Quantcast

PUBLIC OPINION > America Should Not Adopt a Fat Tax

SodaHead News 2012/05/21 22:00:00
Following Denmark's recent adoption of a "fat tax" -- that is, a tax on fatty foods, not a tax on fat people -- researchers are suggesting that a similar tax in America could save thousands of lives and cut down on obesity. But would a fat tax fly in the land of liberty? We asked the public to find out.

sodahead fat tax america

Fat chance! There was some support for a fat tax, but not nearly enough to pass on a ballot. Nearly two-thirds of respondents were opposed. One commenter wrote, "This does nothing to solve the real problem in America: Healthy natural foods are overpriced." Many comments echoed that sentiment, suggesting that it would be more productive to develop cheap nutritious food than to make the fatty stuff more expensive.

International Encouragement

It's gonna be tough to pass legislation if American citizens are against it, but there's plenty of support overseas. Voters from outside the U.S. were twice as likely to support a fat tax. Although, keep in mind that the question asked about an American fat tax, so international voters aren't necessarily saying they want one in their own country. But they'd definitely like to see one in the States.

Heavy Opposition

Naturally, overweight respondents were among the least supportive. Presumably, that's because it would impact their budget the most. Skinny voters were actually more than twice as likely to support a fat tax as overweight voters. Average weight voters sided with the overweight, while athletes were closer to skinny voters, but not quite as enthusiastic.

Liberals Love the Idea

Finally, as expected, there was an enormous political margin. Liberals were more supportive than any other group with 73% saying they would encourage a fat tax. That's an unprecedented 50% more than conservatives. Oddly enough, progressives were against the tax, as were most moderates and "others." Libertarians were even more opposed than conservatives with just 18% support.

If you'd like to vote on this question, dig deeper into the demographics, or engage in existing discussion about the topic, visit our poll about the fat tax. We'd love to hear from you!
You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

  • abubincrazy 2012/05/21 23:19:30
    abubincrazy
    +12
    We are AMERICANS.
    NOT a brain-washed pack of socialist Euro-weenies.
    Government is the PROBLEM, not the solution.
    If I want to main-line lard, WHAT business is it of yours?
    NONE.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • El Prez 2012/05/23 04:45:37
    El Prez
    Nor should thery have a soda tax. But schools have got to quite selling the junk!!
  • Michaelene El Prez 2012/05/23 05:43:32
    Michaelene
    The students will just pick up their soda on the way to school and the schools will lose the revenues.
    What I find ironic is that people will defend a welfare recipients right to buy junk food with tax payers money but will remove the right of individuals to buy what they want with their own money.
    BTW I don't drink soda but the hypocrisy just appals me.
  • El Prez Michaelene 2012/05/23 05:51:53
    El Prez
    And you should be appalled. The soda and cheap fattening crap should not have been there in the fitst place. Schools should not make money on crap. Demand better, machines can sell fruit and juices too. Eventually a change will take place. I am for individual freedom but our kids don't need to have junk sold at the school. if they bring it fro home or buy it on the way to school, so be it. However, the schools do not need to assist them in their lust of fat.
  • Michaelene El Prez 2012/05/23 05:54:01 (edited)
    Michaelene
    So much for individual freedom huh?

    But Americans on food assistance can buy what ever they want, fat and soda with our taxpayers money and it's a ok with you.
  • El Prez Michaelene 2012/05/27 21:58:57
    El Prez
    So can the kids, just not at school.
  • Michaelene El Prez 2012/05/28 12:36:05
    Michaelene
    Is the school paying for the soda, handing it out for free? No

    I allow my kids to have soda and junk food, in moderation. Who pays the 15k in fines? My property taxes do!
  • El Prez Michaelene 2012/05/28 19:58:55
    El Prez
    What you allow is certainly your business and no one elses. Schools should be setting the example not profiting from the continued fattening of the kids.
  • Michaelene El Prez 2012/05/29 16:47:21
    Michaelene
    Keep your government loving hands off of my kids, unlike those who rely on schools to teach their children EVERYTHING, there are parents who teach their children how to be healthy.
    Parents are the primary example for children.

    Our school removed the soda machines, the kids started brown bagging lunches again so they could have a soda. The school lost money!

    The obesity problem is not the fault of schools, it is a parenting problem.
  • El Prez Michaelene 2012/05/29 18:17:42
    El Prez
    +1
    Can't argue with your logic. If everyone was like you, there would be no problem. Unfortunately, that is not the case. Schools should teach.
  • Michaelene El Prez 2012/05/29 18:36:10
    Michaelene
    School should teach about health and nutrition, I agree. A hands on approach is the best method, like cooking and gardening classes.

    For five years I was forced to feed my camp kids "government lunches" due to the high percentage of poor attendees. If you saw what they presented to my "kids" as food, you'd understand my lack of faith.
    I had to fight the city to allow me to utilize a small piece of their property to grow a garden to supplement their diet of moldy bologna sandwiches, prepackaged pbnj, "mystery meat", rotten fruit etc.

    The camp kids loved eating the vegetable they grew themselves! Raw and all! :)

    God bless my husband, he never once complained that my pay was spent on feeding "my kids"
  • El Prez Michaelene 2012/05/31 18:55:57
    El Prez
    +1
    Unfortunately, I believe your story is not unique. I don't believe the system can be improved by allowing the schools to make money off the junk. Your camp kids were lucky to have someone like you who cared enough to do something.
  • Michaelene El Prez 2012/05/31 20:00:08
    Michaelene
    Thanks but I think any parent would have done the same thing, the kids were hungry. When I called the city to protest the "food", they shorted my lunches for a whole week. How sick is that?
    I made a lot of spaghetti, lol!
  • El Prez Michaelene 2012/05/31 20:03:23
    El Prez
    Sick and criminal! That is the kind of stuff that has to be stopped, not laws to fine schools etc.
  • The One 2012/05/23 03:54:30
    The One
    Amen!
  • *○*Me*○* 2012/05/23 03:45:08
    *○*Me*○*
    YES!!! Do it!!
  • WOODMAN34 2012/05/23 03:39:17
    WOODMAN34
    +1
    Hey big brother is at it again, Hey obummer keep your hands off my life. If I want donuts thats my right, Don't tell me what I can eat.
  • Chantal Eyong 2012/05/23 03:36:07
    Chantal Eyong
    +1
    That donut burger is sooo gross looking
  • TheNightFly 2012/05/23 03:31:20 (edited)
    TheNightFly
    +3
    America may have the greatest obesity problem in the world but congress has the greatest obesity problem in America. If anyone in congress gave a rats ass about our health, they would raise food quality standards rather than tax poor quality food. Lawmakers spend all their time trying to convince us that they serve a purpose when all they really serve is themselves.

    http://rt.com/usa/news/wealth...
  • Bureauc 0webama 2012/05/23 02:45:41
    Bureauc 0webama
    +3
    The Government having extensive control over the lives of its citizens is a form of Statism.
    No to the TAX.
  • beach bum 2012/05/23 02:44:02
    beach bum
    interesting
  • UMAD 2012/05/23 00:23:33
    UMAD
    I want a Fat Tax!!!!!
  • TheNigh... UMAD 2012/05/25 02:07:16 (edited)
    TheNightFly
    Fatness naturally taxes itself.
  • Bill 2012/05/22 23:56:49
    Bill
    +4
    I would like to see a Tax that would cut congresses pay in half every time they try to stick us with another one of these BS feel good taxes .. they just want to bleed us dry they don't care if I'm fat or not. Wake up we need to completely gut washington of these parasites.
  • EdVenture 2012/05/22 23:38:25
    EdVenture
    Two things would reverse the trend.
    1, Promote and employ a national health/excercise program centered at the students, much like JFK did when he was in office. I remember getting a badge for conforming to it.
    2, Require better healthy balanced standards in quality food provided to students intended to educate and build healthier standards and habits.
  • tywon.smith 2012/05/22 23:20:55
    tywon.smith
    +1
    Isnt there enough taxes now?
  • WOODMAN34 tywon.s... 2012/05/23 03:41:06
    WOODMAN34
    YES!!!!!!!!!!!
  • tywon.s... WOODMAN34 2012/05/25 14:28:45
    tywon.smith
    Keep on and they'll tax us to breathe!
  • POWERSHAKER 2012/05/22 22:29:06
    POWERSHAKER
    Yep. I don't like that idea either. That's a stupid idea. It wouldn't work either.
  • Omni 2012/05/22 21:46:49
    Omni
    +1
    The health of an individual is their own problem, not anyone else's. The only two things the overweight affect the world differently with is their carbon footprint (which can't really be regulated) and their strain on the health care system. As I'm one of those who thinks health care should be freely available to the majority of people, I also think if you're purposely sabotaging your health through cigarettes, alcohol, drugs, or even food, you shouldn't be allotted health care in the same way others are. If you have a life-threatening addiction, such as a drug or severe alcohol addiction, you should be allowed go to rehab—for free—but if you have a food or cigarette addiction, you're either going to have to pony up extra tax towards health care, or cut the addiction. I think by mandating something like that, equality can reign free. Taxing unhealthy foods affects everyone, even the healthy. It won't mediate the health care system, either. Raising the prices of health care for those who'll naturally use it more, on the other hand, will not only allow more equality in taxation, but also encourage weight loss and sobering up from cigarettes, thus leading to a healthier nation.
  • Michael S Smith 2012/05/22 21:44:10
    Michael S Smith
    +1
    What would be so bad about putting a 1 cent on every 10 gms of fat if something has lets say 100 gms of fat that would only be only 10 cents where it would be a significant amount is when you get to something that is like say 500, 600, 700, 800 ,900 1,000 gms of fat
  • cynsity Michael... 2012/05/23 06:20:22
    cynsity
    Because IF you knew anything at all about nutrition you would understand its not about grams of FAT. While fat does contribute to associated problems in an overweight person fat doesn't cause fat in a person. High cholesterols (the HDLs) which is the main issue with fats can happen in underweight people. Because fats are flushed through the body in the blood stream they cause clogs and plaques but they are not teh main cause of obesity.

    Its about the CARBOHYDRATES. The sugars either simple or complex. 99% of what you eat your body converts it into to sugar (glucose) it is this product which is stored in the cells and this which is horded by the body (fat deposits). All foods have carbs in the veggie world corn is one of teh highest carb/sugar item in the fruit world its berries which are the worse. You could in fact have teh same values if you eat a 1/2 cup of corn or you eat several spoonfulls of plain white sugar.

    Sugar also spikes in the blood and cause people to FEEL hunger so they eat again or more then they should. (carbs are why you feel hungry 1 to 2 hours after eating chinese) Lowering but not eliminating carbs are teh key eating more complex carbs and matching them with protiens (which slow the absorbion of carbs but are also high in fats and cholesterols) is k...



    Because IF you knew anything at all about nutrition you would understand its not about grams of FAT. While fat does contribute to associated problems in an overweight person fat doesn't cause fat in a person. High cholesterols (the HDLs) which is the main issue with fats can happen in underweight people. Because fats are flushed through the body in the blood stream they cause clogs and plaques but they are not teh main cause of obesity.

    Its about the CARBOHYDRATES. The sugars either simple or complex. 99% of what you eat your body converts it into to sugar (glucose) it is this product which is stored in the cells and this which is horded by the body (fat deposits). All foods have carbs in the veggie world corn is one of teh highest carb/sugar item in the fruit world its berries which are the worse. You could in fact have teh same values if you eat a 1/2 cup of corn or you eat several spoonfulls of plain white sugar.

    Sugar also spikes in the blood and cause people to FEEL hunger so they eat again or more then they should. (carbs are why you feel hungry 1 to 2 hours after eating chinese) Lowering but not eliminating carbs are teh key eating more complex carbs and matching them with protiens (which slow the absorbion of carbs but are also high in fats and cholesterols) is key and correct portion sizes. 3oz of meat is a correct portion size taht is teh same size as a deck of cards.

    those 500 and up levels of fat would never occur anywhere even 1 cup of pure veg oil only has 205 gm of fat and I don't know any one who drinks oil. fat levels do not equal calories which is likely what you are thinking of but calories are not something you eat they are a unit of engery measurement and mean nothing in nutritional factors.

    So a tax on fat wouldn't sever any purpose at all except to make food more expensive over all...
    (more)
  • Inquisitve Kat 2012/05/22 21:36:14
    Inquisitve Kat
    +2
    "Many comments echoed that sentiment, suggesting that it would be more productive to develop cheap nutritious food than to make the fatty stuff more expensive."
    It's called vegetables, lardass, they're not expensive.
  • Phantom... Inquisi... 2012/05/22 21:53:44
    PhantomDream
    +1
    Considering my family lives on food stamps and we cannot afford fresh fruits and vegetables, your comment was offensive and untrue. We can get SOME canned vegetables, but that's about it. Bitch.
  • Juliet Phantom... 2012/05/23 03:27:58
    Juliet
    i feel so sad when i hear about families living on food stamps. i'm not saying my country is better than yours at all, one day i would love to go to america but here no one has to live on foodstamps and everyone has the money to eat healthy, even if you cant get work.
  • Inquisi... Phantom... 2012/05/23 04:48:09
  • Inquisi... Phantom... 2012/05/23 04:51:29
    Inquisitve Kat
    Here's a sample of some ingredients to make cheap meals... pasta, rice, potatoes, broccoli (a head goes a long way), carrots, flour, baking powder, baking soda, cooking oil, margarine, eggs, ground beef, chicken (on sale), canned tuna, canned salmon, canned or frozen veggies... can make a lot of meals with those things and they can all be afforded on food stamps. It's cheaper than processed food, it just requires more planning and cooking.
  • Michaelene Phantom... 2012/05/23 05:58:35
    Michaelene
    Have you ever looked into the SNAP garden program. Free seeds and supplies to grow your own vegetables?
  • Chantal... Phantom... 2012/05/25 02:02:57
    Chantal Eyong
    Though I don't agree with the tone of response, it is very true that fruits and veggies are expensive--especially if you have a large family to feed and a low income.
  • Joanna ... Inquisi... 2012/05/22 23:39:18
    Joanna the Great
    Vegetables ARE expensive, that's the whole goddamn point.
  • Inquisi... Joanna ... 2012/05/23 04:52:22
    Inquisitve Kat
    Not frozen and canned vegetables. Or produce on sale. Plan, save coupons, look for sales... cook meals.

News & Politics

2013/05/25 15:14:58

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals