Rescue every industry the way we "rescued" GM and Chrysler?
The only ones dumber than this fool are the fools that will believe this speech.
President Obama: Hey, We ‘Rescued’ the Auto Industry, Why Not Every Industry?
Quietman ~PWCM~JLA
2012/08/09 22:05:59
Top Opinion
-
UGH...LIBS ~ PWCM ~ JLA ~ 2012/08/09 22:39:34Bad idea





















#MARXISTJERK!
Geithner treasury hacks off 20,000 non-union Delphi pensions
http://www.ijreview.com/2012/...
It is NOT the governments job or duty to rescue ANY company, to do so would be letting the government pick the winners and loser's, that is in a nut shell what communism does.
Reality check !!!! the USA is NOT a communist country !!!!
A company that makes a good product, operates with common sense, will succeed, the ones who don't won't...let the free market work...
You chose to ignore the bankruptcy laws we have to deal with this situation to buy union votes.
You screwed the GM shareholders and the Dealers and employees that lost their jobs.
You screwed the support suppliers like Delphi and thousands lost their jobs.
And GM is still not profitable.
Please forward my share certificates ASAP that you bought with my money.
Funny you should mention that. Freudian slip?
Europeans have long delighted in pointing out the perceived ignorance of Americans. There is often bewilderment on their part that such apparently stupid people can be so rich and powerful.
And of course, Obama has not disappointed in that department. "Polish death camps", "Austrian language".
We have plenty of out of work machinists, middle managers, and others to staff these things. We have plenty of resources for the raw materials. This time we can put a buy American clause in the law.
In the long run by having the government keep a share of each of these businesses we reduce taxes because the government will continue to receive dividends from the profits.
Basically all this is doing is applying standard business practice to the government. For the vast majority of employees it should be no different from working for a large corporation. Though possibly a good profit sharing program could be set up to encourage productivity.
This is part of marxist reformism; @ http://www.marxists.org/gloss...
"... Reformism is the current in the workers' movement which aims to bring about change, in particular to advance the interests of the oppressed people, without threatening the state and the vital class interests of the ruling class, but by the gradual accumulation of small changes. Trade and Labour unions are examples of reformist organisations in favor of improving the conditions of the working class without challenging the dominance of the capitalist system itself."
The only ones dumber than this fool are the fools that will believe this speech.