October Surprise setup?
Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆
2012/10/16 02:41:35
Was Ambassador Stevens set up to act a part in a kidnapping drama?
Think about it. An ambassador kidnapped on the eleventh anniversary of September 11.
One month later, on October 11, perhaps, The Delta Force, or maybe Navy SEALs, pull off a daring white-knuckle rescue. Hoo hah, and hooraw for Obama!
I have it indirectly from military sources that Obama had a secret meeting with the Muslim Brotherhood. That same source said that Ambassador Stevens had contract guards around him, all of whom were known practicing--er--same-sex-roommates-sharing-bed. And in a Muslim country. (And we already had a report that Ambassador Stevens himself had tendencies in that direction. So what on earth was he doing there? Why did the State Department post him there, of all places?)
And there's more. The CIA knows exactly who killed the ambassador. 270 pages, written in Arabic, tell the tale. And look at the way they've changed their story since this happened.
So think about it some more. The Muslim Brotherhood agrees to have Ambassador Stevens kidnapped, and then quietly tell the Americans where to go get him. Obama wins, and The Muslim Brotherhood has their man in Washington for another four years.
Only they slipped up. They gave the job to Al Qaeda in Libya. For whom those contract guards were no match. So two Navy SEALs on the scene took the guns away from the contract guards and used them to resist the attack. So the raiders faced more resistance than they bargained for. And they met it head-on. Maximum damage. Termination with extreme prejudice.
And panic in the White House.
Culminating in this spectacle:
Think about it. An ambassador kidnapped on the eleventh anniversary of September 11.
One month later, on October 11, perhaps, The Delta Force, or maybe Navy SEALs, pull off a daring white-knuckle rescue. Hoo hah, and hooraw for Obama!
I have it indirectly from military sources that Obama had a secret meeting with the Muslim Brotherhood. That same source said that Ambassador Stevens had contract guards around him, all of whom were known practicing--er--same-sex-roommates-sharing-bed. And in a Muslim country. (And we already had a report that Ambassador Stevens himself had tendencies in that direction. So what on earth was he doing there? Why did the State Department post him there, of all places?)
And there's more. The CIA knows exactly who killed the ambassador. 270 pages, written in Arabic, tell the tale. And look at the way they've changed their story since this happened.
So think about it some more. The Muslim Brotherhood agrees to have Ambassador Stevens kidnapped, and then quietly tell the Americans where to go get him. Obama wins, and The Muslim Brotherhood has their man in Washington for another four years.
Only they slipped up. They gave the job to Al Qaeda in Libya. For whom those contract guards were no match. So two Navy SEALs on the scene took the guns away from the contract guards and used them to resist the attack. So the raiders faced more resistance than they bargained for. And they met it head-on. Maximum damage. Termination with extreme prejudice.
And panic in the White House.
Culminating in this spectacle:
Read More: http://www.conservativenewsandviews.com/2012/10/15...
Top Opinion
-
Yuffie ♫ K-POP Dance Guru 2012/10/16 03:13:54Yeah...you know what? It must might be...!+13At this point Obama willing to do anything like a bullet to the arm or leg and stay in power.Gee that might be plan B.





















The Bengahzi situation was a arms cover-up, obama osama bin lieing with the eric holder gave arms, and Stevens was sent there to get them back from al-quiada and or the muslim brotherhood. The obama dudes and dudesses got caught, and did not want Stevens to talk, it had nothing to do with a movie, as those who are thinking individuals all the left leaning progressive liberals will follow the messiah!
And I'm not sure where you're bringing delta force or navy seals into this. Ambassador Stevens was with only 3 other people at the time of his assassination. He had 1 information analyst, and 2 body men with him. He was at the embassy when he was told he needed to get out, and the four of them travelled to his compound. When the 4 armored vehicles entered the compound there were no US military forces there at all, so where is this scenario of a planned daring rescue gone wrong coming from?
which is against the constitution ...but he's been allowed to retain this position & office as president of the united states ,,,
it's in the const .!!???
However, Obama has nothing but praise for the Muslims, and I figure that you have not figured that out yet. In Obama's own words; "I will stand with the Muslims."
However, I will say this; I am a warrior Christian, fully understanding that God is a jealous God, and understanding exactly what that means. But the Church is turning apostate as the scriptures say it would, and would eventually do more harm to people than good. I know that you, at least at this point of your life, do not believe, but please allow this one scripture to explain that apostate condition, and some of what it means;
“For yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night. For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape.” (1 Timothy 5:2-3)
In the Greek, there is no definite article before either `day' or `Lord,' indicating that the expression was stereotyped, having become somewhat as a proper noun. The expression was used extensively in the Old Testament; and one could summarize the Old Testament meaning of the expression thus:
(1) It would come suddenly and une...
