Obama Refuses to Answer Questions on Benghazi | TheBlaze.com: Should Obama answer?
Heisenberg
2012/10/26 22:54:46
|
|
|||||
|
69 votes
|
|
88% | |||
|
9 votes
|
|
12% | |||
THEBLAZE.COM reports:
Update (5:53 PM ET): President Barack Obama reportedly refused to provide a direct answer to repeated questions on whether requests for help in Benghazi were denied as the attack was underway during an interview with 9News in Denver on Friday. Kyle Clark, a reporter with 9News, asked the...
Read More: http://www.theblaze.com/stories/reporter-obama-wou...
Top Opinion
-
BlueMax372 2012/10/26 23:05:33Yes
+80v0mit should answer in a court of law. I accuse him of treason and of the murder of four Americans! He MUST not escape prosecution for his felonious crimes!
More polls by Heisenberg
Sort By
- nbarton2 2012/11/07 21:34:03Yes
Too bad we will never find out and no one will ever discuss this incident as anything more than a "terrible tragedy" or a "bump in the road"reply - Footage 2012/10/29 16:39:28YesI had withheld judgement, but this is beginning to look like a coverup.reply
- Swampdog 2012/10/27 13:07:30Yes+3Not answering is answering. This president has made a career of breaking the law, what makes you think he's going to stop now?reply
- jimmy Swampdog 2012/10/27 13:50:24+2ABSOLUTELY, ALL TOLD 40 EO WRITTEN BYPASSING THE LAWSreply
- Swampdog jimmy 2012/10/27 14:14:57+2He's had more EO's than the last two presidents combined!reply
- jimmy Swampdog 2012/10/28 13:29:11+1that's for sure and if he's reelected he'll probably double that because he maybe dealing with a repulbican congressreply
- Swampdog jimmy 2012/10/28 19:02:43+1He'll do more end runs around them than Tebow!reply
- jimmy Swampdog 2012/10/29 13:00:29+1That he well, lets hope the congress has go nats to take him on at every end runreply
- Birthpangs jimmy 2012/10/27 19:41:20
- jimmy Birthpangs 2012/10/28 13:30:35that's probably true but the 40 i mention execeded his authority.reply
- Birthpangs jimmy 2012/10/28 19:08:49
- jimmy Birthpangs 2012/10/29 13:01:49+1I totally agree, but the 40 i mention are impeachable offensesreply
- AL Swampdog 2012/10/28 06:39:34+1I'm just supprised Obama's hasn't tried to claimed the 5th amendment yet is all! You know the one that also protects liars like Obama,from admitting their liars!reply
- Swampdog AL 2012/10/28 19:08:31I think the American news media is suffering a credibility problem they have NEVER encountered before. Circulation is dropping off, which means fewer revenue dollars from advertising. But so what! They brought it upon themselves and any company that will knowingly hurt themselves by lying in their news papers should just GO!reply
- AL Swampdog 2012/10/29 02:42:41+1Why would anyone want to read one sided propaganda and waste their own money to do it as well? Our media taday reminds me of Russias communist Provda news paper!reply
- Swampdog AL 2012/10/29 21:47:23+1Amen, but the paper still makes for a good bird cage liner.reply
- AL Swampdog 2012/10/29 21:51:15+1indeed! It might be Sh----proof anyway!reply
- knothead 2012/10/27 11:46:51Yes+2Definately should answer for the death of four Americans. He is responsible for their deaths and must answer. He is the one who knew what was going on and must accept the responsibility for his lack of actions.reply
- Spencer Im 2012/10/27 11:24:39YesI think the president should give an answer but only after the Benghazi investigation is completed.reply
- Soundstorm 2012/10/27 10:57:23No+1Let Obama go out a liar giving no explanation or respect to the American people so that they all will recognize him for what he is on election day.reply
- maquignon 2012/10/27 09:26:43Yes+2We have to keep the pressure on him!!!reply
- AL 2012/10/27 09:19:48Yes+1Yes,but if I was an incompetent liar like Obama is,I wouldn't answer eitherreply
- Soundstorm AL 2012/10/27 10:58:15+2I honestly believe it's too late for him to come clean.reply
- Stryder Soundstorm 2012/10/27 13:56:39You're probably right. His campaign is already a trainwreck. This would completely derail it.reply
- AL Soundstorm 2012/10/28 05:44:25Obama and clean just don't seem to go together any more after this Libya mess!reply
- ed 2012/10/27 08:16:43Yes+1Should he keep refusing maybe a little torture will make him talk.reply
- Stryder ed 2012/10/27 13:57:00+1Waterboard him.reply
- ed Stryder 2012/10/27 17:55:37+1To nice ,this time it's got to be worth it one that he'll remember for ever.reply
- Pedalpusher 2012/10/27 04:25:24Yes+4Yes and he should be up on Murder and Treason charges!!reply
- Darr247 2012/10/27 04:09:05NoThey should ask Donald Trump what HE knows about it... I heard he paid the terrorists $5 million dollars to do the attack.reply
- AL Darr247 2012/10/27 09:21:47+1How about some facts for a change!reply
- Soundstorm Darr247 2012/10/27 10:58:48You hear voices?reply
- Steve Boston 2012/10/27 03:27:01Yes+2Barry's incompetent cover up and treasonous actions won't surface until after election day. That's a certainty. After Romney wins it will be interesting to see how long it will be before American's will hear the truth on our resident impostor. We got scammed in 2008 folks. Big time.reply
- rk 2012/10/27 03:03:00Yes+2During his impeachmentreply
- ken2ak 2012/10/27 02:55:06Yes+2The Answer will hurt his re-election bid.reply
- Soundstorm ken2ak 2012/10/27 10:59:50+1But so will the cover up! It's called a lose-lose!reply
- ken2ak Soundstorm 2012/10/27 16:26:27People that vote for Obama don't know his record. . .How? I don't know.reply
- Flamingolady 2012/10/27 02:52:42Yes+2He SHOULD, but can't, because then he would have to admit what an amateur he is in any foreign policy and affairs. He was out playing golf when it happened most likely, and hates to admit that and that if he HAD known, he would not have known whether to s*** or wind his watch.reply
- konalimu 2012/10/27 02:10:24 (edited)Yes+2Are you going to make him? Holder, would never do it!reply
- evangel... konalimu 2012/10/27 02:21:57+4
reply
1
2
3
4
Next »
Last »
