Obama Signs JOBS Act: Will It Improve the Job Market?
SodaHead News
2012/04/05 22:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
105 votes
|
|
24% | |||
|
158 votes
|
|
36% | |||
|
174 votes
|
|
40% | |||
President Obama signed a bill on Thursday that will make it easier for small businesses to find investors. The Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act makes it possible for "ordinary Americans ... to go online and invest in entrepreneurs that they believe in," with the hope that small businesses will expand quicker and start hiring. He also hopes the bill will help bridge the gap between Republicans and Democrats, and House Minority Leader Eric Cantor helped sponsor it.
Obama said at the signing ceremony, "I've always said that the true engine of job creation in this country is the private sector, not the government. Our job is to help our companies grow and hire ... That's why I've cut taxes for small businesses over 17 times. That's why every day I'm fighting to make sure America is the best place on Earth to do business." But will the JOBS bill improve the job market? Tell us what you think.

Obama said at the signing ceremony, "I've always said that the true engine of job creation in this country is the private sector, not the government. Our job is to help our companies grow and hire ... That's why I've cut taxes for small businesses over 17 times. That's why every day I'm fighting to make sure America is the best place on Earth to do business." But will the JOBS bill improve the job market? Tell us what you think.























OH AND MY CAPS ARE STUCK ON. I AM NOT YELLING!
WORK AND JOBS WITH GOOD SALARIES WELL HELP OUR JOB PROBLEMS. Companies that have taken the work overseas to forign countries so they can use a cheaper labor and make a larger profit margins.
I know this may anger a large amount of people and not be to popular but this is a realistic Fact!
Apple has there products manufactured in China, where it's workers live at the factory, don't see their family and work for very small wages. Yet America, can't wait to buy there products and Apple has a very high cash on hand!
U.S. COMPANIES NEED TO BRING THE WORK HOME TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE! THIS WILL SOUND CRAZY BUT WE NEED TO START BUYING AMERICAN PRODUCTS. IF YOU WANT AMERICA TO GET STRONGER!
WHEN YOU SPEND YOUR HARD EARNED AMERICAN DOLLAR ON OVERSEAS PRODUCED PRODUCTS WERE IS YOUR DOLLAR GOING TO THOSE COUNTRIES!
BRING THE JOBS AND WORK HOME! BUY AMERICAN!
Want to improve the 'Jobs Market'?
Decrease the size of government.
So here is something for you to read .. as a primer.. keeping it simple for you.. so you can now take your time.. read and go do your own research .. I would much rather you go doing your own exploring on the topic because you will be doing your own discovery..
Regulation Nation: New study finds Obama’s regs cost $46 billion a year
Some 10,215 new federal regulations from the Obama administration are costing consumers, businesses and the economy overall $46 billion annually, more than five times the regulatory price tag of former President Bush in his first three years in office. Worse: just implementing those regulations had a one-time additional cost of $11 billion, according to a Heritage Foundation analysis provided to Washington Secrets.
Ironically, Bush instituted more regulations, 10,674, but they cost just $8.1 billion annually, said the Heritage report, titled “Red Tape Rising: Obama and Regulation at the Three Year Mark.” It will be released Tuesday.
The analysis backs up complaints from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other business groups that the president’s regulations are stalling the economy and employment growth. It also calls into questio...
So here is something for you to read .. as a primer.. keeping it simple for you.. so you can now take your time.. read and go do your own research .. I would much rather you go doing your own exploring on the topic because you will be doing your own discovery..
Regulation Nation: New study finds Obama’s regs cost $46 billion a year
Some 10,215 new federal regulations from the Obama administration are costing consumers, businesses and the economy overall $46 billion annually, more than five times the regulatory price tag of former President Bush in his first three years in office. Worse: just implementing those regulations had a one-time additional cost of $11 billion, according to a Heritage Foundation analysis provided to Washington Secrets.
Ironically, Bush instituted more regulations, 10,674, but they cost just $8.1 billion annually, said the Heritage report, titled “Red Tape Rising: Obama and Regulation at the Three Year Mark.” It will be released Tuesday.
The analysis backs up complaints from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other business groups that the president’s regulations are stalling the economy and employment growth. It also calls into question Obama’s promise to put the brakes on new regulations and his State of the Union bragging about issuing less red tape than Bush.
The fact is, said Heritage’s review, hundreds more costly regulations are coming, especially those targeting energy companies and Wall Street. They threaten “to further weaken an anemic economy and job creation,” said Heritage’s James Gattuso and Diane Katz.
While there is no central agency that collects regulation information, Katz and Gattuso mined the Federal Register and other government databases to get their numbers. What they found was that while Obama has bragging rights to claiming he’s put into place fewer regulations than Bush, his cost far more.
The $46 billion price tag calculated by Heritage is staggering, as are those hitting the economy the hardest. Just consider the regulations tagged as “major” for costing $100 million or more. Obama’s team issued 106 on private industry since taking office, compared to 28 by Bush. Last year alone, Obama’s administration issued 32 major regulations impacting everything from clothes dryers, to toy labels.
Heritage said that most expensive regulation of 2011 was from the Environmental Protection Agency, which added five major rules costing $4 billion. Among them, stricter limits on industrial and commercial boilers and incinerators, for a cost of $2.6 billion annually for compliance.
The regulations are also hitting workers through higher fees on items such as checking accounts.
“The president cannot have it both ways: having identified over-regulation as a problem, he must take real and significant steps to rein it in. At the same time, Congress--which shares much of the blame for excessive regulation--must establish critical mechanism to ensure that unnecessary and excessively costly regulations are not imposed on the U.S,. economy and Americans,” said Gattuso and Katz. “Without decisive steps, the costs of red tape will continue to grow, and the economy, and average Americans, will be the victims.”