However, I will say this; I am a warrior Christian, fully understanding that God is a jealous God, and understanding exactly what that means. But the Church is turning apostate as the scriptures say it would, and would eventually do more harm to people than good. I know that you, at least at this point of your life, do not believe, but please allow this one scripture to explain that apostate condition, and some of what it means;
“For yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night. For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape.” (1 Timothy 5:2-3)
In the Greek, there is no definite article before either `day' or `Lord,' indicating that the expression was stereotyped, having become somewhat as a proper noun. The expression was used extensively in the Old Testament; and one could summarize the Old Testament meaning of the expression thus:
(1) It would come suddenly and unexpected, (2) it would involve a cosmic upheaval in which the earth, and likely its solar system, would be shaken to its very foundations, and (3) it would be a time when God would bring spiritual judgment upon the people of all nations upon the earth.
The adoption, from the very beginning of Christianity, of this same expression, used in the sense of the day of Jesus Christ, shows how universally the early church accepted Jesus as co-equal with God. However, that just means that as most men's sons become equal with their father in the areas of a family business, then God's son became equal with His Father in the capasity as a Savior. Thus, The day of the Lord here means not the destruction of Jerusalem, nor the day of one's death, but the day of the Lord's Return. The Lord himself used this figure; a thief gives no warning of his coming.
But there is a bit more, it also means at the precise moment when humanity feels most secure in their rebellious and sinful course against God, and at a time when all of the devices of government and society believe they have produced an environment in which man may think that the peace, prosperity and safety of the whole world have been secured, it is precisely then, when the Lord will descend from heaven with a mighty shout, with the voice of the archangel and the sounding of trumpet of God.
In regard to "an environment in which man may think that the peace, prosperity and safety of the whole world have been secured," Could that mean a one world government? Revelations seems to set it on that level.
I have very little use for organized religion as I think it is largely just a business.
Most people do the best they can, and most people that I have met over the years have basically been kind.
Good luck to you, I hope you are at peace in your religion.
"And of the ten horns that were in his head, and of the other which came up, and before whom three fell; even of that horn that had eyes, and a mouth that spake very great things, whose look was more stout than his fellows. I beheld, and the same horn made war with the saints, and prevailed against them;"
"Made war with the saints, means, persecuted the Church (Revelation 11:7, 13:7), and prevailed--but only to a point. Most Christians today cannot see what is happening, so how can we think that non-believers can see and understand what they cannot?
While no more is intimated than that the children of men make war with one another, and prevail against one another, the prophet does not show himself so much concerned, but what is the meaning of this? Will the Lord cast off his people? Will he suffer their enemies to trample upon them and triumph over them? What is this same horn that shall prevail so far against the saints? To this the interpreter answers (v. 23–25) that this fourth beast is a fourth kingdom, that shall devour the whole earth, or (...
"And of the ten horns that were in his head, and of the other which came up, and before whom three fell; even of that horn that had eyes, and a mouth that spake very great things, whose look was more stout than his fellows. I beheld, and the same horn made war with the saints, and prevailed against them;"
"Made war with the saints, means, persecuted the Church (Revelation 11:7, 13:7), and prevailed--but only to a point. Most Christians today cannot see what is happening, so how can we think that non-believers can see and understand what they cannot?
While no more is intimated than that the children of men make war with one another, and prevail against one another, the prophet does not show himself so much concerned, but what is the meaning of this? Will the Lord cast off his people? Will he suffer their enemies to trample upon them and triumph over them? What is this same horn that shall prevail so far against the saints? To this the interpreter answers (v. 23–25) that this fourth beast is a fourth kingdom, that shall devour the whole earth, or (as it may be read) the whole land.
This can mean only a one world government, and that the ten horns are ten kings, and the little horn is another king that shall subdue three kings, and shall be very abusive to God and his people, and that is how it sets at the end. It really does not matter, in a general sense that the earth will be destroyed by fire, but whether people like it or not, mankind has discovered the means to do just that, destroy the earth through a nuclear war.
There is a lot that the Bible teaches that fits mankind to the “T”, and that alone should make a person consider at least parts of the Bible, if not all. What does it teach about what I say here? The inherent selfishness of human nature in the pathetic struggle to satisfy the desire for pleasure must inevitably be thrust into conflict both inwardly within the personality itself and outwardly in all human relationships. As so often in God's word, it is self-explanatory. The kind of wars and fightings I mention is precisely that of pleasures warring against the soul's true interests in people’s members, meaning not between members of the church, exclusively (though this is included), but within men themselves, individually.
So true peace between men is often nothing more than a dream, but I can testify that I have an inner peace with God, not man, that will stay intact through anything that gets thrown at me.
Is that a Typo? "It must might be?" is that supposed to be "It just might be"?
(check out 'buning' above)
The desperation from the obama camp to remain in power despite crumbling support and overall failure of his policies is plain to see. With his abysmal performance at the first debate, team obama put out the next moment unbelievable (and I mean UNBELIEVABLE!)
unemployment figures the likes of which he (or anyone else) has seen since obama's been in office.
We've all been worried of an October surprise but if this is the best obama can come up with, along with getting Stevens killed, then the only thing left for obama is cancelling the election. Now how is he going to do that?