Quantcast

PUBLIC OPINION > Beware the Titanic II

SodaHead News 2012/05/03 16:00:00
Clive Palmer, an Australian mining magnate, announced that he would be overseeing the contruction of an RMS Titanic replica, which he will send on a reenactment voyage. Obviously, he doesn't plan to capsize the liner on an iceberg and kill 1,500 people in the process -- he'll use state-of-the art engineering and the best navigation systems money can buy -- but to the extent that it's possible (and safe), he wishes to recreate what the Titanic's maiden voyage should have been. But it's a bit unsettling, no? We asked the public who would be willing to actually board the Titanic II on its first (and hopefully not only) voyage.

titanic

This was a close one, but we can't narrow down the reasoning on either side to one thing. There were definitely those who felt uneasy about the idea that Palmer is recreating a voyage that notoriously ended in disaster -- either out of superstition or out of respect for the dead. Others anticipated an exorbitant price tag. One commenter even wrote, "Certain things made in China I would never use, such as a boat." But for nearly half of voters, as long as he doesn't stick too close to the "reenactment" part, they're good to go.

Older People Would Avoid It

While teens and young adults were relatively gung-ho, the older respondents were extremely hesitant. We suspect it had more to do with the appropriateness of it. One commenter wrote, "Kinda feels disrespectful to the memory to actually build a 'Titanic 2.' Not as disrespectful as the 'Titanic 2' movie, but still." (The movie got a 1.8 out of 10 on IMDB.)

Atheists Aren't Afraid

Thought religion didn't make as big a difference as age did, it did play out how you might expect. Not that Christians are necessarily prone to superstition, but you'd be hard-pressed to find a superstitious atheist. And atheists were the most willing to hop on-board the RMS Titanic II. Agnostics, on the other hand, were exactly as hesitant as Christians.

Big Money Bows Out

We saw the issue of money come up a bit, so we thought maybe well-off respondents would be more likely to participate. Not so. Responses were pretty even for most income brackets, but plummeted at $100k+, the highest-earning group. (Admittedly, it was a small group. But isn't it always?) Only 14% of big earners showed interest in going on the cruise.

If you'd like to vote on this question, dig deeper into the demographics, or engage in existing discussion about the topic, visit our poll about Clive Palmer's Titanic. We'd love to hear from you!
You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Hopscotch 2012/05/04 01:05:58 (edited)
    Hopscotch
    +1
    Young'ns think they can always swim. Old people know better!
  • Pam 2012/05/04 01:03:54
    Pam
    +1
    As much as I would love to take a trans-Atlantic cruise, I doubt I would willingly get on a ship named Titanic. Too much history.
  • diane RN 2012/05/04 00:53:49
    diane RN
    I guess this puts me in the 14%, I wouldnt do it because I am enjoying my life too much. If Im going to take a chance it has to be something that I REALLY want to do.
  • evangelism_vision 2012/05/04 00:50:11
    evangelism_vision
    YA WHY NOT! I was actually hoping someone would build another and make it look like 1912 on board, CALL IT THE HISTORY TOUR
  • jimbo999 2012/05/04 00:07:24
    jimbo999
    +1
    I would definately sail on that ship.
    Call me crazy if you want, but I would.
  • The Yogurt Cup 2012/05/03 23:39:30
    The Yogurt Cup
    only after its been used at least 4 times



    oh and beware the movie titanic 2
  • NicoleBabi The Yog... 2012/05/04 03:51:45
    NicoleBabi
    my friend saw that movie and sad it suck
  • DS in Oak Ridge NC 2012/05/03 22:14:56
    DS in Oak Ridge NC
    He should name it after Titanic's sister ship, Olympic, which had a less storied end. After recent cruise ship disasters / debacles (rampant illness on board, etc), choosing to replicate or emulate the Titanic is foolishness on a par with replicating the Andrea Doria and betting that no one will run smack into it and sink it as happened in '56.
  • NicoleBabi DS in O... 2012/05/04 03:53:00
    NicoleBabi
    well lets hope he used stronger steel then they did back then
  • Tony 2012/05/03 21:53:04
  • Andre 2012/05/03 21:51:42
    Andre
    Seems to be a good idea and investment, people are into nostalgia and the current cruise ships are nothing more than floating malls and entertainment parks, one is hardly aware that one is at sea. There is no "class" anymore, no appreciation of fine things and decorum as in liners of yonder. I would defenitely go
  • capoeir... Andre 2012/05/04 02:21:36
    capoeirakid
    personally, I think modern cruise ships are much to big and carry too many paople to be safe. Rome fell because it was too big.
  • A Found... capoeir... 2012/05/05 07:37:57
    A Founding Father
    Rome was not a ship, was it??
  • Mr. Smith 2012/05/03 21:46:06
    Mr. Smith
    +8
    The unsinkable ship that sunk on it's maiden voyage......yeah, let's do that again!
  • Manster Mr. Smith 2012/05/04 13:46:18 (edited)
    Manster
    +3
    Well said,Mr. Smith!Those who refuse to learn the lessons history has taught,will be doomed to repeat it!
  • Mr. Smith Manster 2012/05/04 17:16:05
    Mr. Smith
    +2
    Let's build a replica of something that failed......it's like rebuilding the Hindenburg or Reactor 4 at Chernobyl. Great idea!
  • Manster Mr. Smith 2012/05/06 18:00:06
    Manster
    +1
    I know! And as if that isn't bad enough,"Let's take the same route as the original!"The original is starting to disappear,maybe the newer one can take her place.
  • Waiting... Mr. Smith 2012/05/04 14:40:16
    Waiting in the Wings
    +1
    Exactly. And it, too, was state of the art at the time.
  • Mr. Smith Waiting... 2012/05/04 17:17:16
    Mr. Smith
    +2
    So was the Hindenburg......try selling tickets to the Hindenburg II. LOL!
  • Waiting... Mr. Smith 2012/05/04 21:55:21 (edited)
    Waiting in the Wings
    +1
    Air ship? I'll walk, thank you! Lol!
  • Mr. Smith Waiting... 2012/05/04 22:11:22
    Mr. Smith
    LOL.....exactly......I'll pass!
  • Christo... Mr. Smith 2012/05/06 16:30:20
    Christopher Kirchen
    Hopefully with history and better engineering on his side, the Titanic II wouldn't suffer the same fate as the original.
  • Mr. Smith Christo... 2012/05/06 16:39:14
    Mr. Smith
    +1
    I thought it was a replica of the same design, wasn't it the flaws in the design that helped bring it down?
  • Christo... Mr. Smith 2012/05/07 20:54:31
    Christopher Kirchen
    I could be wrong, but I thought it was constructed with the original's fate in mind, to hopefully avoid having the same thing befall it.
  • TasselLady 2012/05/03 20:58:13
  • CAA_coffeeaddict 2012/05/03 20:58:04 (edited)
    CAA_coffeeaddict
    Seems fun, but is a little worrisome, consider what did happen the first time
  • Lexi 2012/05/03 20:27:22
    Lexi
    Seems fun!
  • hrailey 2012/05/03 20:10:21
    hrailey
    +1
    I'll go, this one should be practically unsinkable.
  • retrograve hrailey 2012/05/03 20:23:29
    retrograve
    Lol, that's what they said the first time.
  • NicoleBabi retrograve 2012/05/04 03:53:30
    NicoleBabi
    haha so true
  • JohnT 2012/05/03 18:52:49
    JohnT
    +1
    Not interested in the route it took, I like Caribbean cruises.
  • Razoreye001 2012/05/03 18:23:36
    Razoreye001
    +3
    Seeing as this is an exact replica it has the same problem with a structurally weak hull which means if anything were to scrape against it the wrong way it would sink again, count me out.
  • Saul Bo... Razorey... 2012/05/04 02:31:22
    Saul Borbón-Dos Sicilias
    +1
    "Obviously, he doesn't plan to capsize the liner on an iceberg and kill 1,500 people in the process -- he'll use state-of-the art engineering and the best navigation systems money can buy -- but to the extent that it's possible (and safe), he wishes to recreate what the Titanic's maiden voyage should have been."

    Read the article.
  • Professor Wizard 2012/05/03 18:08:16
    Professor Wizard
    I would go.
  • Couri 2012/05/03 18:08:06
    Couri
    I would love to tour a remake of the ship itself but I think going through the whole voyage again is just like asking for bad things to happen.
  • theprothinker 2012/05/03 18:04:54
    theprothinker
    I'd love it! I think it's a great idea -- potentially a huge moneymaker too. Who would have thought that the original Titanic would be the object of so much attention a century later?
  • rustyshackelford 2012/05/03 17:58:46
  • Mtnsmith 2012/05/03 17:33:44
    Mtnsmith
    In today's dollars, a trip on the Titanic (first class, of course) cost $50,000.

    If I go, don't look for me on the Lido deck!
  • Mike 2012/05/03 17:24:14
    Mike
    to each their own, is he gonna re-enact the sinking as well??
  • Margaret Jacobson 2012/05/03 17:13:46
    Margaret Jacobson
    +1
    I think if he has much money to throw away.......give it to me......I do not know how many people would want to ride on the "new" titantic ?? DO THEY HAVE ENOUGH LIFE BOATS ?? DUPLICATE THE FOODS ?? PRICE OF VOYAGE THE SAME ??

News & Politics

2013/06/19 13:48:56

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals