Funny how the liberals seem to be the experts on the alleged bias at Fox News, yet they never watch it. Of course, there have been studies--Pew Research, USC, and UCLA studies--that show that of all the networks, cable and broadcast, Fox News was the most balanced in the 2008 election. But don't bother bringing that up to a lib. They're so invested in their alternate reality that they could never bring themselves to admit that they've been wrong. Here's a great insight into the liberal mindset (this particular one refers to the end of the old Soviet Union, but it's just as applicable to our own leftists and their chosen faith):
Vital resistance and resentment are the two main responses to the events of 1989. Vital resistance: the mind realizes its mistake – it admits, for example, that nationalization of the means of production does not produce a happy society, but rather laziness and constant shortages; it refuses, however, to let go of the idea because of its passionate attachment to it. Existence – adventures, friendships, successes – is nourished and permeated by this belief to such an extent that the belief becomes an identity; the individual cannot renounce it without committing a kind of symbolic suicide. No one can admit… that his existence reflects the echo of a failure.--Chantal Delsol, "Unlearned Lessons of the Twentieth Century"--hat tip to Ward Dorrity
PUBLIC OPINION > Big News Is Bad News
SodaHead News
2012/06/28 16:00:00
CNN reported a massive drop in viewership this year, losing more than a third of its total audience. Fox News, on the other hand, is floating along nicely, only dropping about 1%. But we wanted to know how viewership looked at the ground level. What percentage of the public watches major news networks? We asked the public to find out.
As ratings predicted, Fox News came out on top. However, even more respondents shunned the entire batch. That's evidence of two things. First, the so-called "major" news networks are hardly satisfactory outlets for news. They might have the most viewers, but as with the music charts, a high rating doesn't mean high quality. Second, it suggests most people are getting their news from alternative sources, because it's unlikely all these people are just ignoring world events completely. They're just sick of the major outlets. One commenter put it best: "If I want to hear nothing but lies, I'll talk to my ex wife."
Conservatives Back Fox
Naturally, all of these stations deny these claims of bias. Whether or not that's true is really a matter of opinion, but what is clear is that their viewers do lean. 77% of conservatives voted Fox, compared to 0% of liberals and progressives; 31% of liberals watch CNN or MSNBC, compared to 2% of conservatives. The vast majority of moderates (72%) avoid the major news channels all together.
The Internet Age
The reason "none of the above" was such a popular choice was clear in the age breakdown: People under 35 don't watch the news. Below that age, the difference in support between major networks was negligible. About two-thirds of them refused to pick one. And we think the reason for this is pretty obvious, too. Do they really expect us to wait 'til 11 when we could just check our personalized feed?
Alternative Sources
Simply saying that "the Internet" is an alternative source of news isn't specific enough. We wanted to see what other people were watching specifically. A quick glance through the comments revealed: YouTube, The Onion, Al Jazeera, C-SPAN, local news, college radio, The Weather Channel, and there were even a few hits for The History Channel.
If you'd like to vote on this question, dig deeper into the demographics, or engage in existing discussion about the topic, visit our poll on major news networks. We'd love to hear from you!
Top Opinion
-
JWnTX 2012/06/28 16:42:07
Okay.
I'll buy that.
I find it incredibly sad that the best, most objective, most accurate news analysis comes from a comedy network... & that's a fact. The so-called "news" outlets are simply outlets for propaganda... choose your personal favorite flavor, it really doesn't matter. They're all in the business of promoting hate for your neighbors in order to keep you preoccupied so that you don't notice when both "parties" vote bipartisan to remove our liberties.
This topic is useful for only one thing: counting sheeple. Nothing more.
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.
ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, have a far left lean even with the news. They couldn't be objective to save they arses.
Fox News (not opinion guys) tends to be have the least bias of all, CNN does tend to show it's Ted Turner values in the news room.
"My fellow Americans...you're all going to blow up in 20 seconds. Have a nice day and God Bless America!"
"America has gotten 4 trillion from aliens to pay off their national debt!"
Fox News is biased. CNN, the inventor of the concept of the cable news network, has become a pathetic joke.
I'm sick of the doctored videos, sickening perversion, race baiting and outright lies from the leftwing media that I no longer watch TV.
If I wanted to watch communist propaganda and perverts I would watch the obaaaama alphabet news.
Poor democratic home loan policies caused the creation of derivatives, to spread out the toxic loans - their default was too big for AIG to handle. This caused the economy to collapse. Obama made it much worse by spending 5.1 trillion.
Deliberate alteration, deliberate out-of-context excerpting that alters or even reverses the intent (especially when said out-of-context excerpt is preceded by a snide remark that it was “a rare moment of honesty” for the person in question [I specifically refer to Hannity’s doing precisely that to Obama]), etc. are not “bloopers.” And they’re not forgivable for any news organization.
Oh, and mis-typing a party affiliation may be a blooper if done once. But Fox did it with disgraced GOP Congressman Mark Foley three times in one show, on two different segments: