So my real choice is between a candidate who owned a company that disposed of medical waste, including aborted fetuses.
And a candidate who voted to kill babys who survived abortion, and who currently supports abortion and takes donations from abortionist and abortion supporters?
Or just stay home and hope the "better candidate wins"?
Since I'm going to be dirty either of three ways, I'll just support Romney/Ryan anyway over the bigger spender.
One of Mitt Romney's Companies Made Millions Disposing of Fetuses From Abortion Clinics. RAVE if you Think Christians Are Hypocrites For Supporting Him.
Che Guevara - Hero
2012/09/11 13:32:08
|
|
|||||
|
22 votes
|
|
17% | ||
|
9 votes
|
|
7% | ||
|
43 votes
|
|
33% | ||
|
57 votes
|
|
44% | ||
One of Mitt Romney's Companies Made Millions Disposing of Fetuses From Abortion Clinics. RAVE if you Think Christians Are Hypocrites For Supporting Him. The SEC filing lists assorted Bain-related entities that were part of the deal, including Bain Capital (BCI), Bain Capital Partners VI (BCP VI), Sankaty High Yield Asset Investors (a Bermuda-based Bain affiliate), and Brookside Capital Investors (a Bain offshoot). And it notes that Romney was the "sole shareholder, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of BCI, BCP VI Inc., Brookside Inc. and Sankaty Ltd." The document also states that Romney "may be deemed to share voting and dispositive power with respect to" 2,116,588 shares of common stock in Stericycle "in his capacity as sole shareholder" of the Bain entities that invested in the company ... Another SEC document filed November 30, 1999, by Stericycle also names Romney as an individual who holds "voting and dispositive power" with respect to the stock owned by Bain. For someone who wasn't involved at all in the Stericycle investment, Romney's name sure shows up on a lot of Stericycle-related documents! Because back in 1999, there would have been no reason for Romney to not invest in the fetus-disposal industry. After all, abortion is legal, aborted fetuses exist, and whatever Stericycle does with them — turns them into bicycles, we're guessing? — is probably better than tossing them in a dump somewhere. Plus, Romney was a pro-choice, soon-to-be governor of Massachusetts, where the state motto is literally "Abortions: Ain't Nothin' Wrong With That!" He was probably focused more on the millions upon millions of dollars the investment would net him, and not how awkward it would make life for New Mitt. But Old Mitt had a way of being selfish like that."
"That Bain Capital investment in Stericycle, a medical-waste company that helps to dispose of aborted fetuses? When Huffington Postreported on it earlier this year, Bain officials insisted that Mitt Romney, the currently pro-life Republican presidential candidate, had already left Bain when it happened, in 1999. But a trove of financial filings uncovered by Mother Jonesappears to show the very opposite:
Read More: http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/07/romney-invest...
Top Opinion
-
Dwight-AFCL>dogsbody 2012/09/11 16:06:53
These left wing liberal democrap loonies REFUSE to do any research and only pick out bits and pieces from any story that pleases their pitiful pea brains.
"Moreover, in 1999, Bain and Romney both described his departure from Bain not as a resignation and far from absolute. On February 12, 1999, the Boston Herald reported, "Romney said he will stay on as a part-timer with Bain, providing input on investment and key personnel decisions." And a Bain press release issued on July 19, 1999, noted that Romney was "currently on a part-time leave of absence"-and quoted Romney speaking for Bain Capital. In 2001 and 2002, Romney filed Massachusetts state disclosure forms noting he was the 100 percent owner of Bain Capital NY, Inc.-a Bain outfit that was incorporated in Delaware on April 13, 1999-two months after Romney's supposed retirement from the firm. A May 2001 filing with the SEC identified Romney as "a member of the Management Committee" of two Bain entities. And in 2007, the Washington Post reported that R. Bradford Malt, a Bain lawyer, said Romney took a "leave of absence" when he assumed the Olympics post and retained sole ownership of the firm for two more years."
http://jezebel.com/5922811/ro...
But hey! Never let the facts get in the way of a great smear, am I right?
I'm with Dwight.. Do I vote for someone who has an association with a company that disposes of the bodies of dead babies or do I vote for the one who supports and has voted FOR,, the KILLING of them,, before AND,, despite the FACT that the Supreme Court ruled that it was MURDER,, after birth..
When he ran against EMK for the senate he was pro-choice, but he's changed that now because of the extremism coming from the right and he doesn't want to lose his base.
Morgue's, morticians and funeral director's aren't running for president either.
Whatever happened to " NOBODY has the right to Judge" or is THAT just another one of those Double Standards that the left employs so often..
--He's pro-life THIS week. Who knows what Romney's opinion will be next week. Sometimes Romney has to check with his campaign office to figure out what his opinion is supposed to be.
AND PS, The Holy Bible clearly says that Abortion is NOT Murder:
THE CREATOR says a fetus is not the same as a person. THE CREATOR says the penalty for killing a person is life-for-life, but the penalty for killing a fetus is "a fine."
"If men struggle with each other and strike a woman with child so that she has a miscarriage, yet there is no further injury, he shall surely be fined as the woman’s husband may demand of him, and he shall pay as the judges decide. 23 But if there is any further injury, then you shall appoint as a penalty life for life, 24 eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, 25 burn for burn, wound for wound, bruise for bruise." Exodus 21:22-25
All that matters is getting rich, when the money grabbing starts suddenly all morals are overboard..
Despicable, all that needs to be said *3*
And a candidate who voted to kill babys who survived abortion, and who currently supports abortion and takes donations from abortionist and abortion supporters?
Or just stay home and hope the "better candidate wins"?
Since I'm going to be dirty either of three ways, I'll just support Romney/Ryan anyway over the bigger spender.