If Barack Obama has an immediate eligibility problem, it is more likely to derive from the Social Security Number he has been using for the last 25 years than from his birth certificate.
Ohio private investigator Susan Daniels has seen to that. On Monday, July 2, she filed suit in Geauga County (Ohio) Common Pleas Court demanding that Jon Husted, Ohio secretary of state, remove Obama’s name from the ballot until Obama can prove the validity of his Social Security Number.
Daniels, who has vetted thousands of Social Security Numbers for numerous other clients, has done her homework. In her filing, she thoroughly documents her contention “that Barack Obama has repeatedly, consistently, and with intent misrepresented himself by using a fraudulently obtained Social Security Number.”
To acquire appropriate standing in court, Daniels has gone to the trouble of establishing herself as a valid write-in candidate for president. Before she is through, this 70-something mother of seven, who has been a licensed Ohio PI since 1995, may cause Obama more trouble than the Romney campaign.
Daniels started her investigation in August 2009. Given her profession, she has been able to access a variety of proprietary databases. What she learned without much trouble is that Obama has been using a Social Security Number with the prefix “042″ since 1986.
As she discovered, the “042″ number is reserved for the exclusive use of individuals who register in Connecticut. When she ran 10 sequential numbers before and after Obama’s, all returned with the documentation “issued 1977-1979 in CT.”
When Daniels ran the numbers immediately flanking Obama’s, she came to the firm conviction that Obama’s number was issued in March 1977 in Connecticut.
By all accounts, as Daniels thoroughly documents, Obama was then a 15-year-old living in Hawaii. There is no record of him even visiting Connecticut in or near this time frame.
Daniels checked other databases as well to validate her findings, including the Massachusetts Department of Motor Vehicles and the IRS. Yes, Obama used the 042 number to get a driver’s license when at Harvard and as recently as on his 2009 income tax return.
In her research, Daniels kept coming across what she calls a “marked anomaly,” one she had never seen before – multiple birthdates listed for the same person. The 08/04/1961 and 04/08/1961 variation made sense, but the frequent appearance of the year “1890″ did not.
The ample evidence Daniels gathered led her to believe that the 042 number Obama has been using “had previously been issued to another person,” one who lived in Connecticut between 1977 and 1979 and who was born in 1890.
This assertion can be verified. By law, the Social Security Administration will have kept on microfilm a copy of the original SS-5 application attached to a particular Social Security Number. Daniels, however, does not have access to that microfilm.
With credit being what it is, a new SSN to use would come in handy. Baby needs a pair of new shoes......
Name one other POTUS who has produced their SSN........I'll wait.
And nobody is looking into MItt Romney's either, and he's running for President!
Makes you wonder what separates Obama from all the other presidents and presidential wannabes? What makes Obama so different? What could it be? Hmmmm . . . .
As for Romney. Again no one has made any accusation regarding his SS# being invalid or false. It that were to come up the biased liberal media would be on it in a flash.
What makes Obama so different is that he has opened himself up to this scrutiny by being less than honest in many matter. But I know what you're insinutating and I fully expected it as that is the final attempt when a liberal can't fight a factual and logical discussion.
But why didn't it ever come up before? Especially with Richard Nixon, that dude really was a crook. Why didn't anyone think it was possible for a president to use a fraudulent SS# until Obama? Why don't people think it's possible Romney has done it?
Compare Romney and Obama.
Both men were born on U.S. soil.
Both men have fathers who were NOT born on U.S. soil.
Both men have only been married once and their children are U.S. citizens.
Both men graduated from Harvard Law School.
Both have great teeth and keep their hair cut short.
Seriously, why do you suspect Obama of using a fraudulent SS# and not Romney? What's the difference?
The difference is the PI found evidence regarding Obama's SS# possibly being fraudulent and has made a prima facia case. No one has found this on Romney. That is the difference. It's not to hard to understand if you look at it from a realistic and logical viewpoint.
That's the point. No one even asked the other presidents, no one is asking the current presidential candidate. But these exact same people have been looking up Obama's ass with a flashlight for the past 4 years, claiming EVERYTHING about him is fraudulent, from his career to his education to his BC to his SS# to his parentage to his books. EVERYTHING. Doesn't it seem a bit odd to you that one guy gets a colonic and the other 13 get NOTHING?
The one exception was when the left wanted to see George W. Bush's college transcripts, and he refused to release them, remember? Nobody accused George of "sealing" his records, of not earning his Yale or Harvard Business School degree, of hiding his past. They just thought he was stupid.
And Bush never did release his college transcripts, he told everyone it was none of their business and that was okay. Obama says his college transcripts are none of your business, and he's "hiding something". Eventually someone leaked Bush's Yale transcripts and they were published in the New Yorker in 1999 without his permission. But Bush never vol...
That's the point. No one even asked the other presidents, no one is asking the current presidential candidate. But these exact same people have been looking up Obama's ass with a flashlight for the past 4 years, claiming EVERYTHING about him is fraudulent, from his career to his education to his BC to his SS# to his parentage to his books. EVERYTHING. Doesn't it seem a bit odd to you that one guy gets a colonic and the other 13 get NOTHING?
The one exception was when the left wanted to see George W. Bush's college transcripts, and he refused to release them, remember? Nobody accused George of "sealing" his records, of not earning his Yale or Harvard Business School degree, of hiding his past. They just thought he was stupid.
And Bush never did release his college transcripts, he told everyone it was none of their business and that was okay. Obama says his college transcripts are none of your business, and he's "hiding something". Eventually someone leaked Bush's Yale transcripts and they were published in the New Yorker in 1999 without his permission. But Bush never voluntarily released them. Why was that okay for Bush but not Obama?
