Oh yeah, Romney has it all wrapped up...ooops, did Ron Paul just win Iowa and Minnesota?
Regardless of what people on THIS site say, the American people simply want someone else! Romney just can't put this away nicely!
Ron Paul Wins in Iowa and Minnesota, Romney in Panic
Published: 23 April, 2012, 19:16
­Ron Paul supporters surged to victory in Sunday’s Minnesota and Iowa district conventions. A number of Romney Hawks are now deeply concerned that Paul has already laid the groundwork for success in six more caucus states.
Yesterday’s results for Ron Paul will only increase the influence of Hawks inside the Mitt Romney camp. Dominating the process, Paul picked up more delegates to the Republican National Convention.
Romney advisers are concerned that the rising total of Ron Paul delegates will lead to an unmanageable RNC. Some observers felt that the 1992 convention hurt an incumbent president George H. W. Bush and was a factor in his loss to Bill Clinton.
In most states, victories at the district conventions decide who will move onto the state conventions, where most of the delegates to the Republican National Convention in Tampa will be selected.
The rules in Minnesota are slightly different, and some of those final delegates were actually selected at scattered district conventions on Sunday. Reports from Minnesota show that Ron Paul now has 20 out of the 24 delegates already chosen to represent the state at the Republican National Convention in Tampa, and the campaign is poised to do just as well at the upcoming state convention, May 18-19, when the final 13 will be chosen.
In Iowa, Jennifer Jacobs, a reporter for the Des Moines Resister, broke into open what had been a little secret, namely, the takeover of the GOP in Iowa. “A rising tide of Republicans who share Ron Paul’s philosophy of limited government are flooding into GOP party roles in Iowa,” Jennifer wrote, reporting on the Iowa district conventions.
Actually, it is a phenomenon seen all across the country. It is viewed by many political observers as the biggest transformation of the Republican Party since 1988, when evangelical Christians joined the process and dominated state positions for a whole generation.
While the Iowa Ron Paul campaign is keeping its cards close to the vest, we all got a sneak peak from the Des Moines Register story, which reported that six of the new Iowa GOP state central committee members elected Saturday have publicly expressed support for Ron Paul. Joes Kurtinitis, Kris Thiessen, Dave Cushman, Jeff Shipley, John Kabitzke and Marcus Fedler. “Two more,” Jennifer Jacobs reports, “have close ties.” The new state chairman is also a Ron Paul supporter, who served as a co-chairman for the congressman’s Iowa state organization.
The Iowa state GOP convention is set for June 16, 2012.
Meanwhile, the sleepy New York Times has posted for five months and still posts, even today, that the total delegate count for Ron Paul in Iowa is one. They say that the total delegate count for Ron Paul in Minnesota is nine. In fact, Ron Paul supporters will now dominate both state conventions. And the same trend is ongoing in states across the country
Read More: http://rt.com/news/blogs/contrarian-view/wins-iowa...
Top Opinion
-
strawberry 2012/04/24 04:11:07






















Go Ron Paul
Ron Paul is in the running.
Don't misunderstand me and think I'm endorsing Obama because I'm not. I think it's reasonably solid to assume he'll win a second term because the GOP broken down clown car just can't compete. The GOP is counting on the fact there's a lot of folks that will vote for anyone who isn't Obama, and that's all the GOP has. And I very much doubt there's enough of em to even come close. The GOP could significantly better their chances of upsetting a second term for Obama by dumping Romney and the rest of the lot and throw their support behind this candidate.
http://projects.wsj.com/campa...
But still you have those fools... That block and run I might add.
Scott Brown convinced the TEA party he was a REAL conservative...got elected...promptly voted for a 5 billion dollar obama backed jobs bill
again paulPukes' ignorance borders on the dangerious
"So are you suggesting that flip-flopping liberal Romney is more trustworthy than 30-year consistent conservative Ron Paul?"
Also, since the nomination is not yet over, why are you so concerned about fair and honest debate? No one is arguing that the odds aren't in Romney's favor. But why are you so opposed to fair, open debate about the candidate?
Please answer both questions this time. And do not introduce new topics without resolving the previous. Thanks.