Quantcast

OK 'Ron Paul Supporters'..what will be your decision come November 6, 2012???

Balladeer-PWCM-POTL 2012/05/02 22:15:21
for the good of the Republic and the nation, I am holding my nose and voting for Romney
"I CANNOT and WILL NOT vote for Mitt Romney for president. If that elects Obama for a 2nd term so be it" (actualy quote from a Sodahead Paulborg)
You!
Add Photos & Videos
according the source I trust, the Quisling Ron Paul only has 80 delegates. The paulpukes claim they will tie up the convention..and yet Santorum and Gingrich have greater leverage than The Quisling.

So paulpukes come Election what ARE you going to do ...you going to help save America....or are you going to throw a temper tantrum resulting in 4 more years of Obama

OH no 'other' option on this...this is an up or down vote PERIOD..no hair splitting, no rationalizing, no bloviating

Read More: http://projects.wsj.com/campaign2012/delegates

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • bman~AVA 2012/05/02 22:20:07
    for the good of the Republic and the nation, I am holding my nose and voting ...
    bman~AVA
    +9
    Well my friend I'm not a Paul supporter so it doesn't matter to me if he's the one or not. I'm for voting out a country destroying socialist low life so as long as it's "not" Obama then they're all right to me. Even if I don't like them.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • dreamhippy 2012/05/07 05:04:49
    "I CANNOT and WILL NOT vote for Mitt Romney for president. If that elects Oba...
    dreamhippy
    Six in one hand half a dozen in the other. Wind and clouds without beneficient rain.
  • Ballade... dreamhippy 2012/05/07 05:13:08
    Balladeer-PWCM-POTL
    except this means the survival of the republic ... YOU are helping to destroy it
  • Constitution Believer 2012/05/03 18:56:01
    for the good of the Republic and the nation, I am holding my nose and voting ...
    Constitution Believer
    +1
    Based on an email I received from that moron Paul, seems his son want to reverse ROE Vs WADE.
    I believe that a woman should have the right to abort if she wants to IT IS HER BODY and the GOVERNMENT has no right to tell a person what the can or cannot do with their body. If the girl wants to abort her child that should be her right, if the girl wants to keep the kid that also is her right, and where does these PAULISTONIANS come off they have that right.
    Please allow me to show you the email......It is rather long and I am sorry but you know how long winded the PAULISTONIANS CAN BE.....

    Dear Friend,

    For 39 years, nine unelected men and women on the Supreme Court have played God with innocent human life.

    They have invented laws that condemned to painful deaths without trial more than 56 million babies for the crime of being "inconvenient."

    In 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade ruling forced abortion-on-demand down our nation's throat.

    In the past, many in the pro-life movement have felt limited to protecting a life here and there -- passing some limited law to slightly control abortion in the more outrageous cases.

    But some pro-lifers always seem to tiptoe around the Supreme Court, hoping they won't be offended.

    Now the time to grovel before the Supreme Court is o...














































































































    Based on an email I received from that moron Paul, seems his son want to reverse ROE Vs WADE.
    I believe that a woman should have the right to abort if she wants to IT IS HER BODY and the GOVERNMENT has no right to tell a person what the can or cannot do with their body. If the girl wants to abort her child that should be her right, if the girl wants to keep the kid that also is her right, and where does these PAULISTONIANS come off they have that right.
    Please allow me to show you the email......It is rather long and I am sorry but you know how long winded the PAULISTONIANS CAN BE.....

    Dear Friend,

    For 39 years, nine unelected men and women on the Supreme Court have played God with innocent human life.

    They have invented laws that condemned to painful deaths without trial more than 56 million babies for the crime of being "inconvenient."

    In 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade ruling forced abortion-on-demand down our nation's throat.

    In the past, many in the pro-life movement have felt limited to protecting a life here and there -- passing some limited law to slightly control abortion in the more outrageous cases.

    But some pro-lifers always seem to tiptoe around the Supreme Court, hoping they won't be offended.

    Now the time to grovel before the Supreme Court is over.

    Working from what the Supreme Court ruled in Roe v. Wade, pro-life lawmakers can pass a Life at Conception Act and end abortion using the Constitution instead of amending it.

    That is why it's so urgent you sign the petition to your Senators and Congressman that I will link to in a moment.

    You see, while the national media has talked a lot about the impact of economic issues on this past election, the untold story is just how well pro-life candidates did.

    So it is vital every Member of Congress be put on record.

    And your petition will help do just that.

