Pakistan girl jailed, accused of blasphemy. Does Islam blaspheme the Constitution of the United States?
tncdel
2012/08/20 22:55:58
|
|
|||||
|
15 votes
|
|
83% | |||
|
3 votes
|
|
17% | |||
See:
http://news.yahoo.com/pakistan-girl-jailed-accused-blasphemy-...
Islam is ORGANIZED CRIME operating under the guise of religion, and the Quran itself is AN INSTRUMENT OF CRIME. For it commands ALL Muslims [not some or a few of them] to kill, oppress and annihilate all who don't believe as they do.
See this educational video here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ib9rofXQl6w
Additionally, each and every right under the Constitution is subject to restraint or forfeiture, if it conflicts with the constitutional rights of others. For example, we all have the rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness under the Constitution. But if you kill your neighbor because his dog crapped on your lawn, you can lose all those rights.
So too things like the "Jim Jones kool-aid party" and what the Quran commands are NOT protected under the Constitution. Courts are required to apply the "balancing of the scales" analysis, when opposing sides in a case maintain that they have a right under the Constitution. And the judge must determine WHICH side has the greater claim to "right" under the Constitution and which side would suffer the greatest harm by allowing the opposing side to exercise the right that they claim.
To put things in perspective, YOU play the judge in the following case, then tell us your verdict:
Side A alleges it has a right to kill, oppress and annihilate anyone who refuses to believe as they do.
Side B alleges that they have a right to NOT be killed, oppressed or annihilated.
So please tell us, WHICH side, side A or side B, would you rule in favor of.
If you say side A, then you have violated the Constitution. If you say side B, then you have ruled that Islam is NOT a "religion" for 1st Amendment purposes.
http://news.yahoo.com/pakistan-girl-jailed-accused-blasphemy-...
Islam is ORGANIZED CRIME operating under the guise of religion, and the Quran itself is AN INSTRUMENT OF CRIME. For it commands ALL Muslims [not some or a few of them] to kill, oppress and annihilate all who don't believe as they do.
See this educational video here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ib9rofXQl6w
Additionally, each and every right under the Constitution is subject to restraint or forfeiture, if it conflicts with the constitutional rights of others. For example, we all have the rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness under the Constitution. But if you kill your neighbor because his dog crapped on your lawn, you can lose all those rights.
So too things like the "Jim Jones kool-aid party" and what the Quran commands are NOT protected under the Constitution. Courts are required to apply the "balancing of the scales" analysis, when opposing sides in a case maintain that they have a right under the Constitution. And the judge must determine WHICH side has the greater claim to "right" under the Constitution and which side would suffer the greatest harm by allowing the opposing side to exercise the right that they claim.
To put things in perspective, YOU play the judge in the following case, then tell us your verdict:
Side A alleges it has a right to kill, oppress and annihilate anyone who refuses to believe as they do.
Side B alleges that they have a right to NOT be killed, oppressed or annihilated.
So please tell us, WHICH side, side A or side B, would you rule in favor of.
If you say side A, then you have violated the Constitution. If you say side B, then you have ruled that Islam is NOT a "religion" for 1st Amendment purposes.






















Women are also beaten and abused in this country every day, but they are protected by laws as are all abuse victims and here they can get get help and protection but in the Muslim world they are just free Game,
But, how does one give one's consent? It begins by being presented a choice; a choice to say yes AND a choice to say no. If someone puts a gun to my head and tells me I have a choice to do as they say or die, I do not have a true choice and thus, although they may get my acquiescence, they will not have my consent. For one cannot truly give one's consent unless one also has the option to withhold consent without threat or intimidation. In other words, in order for you to say yes, you must also have the choice to say no. You can't say no if you are only given the choice to say yes or die.
How does this relate to Islam? Islam holds that once one becomes a Muslim, they must remain a Muslim or face a death sentence. Islam spread largely by intimidation or historically by conquering others in battle and then forcing conversions of the defeated. Contrast this with other religions who seek to convert by spreading their ideas and who allow followers to join or leave at will. It is tru...
But, how does one give one's consent? It begins by being presented a choice; a choice to say yes AND a choice to say no. If someone puts a gun to my head and tells me I have a choice to do as they say or die, I do not have a true choice and thus, although they may get my acquiescence, they will not have my consent. For one cannot truly give one's consent unless one also has the option to withhold consent without threat or intimidation. In other words, in order for you to say yes, you must also have the choice to say no. You can't say no if you are only given the choice to say yes or die.
How does this relate to Islam? Islam holds that once one becomes a Muslim, they must remain a Muslim or face a death sentence. Islam spread largely by intimidation or historically by conquering others in battle and then forcing conversions of the defeated. Contrast this with other religions who seek to convert by spreading their ideas and who allow followers to join or leave at will. It is true that Catholicism also experienced a period of forced conversion and torture/death during the Inquisition but it was a notable exception to the rule. In Islam, this forced conversion has continued since its inception and has never abated. So, Islam is not a consent based religion. I can only think of one other belief system which so punishes the non-believer as Islam and that is communism.
So IMO, Islam, as it is currently practiced, is not a "religion" which is subject to First Amendment protections. It is a form of mental and physical slavery where the follower must remain so in perpetuity or face a death sentence. Since slavery was outlawed in the United States, Islam is also therefore illegal, until and unless a follower is allowed to leave the faith without threat or intimidation.
BUT... since I'm sure it's on the list, it's never too soon to STOP THEM.
That's at the broadest level. At a narrower level any woman who can stomach the idea of Islam needs to be committed imo. And there are LOTS of narrower levels.
That the particular religious beliefs of the organization are truly and sincerely held.
That the practices and rituals associated with the organization's religious belief or creed are not illegal or contrary to clearly defined public policy.
Therefore, your group (or organization) may not qualify for treatment as an exempt religious organization for tax purposes if its actions, as contrasted with its beliefs, are contrary to well established and clearly defined public policy. If there is a clear showing that the beliefs (or doctrines) are sincerely held by those professing them, the IRS will not question the religious nature of those beliefs.
Churches. Although a church, its integrated auxiliaries, or a convention or association of churches is not required to file Form 1023 to be exempt from federal income tax or to receive tax deductible contributions, the organization may find it advantageous to obtain recognition of exemption. In this event, you should submit information showing that your organization is a church, synagogue, association or convention of churches, religious order, or religious organization that is an integral part of a ch...
That the particular religious beliefs of the organization are truly and sincerely held.
That the practices and rituals associated with the organization's religious belief or creed are not illegal or contrary to clearly defined public policy.
Therefore, your group (or organization) may not qualify for treatment as an exempt religious organization for tax purposes if its actions, as contrasted with its beliefs, are contrary to well established and clearly defined public policy. If there is a clear showing that the beliefs (or doctrines) are sincerely held by those professing them, the IRS will not question the religious nature of those beliefs.
Churches. Although a church, its integrated auxiliaries, or a convention or association of churches is not required to file Form 1023 to be exempt from federal income tax or to receive tax deductible contributions, the organization may find it advantageous to obtain recognition of exemption. In this event, you should submit information showing that your organization is a church, synagogue, association or convention of churches, religious order, or religious organization that is an integral part of a church, and that it is engaged in carrying out the function of a church.
In determining whether an admittedly religious organization is also a church, the IRS does not accept every assertion that the organization is a church. Because beliefs and practices vary so widely, there is no single definition of the word church for tax purposes. The IRS considers the facts and circumstances of each organization applying for church status.
Convention or association of churches. Any organization that is otherwise a convention or association of churches will not fail to qualify as a church merely because the membership of the organization includes individuals as well as churches or because the individuals have voting rights in the organization.
Integrated auxiliaries. An organization is an integrated auxiliary of a church if all the following are true.
The organization is described both in sections 501(c)(3) and 509(a)(1), 509(a)(2), or 509(a)(3).
It is affiliated with a church or a convention or association of churches.
It is internally supported. An organization is internally supported unless both of the following are true.
It offers admissions, goods, services, or facilities for sale, other than on an incidental basis, to the general public (except goods, services, or facilities sold at a nominal charge or for a small part of the cost).
It normally gets more than 50% of its support from a combination of governmental sources, public solicitation of contributions, and receipts from the sale of admissions, goods, performance of services, or furnishing of facilities in activities that are not unrelated trades or businesses.
Special rule. Men's and women's organizations, seminaries, mission societies, and youth groups that satisfy (1) and (2) shown earlier are integrated auxiliaries of a church even if they are not internally supported.
In order for an organization (including a church and religious organization) to qualify for tax exemption, no part of its net earnings can inure to any individual.
Although an individual is entitled to a charitable deduction for contributions to a church, the assignment or similar transfer of compensation for personal services to a church generally does not relieve a taxpayer of federal income tax liability on the compensation, regardless of the motivation behind the transfer.
To put things in perspective, YOU play the judge in the following case, then tell us your verdict:
Side A alleges it has a right to kill, oppress and annihilate anyone who refuses to believe as they do.
Side B alleges that they have a right to NOT be killed, oppressed or annihilated.
So please tell us, WHICH side, side A or side B, would you rule in favor of.
If you say side A, then you have violated the Constitution. If you say side B, then you have ruled that Islam is NOT a "religion" for 1st Amendment purposes.