Pictures Prove Mini Nukes Caused 9-11 Devastation
|
|
|||||
|
7 votes
|
|
78% | |||
|
2 votes
|
|
22% | |||
Pictures Prove Mini Nukes Caused 9-11 Devastation
Posted on Pakalert on September 18, 2010 // 16 Comments
There are only two events known to cause ground-hugging pyroclastic flows (pictured above).
-
A volcanic eruption
-
A thermo nuclear detonation
by “Dennis”
All research provided by:
www.drjudywood.com and http://911u.org/
On the morning of September 11th, 2001, we were told a fairy tale. That wide body jets flew into the twin towers and completely destroyed them. Let me repeat that: Passenger planes (large hollow aluminum tubes) flew into industrial steel, marble and concrete sky scrapers, and caused them to turn into a pile of dust. And the worst part about this fairy tale is that we, the American people believed it. Now, nine years later, it’s time to wake up from your slumber and take a good hard look at what did and did not happen on that fateful day. The conventional explanation we were provided, by government and media, for a top-down highly destructive gravitational collapse, in near-free-fall times, is physically impossible, and is thus about as worthy of discussion as is the belief that the Earth is flat.
FICTION: Passenger jets flew into the Twin Towers, and the burning jet fuel caused them to collapse.
FACT: The Twin Towers did not collapse. They suffered a mid-air pulverization due to an extreme unconventional energy source that caused the initial upward trajectory of so much of the towers’ mass during the ‘collapses’ as (supposedly only) gravity was pulling them down.
FICTION: The burning jet fuel melted all of the steel beams causing the buildings to collapse directly onto their own footprint.
FACT: 80% of each of the towers 50 million ton mass NEVER hit the ground. The steel did not melt, but turned into nano-dust. Pulverization + Molecular Dissociation = Ground Zero Evidence. When matter is elevated to temperatures hotter than the surface of the Sun, molecular dissociation results. Molecular Dissociation (MD) is easy to understand once we realize that there are four (4) states of matter: solid, liquid, gas, and plasma. Just as ice has trouble surviving in water or steam, molecules have trouble surviving in plasma, which is highly energetic (ie, extremely hot). When molecules dissociate, they leave behind loose atoms and fragments of molecules. In other words, extremely small particles. In this sense, it is correct to think of molecular dissociation as disintegration.
What do these two pictures have in common? They both represent a highly unconventional destructive release of energy, with temperatures much hotter than the sun.
So once we confirm evidence of widespread molecular dissociation having occurred at Ground Zero in New York City, we have a very strong indication that only exotic, unconventional weaponry could have released that much extremely — unimaginably — high intensity energy which suddenly appeared just as the towers disintegrated from top to bottom. This understanding means we cannot blame the highly unconventional Ground Zero devastation on thermite/thermate/super thermate and “controlled demolition” any more than we can blame it on “jet fuel” or “box cutters”.
In a “pancake collapse” the rubble pile should be at least 1/8 of the original building height (12.5%). The actual rubble pile was no more than 2% of the original building height. Both towers went “poof.”
So where did these 110 story tall 50 million ton sky scrapers go?
They were turned into nano-dust and 80% of the “dust” floated off into the atmosphere.
From left to right: A huge steel beam from the south tower falters, turns to “dust” and blows away.
Now that we’ve scientifically proven that only exotic, unconventional weaponry could have released that much extremely — unimaginably — high intensity energy to cause the pulverization and molecular dissociation of these buildings, let’s look at some of the other unexplainable anomalies..
1400 VEHICLES melted NEAR WTC
All of these cars have unexplainable similar damage: Paint gone, instant rusting, and all of their door handles and engine blocks are missing!
A squad car on FDR drive with wilted doors, burned paint, instant rust and no door handles or engine block.
Strange fires appear to be attracted to the engine blocks, while the gas tanks and nearby paper are not affected.
Buildings a few blocks away,had mysterious holes in the windows, and the front marble façade is completely gone, but no other damage.
Why doesn’t the paper burn?
For months we witnessed trucks coming and going from Ground Zero and the media told us they were hauling away the steel. What steel? There was very little steel left in the rubble because it had been pulverized into nano-dust. So what were these trucks really hauling back and forth? Dirt! They hauled in dirt, spread it all over Ground Zero, then scooped it up and hauled it away, and this went on for years. Didn’t they do that at Chernobyl? Yes they did!
So now you know what didn’t cause the buildings to “vanish.” Planes, jet fuel and thermite are irrelevant. So what kind of unconventional energy could have caused the Twin Towers to turn to dust? A fissionless fusion thermo nuclear event? Direct Energy Weapons? HAARP? A scaled up weaponized version of The Hutchison Effect? The investigation continues………
Top Opinion
-
Dave**Gay for Girls** 2010/09/22 11:42:33comment+2OMG, this is dragging things beyond the point of credibility. Nuclear explosions....stay away from ground zero or you'll die from radiation poisoning. Good grief........






















You know what is the most discrediting thing about the 9/11 truthiness movement? (Aside from bizarre theories that defy the laws of physics) Lack of consistency...
"falling down in 8 seconds" WTF???
The Twin Towers did nothing of the kind. Watch the video clips and time it.
Furthermore, 8 seconds is impossible, free fall speed from the top floor of the 110 story twin towers would take 9.22 seconds, this figure assumes a perfect vacuum so as to remove air resistance from the equation.
8 seconds would mean the towers fell faster than an object falling at free fall speed in a perfect vacuum... that quite simply isn't possible, it defies the laws of physics. Also as the video evidence demonstrates, it simply did not happen, not in 9.22 seconds and certainly not in "8 seconds".
"especially the one that was hit last falling before the first one."
The fact that the South Tower collapsed first even though it was hit last is easily predictable and explainable by the basic laws of physics. I'll explain.
The North Tower Also known as WTC 1 was hit by American Airlines Flight 11 at 8:46 AM, the Boeing 767 impacted between the 93rd and 99th floors. WTC 1 fell at 10:28 AM local time.
The South Tower also known as WTC 2 was hit by United Airlines Flight 175 at 9:03 AM, this second Boeing 767 impacted the South Tower between the 78th and 82nd floors. WTC...
"falling down in 8 seconds" WTF???
The Twin Towers did nothing of the kind. Watch the video clips and time it.
Furthermore, 8 seconds is impossible, free fall speed from the top floor of the 110 story twin towers would take 9.22 seconds, this figure assumes a perfect vacuum so as to remove air resistance from the equation.
8 seconds would mean the towers fell faster than an object falling at free fall speed in a perfect vacuum... that quite simply isn't possible, it defies the laws of physics. Also as the video evidence demonstrates, it simply did not happen, not in 9.22 seconds and certainly not in "8 seconds".
"especially the one that was hit last falling before the first one."
The fact that the South Tower collapsed first even though it was hit last is easily predictable and explainable by the basic laws of physics. I'll explain.
The North Tower Also known as WTC 1 was hit by American Airlines Flight 11 at 8:46 AM, the Boeing 767 impacted between the 93rd and 99th floors. WTC 1 fell at 10:28 AM local time.
The South Tower also known as WTC 2 was hit by United Airlines Flight 175 at 9:03 AM, this second Boeing 767 impacted the South Tower between the 78th and 82nd floors. WTC 2 fell at 9:59 AM local time.
So why the seemingly 'early' or 'premature' collapse of the South Tower? The explanation for the timing of the collapse of WTC 2 is simple: weight.
The South Tower impact area was bearing a total of 32 stories above the beginning of the impact zone, that is a lot of weight.
The North Tower impact area was by contrast only holding up 17 stories above the start of the impact zone.
The added weight easily explains why the South Tower fell first, the impact zone of WTC 2 was holding up just shy of double the weight of the impact zone on WTC 1. No mystery or conspiracy needed to explain the timing of the collapse.
Just admit it for once Irish, I got you and there is nothing you can do about it.
http://forum.nasaspaceflight....
not necessary to have radiation.
http://www.nowpublic.com/uss_...
Do you remember the ship that was made from the 9/11 steel?
I believe what is being brought up here is the 'Hirsch-Farnsworth Machine' method of inducing fusion electrically and this is not a bomb at all but rather a method used to produce neutrons for laboratory nuclear experiments. As far as I can tell the method has not yet been able to achieve 'break-even' performance IE produce more energy from fusion than the energy input (electrical) required to induce fusion within the chamber but the proponents of it have great hopes for it.
Basicly it works by producing a very high voltage potential 'well' within an evacuated container and introducing suitable material to be ionised and subsequently the ions are electrically accelerated together fast enough to overcome the 'coulomb barrier' allowing nuclei to be driven together achieving some fusion at the centre of the evacuated spherical chamber without the super high temperatures normally associated with fusion. The flux of neutrons is evidence of successful operation (nuclei being smashed together with neutrons thrown off as 'debris').
Some info on the history of it here and here
Fascinating reading if you're interested in this sort of experimentation and developments like the Tokomak etc.
However, it's a huge stretch to try associating this in any way with the WTC events.
You can still post media.
light bulbs?? seriously??LOL LOL
1. This is a kiloton KT (1,000 tons) bomb, not a megaton MT (1 Million tons) bomb, and it's not even 2% of a kilo (18 tons).
2. "
In November 1972, the following sentence was declassified: "The fact of existence of weapons with tailored outputs, e.g., enhanced x-ray, neutron or gamma-ray output, that we are hardening our weapons to enhanced weapon outputs and that high-Z materials are used in hardening nuclear weapons against high-energy x-rays." Note - the date is the declassification date, not the development date.
How small can a nuclear reaction be? Through hydrodynamic experiments for triggering fusion, extremely lows yield nuclear explosions have been generated on the magnitude of "
several Pounds of TNT." As noted above, in 1961 .01 kt was unveiled in 1961. In 1956, the Tamalpais with a yield of 0.072 kt was declassified.
This
program produced (partial list) the following information for a regular 0.01 kt yields, air ignition: Fireball max light radius = 25.4 meters, Max time light pulse width = 0.011 seconds, Max fireball airburst radius = 10.6 meters, Time of max temperature = 0.0032 seconds, Area of rad. exposure = 0.12 sq. miles; Blastwave Effects: Overpressure = 5 lb/sq. inch (160 mph) radius = 0.09 km, 1 lb/sq. inch ...
1. This is a kiloton KT (1,000 tons) bomb, not a megaton MT (1 Million tons) bomb, and it's not even 2% of a kilo (18 tons).
2. "
In November 1972, the following sentence was declassified: "The fact of existence of weapons with tailored outputs, e.g., enhanced x-ray, neutron or gamma-ray output, that we are hardening our weapons to enhanced weapon outputs and that high-Z materials are used in hardening nuclear weapons against high-energy x-rays." Note - the date is the declassification date, not the development date.
How small can a nuclear reaction be? Through hydrodynamic experiments for triggering fusion, extremely lows yield nuclear explosions have been generated on the magnitude of "
several Pounds of TNT." As noted above, in 1961 .01 kt was unveiled in 1961. In 1956, the Tamalpais with a yield of 0.072 kt was declassified.
This
program produced (partial list) the following information for a regular 0.01 kt yields, air ignition: Fireball max light radius = 25.4 meters, Max time light pulse width = 0.011 seconds, Max fireball airburst radius = 10.6 meters, Time of max temperature = 0.0032 seconds, Area of rad. exposure = 0.12 sq. miles; Blastwave Effects: Overpressure = 5 lb/sq. inch (160 mph) radius = 0.09 km, 1 lb/sq. inch radius = 0.26 km; Underground ignition: Crater diameter = 56 feet with a Richter magnitude of 3.52. Thermal radiation damage range is significantly reduced by clouds, smoke or other obscuring materials. Surface detonations are known to decrease thermal radiation by half. A neutron bomb produces much less blast and thermal energy than a fission bomb of the same yield by expending its energy by the increase in the production of neutrons. Even the older neutron bombs produce very little long term fallout, but made considerable induced radiation in ground detonations. The half life of induced radiation is very short and is measured in days rather than years.
3. Don't believe me, check out the governments admitted need for a nuke that will allow them to use their enemies 'fortresses' against them... the Neutron Bomb. Part of the big benefit was 3 to 5 days = CLEAR. However, stable isotopes formed by neutron activation will be there for centuries.
4. See the Ivy Flats video (also in the article) where they show the needed 'decontamination' for running around the ground zero site in jeeps and patrols. A good dusting with a broom was all that was required per official government statements. HOWEVER, some were just ate up with radiation, they had to be hosed down with SURPRISE.... WATER.
5. Tritium is Radiation and is the only form of radiation that was semi adequately tested for - provided one only wanted data on WTC6.
http://www.sodahead.com/unite...
me?? the more i read,the more facts i found,the more i studied from many ,many sites.