Quantcast

President Obama claims absolute power, acknowledges no Constitutional limitations on his "Executive Power" and he repeals the Welfare Reform Act by executive fiat!

Ken 2012/07/13 22:30:11
Remember the fight over the welfare reform act during

the Clinton administration?
Remember James Carville
and the other rabid libs calling the Republican-led congress
mean-spirited and saying they wanted to take the food out of babies'
mouths? Remember Bill Clinton twice vetoing the bill passed by a
Republican congress, before belatedly realizing that around 70% of
Americans favored it and signing it the third? Then, remember how
"Welfare Reform" suddenly became one of the signal accomplishments of
the Clinton/Gore administration, something that Al Gore actually claimed
credit for during the 2000 election campaign, because the Welfare
Reform Act was highly successful?

Well our imperious, imperial president, Barack Obama, has just

repealed the Welfare Reform Act through executive fiat!

http://blog.heritage.org/2012/07/12/obama-guts-welfare-reform/
Obama Guts Welfare Reform



Robert Rector and Kiki Bradley



July 12, 2012 at 4:10 pm




















Today, the Obama Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released an official policy directive rewriting the welfare reform law of 1996.
The new policy guts the federal work requirements that were the
foundation of the reform law. The Obama directive bludgeons the letter
and intent of the actual reform legislation.


Welfare Reform under Clinton


Welfare reform replaced the old Aid to Families with Dependent
Children with a new program, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families
(TANF). The underlying concept of welfare reform was that able-bodied
adults should be required to work or prepare for work as a condition of
receiving welfare aid.


The welfare reform law is often characterized as simply giving state
governments more flexibility in operating welfare programs. This is a
serious misunderstanding. While new law (the Personal Responsibility and
Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996) did grants states more
flexibility in some respects, the core of the act was the creation of
rigorous new federal work standards that state governments were required
to implement.


The welfare reform law was very successful.
In the four decades prior to welfare reform, the welfare caseload never
experienced a significant decline. But, in the four years after welfare
reform, the caseload dropped by nearly half. Employment surged and
child poverty among affected groups plummeted. The driving force behind
these improvements was the rigorous new federal work requirements
contained in the TANF law.


Obama’s Trick to Get Around Work Requirements


Today the Obama Administration issued a new directive stating that
the traditional TANF work requirements can be waived or overridden by a
legal device called the section 1115 waiver authority under the Social
Security law (42 U.S.C. 1315).


Section 1115 states that “the Secretary may waive compliance with any
of the requirements” of specified parts of various laws. But this is
not an open-ended authority: Any provision of law that can be waived
under section 1115 must be listed in section 1115 itself. The work
provisions of the TANF program are contained in section 407 (entitled,
appropriately, “mandatory work requirements”). Critically, this section,
as well as most other TANF requirements, are deliberately not listed in
section 1115; they are not waiveable.


In establishing TANF, Congress deliberately exempted or shielded
nearly all of the TANF program from the section 1115 waiver authority.
They did not want the law to be rewritten at the whim of Health and
Human Services (HHS) bureaucrats. Of the roughly 35 sections of the TANF
law, only one is listed as waiveable under section 1115. This is
section 402.


Section 402 describes state plans—reports that state governments must
file to HHS describing the actions they will undertake to comply with
the many requirements established in the other sections of the TANF law.
The authority to waive section 402 provides the option to waive state
reporting requirements only, not to overturn the core requirements of
the TANF program contained in the other sections of the TANF law.


The new Obama dictate asserts that because the work requirements,
established in section 407, are mentioned as an item that state
governments must report about in section 402, all the work requirements
can be waived. This removes the core of the TANF program; TANF becomes a
blank slate that HHS bureaucrats and liberal state bureaucrats can
rewrite at will.


Congressional Research Service: “There Are No TANF Waivers”


In a December 2001 document, “Welfare Reform Waivers and TANF,” the
non-partisan Congressional Research Service clarified that the limited
authority to waive state reporting requirement in section 402 does not
grant authority to override work and other major requirements in the
other sections of the TANF law (sections that were deliberately not
listed under the section 1115 waiver authority):


Technically, there is waiver authority for TANF state
plan requirement; however, [the] major TANF requirements are not in
state plans. Effectively, there are no TANF waivers.


Obviously, if the Congress had wanted HHS to be able to waive the
TANF work requirements laid out in section 407, it would have listed
that section as waiveable under section 1115. It did not do that.


