Public Opinion Says We Shouldn't Have a Saggy Pants Ban [INFOGRAPHIC]

by SodaHead Infographics Posted 2011/10/10 20:00:00

Related Topics: Infographic, SodaHead Infographics, Deep Dive, Saggy Pants, Fashion, Baggy, Baggy Jeans, Florida, Georgia, Albany, Public Opinion, 000, Adopt

Read More

Read all 744 opinions

A couple weeks ago, we asked SodaHeads what they thought about the increasingly popular saggy pants ban. A small Georgia town was the first to crack down on conspicuous cracks last November, but after reporting nearly $4,000 in fines related to the ban over the last year, a couple of Florida towns have adopted similar bans.

Though a slight majority voted against the bans, we did uncover some interesting statistics. For instance, in Florida and Georgia, where saggy pants have already been banned in some towns, there was majority support for the bans. We also got some financial perspective on the $200 fines Georgia has been handing out.

So pull up your breeches and peep this week's infographic. Let's dive.

sodahead infographic saggy pants ban

+23

Silver Fang 2011/10/10 20:53:51

+19
People have the right to dress the way they want to. If you don't like it, don't look at it.
>> See Replies

More Infographics

SoD to Zach Tool 2012/01/05 16:19:42

Then tell me how you propose to achieve your goal.

reply
Zach Tool to SoD 2012/01/06 02:06:21

ban them.

reply
SoD to Zach Tool 2012/01/06 03:15:57 (edited)

And if practicing theist organizations refuse to disband, which they more than likely would?

reply
Zach Tool to SoD 2012/01/06 20:30:24

tax them for a start.

reply
SoD to Zach Tool 2012/01/06 20:37:38

And where will your attempts to eliminate organized religion end?

reply
Zach Tool to SoD 2012/01/07 02:46:33

i am not interested in a benevolt dictatorship. but the govt. could add the extra tax funds towards medical costs. homeless people etc.

reply
SoD to Zach Tool 2012/01/07 22:57:35

The religious institutions you want to destroy already put money toward indigent health-care and helping the homeless.

In fact, religious institutions are more efficient and frugal than the federal government regarding providing assistance to people who actually need it.

reply
Zach Tool to SoD 2012/01/07 23:51:49

i dont think so. their whole existance should be destroyed.have you looked at the mansions they own. - just a jokc

reply
SoD to Zach Tool 2012/01/08 00:29:57

Now that you've realized you are wrong, do you intend to change your position regarding religion?

reply
Zach Tool to SoD 2012/01/08 01:57:27

sorry no. they own incredible mansons here hugh amounts of land. they need to pay taxes. and give the land and housing to others in need

reply
SoD to Zach Tool 2012/01/08 04:42:00

So you think all theists are wealthy?

reply
Zach Tool to SoD 2012/01/08 05:05:10

i dont know any poor ones - sorry.

reply
SoD to Zach Tool 2012/01/08 05:27:15

Do you actually know any wealthy ones?

reply
Zach Tool to SoD 2012/01/08 18:59:48

do you mean things that they own or things that they control or benefits they recieve from others.

reply
SoD to Zach Tool 2012/01/09 00:01:32

You're unnecessarily complicating my question, and thus I assume you don't know any wealthy theists. Otherwise, you would have simply answered in the affirmative.

reply
Zach Tool to SoD 2012/01/09 13:16:27

sorry about the delay. but finding the pics on the web has been above my skill level so far = even though i am aware of some cases.

reply
Zach Tool to SoD 2012/01/06 02:04:35

here you are again - being inaccurate.

reply
SoD to Zach Tool 2012/01/06 03:17:58

Make your case.

reply
Zach Tool to SoD 2012/01/06 03:32:28

for starters tax them like anyother business.

reply
SoD to Zach Tool 2012/01/06 04:34:28

Churches don't typically generate revenue through commerce, but rather though charitable contributions. Not all churches are 501(c) organizations, and thus taxation would not eliminate organized religion. Furthermore, the US constitution's 1st amendment forbids laws prohibiting the free exercise of religion.

reply
Zach Tool to SoD 2012/01/07 02:48:20

change it - the people can change the constitution. our churches are very involved in business. - second hand shops - medical facilities - etc.

reply
SoD to Zach Tool 2012/01/07 23:01:38

So the United States should change the constitution thus eliminating the protection of individual faith or lack thereof?

