Quantcast

Planned Parenthood: 38.4% of its income comes from abortions! Meaning that if you deduct all income it receives from government funding, almost all of it is derived from the gruesome abortion business! Should taxpayers be forced to fund it?

tncdel 2011/09/21 07:45:35

SLIDESHOW: Abortion doctor's confession.

1 of 1

Planned Parenthood: 38.4% of its income comes from abortions! Meaning that if you deduct all income it receives from government funding, almost all of it is derived from the gruesome abortion business! Should taxpayers be forced to fund it?
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • teaputts 2011/09/22 01:23:29
    YES, taxpayers should be forced to pay for medically unnecessary abortions [e...
    teaputts
    +3
    We must at all costs continue to carry out Wilson, Sanger, and the rest of the progressives' agenda to "exterminate the human weeds" and the "inferior Negro race" and the rest of the "inferiors".

    Kill as many as we can.

    I hope you all realize I am being sardonic. This was always the stated intent of planned parenthood. It was founded and planned to be a branch of the eugenic cleansing for the Progs. About damned time we call them out for their vile evilness.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Todd *RP 2012* 2011/09/25 03:04:10
    NO, it is unconstitutional to force taxpayers to foot the bill for abortions ...
    Todd *RP 2012*
    +1
    eugenics is still eugenics, regardless of the fancy clothes.
  • jumpboots 187th PIR 2011/09/24 04:38:44
    NO, it is unconstitutional to force taxpayers to foot the bill for abortions ...
    jumpboots 187th PIR
    IT's MURDER.
  • Chukroast 2011/09/23 06:20:21
    NO, it is unconstitutional to force taxpayers to foot the bill for abortions ...
    Chukroast
    Because it denies the growing baby the basic liberties guaranteed by the constitution:
    Life,
    Liberty, and
    the Pursuit of Happiness
  • dlsofsetx 2011/09/22 18:41:06
    NO, it is unconstitutional to force taxpayers to foot the bill for abortions ...
    dlsofsetx
    We don't need to use our taxes to murder innocent babies.Ironic how those who are so pro-abortion are always worrying about whales,seals,or spotted owls,& cry crocodile tears when some vicious murderer is put to death.
  • CMackley ~POTL~PWCM~JLA 2011/09/22 18:39:03
    NO, it is unconstitutional to force taxpayers to foot the bill for abortions ...
    CMackley ~POTL~PWCM~JLA
    +1
    Google Margeret Sanger / founder of Planned Parenthood. Evil personified.
  • Michael 2011/09/22 14:06:32
    NO, it is unconstitutional to force taxpayers to foot the bill for abortions ...
    Michael
    Very disturbing video.Why do I have to pay for the consequences of other peoples irresponsible actions.
  • TheTailor 2011/09/22 13:57:05
    NO, it is unconstitutional to force taxpayers to foot the bill for abortions ...
    TheTailor
    +1
    Screw Planned Parenthood, they promote abortion as birth control so sick perv leftists can screw young women without taking the responsibility of raising a child.
  • DS in Oak Ridge NC 2011/09/22 13:09:48 (edited)
    YES, taxpayers should be forced to pay for medically unnecessary abortions [e...
    DS in Oak Ridge NC
    Reducing the rampant spread of Liberalism and growth in mindless voters for failed DNC policies may be worth whatever it takes, including funding PP. Hold your noses avert your eyes. There may be a silver lining to this horrid practice and unlawful funding source.
  • Mike 2011/09/22 12:33:54
    NO, it is unconstitutional to force taxpayers to foot the bill for abortions ...
    Mike
    Should be surprised it's a libatard organization
  • Torchmanner ~PWCM~JLA 2011/09/22 11:49:38
    NO, it is unconstitutional to force taxpayers to foot the bill for abortions ...
    Torchmanner ~PWCM~JLA
    Right to LIFE.
  • TedStevens 2011/09/22 07:47:30
    NO, it is unconstitutional to force taxpayers to foot the bill for abortions ...
    TedStevens
    +2
    Don't people know what happens when they have sex anymore...I mean, I know that people are getting dumber and dumber every year, but seriously? If you can't afford or don't want a baby, then stop f***ing!

    I understand special circumstances, but most people need to learn self control.
  • Kathy 2011/09/22 07:15:08
    NO, it is unconstitutional to force taxpayers to foot the bill for abortions ...
    Kathy
    +2
    Tax payers pay for all the corrupt programs designed to destroy our childrnen and our families.
    Sex is being used to destroy the foundation of humainity

    http://www.massresistance.org
    http://www.drjudithrieisman.o...
    http://www.silentscream.org
    http://www.cdc.gov/hiv

    In days gone by parents reared their children into healthy and sane adults
    In this age of deception and corruption emotions are the only thing permitted
    to win out, the trouble lies with the lack of responsible parenting and judgement
    If a child comes out as homosexual the parent says? I would be PROUD of you
    NO MATTER What? Just lilke Casey Anthony's Mother whom said Casey was
    an awesome mother? We are really emotionally bankrupt as a humanity.
  • JoeM 2011/09/22 06:53:39
    NO, it is unconstitutional to force taxpayers to foot the bill for abortions ...
    JoeM
    +1
    Like Jen said, we have no responsibility to pay for anyone's "rights".
  • JenSemPa 2011/09/22 05:10:11
    NO, it is unconstitutional to force taxpayers to foot the bill for abortions ...
    JenSemPa
    +2
    Someone once told me that since legalized baby-killing is a "constitutional right," government funds should help pay for it.

    Well, under that "logic," government funds should also go to newspapers in order to promote freedom of the press. Government funds should also subsidizes churches, synagogues, and mosques in order to preserve freedom of religion. And so on.

    Even for things that actually ARE in the Constitution, the public doesn't have to foot the bill for them. So why does legalized baby-killing get the special treatment?
  • JoeM JenSemPa 2011/09/22 06:52:07
    JoeM
    +1
    I love your logic. great argument.
  • NO, it is unconstitutional to force taxpayers to foot the bill for abortions ...
    υяsυℓα  vεηgεαηcε ►нαя∂ cσяε sтяαιgнт ε∂gε◄
    While I don't necessarily believe abortions are moral, I don't think Planned Parenthood is evil. People put a lot of emphasis on abortions, but it's not like PP is a straight up baby slaughterhouse. They also provide ontraceptives (birth control); emergency contraception; screening for breast, cervical and testicular cancers; pregnancy testing and pregnancy options counseling; testing and treatment for sexually transmitted diseases; comprehensive sexuality education, and menopause treatments; all of which can be extremely helpful.

    Planned Parenthood also provides abortion as one of its services. But the people that truly do wrong are the ones who accept it.
  • Kathy υяsυℓα ... 2011/09/22 07:21:46
    Kathy
    +1
    The road to hell was paved with Good Intentions!
  • υяsυℓα ... Kathy 2011/09/23 00:43:16
    υяsυℓα  vεηgεαηcε ►нαя∂ cσяε sтяαιgнт ε∂gε◄
    So just one thing overrides all the good? If you don't agree or want an abortion; then don't get one. I for one would never consent to an abortion, but I would still go to PP if I were in need of their other services.
  • CMackle... υяsυℓα ... 2011/09/22 18:37:14
    CMackley ~POTL~PWCM~JLA
    Planned Parenthood was founded by Margeret Sanger who believed abortion was the answer to getting rid of the "undesirables" and the "unfit". She was also the founder of Eugenics. She was also straight-up evil.
  • υяsυℓα ... CMackle... 2011/09/23 00:40:53
    υяsυℓα  vεηgεαηcε ►нαя∂ cσяε sтяαιgнт ε∂gε◄
    She was evil. However, the article did say abortions are only 38% (which isn't even close to being the majority) of what PP does, so the rest is basic health care. Would you say that's evil?

    And like I said in the original comment, just because there is an option for abortions doesn't mean that option has to be taken. Therefore, the fault and the real evil you hate so much lies in those who consent to the operation.
  • CMackle... υяsυℓα ... 2011/09/23 17:23:48
    CMackley ~POTL~PWCM~JLA
    Nice try. The 'basic health care' you mention is just a cover for the abortions.
  • υяsυℓα ... CMackle... 2011/09/24 03:44:43
    υяsυℓα  vεηgεαηcε ►нαя∂ cσяε sтяαιgнт ε∂gε◄
    Yeah, cuz naturally a man who goes to PP for a vasectomy is actually in dire need of an abortion.
  • jay 2011/09/22 01:32:42
    NO, it is unconstitutional to force taxpayers to foot the bill for abortions ...
    jay
    These guys are so stupid. I am sure more future liberal voters are aborted than conservative ones.