    Signing the Life at Conception Act petition will help break through the opposition clinging to abortion-on-demand and get a vote on this life-saving bill to overturn Roe v. Wade.

    A Life at Conception Act declares unborn children "persons" as defined by the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, entitled to legal protection.

    This is the one thing the Supreme Court admitted in Roe v. Wade that would cause the case for legal abortion to "collapse."

    When the Supreme Court handed down its now-infamous Roe v. Wade decision, it did so based on a new, previously undefined "right of privacy" which it "discovered" in so-called "emanations" of "penumbrae" of the Constitution.

    Of course, as constitutional law it was a disaster.

    But never once did the Supreme Court declare abortion itself to be a constitutional right.

    Instead the Supreme Court said:

    "We need not resolve the difficult question of when life begins . . . the judiciary at this point in the development of man's knowledge is not in a position to speculate as to the answer."

    Then the High Court made a key admission:

    "If this suggestion of personhood is established, the appellant's case [i.e., "Roe" who sought an abortion], of course, collapses, for the fetus' right to life is then guaranteed specifically by the [14th] Amendment."

    The fact is, the 14th Amendment couldn't be clearer:

    ". . . nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty or property, without due process of law, nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law."

    Furthermore, the 14th Amendment says:

    "Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article."

    That's exactly what a Life at Conception Act would do.

    But this simple, logical and obviously right legislation will not become law without a fight.

    And that's where your help is critical.

    You see, it will be a tough fight, but I believe with your signed petition it is one we can win.

    Please click here to sign your petition right away.



    By turning up the heat through a massive, national, grass-roots campaign in this session of Congress, one of two things will happen.

    If you and other pro-life activists pour on enough pressure, pro-lifers can force politicians from both parties who were elected on pro-life platforms to make good on their promises and ultimately win passage of this bill.

    But even if a Life at Conception Act doesn't pass immediately, the public attention will send another crew of radical abortionists down to defeat in the next election.

    Either way, the unborn win . . . unless you do nothing.

    That's why the National Pro-Life Alliance is contacting hundreds of thousands of Americans just like you to mobilize a grass-roots army to pass a Life at Conception Act.

    The first thing you must do is sign your petition by clicking here.

    They are the key ingredient in the National Pro-Life Alliance's plan to pass a Life at Conception Act. They'll also organize:

    ... Hard-hitting TV, radio and newspaper ads to be run just before each vote, detailing the horrors of abortion and mobilizing the American people.

    ... Extensive personal lobbying of key members of Congress by rank and file National Pro-Life Alliance members and staff.

    ... A series of newspaper columns to be distributed free to all 1,437 daily newspapers now published in the United States.

    ... An extensive email, direct mail and telephone campaign to generate at least one million petitions to Congress like the one linked to in this letter.

    Of course, to do all this will take a lot of money.

    Just to email and mail the letters necessary to produce one million petitions will cost at least $460,000.

    Newspaper, TV and radio are even more expensive.

    But I'm sure you'll agree pro-lifers cannot just sit by watching the slaughter continue.

    The National Pro-Life Alliance's goal is to deliver one million petitions to the House and Senate in support of a Life at Conception Act.

    When the bill comes up for a vote in Congress, it is crucial to have the full weight of an informed public backing the pro-life position.

    I feel confident that the folks at National Pro-Life Alliance can gather those one million petitions.

    But even though many Americans who receive this email will sign the petition, many won't be able to contribute. That's why it's vital you give $10, $25, $50, $100, or even more if you can.

    Without your help the National Pro-Life Alliance will be unable to gather the one million petitions and mount the full-scale national campaign necessary to pass a Life at Conception Act.

    A sacrificial gift of $35 or even $100 or $500 now could spare literally millions of innocent babies in years to come. But if that's too much, please consider chipping in with a donation of $10.

    You should also know that a National Pro-Life Alliance supporter wants to make your decision to give easier by agreeing to match your donation, no matter the size, increasing its value by 50%!

    So please respond right away with your signed petition.



    And please help with a contribution of at least $25 or $35. Some people have already given as much as $500. Others have given $50 and $100.

    But no matter how much you give, whether it's chipping in with $10 or a larger contribution of $150, I guarantee your contribution is urgently needed and will be deeply appreciated.

    That's why I hope and pray that you will not delay a moment to make a contribution of $1000, $500, $100, $50, $25, or even $10 if you can.

    Your contribution to the National Pro-Life Alliance and your signed petition will be the first steps toward reversing Roe v. Wade and waking up the politicians about where our barbarous pro-abortion policy is taking us.

    Sincerely,

    Rand Paul,
    United States Senator
    (more)
  • goatman112003 2012/05/03 18:33:03
    for the good of the Republic and the nation, I am holding my nose and voting ...
    goatman112003
    +2
    Simple fact is my candidate couldn't keep his zipper up and resigned. I will vote for Romney for the fact that 4 more years of forward means the end of the country as I know it and possibly the breakup of this country as states totally fail.
  • Aqua Surf 2012/05/03 17:45:33
    for the good of the Republic and the nation, I am holding my nose and voting ...
    Aqua Surf
    +2
    You need a "Let's Wait And See What Happens" option. But short of a miracle, I'll be holding my nose and voting against the Kenyan.
  • Ballade... Aqua Surf 2012/05/03 19:03:16 (edited)
    Balladeer-PWCM-POTL
    nope this is an up and down vote it's time the GOP and the republic know who will stand up for the Republic..and those ready to pull a temper tantrum and help re-elect the most evil president in our history.....we are on the edge of the proverbial precipice....the paulpukes are luxury we can not afford right now
  • dreamhippy Ballade... 2012/05/07 05:07:13
    dreamhippy
    You cannot get elected without us, ergo, you cannot win if the candidate isn`t Paul!!!
  • Ballade... dreamhippy 2012/05/07 05:13:45
    Balladeer-PWCM-POTL
    It won't be paul so you going to man up...OR help to destroy the republic it's THAt simple
  • Rebel Yell 2012/05/03 14:32:08
    "I CANNOT and WILL NOT vote for Mitt Romney for president. If that elects Oba...
    Rebel Yell
    Ron Paul will go to the convention. When Republicans were crowning John McCain and partying like there was no tomorrow, Ron Paul was having his own litte convention on the side. I assume that is his same plan . There are150 superdelegates. If you beleve they will vote for Ron Paul, then I have a producing diamond mine in the middle of the Mississippi .... and will sell to you, cheap... only to you.
  • Someone Else 2012/05/03 12:02:10
    for the good of the Republic and the nation, I am holding my nose and voting ...
    Someone Else
    +1
    Option 3: We'll See
  • ««Gingey, the Master Debate... 2012/05/03 05:19:25
    "I CANNOT and WILL NOT vote for Mitt Romney for president. If that elects Oba...
    ««Gingey, the Master Debater of Þ|-|Дэ†»»
    +3
    Honestly it doesn't really matter since they're the same guy. Flip a coin or choose whichever one you think has nicer hair.
  • Ballade... ««Ginge... 2012/05/03 05:48:57
    Balladeer-PWCM-POTL
    +1
    Show me the relationship between CAIR and the MB and Romney
  • gldynmd 2012/05/03 05:17:35
    for the good of the Republic and the nation, I am holding my nose and voting ...
    gldynmd
    +1
    Romney will do just fine! And I wont be holding my nose either.
  • Ballade... gldynmd 2012/05/03 05:49:39
    Balladeer-PWCM-POTL
    +2
    thank you
  • Brat 2012/05/03 03:19:17
    "I CANNOT and WILL NOT vote for Mitt Romney for president. If that elects Oba...
    Brat
    +1
    I think Balladeer will be the one holding his nose on Election day when he votes for Obama. He's just to proud to admit it.
  • Ballade... Brat 2012/05/03 03:20:36
    Balladeer-PWCM-POTL
    +2
    holding my nose..yup BUT I will be voting for Romney...you see i pulled a Paulpuke Temper tantrum in 08..and helped contribute to this national nightmare
  • Brat Ballade... 2012/05/03 03:24:51
    Brat
    +1
    Let's wait and see who gets the nomination, then we can talk about holding noses.
  • Theresa 2012/05/03 02:35:18 (edited)
    "I CANNOT and WILL NOT vote for Mitt Romney for president. If that elects Oba...
    Theresa
    +2
    You are sure assuming a lot of false information. First the Nominee has not been Chosen, Second the vote totals are much closer in Delegate count than what the MSM has been projecting. So this post is very ill conceived! It is too darn early! Wait for sometime after the GOP nominee is chosen by the convention. Then if Romney is the Nominee. You can place it. However, I think the nominee will not be Romney due to his mounting scandal.
  • Ballade... Theresa 2012/05/03 02:37:31
    Balladeer-PWCM-POTL
    you have 80 delegates....anyway Obama thanks you
  • Theresa Ballade... 2012/05/03 02:38:34
    Theresa
    +2
    Which again is a projection. Not actual count!
  • Ballade... Theresa 2012/05/03 02:44:54
    Balladeer-PWCM-POTL
    fine I have a standing wager dear lady care to take it?
  • Theresa Ballade... 2012/05/03 15:00:53
    Theresa
    +1
    No This conversation is moot until the GOP convention ends.
  • Ballade... Theresa 2012/05/03 16:39:50
    Balladeer-PWCM-POTL
    then you don't have as much faith in your Divine Ron as you say you do
  • Theresa Ballade... 2012/05/03 19:14:02
    Theresa
    +1
    Faith? I believe in the Constitution not one person!
  • Ballade... Theresa 2012/05/03 19:33:35
    Balladeer-PWCM-POTL
    nope
    you believe in your Furher ..Ron paul.(but not enough to put something on the line like staying in SodaHead) ...IF you believed in the Constitution you wouldn't br helping the most anti-Constitution President in our history to get re-elected....
  • Theresa Ballade... 2012/05/03 19:35:13
    Theresa
    Saying you. However, Nothing you have created shows any such attribute. So Your bluster is pretty much hot air.
  • Ballade... Theresa 2012/05/03 19:38:47 (edited)
    Balladeer-PWCM-POTL
    simple realpolitik...it goes like this the enemy (that's obama in case it slipped your mind) is going to stuff the ballot boxes...the enemy (again obama JUUST in case it didn't take the first time)...will do ANYTHING to win....like it or not Romney will be the republican nominee ..and therefor EVERY VOTE WILL BE NEEDED...you childish temper tantrum is a luxury this nation can NOT afford right now...UNLESS you want to see obama get re-elected...you put on your big girl panties..Hold you nose and vote for Romney....the fact that this NEEDS to be EXPLAINED to you shows the depth of your fanaticisim
  • ☮ Ron ☮ Paul ☮ 2012! ☮ 2012/05/03 02:08:41
    "I CANNOT and WILL NOT vote for Mitt Romney for president. If that elects Oba...
    ☮ Ron ☮ Paul ☮ 2012! ☮
    +2
    When Ron Paul gets the nomination, I expect you to hold to your promise and leave Sodahead and never return!
  • Ballade... ☮ Ron ☮... 2012/05/03 02:39:02
    Balladeer-PWCM-POTL
    you taking my bet then? if ron paul ISN'T !he nominee you take a hike from Sodahead "and never return"???
  • ☮ Ron ☮... Ballade... 2012/05/03 04:00:33
    ☮ Ron ☮ Paul ☮ 2012! ☮
    +1
    Sure, I'll leave Sodahead if he doesn't get it.
  • Ballade... ☮ Ron ☮... 2012/05/03 04:40:41 (edited)
    Balladeer-PWCM-POTL
    noted...get ready to activate any other SH identities you might have in storage
  • ☮ Ron ☮... Ballade... 2012/05/04 03:29:30
    ☮ Ron ☮ Paul ☮ 2012! ☮
    No. I said I was leaving for good. That's the deal, right? If you lose I expect you hold to your wager and not come back either. You're still game right?

    Are you willing to cut yourself from SH forever? I am!
  • Ballade... ☮ Ron ☮... 2012/05/04 03:36:49
    Balladeer-PWCM-POTL
    yup if Ron paul is the nominee I will be too busy preparing shelter for the second obama administration...if Ron Paul is NOT the nominee..YOU leave
  • Savior 2012/05/03 02:00:56
    for the good of the Republic and the nation, I am holding my nose and voting ...
    Savior
    +1
    But If he wins, I'm going to be laughing at you when no change occurs.
  • Stryder Savior 2012/05/03 02:01:45
    Stryder
    Romney's going to be a lot better than you think.
  • Stryder Savior 2012/05/03 02:03:12
    Stryder
    My question to the Paul supporters is if Romney does indeed win, and it turns out he's far more conservative than you thought he would be, will you all admit you were wrong?
  • Savior Stryder 2012/05/03 02:10:12
    Savior
    +2
    yeah to a point, I won't accept a warmonger no matter how conservative he is. But if he's actually fiscally conservative, and he cuts down the debt, I will admit I'm wrong on that front.
  • Stryder Savior 2012/05/03 02:15:27
    Stryder
    Skol.
  • Ballade... Savior 2012/05/03 02:40:06
    Balladeer-PWCM-POTL
    a clintonian hairsplit...'to a point'
  • Savior Ballade... 2012/05/03 02:43:13
    Savior
    +2
    being conservative means different things to different people, to me conservative can be anti-war, to you they can't.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/23 10:04:58

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals