Quantcast

Rasmussen: 65% See Gun Rights as Protection Against Tyranny

☆astac☆~PWCM 2013/01/19 19:57:09
Two-out-of-three Americans recognize that their constitutional right to own a
gun was intended to ensure their freedom


Read More: http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/gun-rights-protect...

You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • tom C 2013/01/21 11:10:12
    tom  C
    +2
    Just as it was written in the constitution ...no surprise ....
  • mike j 2013/01/21 01:58:16
    mike j
    +1
    Those 65% are dead nuts right on.
  • Birthpangs 2013/01/20 23:34:19
  • Joves the Instigator 2013/01/20 19:08:15
    Joves the Instigator
    +2
    Well that is an encouraging sign.
  • News4U 2013/01/20 18:49:10
  • Mike 2013/01/20 17:48:15
  • Wolf 2013/01/20 17:22:35
    Wolf
    +3
    Smart people---they know their history and observe the real World not only external to the US but even inside were tyranny is occurring more repeatedly the latest was the Benghazi Cover Up and the violation of the Filmmakers Rights ---who has been put into prison---shows the extend the tyrants in the Public Sector will go to cover their tracks---
  • mk, Smartass Oracle 2013/01/20 16:49:49
  • The Govenor 2013/01/20 16:38:36
  • gareth.ellzey 2013/01/20 16:37:43
    gareth.ellzey
    +3
    What Jesse said. I totally blame the (mis)educational system that neglects to actually TEACH the Constitution.
  • KCurtis 2013/01/20 16:26:35
  • Embalmer 2013/01/20 16:02:12
    Embalmer
    +1
    Rasmussen is always on FOX, and if you ever listened to him talk you would know his poll is a limp dick.
  • shenendoah Embalmer 2013/01/20 19:04:45
    shenendoah
    +1
    Takes one to know one.
  • Wahvlvke 2013/01/20 15:17:09
    Wahvlvke
    +3
    Hummm ... i thought 70% were in favor of obie's gun grabbing ... he said so and surely he wouldn't lie ... would he?
  • ☆astac☆... Wahvlvke 2013/01/20 19:43:03
    ☆astac☆~PWCM
    Well 70% of those who voted for him. These are the idiots
  • Wahvlvke ☆astac☆... 2013/01/21 01:16:59
    Wahvlvke
    +1
    I'm with you.
  • mich52 2013/01/20 15:08:23 (edited)
  • ☆astac☆... mich52 2013/01/20 19:43:57
    ☆astac☆~PWCM
    Ah yes, Waco Texas, when a democrat president attacked and murdered 100 Citizens. Waco is why we need the 2nd.
  • mich52 ☆astac☆... 2013/01/20 21:11:38
  • ☆astac☆... mich52 2013/01/20 21:19:20
    ☆astac☆~PWCM
    Waco is why we have to remember that the American left is the enemy.
  • mich52 ☆astac☆... 2013/01/20 21:43:29
  • inurface 2013/01/20 13:46:29
  • redhorse29 2013/01/20 08:48:50
    redhorse29
    +1
    I agree
  • urwutuis 2013/01/20 08:36:43
    urwutuis
    +2
    65% are wrong. While I recognize the right the idea that hand guns and rifles will hold back even a small army let alone the most powerful fighting machine the world has ever known is, at best, delusional.
  • Wahvlvke urwutuis 2013/01/20 15:21:57
    Wahvlvke
    +3
    Well ... there's this matter of numbers ... and this matter of pay ... and the simple matter of how much of that (once) most powerful fighting machine would not be on the side of the people.
  • urwutuis Wahvlvke 2013/01/20 20:11:07
    urwutuis
    Numbers are irrelevant when faced with such superior fire power and pay doesn't even enter the picture
    I'm guessing you've never been in the military. They're very good at getting people to do things they normally wouldn't against their better judgement. If you're counting on military personnel to disobey direct orders all I can say is good luck. There are a thousand scenarios they can dream up to justify their actions and means at their disposal that wouldn't even require troops.
  • Wahvlvke urwutuis 2013/01/21 01:18:36
    Wahvlvke
    +2
    Sorry ... have been in ... an officer ... and I do not agree with you regarding this circumstance.
  • urwutuis Wahvlvke 2013/01/21 20:26:32
    urwutuis
    That's OK. I respect your point of view and, should the occasion arise, I hope I'm wrong.
    Unlike many around here you can hold an adult discussion instead of resorting to ridicule.
    I thank you for that
  • Wahvlvke urwutuis 2013/01/22 14:12:54
    Wahvlvke
    +2
    Thank you ... you caught me in a benevolent mood.
  • urwutuis Wahvlvke 2013/01/22 16:23:10
    urwutuis
    It happens to the best of us
  • Wahvlvke urwutuis 2013/01/23 13:54:40
    Wahvlvke
    +2
    Thanks again.
  • shenendoah urwutuis 2013/01/20 19:10:01
    shenendoah
    +1
    Obama's so concerned about how the world views him how would it look if he created the civil war that destroys America. Obama isn't after assault rifles, he wants all guns and you know it. However being a liberal you're probably that dumb.
  • urwutuis shenendoah 2013/01/21 00:43:39
    urwutuis
    Oh, another conservative genius who thinks infantile insults are a sign of intelligence.
    Maybe someday you'll master the art of adult discussion but it probably took a long tome to become that crotchety.
  • shenendoah urwutuis 2013/01/21 01:00:04
    shenendoah
    +1
    'Tome'? Isn't a tome a large book? Books and liberals?.... Unless it has pictures I doubt if a liberal has much use for books. Now tell me how would a 'tome' make me cranky unless it was written by stupid liberal.
  • urwutuis shenendoah 2013/01/21 20:55:55
    urwutuis
    Semantics? Grow up.
  • shenendoah urwutuis 2013/01/22 04:48:57
    shenendoah
    +1
    Ignorant turd, learn to spell.
  • urwutuis shenendoah 2013/01/22 16:22:48
    urwutuis
    Blow it out your port hole, Sparky
  • shenendoah urwutuis 2013/01/22 19:11:08
    shenendoah
    And that would affect you...how?
  • ☆astac☆... urwutuis 2013/01/20 19:45:14
    ☆astac☆~PWCM
    No, it is you who is wrong, and the question is why. The military would be on our side fighting against your side
  • urwutuis ☆astac☆... 2013/01/21 00:42:30
    urwutuis
    If you think we're on different sides you're part of the problem.
    You'd be the first one to take up arms against your own countrymen based on the propaganda you've been stuffing yourself with and the reality deprived image you've concocted of the enemy.

    You're under the impression the military won't do it's job.
    You've obviously never been in the military and aren't clear on what the job of the military is.
    The military exists to protect the govt.

    To get people to run headlong into mortal danger requires a level of control that comes from a form of brainwashing. Generally referred to as boot camp .
    Soldiers follow orders. It's what they're trained to do and they do it very well. Considering you're ready to start shooting liberals today you'd be right up there polishing your jack boots with the rest of them.

    A real freedom lover

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2014/07/31 17:43:54

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals