Quantcast

Pessimism rules at G20 Summit

Annette 2010/11/11 23:40:23











Pessimism rules at G20 summit




A
strong sense of pessimism has shrouded the first day of the G20
summit of rich and emerging economies, with world leaders sharply
divided over currency and trade policies. The
US clashed with exporting giants China and Germany on Thursday
over a plan to rebalance skewed trade between deficit and surplus
countries.

The
summit, held in Seoul, South Korea's capital, has become the
centrepiece of international efforts to revive the global economy
and prevent future financial meltdowns.


Behind
the scenes, negotiators squabbled over the language in a closing
statement to be issued at the summit's conclusion on Friday, but
so far, officials cannot even agree on the agenda, much less a
draft statement.
Barack Obama, the US president, who is
working to salvage a deal at the summit after suffering an
economy-linked drubbing in US elections last week, said his
administration wanted to boost growth via "prudent"
economic policies.
"It is difficult to do that if we start
seeing the huge imbalances redevelop that helped to contribute to
the crisis that we just went through," he told a news
conference with the summit's host, Lee Myung-Bak, the South Korean
president.
"I don't think this is a controversial
proposition."


Currency
controversy


Several G20
members are upset after the US Federal Reserve's decision to
pump a further $600bn into the faltering US
economy, in a step that foreign critics say is likely
to trigger tit-for-tat currency devaluations.


Chinese
officials sought to throw the onus back on the US by arguing that
Beijing has an "unswerving" commitment to reform its
currency regime, but needs stability in the world economy to do
it. "If
you're sick yourself, don't ask others to take medicine," Yu
Jianhua, the commerce ministry spokesman, said, demanding the
debt-ridden US fix its own house first.


In
one-on-one talks with Obama, Hu Jintao, the Chinese president,
said: "I believe that with the concerted efforts of all the
parties, the summit in Seoul will produce positive outcomes."


David
Cameron, the UK prime minister, conceded that the G20 was not
in a "heroic phase" compared to its determined
response to the 2008 financial crisis, and that it needed to do "a
lot more work" on fixing economic imbalances.


Harried
negotiators have been meeting long into the night all week in
Seoul to try to pin down language that the G20 leaders can adopt
in the closing communique.


The
talks were likely to drag long into Thursday night, South Korean
officials said, after the G20 heads of government opened their
two-day summit with a working dinner of Korean beef and halibut.


"China
is being very difficult in finalising the texts, so there might be
brackets left for the leaders to fill in after all," a German
government source said on Thursday.


Final
statement:
South
Korean and German officials said tha at best the G20 may settle
for a watered-down deal to task the International Monetary Fund
with crafting guidelines to trim the yawning imbalances between
creditor and debtor nations.


Ahead
of her own bilateral meeting with Obama, Angela Merkel, the German
chancellor, lashed out at a more detailed US plan to rectify
lopsided commerce by limiting the current account surpluses of big
exporters.


The
US wants the G20 to agree to curtail "excessive imbalances"
as a back-door way of forcing China to realign its currency, which
critics say it keeps deliberately cheap to support Chinese
exporters.


But
the proposal has run into trouble not just from China but from an
array of nations including Germany, another export champion that
insists its own trading prowess has nothing to do with any
currency chicanery. "To
set political limits on trade surpluses and deficits is neither
economically justified nor politically appropriate," Merkel
told a G20 business summit.


Emerging
economies around the world are worried that the billions in new
money from the Federal Reserve will stoke speculative flows
of foot-loose "hot money", and some are resorting to
capital controls in a bid to stem the tide.


There
is anxiety that G20 nations could be heading for a return to
1930s-style trade protectionism, with damning consequences for the
world economy two years after the start of the global financial
crisis. Naoto
Kan, the Japanese prime minister, said the risk was of
"competitive devaluation of currencies reminiscent of the
Great Depression"



See video:
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia-pacific/2010/11/201...


You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

  • BlueMax372 2010/11/12 00:00:29
    BlueMax372
    +3
    These fools are really stuck on stupid. Their fundamental assumption, that government intervention can fix any economy, is fundamentally wrong. That many governments can fix the economy internationally is not just fundamentally wrong, it's fundamentally preposterous.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Rockies Man 2010/11/15 03:00:44
    Rockies Man
    +1
    What do you expect? Any where Obama goes, defeatism, pessimism rules the day. Liberals and liberalism is depressing, moronic and anti-intellectual. How can one not feel pessimistic about that?
  • The Frog Princess 2010/11/12 17:04:19
    The Frog Princess
    +2
    Thw world leaders are not at all happy with Obama. He took a bad economy and has driven it off the cliff.
  • BlueMax372 2010/11/12 00:00:29
    BlueMax372
    +3
    These fools are really stuck on stupid. Their fundamental assumption, that government intervention can fix any economy, is fundamentally wrong. That many governments can fix the economy internationally is not just fundamentally wrong, it's fundamentally preposterous.
  • NidStyles BlueMax372 2010/11/12 00:35:27
    NidStyles
    +3
    They have it on good word that caring is sharing and we need to do the sharing with them.
  • Annette NidStyles 2010/11/12 17:11:23
    Annette
    +1
    So much for whatever 'good word' they got this idea from. It stinks.
  • NidStyles 2010/11/11 23:50:36
    NidStyles
    +3
    """""There
    is anxiety that G20 nations could be heading for a return to
    1930s-style trade protectionism, with damning consequences for the
    world economy two years after the start of the global financial
    crisis. Naoto
    Kan, the Japanese prime minister, said the risk was of
    "competitive devaluation of currencies reminiscent of the
    Great Depression"... """

    This is the thing that has me interested. Everything that is going on now has already been tried before. It failed then, why are these same types of idiot's trying the same thing again?
  • BlueMax372 NidStyles 2010/11/11 23:56:39
    BlueMax372
    +3
    Possible answers: 1. They're stupid. 2. They're crazy.
  • NidStyles BlueMax372 2010/11/11 23:58:18
    NidStyles
    +3
    What about 3. They want to start a new war?
  • BlueMax372 NidStyles 2010/11/12 00:01:39
    BlueMax372
    +3
    That's operable but it goes without saying! LOL!
  • Annette NidStyles 2010/11/12 00:04:35
    Annette
    +2
    Because they are truly idiots. Crazy is defined as doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. Yeah - they are all idiots.
  • NidStyles Annette 2010/11/12 00:07:25
    NidStyles
    +3
    Crazy-maybe Retarded, most definately.
  • Striker 2010/11/11 23:49:16
    Striker
    +3
    Summit? G20 has zero authority. Why would American even bother to sit with them?
  • BlueMax372 Striker 2010/11/11 23:57:29
    BlueMax372
    +4
    So Obama can dis America, the country he hates so bitterly, yet again.
  • Annette Striker 2010/11/12 00:06:02
    Annette
    +4
    And have our narcissist in chief miss out on a day of glory amongst his peers. Like I said, they are all idiots. We certainly can't leave him out, now can we? LMAO
  • jubil8 ... Annette 2010/11/12 01:27:20
    jubil8 BN-0 PON
    +2
    I don't think current conditions in the US are bringing any "glory" to Obama. He's permitting a dangerous policy (printing billions and monetizing the debt) to go forward, so one must infer that he approves (if he was going to do this, why he didn't have Bernanke wait till AFTER G20 mystifies me). He has repeated over and over that he wants China to let its currency rise to benefit the US. Oddly enough the Chinese don't want to do this -- except on their own terms, which means when they're good and ready.

    The only leverage we appear to have, if you can call it that, is to say we won''t buy unless the strong export countries make it easier for us to sell as well.

    It seems to me that what Obama wants is a global agreement to control economic growth -- and I don't see why ANY creditor country would agree to it.
  • Annette jubil8 ... 2010/11/12 17:14:23
    Annette
    +1
    I am sure they won't agree. China in particular can hold out almost indefinitely due to the eminent domain papers Hilary Clinton handed them almost immediately after the 'immaculation' of the chosen jerk in office.
    On top of that is the fact that Obama has no sense of diplomacy - his narcissism won't allow for that. We are so screwed!
  • jubil8 ... Annette 2010/11/12 22:12:47
    jubil8 BN-0 PON
    +1
    Narcissism... diplomacy... Hopelessly mutually exclusive, I think.
  • Annette jubil8 ... 2010/11/13 11:18:23
    Annette
    Yeah, I think diplomacy and narcissism are at opposite ends of the spectrum.
  • Dixienc jubil8 ... 2010/11/18 10:17:55
    Dixienc
    +1
    Obama is trying to regain that sense of being "loved by the world" that he garnered during his run for the White House. You remember......all those crowds who came out to see the rock bands playing BEFORE his speeches that he THOUGHT were there only to see and hear him.
  • jubil8 ... Dixienc 2010/11/18 22:18:55
    jubil8 BN-0 PON
    +1
    EEEEWWWW!!! I think he's going to miss out there.
  • Annette Dixienc 2010/11/18 22:56:52
    Annette
    Yeah he is minus the rock bands now, and is standing naked and alone and is found to be wanting!
  • Dixienc Annette 2010/11/18 23:03:48
    Dixienc
    exactly.....

News & Politics

2013/05/25 06:26:06

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals