to take over all modes of
transportation and control of highways and seaports.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 10995 allows the government to seize and control the
communication media.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 10997 allows the government to take over all electrical power,
gas, petroleum, fuels and minerals.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 10998 allows the government to take over all food resources and
farms.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11000 allows the government to mobilize civilians into work
brigades under government supervision.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11001 allows the government to take over all health, education
and welfare functions.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11002 designates the of all persons. Postmaster General to
operate a national registration
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11003 allows the government to
take over all airports and aircraft, including commercial aircraft.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11004 allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate
communities, build new housing with public funds, designate areas to be
abandoned, and establish new locations for populations.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11005 allows the government to take over railroads, inland
waterways and public storage facilities.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11049 assigns emergency preparedness function to federal
departments and agencies, consolidating 21 operative Executive Orders issued
over a fifteen year period.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11051 specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency
Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in
times of increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11310 grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce
the plans set out in Executive Orders, to institute industrial support, to
establish judicial and legislative liaison, to control all aliens, to operate
penal and correctional institutions, and to advise and assist the President.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11921 allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to
develop plans to establish control over the mechanisms of production and
distribution, of energy sources, wages, salaries, credit and the flow of money
in U.S. financial institution in any undefined national emergency. It also
provides that when a state of emergency is declared by the President, Congress
cannot review the action for six months.
Feel free to verify the "executive orders" at will... and these are just the
major ones I'm sure you've all heard the tale of the "Frog in the Pot"... you
all comfortable???
Watch Obama's actions, not his words! By his actions he will show you where
America is headed.
. Just this week, Obama has issued a new executive order that seeks to
"harmonize" U.S. economic regulations with the rest of the world. This new
executive order is yet another incremental step that is pushing us closer to a
North American Union and a one world economic system.
romney is not a popular candidate, he will not get the popular vote, but this time we have to look for the future of our kids, for our country for the well being and future of our parents and for us, I don't like romney, but I like less obama therefore I will vote against obama.
I for one firmly believe the liberals are in for another "2010" in the coming elections including the presidential election, and the liberal media will stop at nothing to divert attention from the inevitable.
Thanks for voting for the better man in the Republican Party.
2012 President Obama wins, anyhow. =)
Unemployment down nearly 2% from its peak in early 2010. 4.25 million new private sector jobs since mid-'10. Twenty three straight months now of job growth. Compare that to the 4.3 million jobs Bush lost in his final year in office, including 818K in his final month alone.
Actually, Obama only has a net of 3.75 million jobs because, unlike his predecessor who expanded the federal government, Obama has reduced it by 600K jobs. What's that? I thought conservatives LIKE smaller government.
"And speaking of Collage"
Um, that's "college", please. Apparently, you've never been.
The reality is its 15% unemployment/Underemployment/and that have given up "Hope" and stopped looking. Obama promised unemployment wouldn't go above 8% if we passed the "Stimulus" bill. Its gone above 10% and hasn't moved down since.
He has not reduced the size of government. He's grown it. What part did he reduce? The military the only place in government that liberals love to shrink?
I have been to collage. And I have served in the United Sates Marine Corps.
Your God-king Obama has failed and its evident to everybody. You voted for NO EXPERIENCE and you got it. If 2008-20012 is what "Change" is then WHAT is moving "Forward". So we've been moving backward for the last 4 years? After all turning NASA into a muslim outreach center has really made the middle-east love us hasn't it.
But you still haven't learned to spell it. I'd ask for my money back.
"If Obama HAD created 4.25 million or 3.75 million it would be all over the news."
Uh, sorry -- it WAS. The DNC tossed around 4.5million repeatedly for a week on national TV, and the MSM wasted countless trees dissecting it.
Here are the numbers direct from the Bureau of Labor and Statistics:
http://data.bls.gov/timeserie...
What's most striking about the numbers isn't how Bush's numbers had been trending downward throughout nearly his entire second term. It isn't how precipitously the economy fell over during his disastrous final year, shedding a staggering 4.5 million jobs -- heck, Obama lost nearly as many during his first thirteen months.
