Public Opinion Rules Prop 8 Unconstitutional [INFOGRAPHIC]

The topic at hand is same-sex marriage, not incest or bestiality. Christianity states that marriage is a sacred union between a man and a woman, and the government has allowed that train of thought to become infused with politics, although not every American citizen considers themselves Christian. Not everyone wants to get married under the light of God. This is the argument that every religious opponent of SSM brings up. The majority of the Republicans candidates believe that homosexuality is sinful, and some are in disagreement with domestic partnerships/civil unions and gay adoption. They desperately want to protect the "traditional" family, which is a norm that has never been fool-proof anyway. One mom, one dad, little Johnny and Jane living in suburbia with the white-picket fence and a pretty front and backyard? lol. In essence, saying that LGBT people can't marry and adopt is a moral judgment, not a political statement. Why should people who do not subscribe to Christianity, have to be forced to submit and build their lives around its teachings? Marriage is not a holy institution for everyone, it should be considered a secular institution first and fore-most.

By bringing up incest and bestiality, you're suggesting that if LGBT people are allowed to marry, then why shouldn't everyone else, correct? Well, I never knew an animal who could talk lol. Humans have the gift of language, and unless someone can come up with an advanced method of analyzing/translating what animals "say", they are out of luck. Why compare two men/two women to a man/woman and their dog/cat? Cuz both are considered social deviants? The fact is, there are millions of Americans that don't have an issue with SSM, that's why this debate is even happening. However, the same cannot be said for incestuous and half-bestial marriage.

OH-hai-thar!
Prop-8 is bigotry justified through religion.
If I made a religion that said anyone named Bibliophilic is evil and then made a bill that said you were evil and should be denied things that everyone else is not denied, you would oppose the bill.
Same principle.

In the end what is constitutional or "good" is based on how many brainwashed people one can get to say it is such. Mix that the majority of the US population (>50%) is uneducated (High school diploma only) and the matter becomes more severe. Uneducated people often times jump to letting someone else tell them what to think instead of thinking for themselves and deciding if the individual in the shoes of the persecuted would hold the same beliefs.

Straight, bi-sexual, gay, transgendered, transexual, and asexual are all Human conditions. What right do you have to deny one human his or her right to happiness and a common rite of passage among nearly every culture on earth?

What if it was decided that you could not marry for whatever reason? Would you be upset? Would you think the people supporting the bill misguided and the forces pushing it forward tyrannical?

Change only happens in blood. In sports it is when someone dies and new protection methods are invented to protect the participants. In revolutions it is as one party slaughters the other until one gives up. If this issue came to a bloody confrontation, I know what side I would support and what side I would put down since I made my moral decision based on my own principles and values.

My question to you is if your decisions are based on your own principles and values or the principles and values that some preacher told you to believe and that you were never supposed to question.
Question your values, beliefs, and principles! Through questioning you gain a deeper understanding of yourself.

Though, I digress: Marriage is an archaic system that is of an archaic religion built on fear, hatred, and ignorance. Religion its self is garbage. Spirituality is what is important.

The simple fact of the matter is that regardless of what one does, someone will be offended. One could run into an Orphanage to save innocent people and there will be a group of people who condemn the act.
Point is, I have my views and believe that only through tolerance and equality will humanity flourish with the least amount of wasted human potential.
If someone is denied something and asks, "why not?" Then there better be a damn good reason for it.

Let me tell you this, if different becomes dangerous everyone in this country will start losing rights faster than we are has seen so far. It is a terrifying outlook that over time our society has become more and more of an Orwellian society, different being dangerous would just kick start that into action at a far exponential rate.

One of the greatest missteps in our society has been to glorify the ignorant, and condemn the informed. Informed people think critically, and through that thought they can understand others and the plights they undertake.
I understand that religious leaders are frightened that if homosexuals/bisexuals were allowed to marry by law that they could sue churches for not marrying them. There concerns are well founded since they would likely get sued, and the suing party would champion marrying them or paying them off. The cheaper option is, obviously, marrying them. It is not humanity's duty to act as the deity's agents on this world, it is the deity's job to carry out its duty when human souls go to it to be judged.

The most important part is the biases associated. The bitch of the matter is Marriage is associated with strong good biases.
Civil Unions are associated with negative biases.
This is the reason homosexuals, bisexuals, pansexuals, and etc. want to 'marry' instead of just getting a 'civil union.'

The other point of prop-8 is that the money came straight from a Church. If the Mormon church did not donate tons of money into the proposition, it would have crashed and burned. Some might say that doing such is ok. What is the Muslim Mosques poured money into an american bill and it passed. I bet people, with how brainwashed and ignorant our population is, would defy that bill.

My experience is that the more educated someone is, the more tolerant the individual is. I am not questioning your education, but pointing out that somewhere in the vicinity of 80% of the US population does not go to college. Why should we even allow these uneducated people who are easily manipulated by greedy politicians and corporation vote on important matters. If I had millions of dollars I could sway the vote of any election and create biases in the mob. Believe it or not, this issue is similar to what killed Greece. The Greeks turned on their enlightened and educated. Enlightenment and Logic has lost to Ignorance and gullibility more often than it has won, and after each defeat the society enters a Dark Age of fear and superstition.