
PUBLIC OPINION > Not Many People Can Go a Month Without Spending
SodaHead News
2012/02/15 14:00:00
Bob Dunning and his family of six stocked their fridge for February and sealed their pocketbooks for the rest of the month. For all intents and purposes, they decided to go an entire month without spending a dime. Even with a preliminary food stockpile, that's an enormous sacrifice for many people. Discretionary spending is completely on hold, and they're not even filling up their gas tank. We asked SodaHeads if they could do the same.
Could You Go a Month Without Spending Anything?


39% Think They Could Pull It Off
Quite a few respondents suggested it doesn't really count if you buy food ahead of time, but that's beside the point. Even after reading the Dunning's stockpiling strategy, most people don't think they could pull it off. Gasoline was a major factor, as many people have to drive to work. Others noted that their monthly bills make it impossible. One commenter wrote, "My mortgage company would not enjoy it near as much as I would." But those who said yes saw a learning opportunity. One commenter explained, "I believe the purpose of this was to put a temporary stop on spontaneous spending. Go a month without spending money on anything except necessities? Yes."

Employment Isn't an Issue


Employment Isn't an Issue

The first place we thought to look was employment status. Mr. Dunning decided to enforce a spending freeze because... he didn't have much of a choice. But we were surprised to find that full-time workers were almost as likely as the unemployed to claim they could do it. (Part-time workers, not so much.)
Drinkers Couldn't Do It


If a full-time job can't stop you, what can? Well, alcohol, apparently. Only a third of drinkers said they would be able to go an entire month without spending, compared to nearly half of nondrinkers. Maybe if we gave them the option to stockpile some vodka, it would have changed the results.
Smokers Don't See the Big Deal


On the flip side, smokers were unusually sure of themselves. Perhaps they felt a cigarette stockpile was implied. It seems odd that one addictive substance (tobacco) would boost voters' ability to cut spending, while another (alcohol) would negatively affect it. Go figure.
If you'd like to vote on this question, dig deeper into the demographics, or engage in existing discussion about the topic, visit our original poll about spending. We'd love to hear from you!






















Spending on credit hurts the economy.
As I'm a commercial field electrician, and refusing to not spend for a month would cost me my job and I would be in dire straights as my mortgage company came knocking on my door serving me with a foreclosing notice.
It's a nice idea, just not terribly realistic.
It's Government spending and Government redistribution of wealth that is the problem. If the Gov. is giving you a check and your spending it on non-necessity items, We then have a problem.
There is a huge difference between 'need' and 'want'.
Forward this memo to the Obama White House.
I have decided to prove to the world that I am a better person by not giving into the consumer system and spending any money for a calendar month. This means that I will not be paying rent, utilities, and other necessary bills this month. Moreover, I will not be purchasing any food or household needs from the grocery store and drug store. Please do not have me arrested when I am dumpster diving for food scraps on your property. Finally, I will not be able to make it to work. I am too far from work to walk, and without a car, I would normally take the bus, but since I am sticking it to the consumerist system, I can not do that either as that requires me to also spend money.
Sincerely,
Beat Magnum True Hero
P.S. Please inform my friends that I have left my house doors unlocked so that they can more easily recover my starved and frozen corpse.