Obama Wins America Wins ! With the Romneys we get more unemployment more foreclosures more debt more wall street bailouts . we get 4 more years of spending taxpayers money
Cut and paste king
2012/04/22 07:07:40
![\]\][[][](http://images.sodahead.com/slideshows/000017687/515859251__75078315241-75078444552_large.jpeg "\]\][[][")
![kp[][]=]](http://images.sodahead.com/slideshows/000017687/76336042_romney_cash_corruption_congress-75078445289_large.jpeg "kp[][]=]")
Obama Wins America Wins ! With the Romneys we get more unemployment more foreclosures more debt more wall street bailouts . we get 4 more years of spending taxpayers money
looks like ann romney is gonna be the one running the country
With obama we still have someone whose greatest success was stuffing food cabinets as a social worker on the South side of Chicago many years ago and someone who is an incredible failure as potus.
You have no idea what you are talking about. Government DOESN'T create jobs.
but they sure love to talk how they re gonna create jobs!
Have you opened a coal plant? How about a manufacturing plant? Have any employees? Doubt it to all three questions....
neither kennedy nixon johnson ford reagan bush sr bush jr bill clinton
Any questions?
1980 - inflation - 11%, unemployment 13%
2008 - inflation - negligable, unemployment 7%
Please explain your fallacious comments....oops, that's right, you've been caught in the web of lies of this incredible lying president and do not want the truth.....my bad.
Sorry to see the facts checkmate your delusional beliefs, but you've been duped by the most lying man to ever live on the face of the earth.
Go look in the mirror, talk to yourself, realize you know nothing politically, do some research if you want to talk factually....get back to me....k?
in april 1980 unemployment was 6.9% on dec 1982 2 years of reagan in office unemployment was 10.9 %
between oct 1 and dec 31 2008 1.9 million were unemployed
between jan1 2009 and may 2009 4.6 million more were unemployed and on the same time 3 million had their homes in foreclosure ............
SO STOP LYING AND GET THE FACTS STRAIGHT A 3 YEAR OLD KNOWS IT!
Now let's look at the facts:
Here’s where things stood in 1980, Carter’s last year in office, and in subsequent periods:
• Carter: Interest rate, 21%. Inflation, 13.5%. Unemployment, 7%.
http://tmq2.wordpress.com/200...
i guess you cant challenge my response so you come back with a new one
under carter interest rate was 21% and i made a ton of money on 6 months cds with citibank ,
when things are bad "cash is king"
It doesn't matter that we have the highest number of food stamp recipients in our nations history, it's about what is good for YOU!
If you could put your arrogance aside for even a second you'd see that people are suffering and obama, Reid, Pelosi, and Soros are just scumbags that are destroying us all.
You have no clue what the hell you are talking about for the good of all. Carry on your despicable arrogance, it will destroy you as well in the end.
So, why are you being a hypocrite by playing some Dit-Wit clip like the one above about Bush when obama is 1000 times worse?
in sept 2008 2 months before the presidential elections the bubble burst . by dec 31 2008 1.9 million people were facing unemployment 310 thousand houses were foreclosured .
by june 2009 4.6 million more were facing unemployment and 2.6 million houses were facing foreclosures . banks were broke auto manufacturers in brink of bankrupcy .
NAME ME ONE PRESIDENT THAT TOOK OVER A COUNTRY WITH THIS MESS
The unemployment rate under obama is going up, not down. The man is an utter and complete failure. He is not stupid, he is doing this intentionally, and you are too blind to see.
THAT is the bottom line.
Keep fishing, like in that photo. One day you'll come back to the dock and one of obama's agents will be there to tell you that you, somehow, broke the law by catching a fish. Maybe then, for someone as slow as you, reality will seep in a little.
obama took over an economic crash of stock market down 3000 points bank bailouts millions of foreclosures and millions of people being unemployed in less than six months affter him taking office , you re the one that cant accept the thruth .
You can blather all you want, but Bush had funds in the 2001 budget to protect from the Dem caused and led financial crisis.
The fact that you do not accept facts does not change the facts. It only shows how partisan and in-capable of reasoning you are.
Why don't you stop when you are so factually beaten?
CARTER COULD NEVER BEAT THAT . TRY TO TOP THAT WITH CARTERS ECONOMIC CRISIS
Go back and look at your original reply to my post. It shows how you're selfish interests are evident. You have no regard for anybody than you're own arrogant existence.
obama is a disaster, I have proven it factually. If you choose to not believe it, that is your delusion, not mine.
unemployment is up (despite a trillion borrowed dollars), the housing market is in recession, 17 million more people are on food stamps than during the Bush years, the debt has been raised 6 trillion dollars (a record for ANY president despite promises to cut the budget in half). How about gas prices? This president is doing everything within his power to destroy America with his energy policy alone.
You should stop living in your selfish shell and look at your fellow man. Put down your arrogance to look at everybody, for a change, not just your own arrogance.
obama inhereted the worst financial crisis since the depression
1- on dec 31 2008 because of the financial crisis 1.9 million people were left unemployed
2- the stock market dropped 6000 points
3- by june 2009 4.6 million more were left unemployed and close to 3 million were foreclosured from their homes
4- bush gave out 1.1 trillion to bailout car companies .banks, manufacturers , and his mother
5- bush gave out $149. billion in welfare before he left office
Is there an echo in here or are you really that stupid?
here's the last paragraph of a recent article about Romneys ideas, or more about Paul Ryans economic plan Romney wouldn't endorse one year ago.
http://www.economist.com/node...
Mr Romney may want to tack away from these proposals over the course of the campaign in an effort to woo centrist voters. But having so prominently embraced Mr Ryan, it will be difficult for him to let go; and in any case, it may not matter. On fiscal policy, it is Mr Ryan, not Mr Romney, who guides the party’s agenda, in a way no legislator has since Jack Kemp, a backbench congressman, came up with supply-side economics in the 1970s as the party’s route back to the White House. As Grover Norquist, an anti-tax campaigner, puts it, “We don’t need a president to tell us in what direction to go. We know what direction to go. We want the Ryan budget. We…just need a president to sign this stuff.”
Romney is going to do what his party dictates to him. The policies of a Romney administration will be large tax benefits for the most wealthy and a return to the same politics that almost ruined us to begin with. Little reguard for the environment, cu...
here's the last paragraph of a recent article about Romneys ideas, or more about Paul Ryans economic plan Romney wouldn't endorse one year ago.
http://www.economist.com/node...
Mr Romney may want to tack away from these proposals over the course of the campaign in an effort to woo centrist voters. But having so prominently embraced Mr Ryan, it will be difficult for him to let go; and in any case, it may not matter. On fiscal policy, it is Mr Ryan, not Mr Romney, who guides the party’s agenda, in a way no legislator has since Jack Kemp, a backbench congressman, came up with supply-side economics in the 1970s as the party’s route back to the White House. As Grover Norquist, an anti-tax campaigner, puts it, “We don’t need a president to tell us in what direction to go. We know what direction to go. We want the Ryan budget. We…just need a president to sign this stuff.”
Romney is going to do what his party dictates to him. The policies of a Romney administration will be large tax benefits for the most wealthy and a return to the same politics that almost ruined us to begin with. Little reguard for the environment, cuts in SS and Medicare for our seniors, more military spending instead of less, ....the list goes on. I don't get it, is that what conservatives in this country really want, or is that what they get told we need so they go along with it? That is what Romney will be as our President, the one that does what his party tells him. I'm not going to call it flip floping, but Romney will do just as his sponsers tell him, not what I think of when I envision the President of the USA. Maybe Paul Ryan should be the republcan candidate.