Pennsylvania Was Supposed To Give Hillary A Much Needed Push
- 2008/04/07 21:28:23
- Read all 106 opinions
A decisive win in Pennsylvania's April 22 primary vote is necessary for Clinton to convince the party's undecided superdelegates to give her the nomination.
University of Pennsylvania professor Donald Kettl says some of the "air [is] starting to slip out of Hillary Clinton's tires."
Obama, who does better when the voters see him more, has spent $3 million dollars trying to get his name and message out, while Hillary Clinton has only spent $1 million dollars.
Top Opinion
-
Mannix 2008/04/12 16:03:27+5The fact that Obama is outspending Hillary 3 to 1 shows me he wants to win at ANY cost. It shows me that he has to rely on his charisma and charm to get the votes because he doesn't have a record to run on. I hope people can see through the smoke and mirrors because we really don't know who this man is or what he can or can't do. Just that he's a good talker!
About Me
Recent Posts
-
Who's Your Favorite Good Girl Gone Bad?
-
Who Is Your Favorite DWTS Winner?
-
Who Is The Sexiest Athlete?
- View more slideshows »
News
-
Beyoncé Cancels Tour Due to Doctors Orders: Do You Think She’s Pregnant?
She may run the world, but today she’s on bed rest. Doctors advised Queen Bee to cancel her performance Tuesday evening in Antwerp.
-
Was American Airlines Right to Kick Woman Off Plane for Singing?
An American Airlines flight from L.A. to New York made an emergency landing on Thursday... when a female passenger refused to stop singing Whitney Houston. Um, what?
Politics
-
PUBLIC OPINION > Rand Paul Is the Future of the Republican Party
Ever since President Obama's re-election back in November, the media hasn't stopped reporting about the ruffled course of the Republican party. So who's the future face of the GOP? Find out how the public voted.
-
PUBLIC OPINION > Chris Christie Should Stay a Republican
New Jersey Governor Chris Christie has been at the center of media coverage for a while now. But more recently, the buzz has been about his proclaimed political party -- and whether or not he should change it.
















Even Bill likes him.
This is a very well educated man of whom we would have been proud 20 years ago, but who now is called "elitist" because he does not correspond to the lowest common denominator. Which is sadly indicative of the dumbing down of America.
This is a man, who can talk with anyone, and who will be able to use diplomacy rather than brute force to get our points across. This is a man who can say: I could have said it better or differently; I am sorry if I offended anyone, rather than using: misspoke, misremembered, misthought... and other misleading terms.
Now obviously you feel I "really don't know this man". I feel I know him well enough to vote for him.
Personality wise, he reminds me of Bill Clinton, although more polished and sophisticated. I voted twice for BC. He also reminds me of Ronald Reagan, in the ease with which he approaches people and communicates with them. I voted for Reagan once too.
So that's how I made my choice. It is not your choice, but just as valid.
The news media has most certainly been blatantly biased in their primary season coverage, and the bias has been mostly against Hillary Clinton. A good example is Chris Matthews of "Hardball" fame on MSNBC.
He is so obviously an Obama fan, any objectivity he may of had as a reporter has been flushed away by his obvious enthusiasm for Obama. What was it he said some months ago that has been quoted several times: "Barack Obama's candidacy sends a 'tingle' down his leg."
That Mrs. Clinton has been doing as well as she has in the face of this incredible bias from the world's largest news media, says more about her abilities to handle the job than any resume she can post.
Let's face it! It's more than her just being a Clinton, it's more about her being a 'woman.'
Editor
The Conservative Independent
(www.conserveind.com)