Obama’s ‘Body Man’ Resigns After Allegations of Past Homosexual Behavior?
~ The Rebel ~
2012/08/29 12:59:49
The former personal aide to Barack Obama known as the president’s “body man,” Reggie Love, resurfaced on the eve of the Republican National Convention to support his old boss.
The White House explained Love had decided to pursue further studies at the Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania, but the Internet, at the time, was abuzz with speculation that Love was dismissed because of the wide circulation of compromising photographs of him when he was a college student. The photos purported to show a heavily inebriated Love surrounded by fellow students assisting him in engaging in a homosexual act at a party on the rival University of North Carolina campus.
The White House explained Love had decided to pursue further studies at the Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania, but the Internet, at the time, was abuzz with speculation that Love was dismissed because of the wide circulation of compromising photographs of him when he was a college student. The photos purported to show a heavily inebriated Love surrounded by fellow students assisting him in engaging in a homosexual act at a party on the rival University of North Carolina campus.
Read More: http://visiontoamerica.com/11831/obamas-body-man-r...
If there was no truth to the story why is he out of the limelight?
I can only assume that you don't know where they are...or that you're too lazy to search for them yourself.
Note that I have no real stake in finding these pictures...and considering it is either you or the author if the article making the accusations that actually DOES want to show that such pictures exist and that the resignation was due to these "gay accusations"...it is up to you to actually show that is a reasonable assertion.
The person making the accusation in the article would also have been able to easily link to them.
The accusations, therefore, remain baseless until some evidence can be shown otherwise.
You do realize that you're making the argument that "since it's out there, you have to disprove the accusation" that's kind of the same argument Reid made about Romney's taxes, no?
http://finance.fortune.cnn.co...
PS - a google search for "reggie love" and various combos of "gay" and "pictures" produces a couple of images that are what they seem to reference...which if that's what you're talking about...yeah, no...it was a bunch of guys playing a prank on a sleeping person.
Tell me that's not what you're resting on.
(2) You are ASSUMING that anything underlying the claims made in the article are actually a reason for him losing his job.
(3) You are ASSUMING that he has lost his job, rather than actually moving on as he claims.
(2) The following searches provide no evidence of any such pictures:
http://www.google.com/search?...
http://www.google.com/search?...
(or any other permutation of the searches)
(3) Where an article provides no evidence for a claim, and there is no clear evidence in basic searches, then there is no reason to believe it.
In cases like that, the reasonable person DISREGARDS the claims in the article until they can be actually supported.
It is not the job of the READER of a claim to prove the claim for the author...it's the other way around.
Shouldn't you care about backing up what you blog?
PS - Not looking for a fight. I do, however, not feel bad about challenging people about their opinions.
I don't think posting something here, on a Q&A opinion site, is you "blogging" particularly when you didn't actually write the article.
A blogger is someone that blogs breaking news...
Weak sauce.
don't look down your nose at me you clown...