It's not the numbers, it's the graph. Bush's final year is a picture of an economy in freefall, plummeting downward out of control. Obama's first year is a complete mirror image. The graph reverses almost literally the day Obama took office, due in part to the stimulus package he passed during his first hundred days. It took Obama more than a year to drag the job numbers out of the negative, and the graph has gone pretty flat since late 2010, but at least it's on the right side of the X axis.
Yes, I know you can get into all kinds of discussion about ...
But you still haven't learned to spell it. I'd ask for my money back.
"If Obama HAD created 4.25 million or 3.75 million it would be all over the news."
Uh, sorry -- it WAS. The DNC tossed around 4.5million repeatedly for a week on national TV, and the MSM wasted countless trees dissecting it.
Here are the numbers direct from the Bureau of Labor and Statistics:
http://data.bls.gov/timeserie...
What's most striking about the numbers isn't how Bush's numbers had been trending downward throughout nearly his entire second term. It isn't how precipitously the economy fell over during his disastrous final year, shedding a staggering 4.5 million jobs -- heck, Obama lost nearly as many during his first thirteen months.
It's not the numbers, it's the graph. Bush's final year is a picture of an economy in freefall, plummeting downward out of control. Obama's first year is a complete mirror image. The graph reverses almost literally the day Obama took office, due in part to the stimulus package he passed during his first hundred days. It took Obama more than a year to drag the job numbers out of the negative, and the graph has gone pretty flat since late 2010, but at least it's on the right side of the X axis.
Yes, I know you can get into all kinds of discussion about what kind of jobs Obama has created, about whether the unemployment rate is down because people are getting jobs or because they're leaving the workforce. But you can't argue with the graph.
(BTW, that temporary spike between Feb and July of 2010 is the hiring and later releasing of 700,000 temporary census workers.)
The numbers you just referenced show no substantial "Change" in employment. The reason the economy hasn't "Changed" is because of Obama's taxes and regulations. Companies aren't going to take any chances on growth when they have to spend most of their revenue on Obama's redistribution tax. People are sitting on their money because they don't know where Obama and the government are going to hit them next. Once Obama's gone companies will take a chance and spend money on that new building that needs to be filled with jobs or create a new dept that needs jobs. That's where the jobs are.
You can't defend Obama because you haven't even attempted to defend his foreign policy. All you can do is attack my spelling.
[That's "cite".]
Hmm, did you actually read my post? I mentioned the DNC because you claimed the number hadn't been "all over the news", when in fact the MSM has been reporting on it endlessly the past few weeks.
As for who I cited, I sent you straight to the Bureau of Labor and Statistics, whose numbers you haven't even attempted to dispute.
You asked, "Where are the jobs?" I gave you the answer: the BLS shows the economy has added 4.3 million jobs in the last 30 months.
So I'll ask: do you dispute the BLS numbers?
"You can't defend Obama because you haven't even attempted to defend his foreign policy."
Foreign policy? What's foreign policy got to do with this discussion? We're talking about jobs. Please DO try to stay on topic.
Do I think the economy has recovered? Not by a long shot. Do I think it's moving in the right direction? Yes, but too slowly. Do I think Obama's doing a good job on the economy? I'm quite impressed with his first thirteen months in office, a bit more ambivalent since then.
Am I voting for Obama? No.
Any more questions?
After re-reading the question, it should be 'No'.
obama will certainly get three of the top 5 states of population by wide margin (California, New York & Illinois). However, throughout the "Heartland" of America, obama is hated and despised so much more than ANY President in my memory! He will not only loose those states, but he will lose them very CONVINSINGLY!
obama looses by 5 to 6% percent in the popular count and by close to 70 votes!
Don't forget that Jimmy Carter had a 10 point lead on Reagan till the last three months! Of course, he did not have the Main Stream Media like obama has in his back pocket!