President Obama trampled on the constitution again. He has no authority to grant amnesty to illegal aliens, only Congress has that authority. True or False
CAPISCE
2012/06/19 00:14:29
|
|
|||||
|
32 votes
|
|
71% | ||
|
13 votes
|
|
29% | ||
President Oba
Top Opinion
-
lonewolf 2012/06/19 00:15:24
for all,the seniors that had free medicare now pay& really have no say in their care,the same with the drs.Our system was not perfect BUT it was better than anyother country.
In the past we were the leaders of the free world but can anyone even THINK that now?
There are 2 ways of looking at this "If something is free it is worth just that".There is NO FREE lunch no matter what you think.But the liberals are not the only ones that want to take away our freedom[under the guise of helping us.]
"He wants to give them jobs"? Untrue. He will not give them any jobs, but he will ALLOW them to work if they find their own jobs.
"Allow them to vote"? Obama said nothing about allowing them to vote. I doubt he wants them to vote before they become citizens.
"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts." - Daniel Moynihan
resumed by who ???? He doe not have the power of selective enforcement of laws , so his actions are criminal.
[QUOTE]
Selective enforcement is the ability that executors of the law (such as police officers or administrative agencies, in some cases) have to arbitrarily select choice individuals as being outside of the law. The use of enforcement discretion in an arbitrary way is referred to as selective enforcement or selective prosecution.
Historically, selective enforcement is recognized as a sign of tyranny, and an abuse of power, because it violates rule of law, allowing men to apply justice only when they choose. Aside from this being inherently unjust, it almost inevitably must lead to favoritism and extortion, with those empowered to choose being able to help their friends, take bribes, and threaten those from they desire favors.
However, the converse can also be true. Police officer discretion is sometimes warranted for minor offenses, for instance where a warning to a teenager could be quite effective without putting the teen through a legal process and also reduces costs of governmental legal resources. Another example is patrol officers parked on the side of a highway for speed enforcement. It may be impractical and cost prohibitive to ticket everyone w...
[QUOTE]
Selective enforcement is the ability that executors of the law (such as police officers or administrative agencies, in some cases) have to arbitrarily select choice individuals as being outside of the law. The use of enforcement discretion in an arbitrary way is referred to as selective enforcement or selective prosecution.
Historically, selective enforcement is recognized as a sign of tyranny, and an abuse of power, because it violates rule of law, allowing men to apply justice only when they choose. Aside from this being inherently unjust, it almost inevitably must lead to favoritism and extortion, with those empowered to choose being able to help their friends, take bribes, and threaten those from they desire favors.
However, the converse can also be true. Police officer discretion is sometimes warranted for minor offenses, for instance where a warning to a teenager could be quite effective without putting the teen through a legal process and also reduces costs of governmental legal resources. Another example is patrol officers parked on the side of a highway for speed enforcement. It may be impractical and cost prohibitive to ticket everyone who is going any amount over the speed limit, so the officer should watch for the more egregious cases and those drivers who are showing signs of driving recklessly.
[END QUOTE http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... ]
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788 - 1860)