Define “Work”…


In the past, state bureaucrats have attempted to define activities
such as hula dancing, attending Weight Watchers, and bed rest as “work.”
These dodges were blocked by the federal work standards. Now that the
Obama Administration has abolished those standards, we can expect “work”
in the TANF program to mean anything but work.


The new welfare dictate issued by the Obama Administration clearly
guts the law. The Administration tramples on the actual legislation
passed by Congress and seeks to impose its own policy choices—a pattern that has become all too common in this Administration.



The result is the end of welfare reform.

It
would seem that the constitutional limitations on the powers of the
President and the Executive Branch no longer apply to the Emperor in the
Oval Office!


"The fundamental article of my political creed is that despotism, or unlimited

sovereignty, or absolute power, is the same in a majority of a popular assembly,

an aristocratic council, an oligarchical junto, and a single emperor."
-- John Adams

, Letter to Thomas Jefferson [November 13, 1815]

You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • texasred ☆stillt... 2012/07/14 23:23:27
    texasred
    +3
    I'd like to see him lose his majority in the Senate and Obama kicked out this November. Even with control of both the House and the Senate, we would still have Holder to deal with if we don't get rid of Obama.
  • ☆stillt... texasred 2012/07/14 23:30:41
    ☆stillthe12c☆
    +3
    I have suggested the house bring him in and try him for obstruction of Congress, ignoring the President as he ignore them and the courts. Then send there investigator to get the information and threaten the President with treason for given authority to the UN over American citizens in a state of emergency. Too bad they will not do that.
  • texasred ☆stillt... 2012/07/14 23:37:24
    texasred
    +3
    That's not going to work. With the evil triad of Obama, Holder and Reid, it's pretty much impossible for the House to do anything.
  • ☆stillt... texasred 2012/07/14 23:43:30
    ☆stillthe12c☆
    +3
    About the only thing they can do is impeach them and that is meaningless with out the Senate to try them. But it may get them the information they want. But that is not going to happen.
  • texasred ☆stillt... 2012/07/14 23:44:21
    texasred
    +3
    They've laid their plans well.
  • ☆stillt... texasred 2012/07/14 23:59:44
    ☆stillthe12c☆
    +3
    Indeed they did!
  • sara ☆stillt... 2012/07/15 13:03:57
    sara
    +2
    These idiots need 1 yr terms & Pelosi needs to fly off on her broom. Bunch of incompetent crooks running the country.
  • Ken texasred 2012/07/15 00:55:03
    Ken
    +2
    I've always thought that it was a denial of equal protection to the voters from other states to have a single senator, elected from a single state (and a small one as far as population goes) to wield as much power as the Senate Leader wields, being able to refuse to bring bills out of committee for an up or down vote.
  • texasred Ken 2012/07/15 22:32:29
    texasred
    There is absolutely no way Reid should be able to keep bills from being voted on. I agree with you.
  • Matt ☆stillt... 2012/07/15 17:39:00 (edited)
    Matt
    +1
    That is the problem. Republicans and Democrats fuss and fight in front of the cameras, much like professional wrestlers.

    In reality, they are both pursuing the same globalist agenda by slightly different means. The next election will just bring more of the same.
    Romney more of the same
  • ☆stillt... Matt 2012/07/15 17:55:23
    ☆stillthe12c☆
    +1
    You have Identified the problem correctly. This is why we need to vote out as many incumbents as possible. Especially those that voted for the Patriot act and NDAA. We need people that will remove most of the EO's that Obama has written and remove the authority that was given to the UN over our country. We also need to remove our national Parks from co0ntroll of the UN.
  • Maj. C. D. Hardy 2012/07/14 04:06:09
    Maj. C. D. Hardy
    +5
    God help us all if this bastard is reelected!!!!! He has no respect for our country it's laws or our constitution.
  • sglmom 2012/07/14 03:59:19
    sglmom
    +4
    So ..
    he makes it eminently clear ..
    that there's a SELECTIVITY involved in the Government's ADMINISTRATION picking and choosing WHICH laws to enforce .. which to IGNORE .. which to disobey ..

    Tell me again why his Behind is .. charged .. facing prosecution and why he and his entire staff of enablers are not in Chains and processed into their cells?

    (because, if it was any Citizen .. including me .. I'd be in a Cell at this time with no chance of ever seeing the light of day .. )
  • Georgia50 2012/07/14 03:43:27
    Georgia50
    +5
    All Hail! Queen Obama!
    quebama
  • mac9 2012/07/14 03:19:49
    mac9
    +5
    He fears not getting re elected so he is screwing with so many things that the new president will have to fix. He is a disgusting moron.
  • gary 2012/07/14 03:13:33
  • Silvershadows 2012/07/14 02:21:52
    Silvershadows
    +7
    He's doing exactly what he planned to do. Lie, confuse and promise everything. Overload the system, it falls, riots, etc. Under the HealthCare Bill he can create his own private defense corps as well armed as the Army (which he's going to cut back to 1940 levels, or further)-----this his Brown Shirts and Gestapo can begin enforcing the "needed" changes to make this a better country!!!! Gonna be interesting----not fun, interesting. He may be treated like Mussolini (heard that one at a restaurant!!). The fools that support him, idiot, non-thinking students, all those who want something for nothing will reap the whirlwind.
  • Vision of Verve 2012/07/14 02:11:22
  • tommyg - POTL- PWCM-JLA 2012/07/14 02:01:39
    tommyg - POTL- PWCM-JLA
    +6
    What Obama wants, Obama gets.

    Time to close the door on this mistake my friends.
  • Arizona1950 2012/07/14 01:34:37
  • KCurtis 2012/07/14 01:32:16
    KCurtis
    +7
    Obama is a Dick Tator.
  • jeane 2012/07/14 01:15:40
    jeane
    +6
    duh bro gotta go
    duh bro gotta go
  • Ken jeane 2012/07/14 02:31:16
    Ken
    +5
    I love this guy - have you seen the videos he has done. I wish I could think of his name, do you know what it is?.
  • jeane Ken 2012/07/14 02:59:53
    jeane
    +4
    I forgot - when I come across it I will let you know though.
  • Ken jeane 2012/07/14 04:37:29
    Ken
    +3
    Bikicat just gave me the name below - it's Zo, and Zonation on YouTube.
  • jeane Ken 2012/07/14 17:11:10
    jeane
    +2
    Good thank you -HE IS GREAT!
  • Biki Ken 2012/07/14 04:13:25
    Biki
    +4
    Try searching for ZO or Zonation on youtube Ken. That is him. He has a hysterical song about people being thrown under 0bama's bus. Search Under My Bus. It's a rolling stones song.
  • jeane Biki 2012/07/14 17:12:37
    jeane
    +2
    Thank you BRO! I will bookmark him.
  • Kane Fernau 2012/07/14 01:10:08
    Kane Fernau
    +5
    Dependents vote for more freebies.
  • GUAPO 2012/07/14 01:05:00
  • sammanilla 2012/07/14 01:04:06
  • tff~PWCM~JLA 2012/07/14 00:59:51
    tff~PWCM~JLA
    +8
    Adolf Obama is losing in the polls so he is using this stunt to try and force the republicans in congress to vote to stop his rule by decree. Under the constitution the congress has (I think) approx. 30 days to vote to repeal a presidential decree or it goes into law. Adolf thinks he will pick up poor voters from those hard hearted republicans. It's another stunt just like the fictional war on women that back fired on the dems.
  • lark 2012/07/14 00:38:53
    lark
    +7
    He is such the dick tator and like one he wants the American people enslaved. Dependent on the government for everything.
  • No nonsense NanC...don't BS... 2012/07/14 00:30:06
    No nonsense NanC...don't BS me!
    +4
    Wonder how WJC will feel about that.
  • Icono1 2012/07/13 23:50:08
    Icono1
    +6
    More Cloward Piven.
  • Ken Icono1 2012/07/13 23:53:55
    Ken
    +6
    You've got that right! Also, purchasing more votes with the taxpayers' money!
  • Red Branch 2012/07/13 23:45:14
    Red Branch
    +6
    I still thought it went by the wayside in late Jan 2009 as part of the Stimulus Bill.

    I have no idea where I read that.
  • Prairie Wind 2012/07/13 23:43:25
  • teigan 2012/07/13 23:38:04
    teigan
    +8
    Can't have welfare laws that get in Obama's way to overload the welfare system. You had to know it was coming. Time limits and work requirements would hinder his ability to overload it quickly enough..

    Can't wait til Romney becomes President, liberals have given future Presidents the ability to over turn laws they don't like by not reigning in their Idiot in Chief. Now they can't rage about Romney doing the same with Obama's healthcare.
  • Ken teigan 2012/07/13 23:41:26 (edited)
    Ken
    +8
    Great point, but I'm not sure if Romney would want to exercise unrestrained authority - he just has to undo the damage the Emperor Obama in doing with his executive fiats.

News & Politics

2013/06/19 12:47:06

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals