Obama's new law, Shut Up By Judge Andrew P. Napolitano
|
|
|||||
|
18 votes
|
|
13% | |||
|
2 votes
|
|
1% | |||
|
120 votes
|
|
86% | |||
Last week, President Obama
signed into law the Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds
Improvement Act of 2011. This law permits Secret Service agents to
designate any place they wish as a place where free speech, association
and petition of the government are prohibited. And it permits the Secret
Service to make these determinations based on the content of speech.
Thus, federal agents whose work is to
protect public officials and their friends may prohibit the speech and
the gatherings of folks who disagree with those officials or permit the
speech and the gatherings of those who would praise them, even though
the First Amendment condemns content-based speech discrimination by the
government.
The new law also provides that anyone who
gathers in a “restricted” area may be prosecuted. And because the
statute does not require the government to prove intent, a person
accidentally in a restricted area can be charged and prosecuted, as
well.
Permitting people to express publicly their
opinions to the president only at a time and in a place and manner such
that he cannot hear them violates the First Amendment because it
guarantees the right to useful speech; and unheard political speech is
politically useless. The same may be said of the rights to associate and
to petition. If peaceful public assembly and public expression of
political demands on the government can be restricted to places where
government officials cannot be confronted, then those rights, too, have
been neutered.
Political speech is in the highest category
of protected speech. This is not about drowning out the president in the
Oval Office. This is about letting him know what we think of his work
when he leaves the White House. This is speech intended to influence the political process.
Top Opinion
-
This is an outrage and a violation of my First Amendement Rights+24I gave my word that I would defend the Constitution from enemies both forien and domestic. I will complete my vow.






















Protests of his invasion of Iraq (15,000,000 people)
Protests over wireless wiretapping
Want more?
H.R. 347 Trespass Act--Restriction of 1st amendment freedom of speech and assembly.
Patriot Act--Violation of 4th Amendment right to privacy by legal use of wiretapping and e-tapping+ 48hr detention w/out charge.
NDAA-Violation of Article 1 sec. 9 'due process of law' by legal indefinite imprisionment by military without probable cause, charge, trial, and representation.
Collective:
Wars Powers Resolution-President can declare war without Congressional approval aka People's consent.
Fed Reserve Act of 1913-Violation of Article 1 sec. 8 Congressional authority to print coin/money and regulate value.
Just a few....:-)
thanks libby for showing not a single right taken from you, also libby the war powers and money issues are not your rights but powers of the us government. but i again want to thank you for securing the fact that no rights lost
If you choose to believe that the examples that I mentioned are Constitutional, then so be it. I just happen to disagree.
P.S. I do not feel we should give up any liberties for the sake of security. Thanks.
When President Bush travels around the United States, the Secret Service visits the location ahead of time and orders local police to set up "free speech zones" or "protest zones," where people opposed to Bush policies (and sometimes sign-carrying supporters) are quarantined. These zones routinely succeed in keeping protesters out of presidential sight and outside the view of media covering the event.
When Bush went to the Pittsburgh area on Labor Day 2002, 65-year-old retired steel worker Bill Neel was there to greet him with a sign proclaiming, "The Bush family must surely love the poor, they made so many of us."
The local police, at the Secret Service's behest, set up a "designated free-speech zone" on a baseball field surrounded by a chain-link fence a third of a mile from the location of Bush's speech.
The police cleared the path of the motorcade of all critical signs, but folks with pro-Bush signs were permitted to line the president's path. Neel refused to go to the designated area and was arrested for disorderly conduct; the police also confiscated his sign.
Neel later commented, "As far as I'm concerned, the whole country is a free-speech zone. If the Bush administration has its way, anyone who criticizes them will be out of sight and out of mind."