Up until now I thought you were a bigot. Now I think you are stupid.

reply
sam 2011/10/22 23:30:28

+4
You know that is stupid (silver fang) if we all did what we wanted all the time it would be a terrible world. Grow up with some honor and respect for others. I see that most of the people are from the poooooooor class that has no upbringing or guidance. No one has gave them love and the teachings that we should have started them out on. Most are sneaky and a lot are criminals. It also show immature parents raising immature children in a baby farm so they can sit on there ass getting welfare.

reply
BAMCIS to sam 2011/11/08 21:18:42

he wasn't saying anyone can do whatever they want whenever they want, he simply said people can dress however they want (within reason obviously), it's their life. If they want to look like "immature children" how exactly is that bothering you?

reply
sam 2011/10/22 23:30:01

+1
You know that is stupid (silver fang) if we all did what we wanted all the time it would be a terrible world. Grow up with some honor and respect for others. I see that most of the people are from the poooooooor class that has no upbringing or guidance. No one has gave them love and the teachings that we should have started them out on. Most are sneaky and a lot are criminals. It also show immature parents raising immature children in a baby farm so they can sit on there ass getting welfare.

reply
Mark Shoffner 2011/10/22 20:08:20

+4
Personally I would smack my kids in the head if they tried to walk out of the house that way.

reply
Zach Tool to Mark Sh... 2012/01/03 19:39:11

great parenting skills you show.

reply
Shelbs:) 2011/10/21 14:29:27

+2
In my opinion, I hate seeing someones underwear. . . there's a reason you have to wear pants. I could really care less about how cool it looks casue to me it looks dumb and nobodys gonna give you a job if you always have to put up your pants.

reply
Pseudonym 2011/10/21 05:23:07

Ban skinny pants too. For real. For the sake of humanity. Those just cannot be healthy environment for the little soldiers to survive.

reply
Pseudonym 2011/10/21 05:13:12 (edited)
BUD LITE 2011/10/20 23:36:24

I guess it's a choice the person has to make for themselves. When I see someone wearing them I always think.....I bet their brain is somewhere down in those saggy pants. It surely could not be in their head. Maybe they should run for Congress or the Senate......their brain is in the same place.

reply
bags 2011/10/20 23:13:03

+1
Whatever we think, saggies have been around for a while now and i think, in some cliques, are here to stay. yeah, i think they're foolish and make the wearer look ridiculous.....but, if they wish to present themselves this way it's their business. Hey, they judge me on how i look!

reply
Zach Tool to bags 2011/10/21 03:26:47

only if you are superficial

reply
meshell to bags 2011/10/25 06:34:35
bags to meshell 2011/10/25 14:00:28
meshell to bags 2011/10/26 03:22:10
bags to meshell 2011/10/26 12:35:22

I don't judge books by their cover. They can wear what they want, I really don't give a crap. I live in the sticks, and we have a few baggie wearing folks here too. But, come time they want a job, they change their act up. Look, love it, hate it....I don't care. But employers, LEO, and a lot of other folks are going to view you differently when your butt is hanging out.

reply
meshell to bags 2011/10/26 13:54:18

+1
aware of this but so are some of the dags out there, one i chatted with said it well, "different occasions require different attire. i wouldnt wear a flanny to an interview."

reply
bags to meshell 2011/10/26 16:36:38

dags?

reply
meshell to bags 2011/10/27 10:26:03