Obama said his wedding ring was being repaired, when someone noticed he wasn't wearing it or his watch. Was it just a coincidence that this was during the Muslim Ramadan, when rings and other jewelry are forbidden to be worn?
tncdel
2012/09/05 00:36:20
|
|
|||||
|
12 votes
|
|
21% | |||
|
44 votes
|
|
79% | |||
Wedding ring is in for repair
Since when does a plain wedding band need repairs, along with your watch, for a whole month?
Another piece falls into place.
In a press conference last week, Obama was not wearing his wedding ring nor was he wearing his watch.
When noticed, his staff said his ring was out for repairs. No reason was given for the missing watch.
So it's just a coincidence that Muslims are forbidden from wearing jewelry during the month of Ramadan. Can't possibly be that, because although he hasn't gone to a Christian church service since entering the White House, we know he's a committed Christian "cause he said so during his campaign!
This is the same president that spent the Christmas holidays in Hawaii to avoid religious obligations as PRESIDENT at the White House. His children do not receive Christmas presents.
Let's just face the facts and quit trying to distort the truth, we have a Muslim for president in the White House, and he has no knowledge of American history.
Top Opinion
-
Vision of Verve 2012/09/05 00:39:43NO, Obama is a closet-Muslim practicing "taqiyyah" [deception of non-Muslims]...
Not that it matters a whole lot since the Liberal media will not report anything damaging about the President, while at the same time critizing Romney's every move.The only time we even find out about stuff like this is when a good honest news outlet reports it. Two writers for the AP showed how bias they can be. They shredded Romney's RNC to bits. I am watching these 2 yo-yos to see if they do the same with Obama's DNC. My money is on their flowery soft-hitting analysis of the Dems.
like it takes a month to repair ..
(when .. within an hour of where I live .. there's several qualified jewelers that will repair rings while you wait .. )
http://www.techchuff.com/web-...
Snopes is owned by a lefty couple but that is not all.
Snopes is heavily financed by George Soros, a big time supporter of Obama and many left wing organizations.
Kagan represented Obama in all the petitions to prove his citizenship. Now she may help rule on them.
Now we know why Obama nominated Elana Kagan for the Supreme Court.
Pull up the Supreme Courts website, go to the docket and search for Obama.
She was the Solicitor General for all the suits against him filed with the Supreme Court to show proof of natural born citizenship.
He owed her big time – since the requests for proof were never heard.
Look up some of these hearings - Elana Kagan is the attorney representing Obama!
Check out these examples:
http://www.supremecourt.gov/S...
http://www.supremecourt.gov/S...
http://www.supremecourt.gov/S...
http://www.supremecourt.gov/S...
http://www.supremecourt.gov/S...
http://www.techchuff.com/web-...
Snopes is owned by a lefty couple but that is not all.
Snopes is heavily financed by George Soros, a big time supporter of Obama and many left wing organizations.
Kagan represented Obama in all the petitions to prove his citizenship. Now she may help rule on them.
Now we know why Obama nominated Elana Kagan for the Supreme Court.
Pull up the Supreme Courts website, go to the docket and search for Obama.
She was the Solicitor General for all the suits against him filed with the Supreme Court to show proof of natural born citizenship.
He owed her big time – since the requests for proof were never heard.
Look up some of these hearings - Elana Kagan is the attorney representing Obama!
Check out these examples:
http://www.supremecourt.gov/S...
http://www.supremecourt.gov/S...
http://www.supremecourt.gov/S...
http://www.supremecourt.gov/S...
http://www.supremecourt.gov/S...
As for the cases you linked, go through them. They've got nothing to do with birthers. Hell, I'll even link you to the decisions themselves (either the Supreme Court or a lower court with the same case) so you can see what they're suing over.
http://docs.justia.com/cases/...
http://ftp.resource.org/court...
Holt Again (you linked him twice)
http://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/O...
You listed that one twice again.
The last one at least sounds like it's about birther suits from the name, but it's not. It's about FEC rules. The first two aren't even linked to politics, and one of them is pure nonsense.