
PUBLIC OPINION > Compromise Between Political Parties Probably Won't Happen
SodaHead Politics
2012/11/08 19:00:00
The election is finally over. Whichever side you fall on, the cards are on the table -- at least until the next Senate elections. At the moment, there are about 60.8 million satisfied voters and 57.9 million frustrated ones, but the L.A. Times wanted to know if both sides could ever learn to compromise. Here's how the public responded.


Unfortunately, it looks like most people think compromise is not an option. It was a heated election this time around, so we're hardly surprised. It may take a little while for some heads to cool. But let's take a look at the demographics to find out where the heat is coming from.
Conservatives Not Keen on Compromise
Going by political alignment, conservatives were much less confident in the possibility of both sides compromising. That's not to say conservatives are less interested in compromise, per se, but they know that if there is to be any compromise going on right now, it's probably going to be in their court. If the left had lost the election, the tables would be turned.
Going by political alignment, conservatives were much less confident in the possibility of both sides compromising. That's not to say conservatives are less interested in compromise, per se, but they know that if there is to be any compromise going on right now, it's probably going to be in their court. If the left had lost the election, the tables would be turned.Youthful Optimism
Young people, teens especially, made up one of the most optimistic groups. In fact, teens were one of the only demographics that gave a majority vote to compromise. This probably indicates two things: First, it suggests young people are not as affected by the negativity of the election season. Second, it probably also reflects the tendency of young people to lean left.
Young people, teens especially, made up one of the most optimistic groups. In fact, teens were one of the only demographics that gave a majority vote to compromise. This probably indicates two things: First, it suggests young people are not as affected by the negativity of the election season. Second, it probably also reflects the tendency of young people to lean left.More Women Want Compromise
The gender breakdown turned out about how we expected, with female voters a bit more optimistic about getting along, but not by a whole lot. They're only about 8% more likely than men to see compromise in the future. Overall, both genders were pretty pessimistic.
The gender breakdown turned out about how we expected, with female voters a bit more optimistic about getting along, but not by a whole lot. They're only about 8% more likely than men to see compromise in the future. Overall, both genders were pretty pessimistic.If you'd like to vote on this question, dig deeper into the demographics, or engage in existing discussion about the topic, visit our poll about compromise. We'd love to hear from you!
Top Opinion
-
⚜Ellen⚜ ☼True American Patr... 2012/11/09 02:42:11+15Nope! Because Conservatives do not believe in Communism, Socialism, Marxism. Those things go against our nature. It's the darnedest thing....























WASHINGTON — Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner presented the House speaker, John A. Boehner, a detailed proposal on Thursday to avert the year-end fiscal crisis with $1.6 trillion in tax increases over 10 years, $50 billion in immediate stimulus spending, home mortgage refinancing and a permanent end to Congressional control over statutory borrowing limits.
Really? A PERMANENT end to Congressional control over statutory borrowing limits? Just that one item should tell you everything you need to know about where Obama stands and where he is going to take this country. This has to be one of the most INSANE plans I have ever seen.
If this is what he believe, then in fact we would be much better going off the "fiscal Cliff". It would be much less destructive.
From the posturing the GOP is doing you would think they won the election instead of losing it. They lost two seats in the Senate and at least two seates in the house.
The GOP better get their collective heads on straight or they will drown in their own polluted tea.
Here's a clue for you. Obama got no mandate in the election. The federal government stayed just as divided as before. NOTHING CHANGED. If Obama wants Republicans in Congress to compromise, he must ALSO compromise (you know, give up something in return).
So far, in typical Obama fashion, he has offered nothing but demagoguery, class warfare, and divisive rhetoric.
I would argue that the GOP took a considerable shellacking. Y'all lost 2 seats in the Senate and at least 2 seats in the House. Tea Party candidates fell like termite infested trees in a hurricane.
For you to say that liberals aren't/weren't willing to compromise ignores the past 4 years of GOP obstinacy. Your precious "Party of NO" has squandered any chance of relevance. McConnell is still insisting that there won't be any tax increases on the rich. The GOP LOST and it is time they moved to the center away from the tea-bagging nutcases.
Frankly I hope that Obama makes good on his threat to kill the Bush tax cuts entirely.
Barack Obama bended over forward to get royally compromised by the Republican congress. And what did he get in return? A water-downed, toothless, ObamaCare bill.
Each side should fight for they believe is best for America and Americans. They are not always going to agree on what's best, and with national elections every two years, they cannot ignore the wishes of their constituent's.
And, "that's the nme of that tune."
THERE IS ONLY 1 PARTY!!!!
The bigger problem is now that there is no residue of the Old Republic to recover, let alone the Economic Rights of modern America's Golden Age.
Therefore, it is our Fate to fall into a mass of squabbling minorities foreseen by Teddy Roosevelt. Compromise validates the crimes of our Power Elites and conflict exacerbates the fruits of those crimes.
Next look at all the departments and failed programs. Determine which one are worth keeping and the ones that are worthless. Like the Department of education. Since their existence it seems the school have gone down hill. Some departments overlap. streamline them and cut people. Like when a salmon goes from the ocean too fresh water it changes agencies. What’s with that.
Add up all the taxes gained and lost and then figure out the taxes needed after cuts and setup up a tax structure. No exemption just gains and loses and pay the tax you owe. That tax book would never need to be 71,684 page long.