So,you are now spreading Bravo Sierra propaganda that Gov. Romney is worse then the "Destroyer in Chief" Barack Obama!!!!
Just click on the Amazon link to the book "The Great Destroyer: Barack Obama's War on the Republic" http://www.amazon.com/The-Gre...
And click on the book image to read the introduction to get a overview of the long list of unconstitutional actions of Obama.While he has been in office!
If you can read that list of unconstitutional crimes of the present Marxist occupier of the White House.And still claim he's still better then Gov.Romney.Then I think you have lost your mind.Or you really are an uncover Obama campaign supporter, in disguise.Running a dirty bigoted disinformation campaign blog for him!
Obama is better than Romney people!!
The Truth
2012/08/29 14:59:33
How can this be true, you ask?
All of you good people who believe everything the talking heads on your 'mind control devices' tell you, should read more.
Romney is a living legend! The only man in politics on record FOR and AGAINST every subject. (Depending on who's paying him at that moment.) Widely known among those who actually know him as, WAFFLE MAN!
But he's definitely, NO super hero!
What Mitt Romney Cares about, is certainly NOT YOU!
A vision of the future!
CAPTION:
[We'll not let any wolves near you nice sheeple!!]
Is this REALLY what you want?
That's not half as bad as they have planned for 90% of us!
Don't die A
So how is Obama any better?
Everybody has enough sense to know he's bad!
All of you good people who believe everything the talking heads on your 'mind control devices' tell you, should read more.
Romney is a living legend! The only man in politics on record FOR and AGAINST every subject. (Depending on who's paying him at that moment.) Widely known among those who actually know him as, WAFFLE MAN!
But he's definitely, NO super hero!
What Mitt Romney Cares about, is certainly NOT YOU!
A vision of the future!
CAPTION:
[We'll not let any wolves near you nice sheeple!!]
Is this REALLY what you want?
That's not half as bad as they have planned for 90% of us!
Don't die A
So how is Obama any better?
Everybody has enough sense to know he's bad!
Top Opinion
-
Steverno~POTL~PWCM~JLA 2012/08/29 15:53:38
While RP has had many good ideas, like auditing the Federal Reserve for one, he has come out with several ridiculous notions, the most worthless one being his isolationist desires for this nation!!!
You "claim" on your profile to be a "trained investigator", yet, you've obviously taken the "Ron Paul hook, line and sinker" WITHOUT CREDIBLE INVESTIGATION, and now that your "messiah" has FAILED in his nomination attempts, you "Paulinistas" throw a temper tantrum, and "believe everything the talking heads on your 'mind control devices' tell you"!!!
Please be CAREFUL!!! You could suffer aluminum poisoning from wearing your aluminum foil hat so tightly!!!
One only needs to look at NAFTA to know that Ross Perot was correct in his assessment of what we could expect if NAFTA was passed, he warned that we would hear a giant sucking sound from all of the job losses in the U.S. if it passed, and we most definitely HAVE!!! Also, the FACT is, without a treaty similar to NAFTA, there is NO nation in the world that would FREELY & FAIRLY TRADE, period!!!
Your "Utopian" dreams of having worldwide "completely free trade and travel", and gutting the military like Carter did, would do nothing more than complete the economic demise, and place this nation's liberties and freedom into the hands of our enemies!!!
If your desire is as you preach, move to Switzerland and live your isolationist dream!!!
The requisite of taxes and tariffs in trade keeps the playing field LEVEL, and "protectionism" is NOT "isolationism". You OBVIOUSLY haven't a clue about protectionism nor isolationism so I'll post the Merriam-Webster definitions for YOUR benefit!!!
http://www.merriam-webster.co...
Definition of PROTECTIONIST
: an advocate of government economic protection for domestic producers through restrictions on foreign competitors
http://www.merriam-webster.co...
Definition of ISOLATIONISM
: a policy of national isolation by abstention from alliances and other international political and economic relations
Protectionism in and of itself is not isolationism, but it moves further in that direction, regardless of whatever merits you perceive in it. Moreover, our current foreign policy, policing the world and setting ourselves up as an empire above other nations instead of diplomatic equals, is indeed quite isolating.
You didn't comprehend the difference between isolationism and protectionism until I PROVIDED you their definitions, and then, all you could spew was your drivel, "Protectionism in and of itself is not isolationism, but it moves further in that direction".
Fact is, you've become a petty, whiny, loser just like Paul.
Protectionism - restricting trade* and travel - is therefore a step toward isolationism. Similarly, our foreign policy of empire and domination isolates us in a symbolic sense.
You apparently have no counterarguments to these points other than baseless characterizations of them as "drivel," along with generic personal insults. Duly noted.
*As a side note, protectionism runs counter to the majority advice of economists from all major schools for reasons beyond the scope of this discussion. Like Perot though, I oppose NAFTA, and so does Ron Paul in case you were unaware. However, it is not the "free trade" agreement it's billed as anyway. Just having "Free Trade" in its name doesn't mean anything. It's a managed trade agreement. The only thing you need for genuine free trade is a lack of barriers (and I know you support barriers, but that's beside the point), not complicated agreements and an organization like the WTO; as soon as those get involved, it's a red flag that the trade is being set up to be unbalanced. NAFTA and GATT have indeed contributed to the hollowing of our econo...
Protectionism - restricting trade* and travel - is therefore a step toward isolationism. Similarly, our foreign policy of empire and domination isolates us in a symbolic sense.
You apparently have no counterarguments to these points other than baseless characterizations of them as "drivel," along with generic personal insults. Duly noted.
*As a side note, protectionism runs counter to the majority advice of economists from all major schools for reasons beyond the scope of this discussion. Like Perot though, I oppose NAFTA, and so does Ron Paul in case you were unaware. However, it is not the "free trade" agreement it's billed as anyway. Just having "Free Trade" in its name doesn't mean anything. It's a managed trade agreement. The only thing you need for genuine free trade is a lack of barriers (and I know you support barriers, but that's beside the point), not complicated agreements and an organization like the WTO; as soon as those get involved, it's a red flag that the trade is being set up to be unbalanced. NAFTA and GATT have indeed contributed to the hollowing of our economy, but they only exacerbate a situation caused by excessive regulations (especially price controls on labor) and a petrodollar system that requires other countries to sell to us at any cost to get dollars for oil.
Simply because you reject the definitions does NOT make them any less accurate.
This nation GIVES MORE to virtually ALL nations than ANY other nation in the world, and by so doing, we gain their trust and support FAR GREATER than what we accomplish militarily, however, had we followed the RP lunacy of turning our military backs to all nations that truly need our military support, and allowing nations like South Korea, Poland, France, England, Spain, etc., to "protect themselves" until such time as our OWN borders were breached, there would be but THREE nations in the world today, the Soviet Union, China, and Nazi Germany!!!
Was I speaking more in your language there?
1. The "author" of it is an illegal alien... or a big fan of them.
https://www.numbersusa.com/co...
http://www.sodahead.com/unite...
http://www.sodahead.com/unite...
2. The "author" is an Obama supporter masquerading otherwise who hates America.
3. The "author" is a Paulbot who is having a hissy fit [Paul by the way is a lot closer to Obama when it comes to illegal immigration and Islamic encroachment].
4. The "author" is a fool who fell for the leftwing lies about Romney hook, line & sinker.
5. The "author" is simply ignorant of the fact that Romney is virtually 180 degrees away from Obama on abortion, business, illegal immigration and most other issues.
6. The "author" doesn't want a man who, as governor, balanced the budget, and did so WITHOUT raising taxes, to replace a dog-eatin' Kenyan with a fake birth certificate who spent over twice as much in 3 years as Bush did in 8, and never created a budget.
7. The "author" was just joking sarcastically, but forgot to list this under "Fun & Humor."
1. The "author" of it is an illegal alien... or a big fan of them.
https://www.numbersusa.com/co...
http://www.sodahead.com/unite...
http://www.sodahead.com/unite...
2. The "author" is an Obama supporter masquerading otherwise who hates America.
3. The "author" is a Paulbot who is having a hissy fit [Paul by the way is a lot closer to Obama when it comes to illegal immigration and Islamic encroachment].
4. The "author" is a fool who fell for the leftwing lies about Romney hook, line & sinker.
5. The "author" is simply ignorant of the fact that Romney is virtually 180 degrees away from Obama on abortion, business, illegal immigration and most other issues.
6. The "author" doesn't want a man who, as governor, balanced the budget, and did so WITHOUT raising taxes, to replace a dog-eatin' Kenyan with a fake birth certificate who spent over twice as much in 3 years as Bush did in 8, and never created a budget.
7. The "author" was just joking sarcastically, but forgot to list this under "Fun & Humor."
Because if you were at all serious, you would invite certain--er--unwelcome attention.