Prominent atheist turns theist. Is this noteworthy?
FanOreilly
2007/12/01 01:04:31
|
|
|||||
|
35 votes
|
|
49% | |||
|
36 votes
|
|
51% | |||
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/DineshDSouza/2007/11/19/th...
" Imagine if one of the world's leading Christians--say C.S. Lewis a generation ago, or Billy Graham now--were to reject his religious beliefs and become a atheist. It would be big news! The New York Times would be all over it, for sure, and the question would be why a man who has devoted his life to God would now turn against Him? In sum, the focus would be on what were the reasons for the conversion and on what's so bad about Christianity.
Contrast this with the New York Times' approach to the conversion of philosopher Anthony Flew. Flew has been, for the past half-century, the world's leading advocate of atheism. His works such as Theology and Falsification and The Presumption of Atheism were considered classics of theist thought. No one has so relentlessly espoused the atheist cause, and no one has been more anthologized and eulogized by the atheist community. Other twentieth-century philosophers, such as Martin Heidegger and Bertrand Russell, were unbelievers but they did not make atheism central to their philosophical work as did Flew. Flew's atheism long precedes that of latecomers like Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett and Christopher Hitchens.
Now, in his early eighties, Flew has rejected atheism and said he believes that God exists. He does not espouse the Christian God, but calls himself a Deist. He says he has a lifelong commitment to following the evidence where it leads, and that new advances in the sciences have shown him that materialism and Darwinism simply cannot account for the world as it is and life as it is. Examining the fine-tuning of the universe and the mind-boggling complexity of the cell (a compexity that evolution presumes but cannot explain), Flew now believes that the design of the universe requires a designer. He gives his reasons in a new book There Is a God which is co-authored with Roy Abraham Varghese."
" Imagine if one of the world's leading Christians--say C.S. Lewis a generation ago, or Billy Graham now--were to reject his religious beliefs and become a atheist. It would be big news! The New York Times would be all over it, for sure, and the question would be why a man who has devoted his life to God would now turn against Him? In sum, the focus would be on what were the reasons for the conversion and on what's so bad about Christianity.
Contrast this with the New York Times' approach to the conversion of philosopher Anthony Flew. Flew has been, for the past half-century, the world's leading advocate of atheism. His works such as Theology and Falsification and The Presumption of Atheism were considered classics of theist thought. No one has so relentlessly espoused the atheist cause, and no one has been more anthologized and eulogized by the atheist community. Other twentieth-century philosophers, such as Martin Heidegger and Bertrand Russell, were unbelievers but they did not make atheism central to their philosophical work as did Flew. Flew's atheism long precedes that of latecomers like Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett and Christopher Hitchens.
Now, in his early eighties, Flew has rejected atheism and said he believes that God exists. He does not espouse the Christian God, but calls himself a Deist. He says he has a lifelong commitment to following the evidence where it leads, and that new advances in the sciences have shown him that materialism and Darwinism simply cannot account for the world as it is and life as it is. Examining the fine-tuning of the universe and the mind-boggling complexity of the cell (a compexity that evolution presumes but cannot explain), Flew now believes that the design of the universe requires a designer. He gives his reasons in a new book There Is a God which is co-authored with Roy Abraham Varghese."
Top Opinion
-
byebye ,I love you,gotta go 2007/12/01 03:36:55Yes+17And he isn't the first atheist to convert! I believe it was john mcarthur who set out to prove God didn't exsist and wound up proving that God did exist! God don't believe in atheist! lol





















Somewhat well known atheist goes senile, and admits that some sort of "higher power" deist god may exist.
Hardly a "conversion" to theism, let alone a specific theism like, say, Christianity.
Such is the need to grasp at straws.
Evidence of the ignorance of the average atheist.
People who claim to see hate where there is none are just projecting their own emotions.
"your smooth lord and savior"
That's a turn of phrase I've never heard before. Smooth, as opposed to crunchy, like peanut butter? But I have no lord, and require no saving from Jewish mythology threats, or Christian ones. My parents freed themselves from that whole racket before I was born.
I bet you believe in global warming.
And another thing: . . .who? I know Dawkins, Dennent, Hitchens, Harris, and all the prominent Youtube guys, but I've never heard of Anthony Flew. . .
Looks like we are more informed than the average atheist.
Sir Issac Newton? I don't know nothin' but no Newton!
Not very scientific of you.
Apparently the highly scientific and intelligent atheists missed how the wikipedia entry lists the late Dr. Flew as:
"Prominent atheist"
Ignorance is probably not your best argument sir.
I, myself, am in the same boat, philosophically, as this guy. While I'm not old, I have tried to think of my consciousness simply ending at my death for eternity, and trying to imagine the scope of time in which there would be no more "me," and it's quite daunting. I don't believe in a god in the traditional sense, but I have to believe that consciousness, whether mine or a different one, like me with amnesia, will continue on.
Anyway, to address the question more directly, no it's not really noteworthy. Plenty of atheists find God all the time just like plenty of religious people become atheists every day. Just because he was a noteworthy person among the atheists and put forth many pro atheist arguments also does not negate those messages. People change their minds all the time. If Abe Lincoln had decided at the end of his life (providing he hadn't been assassinated) that he was wrong to free the slaves, would that have negated the arguments he put forth for abolition? No, it would have just meant he'd gone senile.
If the pope turned atheist, you folks would be howling!
Then by your logic I could reply 'I never heard of no Ratzinger!'
If there was, that would be Bertrand Russell, someone people have actually heard of.
Your ignorance is not an argument it is a shame.
If there was, that would be Bertrand Russell, someone people have actually heard of.
Anyone who is aware of atheism over the past 50 years would agree with this.
LOL!
So you speak for atheism? Is that the official uniform on your head there? I think it is appropriate.
LOL!
Dinesh D'Souza was right...it is as if Billy Graham himself had turned atheist yet the scientifically minded atheists shrug and dismiss him as deranged.
It doesn't matter who adopts a view. If Richard Dawkins were to suddenly say "I believe that someday a nephilim is going to come out of the earth and destroy the human race", until it is proven via the scientific method, it's still false.