I know part of it is the Republicans/conservatives having a witch hunt with the Democratic president. But the sheer scope of the claims, which say everything the guy has said about his life is a lie, indicates a double standard that goes far beyond some self-described "P.I." just looking into something. The hysteria from the right wing fringe goes far beyond anything I've seen since the Civil Rights Era. There is no valid evidence of a fraudulent SS# being use by Obama, everything has been entirely fabricated, and credible voices on the right have verified it. You just don't want to accept that, you are choosing to keep the story going.
So what keeps stuff like this alive even after it's been dispelled by credible members of your own party? Boredom? Desperation beyond all reason to cast suspicion on Obama? A belief that some people really are that stupid and gullible? The fact that perhaps YOU are one who is that stupid and gullible? (no offense, just making a point).
Just once before I die I would like to hear an HONEST explanation from someone on the right. Any chance of that?
You can blame whomever you want, but it's obvious the Rep Party have allowed the Tea Party loons and other fringe extremists to persecute Obama because it served their interests to let them do so. Nutjobs vote, too. And it doesn't matter to the opposing party whether someone votes against Obama because they disagree with his policies or because they believe he's a Martian, a vote is a vote. And any vote against Obama for whatever reason, no matter how nuts, is a vote for them.
The Republican Party courted the fringe, and now they're having a hard time controlling them. It's been a double edged sword that's been fun to watch, especially when the Tea Party House tanked Boehner's and Cantor's duplicate jet engine funding early on. THAT was great.
Everything else you posted is not worth responding to as it is nothing but liberal rhetoric that has no bearing on the premise of my post.
Interesting how you're the first one to go there. Projecting again?
http://www.sodahead.com/unite...
So don't try the BS that you didn't mention race or play the race card as that would make you a blatant liar and hypocrite.
I did not play the race card, I did not mention race at all, YOU did. You brought it up first.
http://www.sodahead.com/unite...
Seems you can't remember your own race baiting so you lie to cover it up. NIce try but you fail and prove your are a blatant liar and hypocrite and nothing more than a waste of time as well as air. Have a nice life as I don't deal with race baiting liars such as yourself. Goodbye.
You have now lost all credibility
The truth eventually outs, doesn't it?
"That's because the black guy with the funny name and a non citizen father CAN'T be a real American, can he?"
Post:
http://www.sodahead.com/unite...
You have now proven yourself to be a blatant liar not worth anymore of my time. I don't like liars, hypocrites or race baitors. And all three is the trifecta. Goodbye.
**In response to your post below. So it is acceptable for you to call others on their comments to another person but when you are called for it you whine and complain that the comment wasn't made to the person calling you on it. LOL You truly are a stellar hypocrite and liar. How pathetic!**
In my discussion with YOU, I haven't mentioned race at all.
I'm still waiting for you to answer my questions, which you can't do.
Sorry to break it to you, but the conservative bigots LOST the Civil War. It's been 150 years. GET OVER IT. THEY'RE HUMAN BEINGS, NOT PROPERTY.
No one asked about the other Presidents as there was no evidence to raise the question. Had someone looked into it and found something to warrant an investigation then it would have occurred. I guess you don't believe in investigative research or reporting. And again, in her lawsuit she will have to give her reason for opening the investigation and the subsequent findings or it won't go forward. That is part of the legal system. If you case is frivilous it will be dismissed. So unless you have seen the lawsuit which was filed your argument is null and void.
This PI saw something about Obama worth looking into (in her opinion). Once she did she found some evidence pointing to a fraudulent SS# so she further investigated. That is the matter plain and simple. Not hard to understand and logical. Unless you are trying to avoid dealing with the facts.
It is only a witch hunt is you are trying to avoid the issue. Was Watergate a witch hunt by the Democrats...
No one asked about the other Presidents as there was no evidence to raise the question. Had someone looked into it and found something to warrant an investigation then it would have occurred. I guess you don't believe in investigative research or reporting. And again, in her lawsuit she will have to give her reason for opening the investigation and the subsequent findings or it won't go forward. That is part of the legal system. If you case is frivilous it will be dismissed. So unless you have seen the lawsuit which was filed your argument is null and void.
This PI saw something about Obama worth looking into (in her opinion). Once she did she found some evidence pointing to a fraudulent SS# so she further investigated. That is the matter plain and simple. Not hard to understand and logical. Unless you are trying to avoid dealing with the facts.
It is only a witch hunt is you are trying to avoid the issue. Was Watergate a witch hunt by the Democrats? Why didn't they investigate every other President for possible ties to breaking and enterings in Washington. Again your premise is ridiculous.
And again if there is no credible evidence the case will be dismissed and as of yet it hasn't. So in the eyes of the court there must be merit to the evidence of the lawsuit. That is what is keeping it alive, it's called our legal system.
Just once before I die I would like to see someone on the left deal with the facts instead of tap dancing around them and coming up with ridiculous arguments to dispute them. Any chance of that?
The only reason you are doing this is because Barack Obama is black. You never asked for Bill Clinton's birth certificate. You never cared about Jimmy Carter's social security number. You're supporting a candidate for President whose father was a citizen of MEXICO. You don't give a damn about truth, or facts, or reality. Not to mention that you've proven a dozen times over that when facts ARE presented to you you can't deal with them. All you care about is that there's a black guy in the White House and no matter how many lies you have to make up, you just HAVE to get him out of there, even though you'd probably be dead today if John McCain had been elected, and even though you are spitting on the graves of every man who signed the Declaration of Independence in the process (and they were all white guys!!)
As I keep telling you, don't worry. He'll be leaving on January 20, 2017. But be careful what you wish for......
I see you didn't answer my question.....what? Had nothing to say?