Obama's Unconstitutional Implementation of DREAM Act Having Adverse Effect - A Surge in Unaccompanied Illegal Child Immigrants!
by The Associated Press
McALLEN, Texas April 28, 2012, 05:00 am ET
McALLEN, Texas (AP) — An unprecedented surge of
children caught trudging through South Texas scrublands or crossing at
border ports of entry into the U.S. without their families has sent
government and nonprofit agencies scrambling to expand their shelter,
legal representation and reunification services. On any given day this
year, the U.S. Office of Refugee Resettlement has been caring for more
than 2,100 unaccompanied child immigrants.
The
influx came to light last week when 100 kids were taken to Lackland Air
Force Base near San Antonio for temporary housing. It was the first
time the government has turned to the Defense Department — now, 200 boys
and girls younger than 18 stay in a base dormitory.
While
the issue of unaccompanied minors arriving in the U.S. isn't new, the
scale of the recent increase is. From October 2011 through March, 5,252
kids landed in U.S. custody without a parent or guardian — a 93 percent
increase from the same period the previous year, according to data
released by the Department of Health and Human Services. In March alone,
1,390 kids arrived.
"The whole community
right now is in triage mode," said Wendy Young, executive director of
Kids in Need of Defense, a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit that matches
pro bono attorneys with unaccompanied minors navigating the immigration
system. "It's important that the resources and the capacity meet the
need, and we're not quite there yet."
The
Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Refugee Resettlement
facilities in 10 states range from shelters to foster homes and have
about 2,500 beds. Government-contracted shelters were maxing out their
emergency bed space, setting up cots in gymnasiums and other extra
spaces.
"It's a much more limited set of
services," said Lauren Fisher of the South Texas Pro Bono Asylum
Representation Project, which helps children and their families navigate
the system. "It felt something like a Red Cross shelter, a hurricane
shelter."
Unaccompanied children are first
processed by the Department of Homeland Security, and then turned over
to the ORR while the deportation process begins. Once in a shelter, the
search begins for their relatives or an acceptable custodian, while
nonprofit organizations try to match the children with pro bono
attorneys. When a custodian is found, the child can leave the shelter
and await immigration proceedings.
Eighty
percent of the children referred to the ORR end up in a shelter,
according to a report released last month by the Vera Institute of
Justice — a nonprofit that developed a program to better provide access
to legal services for children. The average shelter stay is 61 days, and
the report found that at least 65 percent of the kids end up with a
sponsor in the U.S.
The cause of the surge
remains a mystery to child migrant advocates and government officials.
The kids are coming from the same places as usual —Guatemala, El
Salvador, Honduras and Mexico — and they offer the same range of
explanations: they made the trek to look for parents already in the
U.S.; they're seeking economic opportunity to send money home; they want
to escape violence or abuse.
"We're talking
to the children, but we don't have one solid answer," Fisher said.
"There seem to be the same reasons that we've seen before."
Some
have suggested that human smugglers are more aggressively marketing
their services. Others wonder if the Border Patrol, whose presence has
doubled in recent years, is simply catching more of them. But Border
Patrol apprehensions of children and adults were cut in half from 2008
to 2011, and only 5 percent of those caught are unaccompanied children.
Younger children commonly cross with adult smugglers at the ports of
entry, while older kids join groups that follow guides through the
brush.
A South Texas woman told border
authorities this month that the 5-year-old girl accompanying her at the
international bridge connecting Hidalgo, Texas, and Reynosa, Mexico, was
her sister, according to court records. She even presented a Texas
birth certificate. But the girl couldn't answer basic questions, so the
woman told customs officers that she wasn't related to the girl at all.
She said that a man whom she worked with in Mexico offered her $2,000 to
"cross" the girl — who was actually from Guatemala — and accompany her
to Houston. The woman was charged with transporting an illegal
immigrant.
This week, the first ladies of
Mexico, Honduras and Guatemala spoke at a three-day conference on
unaccompanied minors in Washington, D.C. Mexico's first lady, Margarita
Zavala, and Honduran counterpart Rosa Elena Bonilla de Lobo noted that
tougher U.S. border security made it more difficult for parents working
in the U.S. to return for their children, a suggestion as to why parents
increasingly would put their children in a smuggler's care.
"The
statistics are worrisome," said Rosa Maria Leal de Perez, Guatemala's
first lady. "We've had 6,000 unaccompanied children repatriated in the
last year."
The Department of Health and
Human Services limited its public statements on the unaccompanied
migrant children program, but it allowed a few reporters to take a short
tour this week of the housing at Lackland Air Force base. They were not
allowed to speak with children.
The beige,
nondescript four-story dormitory is located deep on the base. When
children arrive, they are issued black duffel bags filled with clothing
and are allowed two phone calls a week. Three-quarters of the children
are boys, most between 14 and 17 years old.
Green
cots were spaced two feet apart along the stark-white walls. A media
room held a large flat-screen television and a video game console; there
were also board games and an outside area with a basketball hoop and
two soccer goals. The kids play outside for an hour each day.
"We
are looking to add some educational features that are appropriate for a
30-day temporary program," HHS spokesman Jesse Garcia said, though the
goal is to move kids to more established accommodations within 15 days.
As
of late Friday, 83 kids had already been transferred out of Lackland,
most to permanent facilities. Nineteen had been reunited with family.
__
Associated Press writer Paul Weber in San Antonio contributed to this report.
Comment:
This is what happens when ICE is told to implement the DREAM Act
administratively, when "selective prosecution" allows minors to remain
in the United States. This is yet another policy of the Obama
administration that has been implemented after a Democratic congress
voted it (i.e. the DREAM Act) down! The fact that such lenient policies
actually attract more illegal immigration remains lost on those who
promote such policies.
Top Opinion
-
Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆ 2012/05/02 18:48:07All of the above+5That's the worst part of the whole immigration business: dragging kids into an illegal activity.






















Some truck full of kids are going to die miserably in Summer desert heat because they are being smuggled into America illegally.
Obama: callous, careless, or clueless?
These children who have been living with relatives are looking for their parents. A child still doesn’t understand how their mother or father can leave them behind. Even if it means bringing food to the table. They miss their parents desperately and need to be with their parents. Parents leave their children behind in the care of relatives and cross the border so they can find work that will help provide money for their families back at home.They miss their parent(s) and are desperate to see and be near them again. So, in the end these children will decide to travel alone and try to get reunited with their parents. Most of the children don’t realize the dangers they face when trying to cross the two borders. Many are swept up by sex traffickers. Others get lost in the desert and disappear.
Others hop trains . (Which Way Home, Kids Riding Trains), the movie
By my math, that's a whole 160 agents Obama has added, not 1200. Also, Obama is cutting the number of National Guard troops on the border (placed there by Bush) by at least half.
http://www.washingtontimes.co...
You know, it really does get annoying when people who obviously have never read the Constitution and clearly have no idea as to how our system of government works constantly complain about "constitutional violations". It's funny sometimes, but it just demonstrates the irrationality of all of the Obama Haters and their obsession with attacking one of the most effective and successful Presidents this nation has ever had.
http://www.wnd.com/2011/06/31...
And you are the one who is misreading the article - just after the statement that the border patrols have doubled, it is qualified: "But Border Patrol apprehensions of children and adults were cut in half from 2008 to 2011, and only 5 percent of those caught are unaccompanied children. Younger children commonly cross with adult smugglers at the ports of entry, while older kids join groups that follow guides through the brush."
And I didn't misread anything. They are talking about apprehensions of adults WITH children with them. Look, I ...
And I didn't misread anything. They are talking about apprehensions of adults WITH children with them. Look, I would have no objection to them adding even more Border Patrol agents, but the reality is that illegal immigration is not nearly the "crisis" that the conservatives try to make it. We are at net zero illegal immigration this year, and assuming we continue the policies now in place the total number of illegals will be dropping within the next few years. I won't deny that not all of the drop is because of President Obama's policies. The weakened world and US economy the last few years also plays a role, and I do give the anti-immigrant people some credit for frightening a lot of employers out of hiring illegals at the rate they used to.
"A study published this week by the Pew Hispanic Center found that over the last five years, immigration from Mexico to the United States has dropped to its lowest level in decades, hitting the key “net zero” benchmark just recently, where more Mexicans are moving out of the U.S. than there are coming in.
The study’s most startling finding: while the population of legal Mexican immigrants is growing faster than it has in many years, the undocumented population is shrinking even faster. There were a total of 6.1 million undocumented Mexican immigrants living in the U.S. in 2011, compared to nearly 7 million in 2007 — a statistic that, according to Pew, represents the first significant decrease in illegal immigration in nearly two decades."
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/20...
The "laundress" is every bit as much a law-breaker as the criminal, in terms of violating our immigration laws. According to you and Obama, we are to now look the other way when anyone is found within our borders who has failed to comply with our laws, while virtually no other nation in the world abdicates their own sovereignty and their right to secure borders? So it isn't amnesty because you say it isn't? Easy to win a debate when you control the definitions.
Yes, you did misread it and you are still doing so, perhaps intentionally. The entire story is about a surge in unaccompanied children crossing the border, the younger ones at ports of entry accompanied by adults, who ostensibly have papers, and the older ones who are trekking through the "scrub" with their ...
The "laundress" is every bit as much a law-breaker as the criminal, in terms of violating our immigration laws. According to you and Obama, we are to now look the other way when anyone is found within our borders who has failed to comply with our laws, while virtually no other nation in the world abdicates their own sovereignty and their right to secure borders? So it isn't amnesty because you say it isn't? Easy to win a debate when you control the definitions.
Yes, you did misread it and you are still doing so, perhaps intentionally. The entire story is about a surge in unaccompanied children crossing the border, the younger ones at ports of entry accompanied by adults, who ostensibly have papers, and the older ones who are trekking through the "scrub" with their coyotes -- it isn't about whether they are caught or not.
Once again, it does appear that illegals are self-deporting because of a lack of jobs. Apparently Obama's immigration policy, destroy private sector jobs and provide an economy that sucks, is working.
Also, I seriously doubt Pew's statistics on the total number of illegals. In 2000, California alone had a foreign-born population of 8,864,255, or 26% of the state's total population, and half of them, or over 4,000,000, were Latin Americans. The total number I've seen is typically 11.2 to 11.5 million. http://news.yahoo.com/number-...
I also love the part about "destroying private sector jobs". I guess you haven't noticed that we've ADDED private sector jobs for the last 25 consecutive months, and have added over 4 million private sector jobs overall since the President took office.
http://politicalcorrection.or...
As to jobs, you overlook the fact that George Bush's going away present to the nation was a job loss of 750,000 jobs a month. It's true that the "net number of jobs created" is nowhere near enough, but when you consider that for the first six months of President Obama's term, when we were still in Bush's fiscal year and the stimulus had not yet started to kick in fully, we lost another several million jobs. Had we started on January 20, 2009 at zero jobs gained or lost per month, the 4 million figure would be a net gain figure. As it is, it took a long time to even break even given the damage Bush's failed policies inflicted.
What he got for his troubles was a letter signed by 76 Democrats complaining that his proposal to regulate Fannie and Freddie for "safety and soundness" would interfere with their mission to provide subsidized housing. Barney Frank infamously remarked that he wanted to "roll the dice a little longer" in favor of more subsidized housing. Barney and the Dems rolled the dice and they came up "craps" for the American people.
I suggest you read "Reckless Endangerment" by Gretchen Morgenson, a financial editor/writer for the N.Y. Times (hardly a right-wing source!) for the story of how the policies of the CEO of Fannie Mae, James Johnson, to push "subprime loans" as a way to increase volume and his own bonuses (Johnson,a Democrat, made over $100 million at Fannie Mae in ~ eight years!), from the early 90s on, along with Clinton's "federalizing" Johnson's policies by rewriting the regulations to the CRA and forcing banks to make shaky loans, led to the "housing boom" and the subsequent m...
What he got for his troubles was a letter signed by 76 Democrats complaining that his proposal to regulate Fannie and Freddie for "safety and soundness" would interfere with their mission to provide subsidized housing. Barney Frank infamously remarked that he wanted to "roll the dice a little longer" in favor of more subsidized housing. Barney and the Dems rolled the dice and they came up "craps" for the American people.
I suggest you read "Reckless Endangerment" by Gretchen Morgenson, a financial editor/writer for the N.Y. Times (hardly a right-wing source!) for the story of how the policies of the CEO of Fannie Mae, James Johnson, to push "subprime loans" as a way to increase volume and his own bonuses (Johnson,a Democrat, made over $100 million at Fannie Mae in ~ eight years!), from the early 90s on, along with Clinton's "federalizing" Johnson's policies by rewriting the regulations to the CRA and forcing banks to make shaky loans, led to the "housing boom" and the subsequent meltdown.
You also greatly exaggerate the job losses under Bush. During 2008 there were a total of 2.6 million jobs lost, approximately 217,000 a month - less than a third of your claim. http://www.pbn.com/US-job-los...
The unemployment rate remained at just over 7% when Obama took office in January, 2009. Obama promised that if his $800 billion "stimulus" bill was passed, unemployment wouldn't go above 8%. It promptly went to 11% and his stimulus was an abject failure. If the people who have quit looking and those who are under-employed were counted, the true unemployment rate would be around 15%!
The main point of SB1070, of course, is voter suppression. It was designed to intimidate LEGAL hispanics from going to the polls out of fear that if their papers were not in order, or they didn't happen to have a copy of their birth certificate, they would be thrown in jail for trying to exercise their constitutional right to vote.
And it is the job of the Justice Department to protect the constitutional rights of American citizens. SB1070 infringes on those rights, so they had a duty to do what they could to prevent it from taking effect. And both the District Judge and the Court of Appeals agreed with the Justice Department. It remains to be seen whether this will be another case of SCOTUS putting politics ahead of the Constitution.
If you truly believe it is nothing but a "campaign ad" why don't you point out the inaccuracies!!!
But please, let's make sure we don't raise taxes on millionaires to pay for any of this.