I'm SURE whoever wrote this article is aware of the fact that not all fish used for sushi is from Japan. SodaHead staff can't be THAT ignorant.
I'll be asking the owners of the only sushi place I go to where the fish is from. If they say Japan, I'll avoid that fish. I know that their O-toro is farmed in Cambodia so I don't order that anymore either. I doubt the fish in Japan will be healthy to eat and I don't care what the Japanese government says. The American government has said that the Gulf seafood is good too... and it's not.
I think I'll go vegetarian for a year or so and then reevaluate the state of the world's food supply safety.
Radioactive Water Dumped Into Pacific Ocean Off Japan: Still Safe to Eat Sushi?
SodaHead News
2011/04/05 15:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
284 votes
|
|
38% | |||
|
461 votes
|
|
62% | |||
If you’re the kind of person who loves sushi, there’s not a whole lot that will deter you from eating your beloved raw slices of fish. Though your friends might cringe at the sight of you gobbling down cold, uncooked hunks of tuna, The New York Times may have the news that will get you to ponder your next Philly Roll.
In the latest desperate attempt to stave off a full-on nuclear core meltdown, the Tokyo Electric Power Company started dumping more than 11,000 tons of radioactive water from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant into the Pacific Ocean on Monday.
And they’re not done. The dump was merely to make room in storage containers for yet more contaminated runoff that will be released over the next few days. The dirty water has nearly 100 times the legal limit of radiation, with some tainted with 10,000 times the legal limit.
The effort may help the workers attempting to clear radioactive water from the turbine buildings reach the cooling controls that were damaged by the March 11 earthquake and tsunami. But the radioactive flow could keep coming, especially since workers have not been able to plug a gushing leak from a crack in a containment pit near the No. 2 reactor.
Yukio Edano, the chief cabinet secretary, has ordered the power company to monitor the effects of radioactive dumps on Pacific sea life. The Times reported that consuming seafood caught in the area every day for a year would result in the intake of about 0.6 millisieverts of radiation, or a quarter of the average annual exposure to radiation in Japan.
But considering it could be months before the radioactive flow is stemmed, marine biologists fear fish could bear the brunt of contamination. Some of the elements in the dumped water, like cesium 137, with a half-life of 30 years, are collected in larger fish as they eat smaller fish, which could magnify the problem over time. The good news is that mixing radioactive water with uncontaminated seawater can quickly decrease radiation levels, but in the meantime, radiation levels 19 miles offshore are hundreds to thousands of times as high as levels sampled in the same area in 2005.
Seafood sales have already taken a hit, as the price of fish such as young yellowtail have fallen by half in recent days, even though one large fishery owner said his fishermen have found on traces of radioactivity so far. But, he worried, when tides shift from north to south in the fall that could all change.
Will you still eat sushi?
In the latest desperate attempt to stave off a full-on nuclear core meltdown, the Tokyo Electric Power Company started dumping more than 11,000 tons of radioactive water from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant into the Pacific Ocean on Monday.
And they’re not done. The dump was merely to make room in storage containers for yet more contaminated runoff that will be released over the next few days. The dirty water has nearly 100 times the legal limit of radiation, with some tainted with 10,000 times the legal limit.
The effort may help the workers attempting to clear radioactive water from the turbine buildings reach the cooling controls that were damaged by the March 11 earthquake and tsunami. But the radioactive flow could keep coming, especially since workers have not been able to plug a gushing leak from a crack in a containment pit near the No. 2 reactor.
Yukio Edano, the chief cabinet secretary, has ordered the power company to monitor the effects of radioactive dumps on Pacific sea life. The Times reported that consuming seafood caught in the area every day for a year would result in the intake of about 0.6 millisieverts of radiation, or a quarter of the average annual exposure to radiation in Japan.
But considering it could be months before the radioactive flow is stemmed, marine biologists fear fish could bear the brunt of contamination. Some of the elements in the dumped water, like cesium 137, with a half-life of 30 years, are collected in larger fish as they eat smaller fish, which could magnify the problem over time. The good news is that mixing radioactive water with uncontaminated seawater can quickly decrease radiation levels, but in the meantime, radiation levels 19 miles offshore are hundreds to thousands of times as high as levels sampled in the same area in 2005.
Seafood sales have already taken a hit, as the price of fish such as young yellowtail have fallen by half in recent days, even though one large fishery owner said his fishermen have found on traces of radioactivity so far. But, he worried, when tides shift from north to south in the fall that could all change.
Will you still eat sushi?
Top Opinion
-
Liza Jane 2011/04/05 17:13:57





















Thorium is from Nuclear reactors and other sources that I am not near. I was told that it
is showing up in peoples blood in hugh amounts in the past 4 months. This is from my medical doctor. I live most of the time in the past 3 years on the beach in Florida ... I am in the water lots ... however I spend a great deal of time in Santa Barbara, CA ... not in the water ... do I trust fish? No ... Also there was a high level of Lead in my tests which
is from ceramics from China ... they say ... some uranium was also found .. I do not and have never lived next to any nuclear power plants ...
..toxic & radioactive water in the ocean
..mad cow disease
..avian (bird) flu
..swine disease (pig)
..pesticides on fruits/vegetables
..air pollution
..etc..etc..etc..
We might as well go back to "Stone Age"..
When, oh when, will people wise up and see how Nuclear is demonstrably the most UNCLEAN of fuel sources...
LWR, Light Water Reactor, is a design fron the 50's. . .The U.S. has over 100 operating commercial nuclear power plants, more than any other country, and many of them are near large population centers. The NRC has done a fair job in keeping American safe from this danger with the byproduct being cheap power with a low carbon footprint.
Here is the reason I am 100% against nuclear power:
NUCLEAR:
Nuclear Plant loses main and backup power (like in an earthquake)
Result: - Big explosions and massive amounts of radiation spewed all over the countryside. Large area uninhabitable for generations. Thousands to Hundreds of thousands of deaths from cancer and other radiation-related diseases. (eg Chernobyl)
COAL:
Coal Plant loses main and backup power (like in an earthquake)
Result: - nothing...
You'd think we wouldn't build on fault lines, but we're building a new nuclear plant
right now on a fault line in KY. I wouldn't care if it was coal.
EDIT: I see that Fukushima is a Light Water Reactor
I do agree...no uncooked meat whatsoever. Just the idea of raw meat is enough to make one throw up, with or without parasites haha.