Quantcast

One Bad Apple In RonPaulieLand? not exactly

Balladeer-PWCM-POTL 2012/06/11 22:15:22
Ron Paul will save us from the Baby Eating Bilderbergers, Bless You Alex Jones
Are these nutcases serious?
Other: because I refuse to Vote for the Fat Man, if that means an obama 2nd term so be it
You!
Add Photos & Videos
I WAS going to wait until the convention to post about The Quisling and the paulpukes...BUT this is WAY too good to pass up...for months I have been posting a quote from a rather Foamy mouthed Paulpuke ..the statement was made on or around April 25, 2012...and went as follows:

" I CANNOT and WILL NOT vote for Mitt Romney for president. If that elects Obama for a 2nd term so be it"

many times I was told that this person does NOT speak for all....and yet in the article linked below you will find OTHERS of the same ilk that went on the net shortly after RAND Paul announced his support of Mitt Romney

RP1

RP2

RP3

RP4


and MY personal Favorite...

RP5


Someone please tell me again...

A) paulpukes are really intelligent people?

and

B) we need to reach out to them?

Read More: http://www.businessinsider.com/ron-paul-fans-angry...

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • Tasine 2012/06/12 13:12:10
    Are these nutcases serious?
    Tasine
    +10
    I hope I don't lose friends over this, but I feel I have to say it. I think most here want to see honest voters who want to change from the same old worn out politicians' actions to a person of honesty and integrity, a person who knows and believes in the Constitution, a person who favors small government, a person who hears them when they speak.

    I believe that Ron Paul and Gary Johnson supporters are just that sort of voters. I believe those putting them down are practicing the same oppressive attitudes as the Progressives do. I believe MOST people on the right are as honorable as they know how to be. And I believe they want to vote on principle rather than to merely unseat someone, even someone as evil as Obama. I believe any candidate from the Democrat Party or the Republican Party will probably disappoint most of us.

    Do all of us want to see Obama unseated? YES, of course we do! Do we want to display our own principles when we do it? Yes, we do. Can we do that if we are trying to tell others (others who agree with us on most issues) who to vote for, who not to vote for? I understand calling the enemy names. I have a harder time understanding calling erstwhile friends names if they are determined to vote on principle rather than just a way of getting rid of O...

    I hope I don't lose friends over this, but I feel I have to say it. I think most here want to see honest voters who want to change from the same old worn out politicians' actions to a person of honesty and integrity, a person who knows and believes in the Constitution, a person who favors small government, a person who hears them when they speak.

    I believe that Ron Paul and Gary Johnson supporters are just that sort of voters. I believe those putting them down are practicing the same oppressive attitudes as the Progressives do. I believe MOST people on the right are as honorable as they know how to be. And I believe they want to vote on principle rather than to merely unseat someone, even someone as evil as Obama. I believe any candidate from the Democrat Party or the Republican Party will probably disappoint most of us.

    Do all of us want to see Obama unseated? YES, of course we do! Do we want to display our own principles when we do it? Yes, we do. Can we do that if we are trying to tell others (others who agree with us on most issues) who to vote for, who not to vote for? I understand calling the enemy names. I have a harder time understanding calling erstwhile friends names if they are determined to vote on principle rather than just a way of getting rid of Obama........in actuality THEY are the ones voting for real change, and most others will be voting for the same old, same old thing.

    I don't think there is a pot here who should be calling the kettle black. SOMEWHERE along the way we have to stand on principle, which is hard enough to do, but to have friends belittle you for standing on the very principle they themselves find attractive is very discouraging. And it makes one wonder exactly who really supports principled living.
    (more)

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • JesusIsMyGod 2012/06/22 02:32:55
    Are these nutcases serious?
    JesusIsMyGod
    +2
    It is a fact that most politicians suck.
  • DizziNY 2012/06/13 20:33:27 (edited)
    Ron Paul will save us from the Baby Eating Bilderbergers, Bless You Alex Jones
    DizziNY
    +3
    Ok I have to read it closer, but, Rand is no Benedict Arnold.

