SodaHead Celebrates Green Week

Question US

Obama Helping Mexico Drug War: Should he renew the gun ban instead?

W_C April 17, 2009 01:59:45

President Barack Obama is helping Mexico fight their drug war by stepping up enforcement of laws that ban the transfer of assault weapons across the border. This was instead of reinstating the US assault weapon ban. During Obama campaign days, he pledged that he would try to get the gun ban renewed, but has decided that enforcing laws on the Mexico border was a better choice. Even Mexican President Felipe Calderon wanted Obama to reinstate the gun ban.

Should Obama have reinstated the gun ban, or do you agree with his choice to step up enforcement laws on the Mexican border?
Obama is right in trying to help stop the mexican drug war.
Obama should have renewed the US assault weapong gun ban instead.
Why didn't Obama just renew the gun ban and step up Mexican border enforcement?
You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Comment
  • +4 raves JDLogan April 17, 2009 02:38:13
    JDLogan

    Obama is right in trying to help stop the mexican drug war.

    However, he'll go about it all wrong. The US military has several special forces units that could do a lot of good if just given a goal and the tools; don't tell them how, just what, and my "whats" are: stop drugs and illegal immigrants *before* they get into the US, and keep trade routes open and free of pirates.

    As far a government regulation of our guns, the only gun law we need, the absolute one and only is The Second Amendment to The Constitution of The United States of America!
    View thread
Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Comments
  • +2 raves
    STEPPIN... wolfshadow April 17, 2009 05:27:23 (edited)
    STEPPINRAZOR
    "only criminals with guns"
    Exactly... Look at what's happened to Australia. Crime rate ▲
  • +1 raves
    Zuggi April 17, 2009 04:40:23
    Zuggi

    Obama is right in trying to help stop the mexican drug war.

    Wait, I thought he was GOING TO TAKE AWAY ALL OUR GUNS!!!!!!!!!!!11!1!1!1
  • dtremaine Zuggi April 20, 2009 14:18:18
    dtremaine
    Just wait!!
  • dtremaine Zuggi April 20, 2009 14:26:36
    dtremaine
    And England!
  • Zuggi dtremaine April 20, 2009 14:28:18
    Zuggi
    He's taking away our England?
  • +3 raves
    STEPPINRAZOR April 17, 2009 02:49:40
    STEPPINRAZOR

    Obama is right in trying to help stop the mexican drug war.

    As far as Mexico goes I don't really care accept the fact of me paying for it out of my pocket and also ME BEING THE ONE THAT GOES OVER THERE!! I'm a service member and it doesn't sound like how I want to spend my next Christmas... Better than Afghanistan I guess, which is what it will be if this drug war thing doesn't happen.... Fuck it "Viva La Mexico!"
    As for any kind of gun ban goes... Just you try and take my fuckin' guns away.
  • +4 raves
    JDLogan April 17, 2009 02:38:13
    JDLogan

    Obama is right in trying to help stop the mexican drug war.

    However, he'll go about it all wrong. The US military has several special forces units that could do a lot of good if just given a goal and the tools; don't tell them how, just what, and my "whats" are: stop drugs and illegal immigrants *before* they get into the US, and keep trade routes open and free of pirates.

    As far a government regulation of our guns, the only gun law we need, the absolute one and only is The Second Amendment to The Constitution of The United States of America!
  • Michael... JDLogan April 21, 2009 16:16:57
    Michael Shaw
    Would that include the corporate pirates of Wall Street? From Dr Wu's, "Your Pirates and Mine": .....We asked the young Somalian why does he pirate? He answers, "That's where the money is!" We ask the young Wall Street executive why does he sell toxic commodities and pass them off as AAA? He answers, "That's where the money is!"

    All of our priorities are wrong but this did not begin with Obama. It's been going on for a long time now. But just like his predecessors and beyond a few cosmetic differences, Obama will basically stay on the same course, a course that has been generally inimical to most of our own best interests. We have no real say in these matters. The majority of the politicians regardless of affiliation work for a few thousand people, not us. We don't even choose our candidates. They are chosen for us by those who are willing to throw the most money at either and/or both parties. Thus if a candidate is not pro corporation(meaning he accepts no corporate campaign finance) he is never brought to the forefront in an election. Usually he is marginalized by his own party and the corporate owned media. This is why for example candidates like Ralph Nader, Dennis Kucinich or Ron Paul will never become president. They don't accept corporate campaign finance so they can't b...
    Would that include the corporate pirates of Wall Street? From Dr Wu's, "Your Pirates and Mine": .....We asked the young Somalian why does he pirate? He answers, "That's where the money is!" We ask the young Wall Street executive why does he sell toxic commodities and pass them off as AAA? He answers, "That's where the money is!"

    All of our priorities are wrong but this did not begin with Obama. It's been going on for a long time now. But just like his predecessors and beyond a few cosmetic differences, Obama will basically stay on the same course, a course that has been generally inimical to most of our own best interests. We have no real say in these matters. The majority of the politicians regardless of affiliation work for a few thousand people, not us. We don't even choose our candidates. They are chosen for us by those who are willing to throw the most money at either and/or both parties. Thus if a candidate is not pro corporation(meaning he accepts no corporate campaign finance) he is never brought to the forefront in an election. Usually he is marginalized by his own party and the corporate owned media. This is why for example candidates like Ralph Nader, Dennis Kucinich or Ron Paul will never become president. They don't accept corporate campaign finance so they can't be bought. When it comes to corporate campaign finance the republicans and the democrats are two sides to the same coin. But people remain complacent and continue to the play the game that has been invented for us thinking any one guy or one party is the answer to solving our problems. The truth is only people collectively can demand change or keep the few good things we have left. But it will go on and on, the pointing of fingers between democrats and republicans and we the suckers will stay in line like the good sheep we are.
    (more)
  • JDLogan Michael... April 21, 2009 19:39:04
    JDLogan
    I do believe *ALL* people should be held accountable for their actions, including Somalia, Wall Street and Washington DC, not excluding anyone else.

    I have never voted for a Democrat or a Republican in a state or national election, and cannot imagine ever doing so.

    I believe all debates should include all candidates for the office and all questions should be secret until the debate, no previews by any candidates, no speakers in their ears, just them thinking on their feet.

    And I believe if the world wants us to keep the peace across the globe (not something I think we should be doing) then they should all play by our rules and help pay for our military.
  • Michael... JDLogan May 18, 2009 17:41:45
    Michael Shaw
    For decades we have been sending in the military IE special opts to countries throughout Latin America to stop illegal drugs and in all of that time the problem has gotten worse, not better. In other words, the military solution to the drug problem is a failure. It is a very lucrative business though for munitions manufacturers, defense and private security contractors. It has also been very profitable for construction companies who build prisons, for venders who provide food and laundry services to them, for hi tech surveillance manufacturers and others who provide campaign finance to the politicians to insure this canard goes on forever. the war on drugs is an American invention that it so profitable to some that an end to it is simply not feasible. In fact it is to their advantage to see to it this war goes on forever.
  • +3 raves
    lawguilford April 17, 2009 02:27:09
    lawguilford

    Obama is right in trying to help stop the mexican drug war.

    i think that something has to be done about the mexican drug war and i feel that Obama cant really make it any worse....only better

    but the stupid ban on assault weapons gets me mad, Obama is suposed to take our rights to own assault weapns and the amount of bullits we can buy for certain guns we own at the moment---------WHAT THE HELL EVER HAPPENED TO OUR RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS?????
  • wolfshadow lawguil... April 17, 2009 05:15:12
    wolfshadow
    Thats the end run he is making around the Constitution.

    We have the right to keep and bear arms...we have NO constitutional right to have ammo for them.
  • Michael... wolfshadow April 21, 2009 15:39:50
    Michael Shaw
    In the constitution, what is it that actually constitutes the term arms? There were no assault rifles in the late 1700's. And arms can be construed as virtually any weapon. So what does the right of the people to keep and bear arms actually mean? Does it mean we can all have howitzers in our front yards? How about surface to air missiles or nuclear warheads?
  • +1 raves
    wolfshadow Michael... April 22, 2009 06:05:34
    wolfshadow
    Sure why not? Never can tell when your gonna drop by.

    gonna drop
  • +1 raves
    diana April 17, 2009 02:06:13
    diana

    Obama is right in trying to help stop the mexican drug war.

    i think he should help mexican people because there going into a dificult time right now and mexican people need help on drugs
  • +3 raves
    flaca April 17, 2009 02:04:21
    flaca

    Obama is right in trying to help stop the mexican drug war.

    if we don't help Calderon, the drug barons may end up assassinating him and the country might end up even more lawless than it is now.
or
Cancel