However, he'll go about it all wrong. The US military has several special forces units that could do a lot of good if just given a goal and the tools; don't tell them how, just what, and my "whats" are: stop drugs and illegal immigrants *before* they get into the US, and keep trade routes open and free of pirates.
As far a government regulation of our guns, the only gun law we need, the absolute one and only is The Second Amendment to The Constitution of The United States of America!
Question US
Obama Helping Mexico Drug War: Should he renew the gun ban instead?
W_C April 17, 2009 01:59:45
- 23 answers
- Read all 56 comments
- +2 raves
President Barack Obama is helping Mexico fight their drug war by stepping up enforcement of laws that ban the transfer of assault weapons across the border. This was instead of reinstating the US assault weapon ban. During Obama campaign days, he pledged that he would try to get the gun ban renewed, but has decided that enforcing laws on the Mexico border was a better choice. Even Mexican President Felipe Calderon wanted Obama to reinstate the gun ban.
Should Obama have reinstated the gun ban, or do you agree with his choice to step up enforcement laws on the Mexican border?
Should Obama have reinstated the gun ban, or do you agree with his choice to step up enforcement laws on the Mexican border?
Loading... 

Top Comment
-
Obama is right in trying to help stop the mexican drug war.
View thread
SodaHead Hot Trends

Exactly... Look at what's happened to Australia. Crime rate ▲
Obama is right in trying to help stop the mexican drug war.
Obama is right in trying to help stop the mexican drug war.
As for any kind of gun ban goes... Just you try and take my fuckin' guns away.
Obama is right in trying to help stop the mexican drug war.
As far a government regulation of our guns, the only gun law we need, the absolute one and only is The Second Amendment to The Constitution of The United States of America!
All of our priorities are wrong but this did not begin with Obama. It's been going on for a long time now. But just like his predecessors and beyond a few cosmetic differences, Obama will basically stay on the same course, a course that has been generally inimical to most of our own best interests. We have no real say in these matters. The majority of the politicians regardless of affiliation work for a few thousand people, not us. We don't even choose our candidates. They are chosen for us by those who are willing to throw the most money at either and/or both parties. Thus if a candidate is not pro corporation(meaning he accepts no corporate campaign finance) he is never brought to the forefront in an election. Usually he is marginalized by his own party and the corporate owned media. This is why for example candidates like Ralph Nader, Dennis Kucinich or Ron Paul will never become president. They don't accept corporate campaign finance so they can't b...
All of our priorities are wrong but this did not begin with Obama. It's been going on for a long time now. But just like his predecessors and beyond a few cosmetic differences, Obama will basically stay on the same course, a course that has been generally inimical to most of our own best interests. We have no real say in these matters. The majority of the politicians regardless of affiliation work for a few thousand people, not us. We don't even choose our candidates. They are chosen for us by those who are willing to throw the most money at either and/or both parties. Thus if a candidate is not pro corporation(meaning he accepts no corporate campaign finance) he is never brought to the forefront in an election. Usually he is marginalized by his own party and the corporate owned media. This is why for example candidates like Ralph Nader, Dennis Kucinich or Ron Paul will never become president. They don't accept corporate campaign finance so they can't be bought. When it comes to corporate campaign finance the republicans and the democrats are two sides to the same coin. But people remain complacent and continue to the play the game that has been invented for us thinking any one guy or one party is the answer to solving our problems. The truth is only people collectively can demand change or keep the few good things we have left. But it will go on and on, the pointing of fingers between democrats and republicans and we the suckers will stay in line like the good sheep we are.
I have never voted for a Democrat or a Republican in a state or national election, and cannot imagine ever doing so.
I believe all debates should include all candidates for the office and all questions should be secret until the debate, no previews by any candidates, no speakers in their ears, just them thinking on their feet.
And I believe if the world wants us to keep the peace across the globe (not something I think we should be doing) then they should all play by our rules and help pay for our military.
Obama is right in trying to help stop the mexican drug war.
but the stupid ban on assault weapons gets me mad, Obama is suposed to take our rights to own assault weapns and the amount of bullits we can buy for certain guns we own at the moment---------WHAT THE HELL EVER HAPPENED TO OUR RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS?????
We have the right to keep and bear arms...we have NO constitutional right to have ammo for them.
Obama is right in trying to help stop the mexican drug war.
Obama is right in trying to help stop the mexican drug war.