Obama’s Lawyers Officially Admit Birth Certificate is Fake
Southern Man
2013/02/05 23:09:00
Lawyers for the Obama Administration announced that Barack Obama’s long form birth certificate was a forgery. Under penalty of perjury, the lawyers said they were forced to say that the birth certificate was valid.
A lawyer representing the Obama administration say the birth
certificate was knowingly purveyed to fool the American public into
believing he was legitimately able to be President.
I sure as hell hope this is true this will be change we can believe in that's for sure I would guess there are 10,000 of thousands of very happy people from all over
Read More: http://occupycorporatism.com/obamas-lawyers-offici...
Top Opinion
-
Sniper 2013/02/05 23:11:23
This article is from April 20 of last year, and is a massively twisted account of what happened with the New Jersey Presidential Primary ballot access hearing.
What actually happened was that under New Jersey State law , any candidate must have a petition with 1,000 New Jersey registered voter signatures by a certain deadline, which Obama’s people did. Birthers Nick Purpura and Ted Moran filed a challenge to Obama being on the New Jersey primary ballot, claiming that he was ineligible because of Birther issues.
Alexandra M. Hill, one of Obama’s attorneys, simply pointed out the following truths:
#1: While New Jersey law does state that the candidate being nominated has to certify being eligible for the office, in a Presidential Primary , the actual people being voted for are not the candidates themselves, but the delegates for that Party’s National Convention (the DNC in the case of Obama). All that’s required is that they be qualified to be DNC delegates .
#2: For that reason, any birth certificate or other issues involving Obama’s citizenship are irrelevant to this particular case which was about the requirements under New Jersey State Law. This case was not about whether Obama was eligible to be President, it was about whether his delegates were el...
This article is from April 20 of last year, and is a massively twisted account of what happened with the New Jersey Presidential Primary ballot access hearing.
What actually happened was that under New Jersey State law, any candidate must have a petition with 1,000 New Jersey registered voter signatures by a certain deadline, which Obama’s people did. Birthers Nick Purpura and Ted Moran filed a challenge to Obama being on the New Jersey primary ballot, claiming that he was ineligible because of Birther issues.
Alexandra M. Hill, one of Obama’s attorneys, simply pointed out the following truths:
#1: While New Jersey law does state that the candidate being nominated has to certify being eligible for the office, in a Presidential Primary, the actual people being voted for are not the candidates themselves, but the delegates for that Party’s National Convention (the DNC in the case of Obama). All that’s required is that they be qualified to be DNC delegates.
#2: For that reason, any birth certificate or other issues involving Obama’s citizenship are irrelevant to this particular case which was about the requirements under New Jersey State Law. This case was not about whether Obama was eligible to be President, it was about whether his delegates were eligible to be New Jersey DNC delegates, and they were. All she did was point that out.
#3: At one point, she states that the Internet image of the birth certificate on the White House website would not constitute admissible evidence even were it required (which it was not), because no Internet image of any document constitutes legal evidence in any court of law, which is absolutely true! Only the actual, physical document constitutes legally admissible evidence. She was not saying that it was in any way fake nor forged.
Unedited video of the entire hearing is available on the Internet, as is the complete transcript. You will not find any statement nor admission nor even implication by her anywhere in there that the birth certificate is fake, fraudulent, forged, nor any other such thing.
Everybody’s personal records are sealed by law and are on a need-to-know basis. The people who need to know Obama’s details have seen them. You and I don’t need to know, so we haven’t.
Obama has not spent a bunch of money to keep them sealed. The $1.2 million figure floated around the RWNJ blogosphere comes from disclosure of how much the Obama campaign spent on total post-campaign legal expenditures. All political campaigns incur legal expenses before, during, and after the campaign.
But truth is truth and falsehood is falsehood, and you’re spouting falsehood and I will not allow it to go uncorrected so long as I can correct it.
You can, of course, Block me, but check my Profile first before you do.
Q: Are Obama’s early records “sealed”?
A: No. Many records that presidential candidates don’t ordinarily release do remain confidential, but they are not “sealed” by a court. The 16 claims in a widely distributed graphic are mostly false or distorted.
I seek only the truth, not to disparage. the truth will set you free!!
no social security number
no registration for the draft proof
no college records
no girlfriends from his past
no old classmates
HM I wonder if Obama has his own fingerprints
Did you know that most of the planets inhabitants disobey God?
And all these billions of people are wrong!