Obama Supports Lieberman. Good Idea?
StarrGazerr
2008/11/11 20:51:13
Obama Supports Keeping Lieberman in Democratic Caucus
By Paul Kane
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, November 11, 2008; 11:57 AM
President-elect Barack Obama has endorsed keeping Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.) in the Democratic caucus, suggesting to leadership that the two sides reach a compromise in the conflict over the former Democratic vice presidential nominee's future, sources said today.
In a phone conversation last week with Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.), Obama said that expulsion of Lieberman for his support of the Republican presidential ticket would send the wrong signal after Obama's promises to set partisanship aside, according to a Senate Democratic aide familiar with the conversation.
Obama "didn't get into the minutiae. It was more along the lines of, 'let's find a way to put the campaign behind us'," the aide said.
The call to Reid, which covered many other issues, came before the majority leader met with Lieberman last Thursday to discuss Lieberman's future in the Democratic caucus. Lieberman is one of two independents who caucus, and generally vote, with the Democrats.
Aides to Obama and Reid declined comment on the specifics of the conversation between the two party leaders. Obama's camp insisted the president-elect did not make any specific suggestions about how to resolve the situation, but did say that Obama wants Lieberman to remain with the Democrats.
"President-elect Obama looks forward to working with anyone to move the country forward," Obama transition spokesperson Stephanie Cutter said in a statement issued today. "We'd be happy to have Sen. Lieberman caucus with the Democrats. We don't hold any grudges."
Lieberman faces a crucial Nov. 18 meeting of Senate Democrats at which he is expected to plead his case for retaining the chairmanship of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, which has wide oversight of the executive branch. Many Democrats have privately suggested that Lieberman should surrender the post even if that risks him crossing the aisle to caucus with Republicans, in part because Democrats padded their majority in the Senate by gaining at least six seats in last week's election.
Some liberal activists have pushed to have Lieberman expelled from the caucus by stripping him of all his committee assignments, particularly after his speech on behalf of Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) at the Republican National Convention. Lieberman called Obama "an eloquent young man" who was not prepared to be president.
Reid hinted Sunday that Democrats could offer Lieberman an alternative to his current chairmanship.
"The caucus has a decision to make and they're going to make it...whether we're going to say, 'OK, we've had enough of you, Joe, go vote with the Republicans' or whether we're going to try to work something out with Joe Lieberman," Reid said Sunday on CNN's "Inside Edition."
After meeting with Reid Thursday, Lieberman told reporters that with the election over, the country "must now unite.
"That is exactly what I intend to do with my colleagues here in the Senate in support of our new president and those are the standards I will use when considering the options that I have before me," he said.
A possible alternative would be to give Lieberman the chairmanship of the Small Business Committee, which has one of the lowest profiles on Capitol Hill. Its current chairman, Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.), is set to move into a more prestigious chairmanship. Other senior members of the Small Business panel already chair more powerful committees, which would allow Lieberman to become chair if he is removed from his current post.
While that chairmanship would be a step down for Lieberman, he still would receive an annual budget that would allow him to maintain additional staff and would continue to participate in important meetings, such as the weekly gathering of committee chairmen hosted by Reid.
Lieberman's home-state colleague, Sen. Christopher Dodd (D-Conn.), suggested last week that Obama could take the higher ground by helping to resolve the dispute. "He's talked about reconciliation, healing, bringing people together. I don't think he'd necessarily want to spend the first month of this president-elect period, this transition period, talking about a Senate seat," Dodd, told Connecticut reporters Friday. Dodd has not spoken directly with Obama about the issue.
Obama and Vice-President-elect Joseph Biden, who are departing the Senate and will not be part of the 111th Congress, will not have votes in the Democratic caucus over Lieberman's future.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/...
By Paul Kane
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, November 11, 2008; 11:57 AM
President-elect Barack Obama has endorsed keeping Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.) in the Democratic caucus, suggesting to leadership that the two sides reach a compromise in the conflict over the former Democratic vice presidential nominee's future, sources said today.
In a phone conversation last week with Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.), Obama said that expulsion of Lieberman for his support of the Republican presidential ticket would send the wrong signal after Obama's promises to set partisanship aside, according to a Senate Democratic aide familiar with the conversation.
Obama "didn't get into the minutiae. It was more along the lines of, 'let's find a way to put the campaign behind us'," the aide said.
The call to Reid, which covered many other issues, came before the majority leader met with Lieberman last Thursday to discuss Lieberman's future in the Democratic caucus. Lieberman is one of two independents who caucus, and generally vote, with the Democrats.
Aides to Obama and Reid declined comment on the specifics of the conversation between the two party leaders. Obama's camp insisted the president-elect did not make any specific suggestions about how to resolve the situation, but did say that Obama wants Lieberman to remain with the Democrats.
"President-elect Obama looks forward to working with anyone to move the country forward," Obama transition spokesperson Stephanie Cutter said in a statement issued today. "We'd be happy to have Sen. Lieberman caucus with the Democrats. We don't hold any grudges."
Lieberman faces a crucial Nov. 18 meeting of Senate Democrats at which he is expected to plead his case for retaining the chairmanship of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, which has wide oversight of the executive branch. Many Democrats have privately suggested that Lieberman should surrender the post even if that risks him crossing the aisle to caucus with Republicans, in part because Democrats padded their majority in the Senate by gaining at least six seats in last week's election.
Some liberal activists have pushed to have Lieberman expelled from the caucus by stripping him of all his committee assignments, particularly after his speech on behalf of Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) at the Republican National Convention. Lieberman called Obama "an eloquent young man" who was not prepared to be president.
Reid hinted Sunday that Democrats could offer Lieberman an alternative to his current chairmanship.
"The caucus has a decision to make and they're going to make it...whether we're going to say, 'OK, we've had enough of you, Joe, go vote with the Republicans' or whether we're going to try to work something out with Joe Lieberman," Reid said Sunday on CNN's "Inside Edition."
After meeting with Reid Thursday, Lieberman told reporters that with the election over, the country "must now unite.
"That is exactly what I intend to do with my colleagues here in the Senate in support of our new president and those are the standards I will use when considering the options that I have before me," he said.
A possible alternative would be to give Lieberman the chairmanship of the Small Business Committee, which has one of the lowest profiles on Capitol Hill. Its current chairman, Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.), is set to move into a more prestigious chairmanship. Other senior members of the Small Business panel already chair more powerful committees, which would allow Lieberman to become chair if he is removed from his current post.
While that chairmanship would be a step down for Lieberman, he still would receive an annual budget that would allow him to maintain additional staff and would continue to participate in important meetings, such as the weekly gathering of committee chairmen hosted by Reid.
Lieberman's home-state colleague, Sen. Christopher Dodd (D-Conn.), suggested last week that Obama could take the higher ground by helping to resolve the dispute. "He's talked about reconciliation, healing, bringing people together. I don't think he'd necessarily want to spend the first month of this president-elect period, this transition period, talking about a Senate seat," Dodd, told Connecticut reporters Friday. Dodd has not spoken directly with Obama about the issue.
Obama and Vice-President-elect Joseph Biden, who are departing the Senate and will not be part of the 111th Congress, will not have votes in the Democratic caucus over Lieberman's future.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/...
Top Opinion
-
Ali ~ In My Heart I Trust ~ 2008/11/13 00:45:31Great. The first step towards true political unity.+5As LBJ famously said of J. Edgar Hoover, "I'd rather have him inside the tent pissing out than outside the tent pissing in."






















Personally I think Joe Lieberman is a douche nozzle and should be pushed aside with John McCain.
I think you are correct on McCain and as far as "Holy Joe" goes, he is a Senator who does what HE thinks is best not what the Party subscribes to. I give him all the credit in the world for that stance.He would say that he has "chutzpah".
I think Obama may have a problem with Reid and Pelosi trying to run the show. If that is the case look for Rahm Emmanuel to step on them good.
RWD
Obama's gesture is purely politically motivated. He needs a Dem vote for the Senate and the Homeland security chairmanship is cheap price to pay.
As I said, the man thinks and speaks what he thinks not what the party says to say. Yes, he pisses off both sides and I find that refreshing in a D.C. politician or any politician for that matter. Tell me, could you see Dick Durbin ever doing what Joe Lieberman does (and I don't mean going to temple)? Oh, I think it imporant to say after the vote in the last election that Obama received, I am not pro-Lieberman because I am a Democrat and I am also not a Jew. I also usually say what I think not what may be popular. Star, I think that is one reason we get along as well as we do! You are also in someways that way!
RWD
The thing we shouldn't overlook is that Obama doesn't really have control of the situation anyway. He can express what he thinks, and if I were a Democratic congressman I would certainly pay attention, but the one who really controls the situation, sadly enough, is Harry Reid. My guess is he wouldn't ignore what Obama has to say but also wants to keep his own power, so it might just wind up that they'll take Homeland Security away from Joe but give him some other appointment that will give him a chance to save face and work his way back into the good graces of the "Majority"
(And RWD - it's one reason but not the only one.
)
See you are RIGHT some of the time ;-)
RWD
Since IMHO Pelosi and Reid are more than a little corrupt, chances are strong he's retain a fair amount of power.
You do know that Emmanuel wnated that job this time around but he is out of the running. Who else could the Dems put up to replace Pelosi? I think she is in and I think she is dangerous.
To say however that the President of the party in power has no say in who is chosen is a bit of a stretch.
RWD