Obama's former czar Van Jones says Obama isn't a socialist or a communist, but is a social communitarian. All are leftwing. Do you think there is any major ideological difference between those political labels?
tncdel
2013/01/24 23:23:47
|
|
|||||
|
9 votes
|
|
15% | |||
|
52 votes
|
|
85% | |||
Former communist Russia was both a communist and a socialist hybrid. Its full name was "The Union of Soviet Socialist Republic," often shortened to U.S.S.R.
Communism and Socialism has never existed in its "pure" form in any government. But the New World Order globalists who created Barack Obama are communist-socialist oriented. And Obama's mentor alleged by many to be his true biological father, Frank Marshal Davis, was an avowed Communist. If Barack Obama isn't "a chip off the old block," he certainly gives a good impression of it most times.
Communism and Socialism has never existed in its "pure" form in any government. But the New World Order globalists who created Barack Obama are communist-socialist oriented. And Obama's mentor alleged by many to be his true biological father, Frank Marshal Davis, was an avowed Communist. If Barack Obama isn't "a chip off the old block," he certainly gives a good impression of it most times.
Top Opinion
-
Balladeer-PWCM-POTL 2013/01/24 23:24:53NO, I think it is splitting hairs or simply labeling the same basic thing dif...
The sooner we, the people, who are the government stop looking for the costly "freebies" that the current administration tosses out and own up to our individual responsibilites as citizens the better and more prosperous out nation can become.
Secondly Barbra the size of the government has shrunk by 700,000 since Obama was elected.
Lastly under George W Bush government jobs increased by nearly 1.8 million while private sector jobs over the 8 years of his presidency lost almost 700,000 jobs.
So tell me Barbra what is so great about republicans? They increase the deficit, lose private sector jobs increase the size of government by almost 1.700,000 jobs all the while claiming to be the party of smaller government. At least with democrats we increase the number of private sector jobs so people could have dignity and claim personal responsibility for themselves while providing a safety net for those who fall through the cracks or just fell on hard times for awhile.
You may have noticed some economic difficulties across the country in recent years among family, friends, neighbors, colleagues. One sector is doing quite nicely, however, under Barack Hussein Obama.
In the 1,420 days since he took the oath of office, the federal government has daily hired on average 101 new employees. Every day. Seven days a week. All 202 weeks. That makes 143,000 more federal workers than when Obama talked forever on that cold day in January of 2009.
Under Obama the total federal workforce has surpassed two million for the first time since the first Clinton term, now sitting about the 2.2 ,million level.
Read More At IBD: http://news.investors.com/pol...
The health care mess greatly infringes upon my rights. I now have the regime telling me what kind of health care I can have. We, the people are the government, not the regime. Now, probably unbeknown to you, we the people have to pay for two health care messes - the one foisted on the private sector and the one for the hirelings in the regime. None of our hireling are on the mess. Nasty Pelosi introduced a bill to excluded themselves before the mess was passed.
The Republicans have recognized that the taxing and spending has to stop. You cannot tax and spend your way out of a depression. It has been proven over and over again. FDR sent the unemployed to war and the great depression ended the day he died.
The health care mess will bankrupt our struggling government. The democrats did not increase private sector jobs, it decreased them. At present the health care mess is reducing the work hours to less than 30 per week and not hiring. Any business with over 50 employees will be fined for not providing it.
What responsibilities has your president claimed? None, I don't want you to have to stretch to find some. Look at the Benghazi fiasco. Neither...
The health care mess greatly infringes upon my rights. I now have the regime telling me what kind of health care I can have. We, the people are the government, not the regime. Now, probably unbeknown to you, we the people have to pay for two health care messes - the one foisted on the private sector and the one for the hirelings in the regime. None of our hireling are on the mess. Nasty Pelosi introduced a bill to excluded themselves before the mess was passed.
The Republicans have recognized that the taxing and spending has to stop. You cannot tax and spend your way out of a depression. It has been proven over and over again. FDR sent the unemployed to war and the great depression ended the day he died.
The health care mess will bankrupt our struggling government. The democrats did not increase private sector jobs, it decreased them. At present the health care mess is reducing the work hours to less than 30 per week and not hiring. Any business with over 50 employees will be fined for not providing it.
What responsibilities has your president claimed? None, I don't want you to have to stretch to find some. Look at the Benghazi fiasco. Neither he nor Hillary will explain exactly what happened because they know they are culpable and have yet to figure out who to blame. The ball is in their court and it is too hot for them to handle. Bush didn't do it!
What did your touted Hillary do? She traveled to 121 countries and flew over 1,000,000 miles. What did she accomplish? Nothing.
Do you have healthcare now? If so it infringes upon nothing if not then get some because we who have it are tired of paying for the freeloaders who don't.
Republicans have the same failed policies they always had. Cut taxes and "increase" spending making bigger deficits. They are either too stupid or too stubborn to change or both.
Talk about accomplishing nothing. Bush invaded Afghanistan to get Bin Laden he didn't get Bin Laden and we're still there spending money we don't have. Bush invaded Iraq for the resason of WMD which has never been found to this day and all we got was Saddam and his two sons at the cost of $1 trillion dollars over 4,400 American deaths and 10's of thousands of American wounded. You know nothing.
I pay for my own healthcare, dental, long term disability, etc. I am not nor have I ever been a freeloader. I am debt free and live within my budget.
Tell me where the republicans have increased the spending? The house that approves the budget has been in the dems domain for the last two years of the Bush administration and the first two years of Balmy's regime. They determined the spending. The increase in spending is always the Democrats plan. Tax and spend they are notorious for it. Look at Balmy's stimulus plan over 800 billion plus thrown away on failed green industries because of campaign paybacks for donations and bundling. The funds that went to the states for shovel ready jobs were mostly put in the pension funds. What little infrastructure work that was done was done by public employees. Apparently the regime has failed to realize that it is the private sector that fills the public trough.
As for Bush not getting Bin Laden in Afghanistan, Mali offered him up to Bubba Clinton and he turned down the offer. This was after the first world trade center bombing.
As for the WMSs there was every indication that Sadam could have had them. He used them and murdered about 600...
I pay for my own healthcare, dental, long term disability, etc. I am not nor have I ever been a freeloader. I am debt free and live within my budget.
Tell me where the republicans have increased the spending? The house that approves the budget has been in the dems domain for the last two years of the Bush administration and the first two years of Balmy's regime. They determined the spending. The increase in spending is always the Democrats plan. Tax and spend they are notorious for it. Look at Balmy's stimulus plan over 800 billion plus thrown away on failed green industries because of campaign paybacks for donations and bundling. The funds that went to the states for shovel ready jobs were mostly put in the pension funds. What little infrastructure work that was done was done by public employees. Apparently the regime has failed to realize that it is the private sector that fills the public trough.
As for Bush not getting Bin Laden in Afghanistan, Mali offered him up to Bubba Clinton and he turned down the offer. This was after the first world trade center bombing.
As for the WMSs there was every indication that Sadam could have had them. He used them and murdered about 600,000 Kurds. Were did Syria get the Seren gas from?
Before you call me stupid, you better check your own mental capacity. By doing so you will note that yours is definitely lacking.
Yes Bush invaded Afghanistan to wipe out the Al Quada training camps. He took a definitive action, whereby the whimp in the WH, would have hid under his bed.
Name one Democrat that can even come near what Reagan did for our country. You can't so don't bother.
Do you really want to go back to Clinton and Bin Laden when Reagan was the one who helped make Bin Laden into the terrorist he was. Don't just go back to Clinton go back to Reagan.
Again with the WMD's go back again to Reagan allowing Saddam to use WMD's on Iran for which over a million people died.
The wimp in the WH has killed more top Al Queda leaders in 4 years then Bush did in 7. Oh by the way Bush had Bin Laden in Tora Bora but gave the order to stand down when special forces wanted to go get him. They were within 2,000 meters of the caves he was in. Why let Bin Laden escape? Hummm maybe for an excuse to invade Iraq????????? Read and learn and don't be so ignorant.
"Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy; it's inherent virtue is the sharing of misery." Winston Churchill
As for healthcare it is costing this country an arm and a leg and it will destroy this country if nothing is done something conservatives are good at, doing nothing that is. At least we try. As for budget cuts of $1.1 trillion so far but we need more cuts and way more in revenues.
You hate stinks. But i'll continue anyway. All your $1.6 trillion in taxcuts did was create minus 700,000 private sector jobs under Bush but on the bright side he expanded government jobs by 1.9 million jobs.
$873 billion on bankrupt green companies. Are you for real. If you want to respond at least be honest if you can.
Oh and by the way you boy Bush set a record for going on vacation at taxpayer expense he spent 1/3 of his presidency on vacation at least Obama's trip is work related.
Yeah, Balmy"s trip is work related, he pops in to a small business and promises them some government dole and then campaigns at the taxpayers expense at some high school or such and lets the taxpayers cover his progressive indoctrinations.
The rest of your drivel is unsubstantiated lies.
The Cap and Trade scan was ferreted out by the Congress so Balmy in an EO declared Carbon as a toxic substance and turned it over to the EPA. This scam is an unjust enrichment fiasco bigger than Enron. Valerie Jarrett, Al Gore, Goldman Sachs, Marco Rains, Van Jones, and Balmy stand to make millions with their carbon blocs nonsense. The idea that SUVs are the cause of global warming has been proven wrong. Today, the news is saying that a cause of it might be earthworms. Wake up and quit calling me names because of the faulty information you spew to defend the indefensible.
In defense of Bush, Bush went to his summer white house in Crawford, Texas. If you know anything about American history, you will note that most presidents returned to their residences to avoid the summer heat in DC. Clinton and Balmy are the only two that fed off of the taxpayers with their summer vacations.
I love science deniers, why because it's easier to bury ones head in the sand (conservatives actions) then open their eyes see what is happening and then doing something about it. That actually means using ones brains. That's too hard for conservatives to do. 90% of scientists say man is helping global warming along. 5% aren't sure and the other 5% work for oil, coal and gas companies. Well maybe Texans will learn the hard way as more of their crops die from drought this year and they continue to lose all their money.
Now lets get the facts straight as to who went and who paid what. Mrs. obama went with her daughters 2 friends,and their 4 daughters, secret service members and some staf members. The 40 friend rumor was false.
Mrs. Obama paid what amounted to first class commercial priced tickets for herself and children she also paid for her own food hotel and transportation and her friends paid all their expenses. Now the Air Force jet she flew cost over $11,000 an hour for the 14 hour trip or $160,000.
Mrs. Bush also took vacations seperate from her husband mostly going to national parks with friends of course we liberals never complained about her trips and her daughters went to South America for a vacation at taxpayer expense with all the secret service members going along for protection. You needn't go back all the way to Washington, Adams and Jefferson to see someone who also spent big time on vacations at taxpayer expense just go back to Laura Bush and her two daughters.
By the way I'm talking about a seperate SA vacation. No mommy Bush just the little birdies on their own.
Do me a favor Google "Bush girls go to south america". Have fun reading. "US embassy asked Bush girls to leave". LOL "The Bush daughters, a secret service headache". LOL "First daughter Barbra robbed in Argentina". lol "Bush girls streaking in South America". lol Such class.