    BTW- I just clicked anything.
  • Ballade... DizziNY 2012/06/14 03:05:09
    Balladeer-PWCM-POTL
    riiigghhhhht
  • RageFury 2012/06/13 16:07:31 (edited)
    Other: because I refuse to Vote for the Fat Man, if that means an obama 2nd t...
    RageFury
    +6
    You see Romney supports most if not all of Obama's policies. A vote for Romney is a vote for "More of the Same". I don't want more of the same. If I did I would just pull the lever for Obama... What I want is real change. This election I will vote my conscience as I did last election and know I had the best interest of the country in mind, in thought and in action.



    You "lesser of 2 Evils" people have been repeating this nonsense for years and continuing to do so will not change the end result. Continuing to do so will keep this country marching off the cliffs of economic doom. If you do not change your ways and that does mean change how you vote and start voting for individuals based on their merits and not the Rs or the Ds in their names we are all doomed to repeat this cycle of insanity and we will get no positive change.



    Research your candidates. Ignore the MSM and the obvious bs it preaches.

    Grown adults with access to the Internet should have no reason not to know people like Romney are fos. They only represent the status quot. This is why his opinions change depending on the crowd he is talking to. Same thing with Obama as many of us warned back then.



    I started paying attention after Bush's second term. I SHOULD have known what I know now then, but alas my head was in the ...











    You see Romney supports most if not all of Obama's policies. A vote for Romney is a vote for "More of the Same". I don't want more of the same. If I did I would just pull the lever for Obama... What I want is real change. This election I will vote my conscience as I did last election and know I had the best interest of the country in mind, in thought and in action.



    You "lesser of 2 Evils" people have been repeating this nonsense for years and continuing to do so will not change the end result. Continuing to do so will keep this country marching off the cliffs of economic doom. If you do not change your ways and that does mean change how you vote and start voting for individuals based on their merits and not the Rs or the Ds in their names we are all doomed to repeat this cycle of insanity and we will get no positive change.



    Research your candidates. Ignore the MSM and the obvious bs it preaches.

    Grown adults with access to the Internet should have no reason not to know people like Romney are fos. They only represent the status quot. This is why his opinions change depending on the crowd he is talking to. Same thing with Obama as many of us warned back then.



    I started paying attention after Bush's second term. I SHOULD have known what I know now then, but alas my head was in the sand, it is not anymore...

    I DID know Obama represented the status quot. of sailing this country over the cliffs, so did most of you. So wake up now, Romney supports Obama's policies. That should clearly tell you this man does not represent change of any kind.



    None of this is secret and can be easily verified, I suggest you all wake up and look it up. . In some cases Romney's words have been spliced side by side next to Obama's and these two might as well be the same man with a mask on as they preach the same BS...

    That should be your first clue...



    You owe it to your country, that you supposedly love, to make informed and responsible decisions in regards to who you vote for. If nothing else, at least look this up for the benefit of your country. You will find fairly quickly that this is all quite true with zero spin...
    (more)
  • Ballade... RageFury 2012/06/13 17:47:58
    Balladeer-PWCM-POTL
    you can , of course Show me the ROMNEY connection with the muslim brotherhood?
  • RageFury Ballade... 2012/06/13 19:36:25 (edited)
    RageFury
    +5
    I can of course show you the agreements on policy, would that work for ya? That of course was my point during these economically challenged times...


    On Foreign Policy I don't imagine that will change much at all. Only difference I see here is Romney won't be as apologetic, but we will still be sticking our noses where it doesn't belong nonetheless we had that with Bush.

    We have no business conducting more Presidential wars of aggression, not that we have any business doing that without Congressional approval anyways. Afghanistan being the only exception whose purpose has now expired, yet we remain.
    Wars of aggression, which by the way Obama is not adverse to given Libya, Somalia, Yemen and Pakistan and the troop surge in Afghanistan. Romney will not be adverse to it either and will likely start his own, not that we can in any way afford more in money, lives, or quality of life of our stretched thin soldiers.
    Right now the only thing our Foreign Policy will help in doing is spend money faster, hasten our economic collapse while creating more enemies. An economic collapse that is just over the horizon...If that collapse happens, then things overseas become irrelevant and out of our reach anyways. Apparently this is what you Romney folk advocate..

    As to the Muslim Brotherhood sp...




    I can of course show you the agreements on policy, would that work for ya? That of course was my point during these economically challenged times...


    On Foreign Policy I don't imagine that will change much at all. Only difference I see here is Romney won't be as apologetic, but we will still be sticking our noses where it doesn't belong nonetheless we had that with Bush.

    We have no business conducting more Presidential wars of aggression, not that we have any business doing that without Congressional approval anyways. Afghanistan being the only exception whose purpose has now expired, yet we remain.
    Wars of aggression, which by the way Obama is not adverse to given Libya, Somalia, Yemen and Pakistan and the troop surge in Afghanistan. Romney will not be adverse to it either and will likely start his own, not that we can in any way afford more in money, lives, or quality of life of our stretched thin soldiers.
    Right now the only thing our Foreign Policy will help in doing is spend money faster, hasten our economic collapse while creating more enemies. An economic collapse that is just over the horizon...If that collapse happens, then things overseas become irrelevant and out of our reach anyways. Apparently this is what you Romney folk advocate..

    As to the Muslim Brotherhood specifically, if we go "willy nilly" invading and toppling other countries Governments, there will always be risk that an enemy will come to power from the vacuum we create. The connections, regardless of what they may be, won't mean a thing. That is to say Romney will not need any... We saw this in Libya. We also saw it in Iran. We helped overthrow Iran's Democratically elected Government of around 1953, the cause and now we deal with the "blowback" that has created a belligerent Iran, the effect.
    It remains to be seen what will come of Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia.
    Far better would be to unchain Israel and let them do as they see necessary, to ensure their own security. Keeping Israel chained to our hips do them no favors. Neither Obama nor Romney will change that of course.
    So while Romney may not have your "connections", he will in fact do pretty much what Obama has done, just as Obama has done pretty much what Bush would have done...

    The heads may change but the policies have not and will not until we recognize as a people, that the player's parties are irrelevant and understand that it is their individual policies that matter.
    (more)
  • Striker 2012/06/12 15:27:48
    Ron Paul will save us from the Baby Eating Bilderbergers, Bless You Alex Jones
    Striker
    +7
    There are millions of the best people in America who will not put up with a bad apple who insults them by calling them PaulPukes, and we will have no more of you.

    You forget there is something called Principle, or otherwise your brain is defective.
  • zbacku 2012/06/12 14:24:26
    Are these nutcases serious?
    zbacku
    +1
    I have seen but a few PaulPots that will agree that we MUST remove the Marxist Obama from office, even if it means we have to vote for Romney. Most border on the cliff of madness. ron paul insanity
  • Tasine 2012/06/12 13:12:10
    Are these nutcases serious?
    Tasine
    +10
    I hope I don't lose friends over this, but I feel I have to say it. I think most here want to see honest voters who want to change from the same old worn out politicians' actions to a person of honesty and integrity, a person who knows and believes in the Constitution, a person who favors small government, a person who hears them when they speak.

    I believe that Ron Paul and Gary Johnson supporters are just that sort of voters. I believe those putting them down are practicing the same oppressive attitudes as the Progressives do. I believe MOST people on the right are as honorable as they know how to be. And I believe they want to vote on principle rather than to merely unseat someone, even someone as evil as Obama. I believe any candidate from the Democrat Party or the Republican Party will probably disappoint most of us.

    Do all of us want to see Obama unseated? YES, of course we do! Do we want to display our own principles when we do it? Yes, we do. Can we do that if we are trying to tell others (others who agree with us on most issues) who to vote for, who not to vote for? I understand calling the enemy names. I have a harder time understanding calling erstwhile friends names if they are determined to vote on principle rather than just a way of getting rid of O...

    I hope I don't lose friends over this, but I feel I have to say it. I think most here want to see honest voters who want to change from the same old worn out politicians' actions to a person of honesty and integrity, a person who knows and believes in the Constitution, a person who favors small government, a person who hears them when they speak.

    I believe that Ron Paul and Gary Johnson supporters are just that sort of voters. I believe those putting them down are practicing the same oppressive attitudes as the Progressives do. I believe MOST people on the right are as honorable as they know how to be. And I believe they want to vote on principle rather than to merely unseat someone, even someone as evil as Obama. I believe any candidate from the Democrat Party or the Republican Party will probably disappoint most of us.

    Do all of us want to see Obama unseated? YES, of course we do! Do we want to display our own principles when we do it? Yes, we do. Can we do that if we are trying to tell others (others who agree with us on most issues) who to vote for, who not to vote for? I understand calling the enemy names. I have a harder time understanding calling erstwhile friends names if they are determined to vote on principle rather than just a way of getting rid of Obama........in actuality THEY are the ones voting for real change, and most others will be voting for the same old, same old thing.

    I don't think there is a pot here who should be calling the kettle black. SOMEWHERE along the way we have to stand on principle, which is hard enough to do, but to have friends belittle you for standing on the very principle they themselves find attractive is very discouraging. And it makes one wonder exactly who really supports principled living.
    (more)
  • Striker Tasine 2012/06/12 15:22:47
    Striker
    +10
    Ignoring principle for expediency is far beyond "discouraging", it is downright insulting. And yes, I am losing friends and actually ditching friends now. Those who cannot and will not stand on a foundation of principle are not worthy of my friendship.
  • Tasine Striker 2012/06/12 16:39:26
    Tasine
    +10
    It saddens me to know many of my friends will not stand on principle. If our principles cannot win elections, there really isn't much use in voting. And we truly do NOT have a representative government, but one out of control with no hope on the horizon for those who believe in freedom above all else.
  • RageFury Striker 2012/06/13 16:15:40
    RageFury
    +6
    I have not cut ties to some of them yet, however if they keep on with what amounts the Lefts practice of bashing they will be left in the dust soon enough. It is my hope that they wake up soon and see what really goes on around them as I have.
  • Chris -... Tasine 2012/06/13 13:58:42
    Chris - The Rowdy One! #187
    +4
    Don't forget the Virgil Goode voters!
  • RageFury Tasine 2012/06/13 16:12:54
    RageFury
    +3
    Thank you, an excellent piece you have written here.
  • Tasine RageFury 2012/06/13 16:54:33
    Tasine
    +3
    Thank YOU.
  • Dave 2012/06/12 13:06:15
    Are these nutcases serious?
    Dave
    +3
    The RP clan is bipolar.
  • Scooter Dave 2012/06/12 22:16:43
    Scooter
    +4
    I have to disagree Peapod...
  • Dave Scooter 2012/06/13 00:34:01
    Dave
    +2
    I know you like RP, but I hope you wouldn't waste your vote on him and let the mack daddy get re-elected because of it.
    We don't have to talk about RP.
    There are many other things to talk about.
    ;)
  • Scooter Dave 2012/06/13 01:00:58
    Scooter
    +4
    Just saying I am not bi polar...
  • Ballade... Scooter 2012/06/13 01:02:30
    Balladeer-PWCM-POTL
    +1
    are you going to help obama get reelected?
  • Scooter Ballade... 2012/06/13 01:03:26
    Scooter
    +6
    I am not going to replace one POS with another POS!! Period~
  • Ballade... Scooter 2012/06/13 01:04:28
    Balladeer-PWCM-POTL
    +2
    translation you ARE going to help OBAMA get reelected because YOUR boy didn't win...in other words you are throwing a temper tantrum
  • Scooter Ballade... 2012/06/13 01:11:23
    Scooter
    +6
    Nope, not at all...I can not and will vote for someone I don't believe in...We need a big change and nothing is going to change with those two...so I will vote for someone who I believe can.
  • Ballade... Scooter 2012/06/13 01:12:14
    Balladeer-PWCM-POTL
    +1
    which is...?
  • Scooter Ballade... 2012/06/13 01:28:25
    Scooter
    +6
    RP or Gary Johnson...
  • Ballade... Scooter 2012/06/13 01:43:09
    Balladeer-PWCM-POTL
    in other words you are going to cast a defacto vote for obama
  • Scooter Ballade... 2012/06/13 01:56:47
    Scooter
    +6
    So will you if you vote for Mitt...He won't beat him.
  • Ballade... Scooter 2012/06/13 02:00:34
    Balladeer-PWCM-POTL
    +1
    I am going to hold my nose and vote for mitt because the republic is more important than my ego....something it sounds like YOU won't do
    Mitt has a far better chance than The Legalweedtarian Party
  • Scooter Ballade... 2012/06/13 02:12:38
    Scooter
    +6
    See that's the difference! I am not holding my nose for who I am going to vote for...If you have to hold your nose, then you aren't voting for the right guy! Plain and simple!

    Hey, nothing wrong with a little weed from time to time~ Trust me...it might lighten you up!
  • Ballade... Scooter 2012/06/13 02:20:37
    Balladeer-PWCM-POTL
    +2
    sorry I will pass....you see 32 years ago a friend of mine got some innocent weed laced with even more innocent PCP...for about 5 minutes I had him in a full nelson to keep him from clawing his own eyes out
  • Scooter Ballade... 2012/06/13 02:34:23
    Scooter
    +6
    What if you ever *God Forbid* would get cancer? Would you still turn it down? My 78 year old Grandmother had lymphoma and it helped her immensely! Gotta watch the source carefully....
  • Ballade... Scooter 2012/06/13 03:07:55
    Balladeer-PWCM-POTL
    +1
    LAUGHTER...I did get cancer , sweet cheeks, a rare one a smooth muscle tumor on my left thigh...right now I sport a 14 inch long scar that could pass as a map of the Ohio river with a 1/2 inch divot where some muscle used to be....yeah there was and there is pain...ever hear of something called aspirin..NOT to mention Managing the pain???
  • Scooter Ballade... 2012/06/13 03:15:58
    Scooter
    +6
    Well, her doctor must have thought she needed more than asprin to manage her pain ( she was 78 after all) and give her an appetite back so she wouldn't waste away. It worked because she beat it too...she lived another 5 or 6 years...
  • Ballade... Scooter 2012/06/13 03:20:31
    Balladeer-PWCM-POTL
    I beat mine without weed
  • Scooter Ballade... 2012/06/13 03:33:57 (edited)
    Scooter
    +5
    you are a tad younger and nearly not as frail looking...lmao...if ya get my drift!
  • Ballade... Scooter 2012/06/13 03:51:20
    Balladeer-PWCM-POTL
    the doctor's said a piece was about to break off if it had I wouldn't be here. while in the hosiptol I only used 25% of my morphine box...I MANAGED the pain ...also had gall bladder surgery my gallstones could fit in a 62 caliber Pistol chamber..again there was PAIN ...BUT there was also ASPIRIN...IBUPROPHIN then there is also PERSONAL FORTITUDE
  • Scooter Ballade... 2012/06/13 04:00:11
    Scooter
    +4
    I think the doctor missed a piece that broke off in your head!
  • Ballade... Scooter 2012/06/13 04:01:28
    Balladeer-PWCM-POTL
    nope if i was deranged I would be a paulpuke it seems to be the one common denominator for that dementia
  • Sandra Ballade... 2012/11/09 19:24:19
    Sandra
    ok but see that is your personal choice, and it is a good thing that we're all allowed to have one.
  • Sandra Ballade... 2012/11/09 19:22:33
    Sandra
    So what, there is nothing wrong with the drug in of itself. It isn't like evil or something, used as medicine that helps someone is a good thing. All sorts of drugs out there by prescription are legal and used and are much more dangerous.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 8 Next » Last »

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/06/19 00:33:40

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals