People’s Republic of California Strikes Again…
Contrary to what voters were led to believe, California took the
unprecedented step this month to give banks and struggling homeowners up
to $100,000 in taxpayer funds to reduce underwater mortgages.
Originally, banks and lenders were supposed to pay 50 percent of
the cost of reducing the principal for those whose homes are worth less
than their mortgage. But when the banks refused, California took the
controversial step of paying the entire amount, up to $100,000.
"We thought, you know, 50-50 was much more attractive and we'd
have much more traction with lenders, and it just didn't turn out to
work as well as we would have liked," said Diane Richardson, legislative
director of the California Housing Finance Agency.
The program, known as the Hardest Hit Housing Market fund, is
part of a $7.6 billion federal effort to help underwater homeowners in
18 states. California received $2 billion. But when banks and lenders
who service loans refused to write down even a small portion of the
negative equity loans, California decided to use the taxpayer money to
pay 100 percent of the mortgage reduction.
Richard Green, a professor of real estate at the University of Southern California, said it's not what taxpayers signed up for.
"I think taxpayers would be furious at the idea that everybody
gets completely off the hook for this," Green said. "There are people
that say, look, I've been a renter all these years, I've been paying my
mortgage all these years, why am I bailing out these people who made a
bad decision? I think the politics of it are very combustible."
Top Opinion
-
+11I make 25K a year. I'm going to move to Cali and buy a million dollar house. Then I'll just have the government bail me out. It's fool proof!





















the way it's done is the govt wants 6% the home owner needs a reduction ,,they go to 5% instead of the proposed 2.5% that was supposed to be to !
instead they have a flood of houses empty , foreclosed ...the owner gets screwd again !
though for ca. and alot of other states there not ,,,and a 1/4 of a % point doesnt do it .
there supposed to reduce it by 2 to 4 % ,even for loan mods' but the home owner applies for the mod , and the servicer claims not to receive apps. then refuses to drop rate (because apps werent received in time ) ,,then the home owner still can afford the payment ,,and they file bankruptcy ,,and are frowned upon ..
it's not the fed govt. money any way ..it was the peoples taxes money (TARP ) used to bail out the govt. & inst. 's
so why shouldnt the people benefit ?
Nada. Hershey imported from Cadbury, but Cadbury was bought out by Kraft Foods.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... (this is pretty much accurate as far as my memory stretches)
And while the rest of us are being raped to pay for their BS, we now also have to subsidize tattoo removal in california.