O'Donnell's Supporters Show Their Ignorance
StarrGazerr
2010/10/20 22:54:38
Christine O'Donnell, the former dabbler in witchcraft always on the lookout for chimps evolving into humans, and America's foremost bastion against super mice with human brains, continues to dazzle with her ignorance - most recently her demonstration that she has not ever read the First Amendment to the Constitution. It seems, in what cannot be a surprise to many (especially if they read Right Wing comments to SodaHead blogs), that her supporters are as ignorant as she is. Witness the latest in the funniest show to hit the campaign trail since the Wasilla Disaster herself:
---
Excerpt from the article:
Christine O'Donnell's name spelled wrong on fundraising website
By Raw Story
Wednesday, October 20th, 2010 -- 10:20 am
There are some things you expect supporters of a candidate for high office to do without messing it up -- for instance, spell the candidate's name correctly on a public Web page.
Christine O'Donnell, the GOP's US Senate nominee from Delaware, on Tuesday was found to have her name misspelled on a pro-O'Donnell site, ElectChristineODonnell.org. The error was first caught by Jeff Neumann of Gawker early Wednesday morning.
The full article can be found at the link below:
---
Excerpt from the article:
Christine O'Donnell's name spelled wrong on fundraising website
By Raw Story
Wednesday, October 20th, 2010 -- 10:20 am
There are some things you expect supporters of a candidate for high office to do without messing it up -- for instance, spell the candidate's name correctly on a public Web page.
Christine O'Donnell, the GOP's US Senate nominee from Delaware, on Tuesday was found to have her name misspelled on a pro-O'Donnell site, ElectChristineODonnell.org. The error was first caught by Jeff Neumann of Gawker early Wednesday morning.
The full article can be found at the link below:
Read More: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/10/christine-odonn...
"dummycrats this, Oduma that" Whatever Oduma means.
I'd rather have someone in the WH with community organization experience than someone in the Senate that thinks masturbation is adultery, thinks condoms spread HIV, and is convinced that the US government was involved in a land war with Russia in 1990.
Sorry to hear that you're still suffering from political amnesia, but it wasn't Obama that pushed this country to bankruptcy. It was the previous administrations large hand in that. We're still digging ourselves out.
Oh yeah,
"man up"
COONS: No, we're staying focused on the issue of Afghanistan rather than jumping to other issues.
O'DONNELL: And you jumped around. You said that security -
COONS: Ms. O'Donnell -
KARIBJANIAN: Let's let - let's let -
COONS: The core issue here -
KARIBJANIAN: -- Mr. Coons finish his point.
COONS: The core issue here is what reasonable prospect do you have for these gauzy benchmarks and timelines you suggest to ever actually result in a withdrawal?
In Iraq, there was a modern nation. There was a central government. There was infrastructure in place. In Afghanistan, there hasn't been a nation in decades. And so, despite our 10 years of incredible effort, we are not succeeding in building a nation.
As you put it, if the benchmark is self-governance, stability, security, we had a decent shot -
BLITZER: All right.
COONS: -- of that in Iraq.
BLITZER: I want to -
O'DONNELL: Well, if you remember, when we were fighting the Soviets over there in Afghanistan in the '80s and '90s, we did not finish the job. So now we have a responsibility to finish the job. And if you're going to make these politically correct statements that it's costing us too much money, you are threatening the security of our homeland.
You can read the full transcript at:
http://www.delawareon...
COONS: No, we're staying focused on the issue of Afghanistan rather than jumping to other issues.
O'DONNELL: And you jumped around. You said that security -
COONS: Ms. O'Donnell -
KARIBJANIAN: Let's let - let's let -
COONS: The core issue here -
KARIBJANIAN: -- Mr. Coons finish his point.
COONS: The core issue here is what reasonable prospect do you have for these gauzy benchmarks and timelines you suggest to ever actually result in a withdrawal?
In Iraq, there was a modern nation. There was a central government. There was infrastructure in place. In Afghanistan, there hasn't been a nation in decades. And so, despite our 10 years of incredible effort, we are not succeeding in building a nation.
As you put it, if the benchmark is self-governance, stability, security, we had a decent shot -
BLITZER: All right.
COONS: -- of that in Iraq.
BLITZER: I want to -
O'DONNELL: Well, if you remember, when we were fighting the Soviets over there in Afghanistan in the '80s and '90s, we did not finish the job. So now we have a responsibility to finish the job. And if you're going to make these politically correct statements that it's costing us too much money, you are threatening the security of our homeland.
You can read the full transcript at:
http://www.delawareonline.com...
[ah, well..... at least you didn't throw Bill Ayers in LOL]
With the possible exception of George Washington, I doubt we have ever had a President more qualified to do the job. And Washington didn't even WANT the job.
I think some may now realize that they created a monster though as he has proven to be more of a narcissist than they could ever have imagined.
"A bad judge of character" and you come up with poor moral character? That's quite a jump.