Please Rave This; If you have total DISDAIN for those in the LSM and their lib followers that will sell out America without any remorse for the future of most giving Country on earth.
Scalded Eagle
2012/09/30 22:16:53
Top Opinion
-
+21Disdain is not even the word for it....I ABHOR LSM...they would sell their own mothers for their agenda!
What I am able to see now scares me.
1st Amendment to the US Constitution: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
The Liberal media are fully within their right to present their version of the news as they see fit. Does it make it morally and ethically right? Hell no!
I recently went to one of the major online editorial sites, Huffington Post. After comparing favorable and unfavorable editorials for both of the major presidential candidates this year, I was both saddened and angered to see all positive opinions of Obama and all negative opinions of Romney. To make things worse, all comments are moderated, which lead me to wonder what kind of user responses were passing their checkpoint... Of the few comments from conservatives that I was able to find, many of them were simple ...
What I am able to see now scares me.
1st Amendment to the US Constitution: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
The Liberal media are fully within their right to present their version of the news as they see fit. Does it make it morally and ethically right? Hell no!
I recently went to one of the major online editorial sites, Huffington Post. After comparing favorable and unfavorable editorials for both of the major presidential candidates this year, I was both saddened and angered to see all positive opinions of Obama and all negative opinions of Romney. To make things worse, all comments are moderated, which lead me to wonder what kind of user responses were passing their checkpoint... Of the few comments from conservatives that I was able to find, many of them were simple angry attacks that could be easily made fun of by anyone indoctrinated into the biased Liberal mindset. I was unable to find an intelligent Conservative point of view so I added my own two cents. After about an hour of waiting my response made it through intact, but I am fairly certain that it will not be paid much attention to. While I cannot say for certain that freedom of speech is being impeded over at Huffington Post, it is painfully obvious that their users are only being fed one side of the story and thus do not have a complete picture of both candidates. I wonder just how many of their users only get their political information from this website and how many of those people will be voting for Obama.
In light of this, Liberal Media can be quite an effective and dangerous tool for manipulating the public opinion and influencing the popular and electoral vote.
I do not like where I see our country headed.
"Censorship directed at political opposition to the ruling government is common in authoritarian and repressive regimes."
Will it eventually come down to this? I sure as hell hope not.
I can honestly say that I fall somewhere between Libertarian and Republican in my political views and I am proud to say that I arrived there upon my own accord.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?...
http://www.flexyourrights.org/
Armani suit: $850
90 minute a** -whipping.....PRICELESS!
http://www.pensitoreview.com/...
Sorry, but the US is 19th in the world in Official Development Assistance by country as a percentage of Gross National Income, at 0.21%. Sweden on the other hand gives 1.12% in Official Development Assistance of their gross national income.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
BTW, the future for the United States is bright and positive. Our GDP is more than twice that of the second most productive country, China.
The only reason why businesses have been leaving this country is because they get tax breaks for sending jobs overseas, and they can reinvest profits overseas and not have to pay taxes on them.
Back in July, the Democrats introduced a bill called the Bring Jobs Home Act, sponsored by Sen. Debbie Stabenow (S.3364) that would have given a tax credit for up to 20% of insourcing expenses incurred for eliminating a business located outside the United States and relocating it within the United States, and it would have repealed the tax law that gave a deduction for outsourcing expenses incurred in relocating a U.S. business outside the United States. Of course, the Republicans in the Senate filibustered the bill, and it fell four votes short to invoke cloture not allowing it to go to debate and to a vote on the Senate floor.
Here’s how the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation described it:
“Under present law, there are no specific tax credits or disallowances of deductions solely for locating jobs in the United States or overseas. Deductions generally are allowed for all ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred by the taxpayer during the taxable year in carrying on any trade or business, which includes the relocation of business units.”
The JCT estimated that ending the deduction for moving operations overseas would raise just $168 million over a decade.
In the federal government with an annual budget deficit of more than $1 trillion, that’s what you call a rounding error.
Here is the "Bring Jobs Home Act" that was killed by Republicans in the Senate in July. Please note what the bill does in the summary:
"Bring Jobs Home Act - Amends the Internal Revenue Code to:
(1) grant business taxpayers a tax credit for up to 20% of insourcing expenses incurred for eliminating a business located outside the United States and relocating it within the United States, and
(2) deny a tax deduction for outsourcing expenses incurred in relocating a U.S. business outside the United States. Requires an increase in the taxpayer's employment of full-time employees in the United States in order to claim the tax credit for insourcing expenses."
http://www.govtrack.us/congre...
I could take the time and find the changes to the internal revenue code that provides a tax deduction for outsourcing expenses, and I will if you provide the link to the fact checker that claims there are no deductions for outsourcing expenses incurred in relocating a U.S. business outside the United States.
The bill you reference would give a 1 time incentive for businesses to relocate back to the US by paying 1/5th of the cost to move back. The business would be rewarded with returning to an overburdensom regulatory environment which they were likely fleeing to begin with, higher tax rates at all levels which they were likely fleeing to begin with, and a future that almost certainly will amount to more regulation and taxation with the current clan in power. All this for whopping incentive of "hey, you only have to pay 80% of your costs to move back". Gee thanks! In addition, the "tax break" you refer to for sending jobs overseas is not a break at all. Its simply an accounting for expenses a business has whether those expenses are overseas or here. businesses pay taxes on their net incom...
The bill you reference would give a 1 time incentive for businesses to relocate back to the US by paying 1/5th of the cost to move back. The business would be rewarded with returning to an overburdensom regulatory environment which they were likely fleeing to begin with, higher tax rates at all levels which they were likely fleeing to begin with, and a future that almost certainly will amount to more regulation and taxation with the current clan in power. All this for whopping incentive of "hey, you only have to pay 80% of your costs to move back". Gee thanks! In addition, the "tax break" you refer to for sending jobs overseas is not a break at all. Its simply an accounting for expenses a business has whether those expenses are overseas or here. businesses pay taxes on their net income, it only makes sense. Reversing that would be telling businesses that they have to pay a higher rate of taxes for doing business overseas, a penalty if you will. Yes, the spin on the left is clever, it always has been but the characterization of things like this is rediculous.
Lastly, tthe idea that raising taxes is raising revenue id FALSE! Unless your economy is roaring and you are raising rates ever so slightly as to not affect economic activiity, raisning taxes will always serve toreduce revenue over the long haul. The absolute best way right now to spark economic activity here and now when rates are already 0, and the Fed is already printing money by the trillions to pump into the economy, Is to be the most attractive place in the world to do business! You do not make this country more attractive by raising any type of tax right now. The budget can absolutely be balanced without any tax increases! If Growth gets to 8% per year, and unemployment back down to the 4's, the revenue generated to the Gov. will DWARF any tax increase you can come up with.
http://www.politifact.com/tru...