
Obama Pulls Combat Pay For U.S. Troops.... Why Was This Not Covered By Media...????
ReconMarine~AVA/POTL/JLA/PWCM
2012/11/16 22:54:48
What's It Worth?..Article From Field And Stream...Link Below..
Obama Pulls Combat Pay for U.S. Troops February 4, 2012 | Filed under: Florida Review | Posted by: Javier Manjarres
Uploaded on February 05, 2012
Obama Pulls Combat Pay for U.S. Troops
February 4, 2012 | Filed under: Florida Review | Posted by: Javier Manjarres
By Javier Manjarres
President Obama’s latest policy outrage makes no attempt to hide his contempt for our military, as he is ordering that our troops serving overseas in war zones overseas are not to receive combat pay unless they are being shot at, or at risk of being injured by hostile aggression. A Marine who lives in Florida has just posted a note on Facebook which stated that he received a letter from his MyPay account that he would only be receiving his Hazard pay (Imminent Danger Pay) if he is actually in a hostile area and at risk of being shot at.
So I just got a letter from MyPay (the way we get paid in the military), saying that I will only reason Combat Pay while deployed for the days that I take fire or am in a hostile area. Now, as an Infantry Marine, I’m constantly in a combat zone…it may not always be popping off, but for them to take that away from us is bullshit. Now, the aviation tech who sits on Camp Leatherneck, sure, I can see him not getting Combat Pay, but to take it away from the grunts, the ground pounders, the front line of defense…come on, Uncle Sam. You let the Liberals win a big one here… Marine from Florida (We are not posting his name for obvious reasons)
According to Military.com, and the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 (H.R. 1540-7 Sec 616) as of February 1, 2012, this new measure went into effect, and soldiers who are to receive the additional $225/mo. combat pay ‘must’ be in immediate risk of harm. The measure is very specific in its criteria for receiving the additonal pay.
The rules for Hostile Fire and Imminent Danger Pay have changed. Service members will now receive imminent danger pay only for days they actually spend in hazardous areas. This change went in effect on February 1, 2012.
A member of a uniformed service may be entitled to Hostile Fire and Imminent Danger pay at the rate of $225 for any month in which he/she was entitled to basic pay and in which he/she was:
Subject to hostile fire or explosion of hostile mines;
On duty in an area in which he was in imminent danger of being exposed to hostile fire or explosion of hostile mines and in which, during the period he was on duty in that area, other members of the uniformed services were subject to hostile fire or explosion of hostile mines;
Killed, injured, or wounded by hostile fire, explosion of a hostile mine, or any other hostile action; or
On duty in a foreign area in which he was subject to the threat of physical harm or imminent danger on the basis of civil insurrection, civil war, terrorism, or wartime conditions.
The last bullet point speaks volumes as to the sheer stupidity of this measure. The whole point of going to Afghanistan and Iraq was for combat operations- Afghanistan still is a hostile warzone, and both U.S. and NATO forces continue to suffer losses in and out of combat hot zones. Insurgent attacks have accured throughout areas that have been deemed ‘safe’, and in areas where hostilities were not forseen.
Before the regulation went into effect, military personnel would be awarded $225 “combat pay” if they spent a single qualifying day in the combat zone (i.e., “danger pay location). Now, however, the $225 “combat pay” will actually be awarded $7.50 per day for the actual number of days that one spends in an established combat zone. As described by Andrew Tilghman in The Air Force Times, “So, for example, if a service member spends only 7 days of the month in Afghanistan, he or she will have only $52.50 in Imminent Danger Pay added to their paycheck.”
http://www.examiner.com/article/obama-freezes-military-combat...
http://www.fieldandstream.com/forums/guns/whats-it-worth/obam...
http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2012/02/obama-pulls-c...
http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/combatpay.asp
http://forums.militaryspot.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/3461073/m/6...
http://www.military.com/benefits/military-pay/special-pay/hos...
http://shark-tank.net/2011/12/28/23486/barack_obama/
http://patdollard.com/2012/02/obama-pulls-combat-pay-for-u-s-...
http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2012/02/perfect-obama-pulls-...
Obama Pulls Combat Pay for U.S. Troops February 4, 2012 | Filed under: Florida Review | Posted by: Javier Manjarres
Uploaded on February 05, 2012
Obama Pulls Combat Pay for U.S. Troops
February 4, 2012 | Filed under: Florida Review | Posted by: Javier Manjarres
By Javier Manjarres
President Obama’s latest policy outrage makes no attempt to hide his contempt for our military, as he is ordering that our troops serving overseas in war zones overseas are not to receive combat pay unless they are being shot at, or at risk of being injured by hostile aggression. A Marine who lives in Florida has just posted a note on Facebook which stated that he received a letter from his MyPay account that he would only be receiving his Hazard pay (Imminent Danger Pay) if he is actually in a hostile area and at risk of being shot at.
So I just got a letter from MyPay (the way we get paid in the military), saying that I will only reason Combat Pay while deployed for the days that I take fire or am in a hostile area. Now, as an Infantry Marine, I’m constantly in a combat zone…it may not always be popping off, but for them to take that away from us is bullshit. Now, the aviation tech who sits on Camp Leatherneck, sure, I can see him not getting Combat Pay, but to take it away from the grunts, the ground pounders, the front line of defense…come on, Uncle Sam. You let the Liberals win a big one here… Marine from Florida (We are not posting his name for obvious reasons)
According to Military.com, and the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 (H.R. 1540-7 Sec 616) as of February 1, 2012, this new measure went into effect, and soldiers who are to receive the additional $225/mo. combat pay ‘must’ be in immediate risk of harm. The measure is very specific in its criteria for receiving the additonal pay.
The rules for Hostile Fire and Imminent Danger Pay have changed. Service members will now receive imminent danger pay only for days they actually spend in hazardous areas. This change went in effect on February 1, 2012.
A member of a uniformed service may be entitled to Hostile Fire and Imminent Danger pay at the rate of $225 for any month in which he/she was entitled to basic pay and in which he/she was:
Subject to hostile fire or explosion of hostile mines;
On duty in an area in which he was in imminent danger of being exposed to hostile fire or explosion of hostile mines and in which, during the period he was on duty in that area, other members of the uniformed services were subject to hostile fire or explosion of hostile mines;
Killed, injured, or wounded by hostile fire, explosion of a hostile mine, or any other hostile action; or
On duty in a foreign area in which he was subject to the threat of physical harm or imminent danger on the basis of civil insurrection, civil war, terrorism, or wartime conditions.
The last bullet point speaks volumes as to the sheer stupidity of this measure. The whole point of going to Afghanistan and Iraq was for combat operations- Afghanistan still is a hostile warzone, and both U.S. and NATO forces continue to suffer losses in and out of combat hot zones. Insurgent attacks have accured throughout areas that have been deemed ‘safe’, and in areas where hostilities were not forseen.
Before the regulation went into effect, military personnel would be awarded $225 “combat pay” if they spent a single qualifying day in the combat zone (i.e., “danger pay location). Now, however, the $225 “combat pay” will actually be awarded $7.50 per day for the actual number of days that one spends in an established combat zone. As described by Andrew Tilghman in The Air Force Times, “So, for example, if a service member spends only 7 days of the month in Afghanistan, he or she will have only $52.50 in Imminent Danger Pay added to their paycheck.”
http://www.examiner.com/article/obama-freezes-military-combat...
http://www.fieldandstream.com/forums/guns/whats-it-worth/obam...
http://www.conservativeactionalerts.com/2012/02/obama-pulls-c...
http://www.snopes.com/politics/military/combatpay.asp
http://forums.militaryspot.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/3461073/m/6...
http://www.military.com/benefits/military-pay/special-pay/hos...
http://shark-tank.net/2011/12/28/23486/barack_obama/
http://patdollard.com/2012/02/obama-pulls-combat-pay-for-u-s-...
http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2012/02/perfect-obama-pulls-...
Top Opinion
-
☆56lady☆POTL~JLA~PWCM 2012/11/16 23:39:10Troops Should Be Paid Combat Pay in Any War Zone






















Especially since Tax Payers Paid 1.4-Billion each Year to Him and Family...
Pay The Troops...They Deserve It....
It use to be War Zone...that meant the Country or Sector you were in that was Declared By Congress....Now, You must be in the Direct Line of Fire or in an Explosive Devise Area...
and That is paid at $7.50 Per Day in that Line of Fire....which breaks down to $0.32 per Hour....
Is this How he is going to Create More Jobs...have Monitors to Verfy every Claim for Haz Pay..????
He Cuts Troops Haz Duty Pay in a War Zone, Unless In Direct Line Of Fire, while Taxpayers Spend 1.4-Billion each Year for Him and His Family....Where is the Logic....????
His actions against our military will only WORSEN from this point on.
Thanks for posting this Recon.....since OVomit CONTROLS THE MESSAGE that's reported by his lap-dog liberal media.
ODUMBO definitely controls the Media and you would Never see this reported there...
You Bet...Pay them...$220.00 per month can surely be found somewhere from the Budget...Maybe they can find it from their PORK projects....Their Food Stamp Scam Programs...
$220 per Month is Nothing...But I guess that is all a Life is worth to the Gov....
Every Campaign says they are going to stop Lobbyists....Yeah Right...
Obama is the worst one for allowing them into the WH...
Obviously, the author of this post didn't read the articles he referenced, thinking that they supported his contention when, actually, they disprove it.
Yes..I read them and Posted everything...
I do NOT do just one side as YOU do...
ODUMBO has Gone around Congress for Illegals..He could Do it for the Troops who are Dying for this Country...
What are Illegals Doing...Taking Jobs and Giving Nothing in return..
Very pathetic Attempt to Protect your King Allah Obama....Pathetic at Best...
He Over Rode the Dream Act...he could Over Ride This..
ODUMBO does Not get a Free Pass on this...
Those of US who have been there understand...
These Areswhole LIB's Haven't and Seem to think the Troops do not deserve The Low Pay as It is....Yet they Believe the ILLEGALS here deserve the Free Welfare, and Food Stamps they receive...
Very Warped Attitude of Who is Deserving...
You should not attack liberals over this because liberals are not against the troops, they are against how they are used maybe, but not the troops. I'm a liberal and I think the soldiers should be treated 100% better than they are by the US government.
He has reduced the War Zone to actual Fighting...yet discounts other areas that Can Be Attacked, because you are in a War Zone...
From Many polls on SH over the Years I have been On it...I find Most LIB's do NOT support our Troops....They Support Obama and Islam....PERIOD
You are Right...If Obama Could Have his Way..he Would Charge the Troops for Being Their...
He did try in 2010 to Have Troops in a Combat Area pay their Own health Care...It Did get Voted Down....