    head this joke, what do you cal a typical woman ( demographically) who has more than three abortions? Crime fighter.
  • Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆ 2011/09/22 01:31:17
    NO, it is unconstitutional to force taxpayers to foot the bill for abortions ...
    Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆
    +2
    It is beyond the reach of Congress' enumerated powers to lay and collect taxes to pay for abortions. That does not provide for the general (i.e. federal) welfare or the common defense. Nor has Congress the power to establish abortuaries.
  • teaputts 2011/09/22 01:23:29
    YES, taxpayers should be forced to pay for medically unnecessary abortions [e...
    teaputts
    +3
    We must at all costs continue to carry out Wilson, Sanger, and the rest of the progressives' agenda to "exterminate the human weeds" and the "inferior Negro race" and the rest of the "inferiors".

    Kill as many as we can.

    I hope you all realize I am being sardonic. This was always the stated intent of planned parenthood. It was founded and planned to be a branch of the eugenic cleansing for the Progs. About damned time we call them out for their vile evilness.
  • cheshirewayne 2011/09/22 01:22:46
    NO, it is unconstitutional to force taxpayers to foot the bill for abortions ...
    cheshirewayne
    +2
    There is big money in America's death industry. Before Roe v Wade, abortion was on a state by state basis. But because a brat who didn't want to ride a bus 200 miles, it is now a "right" forced on every state. Death on demand.
  • Stan Kapusta 2011/09/21 20:19:30
    NO, it is unconstitutional to force taxpayers to foot the bill for abortions ...
    Stan Kapusta
    It is a women's choice to do something like that. I should not have to finance it.
  • moonchild 2011/09/21 17:07:12
    YES, taxpayers should be forced to pay for medically unnecessary abortions [e...
    moonchild
    +2
    First of all- neither of the answers provided are appropriate..

    Second of all- tax dollars don't fund abortions.

    Third- if I have to sit back and watch MY taxes subsidize corporate jets and corporate welfare, you bet your ass tax dollars better subsidize family planning clinics that prevent and treat STDs, cervical cancer, and provide birth control and education to under-served populations.

    You want to keep those abortions from happening, you keep unwanted pregnancies from happening. Planned Parenthood prevents a hell of a lot more pregnancies than it terminates.
  • MadAsHEck moonchild 2011/09/22 00:12:16 (edited)
    MadAsHEck
    +4
    You do some research, and you will find that every service performed by PP is available from other sources. Many are non profit, and others are government funded.

    But PP sure wouldn't want those facts out in the open.

    I disagree with Ron Paul on a lot of his ideas, but this is one I totally think he has the right slant on.
  • chaoski... MadAsHEck 2011/09/22 01:35:21
    chaoskitty123
    +2
    Research Margaret Sanger and see what the founder of Planned Parenthood believed as she wanted to eliminate the undesirables no different than Hitler except that she didn't believe in killing them after they were born... she believed in convincing them to have abortions as a kinder way to eliminate them. She also believed in convincing poor white women to have abortions because she viewed them as mentally ill to explain their poverty and so didn't think they should have children because they bred like cockroaches. Anyone deemed mentally ill by the state, she supported sterilizing them which Liberals supported even into the 1970's... ironically, those Hitler didn't kill he ordered sterilized and anyone he considered impure might also be sterilized.

    In fact, without even realizing it, moonchild is part of the white supremist movement as they controlled groups like Planned Parenthood for most of it's existence and by continuing their policies... they still are as a white supremist isn't defined by the color of their skin, they are defined by their beliefs and even Sanger believed life began at conception just to give you an idea how times changed.

    But get this... Sanger didn't support abortion as a whole as she did believe in contraceptives and birth control. However, in her time ...











    Research Margaret Sanger and see what the founder of Planned Parenthood believed as she wanted to eliminate the undesirables no different than Hitler except that she didn't believe in killing them after they were born... she believed in convincing them to have abortions as a kinder way to eliminate them. She also believed in convincing poor white women to have abortions because she viewed them as mentally ill to explain their poverty and so didn't think they should have children because they bred like cockroaches. Anyone deemed mentally ill by the state, she supported sterilizing them which Liberals supported even into the 1970's... ironically, those Hitler didn't kill he ordered sterilized and anyone he considered impure might also be sterilized.

    In fact, without even realizing it, moonchild is part of the white supremist movement as they controlled groups like Planned Parenthood for most of it's existence and by continuing their policies... they still are as a white supremist isn't defined by the color of their skin, they are defined by their beliefs and even Sanger believed life began at conception just to give you an idea how times changed.

    But get this... Sanger didn't support abortion as a whole as she did believe in contraceptives and birth control. However, in her time women honestly didn't know about birth control of any type... today with the internet, it's highly unlikely most 13 year old girls don't know about birth control. The vast majority of women who have abortions know about birth control, contraceptives and the day after pill... they just chose not to use them.

    These claims that Planned Parenthood teaches about birth control and so forth... all BS because they stopped being important with the advent of the internet and the real question is just how racist are they when black women have twice the number of abortions as white women and mestizo Hispanics now are almost one to one with white women... and the white women, they're poor people who must be mentally ill and are breeding like cockroaches at least according to Sanger.

    And for everything Pro Choicers say... isn't it ironic her own words convict Sanger of being one of the most vile forms of racists little different than Hitler himself in her views on racial purity, sterilization and termination except she thought it more humane to convince undesirables to abort their unborn rather than killing them after they were born.

    You mentioned Ron Paul... Ron is a proven intellectual and the only things you disagree with him on are his Libertarian views which is true of almost all rightwingers. However, his Fiscal Conservative and Constitutionist views I bet you have more in common with. I recently laid it all out pointing to Republicans how Rick Perrys a complete fraud if they would take the time to do just five minutes research to figure it out as almost 90% of what he claims he shares in common with Republicans are all lies. Mitt Romney is almost completely leftwing on most of the issues and for as bad as Republicans want to remove Obama... you choose Perry or Romney and you've just given Obama 4 more years.

    Now why did I say that? Because people like moonchild are totally blind to the truth but you can tell by her response that this got to her... she'll never admit it but when you check this guy out and see that he's telling the truth about being one of the most important people in the Pro Choice movement's history, it's hard not to listen to him. But I wanted to illustrate how you guys got your asses kicked in 2008 and you're going to repeat that in 2012 if you don't stop blindly supporting people running to represent your party in 2012 just because of what they say or how they look. Ron paul may say things you don't like but there is no question he's telling you the truth as he sees it out of honesty. The more radical things he says will never win support and when he recently blamed America for 9/11... it was before a Tea Party audience who booed him which ironically if it weren't for Ron Paul, they wouldn't even exist although they have never supported him... although they support his son wholeheartedly and his beliefs are the same as his fathers lol.

    With Ron Paul, you know what you're getting whether you like him or not but if you elect Romney with his four years total of political experience (he has less political experience than Obama, caves left and can't beat Obama on any issue because his records worse than Obama's) or Mr Bilderberger Rick Perry whose entire political career tells you he's only a bad parody of a Republican representing the worst things Liberals say about Republicans as an absolute truth rather than political accusations.

    Now, you told moonchild to do some research... I'm telling you to do the same not to be a smartass, but because you said you agree with Ron Paul on this and I guarantee that if you closely examine Rick Perry and Mitt Romney thinking you want either to beat Obama in 2012... you have got one hell of a rude awakening coming as between the top three Republicans, Ron's the only one that has a legitimate record and his record is far more rightwing than either Perry or Romney.
    (more)
  • MadAsHEck chaoski... 2011/09/22 02:17:14 (edited)
    MadAsHEck
    +2
    I have researched Margaret Sanger, and long before this thread. Her association with the KKK etc.

    And I have said that I agree with Ron Paul on this stance. Not even indicating that I am ready for , and have even considered who I will consider in the Primaries.

    You seem to be looking for an argument where I won't go at this time. 15 months to Election, and a lot to digest before making a final decision.

    That Bilderberg argument is BS.

    It consists of a number of wealthy folks that want to get together and have meetings without the press using their every word to create controversy. And a lot of it is perpetrated by those that are not Invited to their conferences. Like Obama and many of the Democrat and Republican Elite. They make no policy, take no votes, and have little control of events. A real conspiracy theory.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    Like the Knights Templar, and their still guarding the Holy GRail is some secret location controlled by the Catholic Church.. Or the Skull and Bones thing in the eastern colleges. Much ado about nothing.
  • chaoski... moonchild 2011/09/22 00:50:12
    chaoskitty123
    +3
    Is that why black women have twice as many abortions as white women? Is that why poor white women have more abortions statistically than middle or upper class white women? Is that why mestizo Hispanic women now almost match white women one to one where abortions are concerned?

    Or is it because the founder of Planned Parenthood was Margaret Sanger, an avowed racist who believed that rather than killing undesirables after they were born as Hitler did that it was kinder to convince them to terminate their pregnancies in the womb instead... and let's not forget she was a wealthy elitist who felt that poor women shouldn't even have children because they were breeding like cockroaches or that women who became pregnant who didn't wish to be were dimwitted morons.

    Yet through it all, for as bad as she was, she believed human life began at conception.

    And moonchild...women aren't so ignorant that they don't know about birth control so you haven't got a clue what you are talking about.

    They know about condoms.

    They know about birth control.

    They know about the day after pill.

    And they choose not to use any of them. This is the age of the internet and they don't need Planned Parenthood to teach them how to use these things.

    So moonchild... how long have you been part of this white supremist gr...







    Is that why black women have twice as many abortions as white women? Is that why poor white women have more abortions statistically than middle or upper class white women? Is that why mestizo Hispanic women now almost match white women one to one where abortions are concerned?

    Or is it because the founder of Planned Parenthood was Margaret Sanger, an avowed racist who believed that rather than killing undesirables after they were born as Hitler did that it was kinder to convince them to terminate their pregnancies in the womb instead... and let's not forget she was a wealthy elitist who felt that poor women shouldn't even have children because they were breeding like cockroaches or that women who became pregnant who didn't wish to be were dimwitted morons.

    Yet through it all, for as bad as she was, she believed human life began at conception.

    And moonchild...women aren't so ignorant that they don't know about birth control so you haven't got a clue what you are talking about.

    They know about condoms.

    They know about birth control.

    They know about the day after pill.

    And they choose not to use any of them. This is the age of the internet and they don't need Planned Parenthood to teach them how to use these things.

    So moonchild... how long have you been part of this white supremist group that believes minority women should be convinced to have abortions and that poor white women are inferior so they shouldn't be allowed to reproduce?

    You do know that Sanger also believed in sterilizing the mentally ill as well right?

    And guess what moonchild... the charter Planned Parenthood uses was created by Margaret Sanger and of course you don't care that the reason Planned Parenthood targets poor communities isn't because she felt sorry for them or believed they needed help... she wanted to exterminate them as that's what you do to cockroaches isn't it.

    You'll never see it for the same reason the Germans claimed they didn't see what Hitler was doing... because you don't want to.

    Am I equating you with a Nazi... I am equating your attitude and ignorance to people who supported them.
    (more)
  • moonchild chaoski... 2011/09/22 01:42:57 (edited)
  • MadAsHEck moonchild 2011/09/22 02:24:25
    MadAsHEck
    +2
    If you were to do Research, you would find that anything PP provides is available under many other programs.You are from Texas. This is from just a 5 minute search.

    http://www.dshs.state.tx.us/f...
    http://whfpt.org/
    http://www.dshs.state.tx.us/f...
    http://www.americanindependen...

    With presidential hopeful Texas Gov. Rick Perry’s blessing, as of this month, Texas women’s health clinics and hospitals that provide medical and reproductive health services to low-income, uninsured women across the state have collectively lost approximately $74 million in state funding. Meanwhile, a state network of crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs), whose predominant function is to counsel women against abortions, has been allocated even more money in the latest state budget.

    Any more critisism of my knowledge?
  • moonchild MadAsHEck 2011/09/22 16:24:40
    moonchild
    How many of those services offer the option of abortion for those who choose to go that route?
  • CMackle... moonchild 2011/09/22 18:43:49
    CMackley ~POTL~PWCM~JLA
    Stop spinning. You'll give yourself a cerebral aneurysm.
  • moonchild CMackle... 2011/09/22 18:56:35
    moonchild
    Spinning what, exactly?
  • CMackle... moonchild 2011/09/22 19:03:45
    CMackley ~POTL~PWCM~JLA
    OK. Deflecting.
  • moonchild CMackle... 2011/09/22 19:07:20
    moonchild
    Deflecting what?

    In this country women have the right to choose. I'm not spinning or deflecting anything.. I'm saying exactly what I believe.
  • CMackle... moonchild 2011/09/22 19:15:22
    CMackley ~POTL~PWCM~JLA
    +1
    In this country the taxpayers have the right to choose who gets said tax monies. Disguising murder behind medical precedures easily obtained elsewhere is both spin and deflection of the truth.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/22 09:14:42

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals