Pro-gay marriage groups plan Chick-fil-A 'Kiss-In.' Is the a good ideal

by tblackb Posted 2012/08/03 19:45:03

Related Topics: Gay Marriage, Kiss, Chick-fil-a, Marriage, Gay

Read More

34 votes
Read all 30 opinions
View Results and Demographics + View Demographics

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	yes	5 votes	15%
	no	24 votes	71%
	Undecided	5 votes	15%

Add a comment above

Vision of Verve 2012/08/03 20:04:42

no

+8
moderated...
>> See Replies

More polls by tblackb

rustex782 2012/08/05 21:37:10

yes

+1
but why is all this centered around the gay marriage thing? i thought the fight was for freedom of speech. Im VERY anti chick and have not eaten there EVER, but fighting against the gays but doing it in the name of "free speech" is stupid and ignorant. Just admit what you stand for and stop trying to save face by calling it something else.

reply
Jalysa Ellis 2012/08/04 21:51:18 (edited)
Freedom to Jalysa ... 2012/08/04 22:15:34

Best opinion on this yet, thank you!

reply
Jalysa ... to Freedom 2012/08/04 22:17:44

Oh, you're welcome; and thanks. :)

reply
none 2012/08/04 19:12:19

no

Who cares, it's more foolishness that will only make them look desperate and ignorant. The country sent them a strong and simple message and they're too stupid to understand.

reply
Angryface01 2012/08/04 05:47:18

no

but what the hell... grab the one you love and smooch them.... who cares what Chic-fil-a does?

reply
Donnie 2012/08/04 03:08:44
nbarton2 2012/08/04 02:53:54

no

Why can't they just let it go?

reply
Nancy~PWCM~JLA~POTL 2012/08/04 00:30:30 (edited)

no

owner of a private biz can express his values and never denied gays just expressed views. Thjt is his free speach to do so. Gays can eat there or elsewhere and I am not opposed to guy rights. Just stop demonizing another

reply
Suzie1001 2012/08/03 23:58:41

no

+2
Chick Fil A already proved their point, And didn't even try too.

reply
KingdomNow 2012/08/03 23:20:23

no

If they don't buy, kick the loiterers out.

reply
Sebastian 2012/08/03 23:15:16

no

This disgusting act is just going to turn off the voters still "on the fence" about the gay marriage issue, by making gays out to look like sick sex-crazed perverts who can't control their sexual impulses in public. The average parent will NOT want their children to see such things. I'm glad the LGBT community is shooting itself in the foot by such actions.

reply
Jackie G - Poker Playing Pa... 2012/08/03 22:34:11

no

No, it was silly - but fine, do what ever spins the prop

reply
Katherine 2012/08/03 21:50:45

no

+1
Idea or ideal?

1) They'd do better making their case, proving it's genuine, and inspired by love, by picking something to support, rather than ruining someone's business or bother people.

2) Apparently there's 4 million gay people. I don't know how many bi. Maybe double it and say 8 million participants. This is out of 314 million, leaving 306 million straights.

3) Out of the 314 million Americans, I'm sure at least half strongly support freedom of speech and religion, regardless of the stance on issues.

reply
Transquesta 2012/08/03 21:33:23

no

+2
This stunt is virtually GUARANTEED to further alienate the American people.

reply
Don Leuty 2012/08/03 21:21:38

no

+3
Really doesn't help any cause and could have numerous unintended consequences. Trying to bite an alligator in the mouth is not a winning proposition.

reply
krayzrick 2012/08/03 21:03:24

no

+2
AND I WILL NEVER BE OK WITH 'GAYDOM'....

reply
john olson 2012/08/03 20:35:59

no

+4
I don't understand the gays. Why do they insist on putting their deviant behavior in the face of the normal people all the time. I don't really care what nasty, abhorrent behavior they partake of in the privacy of their own homes but I do object when they have to do it in front of my children and grandchildren. I think the term "Queer" better describes them that the term gay!

reply
studiobrat BN-0 AFCL 2012/08/03 20:30:46

no

+3
I thiink that this immature stunt will only harm their agenda. Sometimes this group is very clever with their publicity, but not this time.

reply
RogerRover 2012/08/03 20:18:49 (edited)

Undecided

+4
Good deal for WHO? It simply makes them look like some kind of a gross. insensitive sub culture.

reply
t.eliot, topbard 2012/08/03 20:08:22

Undecided

+1
I don't know, nor do I care, but just like Mr. Chick-fil-a, they have a right to express their opinion

reply
krayzrick to t.eliot... 2012/08/03 21:02:50

+2
true....maybe they should do it at 'their own business'...

reply
thefatguy 2012/08/03 20:08:17

yes

+4
It's a good idea from the standpoint that it will only work against them by demonstrating their immature and emotion-based argument. It's very childish but I support them making fools of themselves and undermining their cause. Keep up the childish behavior! You go, girl(s)!

reply
Stryder to thefatguy 2012/08/03 20:42:54

+3
They're their own worst enemy. You'd think they would eventually figure out that these type of actions only alienate them from the mainstream even more.

reply
thefatguy to Stryder 2012/08/03 20:48:33

+2
I "hope" they never "change" their tactics.

reply
Stryder to thefatguy 2012/08/03 20:51:20

+2
Me, too. It's really entertaining watching all their "protests" blow up in their faces.

reply
thefatguy to Stryder 2012/08/04 00:17:07

+1
I think many of them actually like things to blow up in their faces.

On an unrelated note: this guy needs a wet wipe.

reply
Stryder to thefatguy 2012/08/04 00:20:05

+2
I don't even want to know what that is.

reply
Vision of Verve 2012/08/03 20:04:42
Simmering Frog 2012/08/03 19:51:08

Undecided

+5
It's neither a good nor a bad idea. It's irrelevant to the first Amendment to the United States Constitution. It doesn't matter.

reply