As if the death of U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other U.S. officials wasn't enough, violence continues in the Middle East in protest of an American-made, anti-Muslim film that portrays Prophet Mohammed as a womanizer, killer and child molester.
Clashes between protesters and security forces outside the U.S. Embassies in Tunisia, Egypt, Yemen and Sudan have resulted in a handful of deaths so far. Protesters continue to burn U.S. flags and attempt to storm U.S. Embassies across the Middle East.
Do you think the controversial film should have been made in the first place? Or was it a poor move considering the hyper-sensitive relationship between the East and West right now?
CBSNEWS.COM reports:
Clashes outside U.S. Embassies in Sudan, Tunisia and Cairo; At least 3 dead in demonstrations held in several nations after Friday prayers, as protesters denounce anti-Islamic film
What would you think about this? What if a thousand filmmakers from countries all over the world made videos criticizing Islam and Mohammed and uploaded them to the Internet all on the same day, what would happen? Then do the same thing once a week thereafter.
The Muslims would be so exhausted from protesting, that they just might get the message of tolerance.
I in fact do not believe it was any worse than the murders committed by Ferdinand and Isabella when they took Spain from the Muslims.
But I reckon such persecution to be endemic to religions as absolutist as either Islam or Christianity.
And why blame an expose film anyway? It seems radical Muslims, like an excuse, any excuse, to cause trouble. If it wasn't this, they would have found something else. What a worthless and false and stupid and barbaric religion.
.
These riots show true colors of Muslims.
.
.
Australia
Kashmir (university of)
Indonesia
Australia
...
BTW, why aren't we having more children? Do we actually want radical Muslims taking over the world?
But rather than criticize other people for obeying God, shouldn't we also obey God? If Muslims apparently think they have, or assert their God-given right to "multiply like rabbits," can't we also do that? Besides, many guys don't like to use condoms anyway. We can still have more human life upon the planet, without so many people being born only into the Muslim cult. There are lots of other good reasons for letting families grow naturally large, than just "it's the old traditional way." What about respect for nature and the immense and sacred value of each and every human life? There's so many reasons that people can cite, as to why to not take "precautions" against the prospect that natural sexual acts may cause human life to spread prolifically.
Perhaps where we are doomed, as you say, is that those greedy Muslims are snatching up all the women, with their polygamy, and not leaving enough women left, for the rest of us to marry?
By the way, the earth is already overpopulated and we all need to pull back on the birth rates. islam needs to be controlled in that respect. aRCANumber69 is actually correct. muslims are allowed four wives, and so have far more chiildren. At their prolific birth rates, they will soon out number us in a few short decades, living off host countries largess and benefits system. Not only that, islam allows slaves, and many are women, temporary marriage, for an hour, a night, a day..... so you can see how they are patiently taking us over.
We do NOT need to reduce birthrate, for there's lots of places most everywhere, where we could put lots more people.
Now yeah, Islam is a barbaric religion, certainly not true. How come they don't accept the Bible as the scripture to follow? How come they don't want to know the truth about Mohammad? And certainly polygamy could be complicated or have problems.
But there's nothing wrong with responsibly married couples, respecting the natural reproductive rhythm of their bodies, and welcoming babies to push out freely, naturally, without any means of "birth control." More and more people would be glad to live, and with just 1 wife to a man, typical family size is around 5 or 6 children.
So why are we inviting Muslims to take over, with our weak and immoral cultures, and our pitifully-low birthrates?
Yes, we need some financial reforms, but waiting for these means we do little or nothing in the meantime, so nothing gets reformed. Ending the government welfare state, would also take the burden off of families, create more high-paying good jobs, and end that "unfair advantage" that "living on the dole" Muslims seem to have found.
We may have to consider some material sacrifice, such as actually building our own larger homes, or asking ourselves whether it's more blessed to have a naturally-large family crammed into a single-wide trailer, or a big house...
Yes, we need some financial reforms, but waiting for these means we do little or nothing in the meantime, so nothing gets reformed. Ending the government welfare state, would also take the burden off of families, create more high-paying good jobs, and end that "unfair advantage" that "living on the dole" Muslims seem to have found.
We may have to consider some material sacrifice, such as actually building our own larger homes, or asking ourselves whether it's more blessed to have a naturally-large family crammed into a single-wide trailer, or a big house that is mostly empty due to too few children?
Some families feel a need to end the "2nd wage earner," and to have a Stay-At-Home Mom, but aren't in a very good financial position yet, to do so. One suggestion I have heard is, start budgeting for the one income only, while reducing debt and bills, so as to make it a reality of actually soon reaching that goal. And of course, much prayer about it.
But I think polygamy is too complicated for me anyway. It's hard enough to maintain a proper relationship with 1 wife, let alone 4. Not all of us are rich kings, or lady magnets. Is polygamy even moral?
All the children I could possibly conceive with 1 wife, shouldn't be all that "too many." But if I had 4 or more wives, would I even be able to remember the names of all the children? And wouldn't it be a little complicated, trying to maintain the schedule of which wife to sleep with each night? Maybe just go with 7 wives, that way, you can have a wife for each day of the week?
If Muslim culture seems to be so dominant, then why not also ask why, our culture seems to be so weak? Who really reads and believes their Bibles anymore? Surely, that is not an adequate way to treat the God who we claim to believe in? Now how hard can it really be, to put a little more effort into reading the Bible and prayer? Just shut the TV off, and you will have several more hours in each day, and a clearer mind to boot.
But I do think "Allah" is supposed to start with a capital letter, for it is a proper name, even if it is that of a false god.
But what I am still wondering, do we accomplish anything, by violating the laws of English? Can you not find some other way to "disrespect" Allah? One idea that comes to mind. During the Jewish and Messianic Purim plays, retelling the story from the Book of Ester, we Messianics make much noise to drown out any mention of the name of Haman, because we want to erase him from history. Part of the "fun" of the play too, I suppose? So what would be valid, is to "gray out" any typed reference to Allah. However, do we have any stylized text or manual HTML coding access here on Sodahead? Or you could do [strike]Allah[/strike]. (Use greater-than and less-than symbols. I tried, but SH server stripped out my HTML coding.) On another forum when I have composed polls, I quite often "gray out" "wrong" answers. Oh, you can still vote "wrong," but you are already warned that you are an idiot if you do so.
Look, respect is a two way thing. islam does not respect Christianity or any other religion. Respect is also earned, and islam has not earned it with me, nor do I get respect off muslims. I will not respect their pagan moon deity. End of story. I detest islam and muslims. I once got involved and it ended badly for me. So, my personal experience of hell and misery means I will not give these animals respect. They deserve NONE.
Study the "conspiracy theories," because "1000s of people can't keep a secret."
A friend told me that the Koran is a book of spiritual pornography, written by a victim of abuse. Does not anybody read the Koran, to see why it should not even be considered to be a "holy" book?
People, stop going with the crowd, stop believing the lies, and do your own diligent research, so that you can know the truth, and set people free.
The quran could qualify as 'hate speech,' all by itself. It is in fact, two books. The first part is of his early days in mecca, and this is where he is relatively peaceful, (before he had politics and power,) the second half is when he had both in medina and is pretty vile and violent. His mental illness very pronounced then.
However, if 9-11 was an inside job, that sort of lets Muslims off-the-hook, for at least that.
So why would government do such evil to us? Research "false flags" in history, and it will start to make sense.
Now if this film is done in a way to incite hatred or violence to anyone in any way. It can be categorized as hate speech.