But, he may have a hard time replacing Obiden since so
many endangered Demwits are running from the DNC!
Obama Has 21 Days to Drop Biden: Would Dumping Biden Signal Desperation?
Fef
2012/08/16 22:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
314 votes
|
|
68% | |||
|
150 votes
|
|
32% | |||
President Obama has a lot of pressure to dump Vice President Joe Biden from the 2012 election campaign. Biden would not likely run for president in 2016 at the age of 73. Biden, a former Senator from Delaware, doesn't help with voters in the swing states like Florida, Virginia, Ohio or Pennsylvania. And Biden continues to bore people except with his gaffes ("20th Century") or outlandish rhetoric (accusing Republicans of enslaving people).
President Obama could shake things up by replacing Biden with Secretary Hillary Clinton as his vice president on his 2012 re-election ticket. Some pundits argue that would signal desperation by the Obama 2012 campaign because it would look as if Obama made a bad choice in picking Biden in 2008. Dumping Biden would only happen in desperation.
Then again, maybe President Obama would dump Biden for a candidate like Hillary Clinton because even Biden considers her more qualified for vice president (watch the video).
WEEKLYSTANDARD.COM reports:
President Obama could shake things up by replacing Biden with Secretary Hillary Clinton as his vice president on his 2012 re-election ticket. Some pundits argue that would signal desperation by the Obama 2012 campaign because it would look as if Obama made a bad choice in picking Biden in 2008. Dumping Biden would only happen in desperation.
Then again, maybe President Obama would dump Biden for a candidate like Hillary Clinton because even Biden considers her more qualified for vice president (watch the video).
WEEKLYSTANDARD.COM reports:
Read conservative news, blogs and opinion about 2012 Elections, Barack Obama, Charlotte, Democrats, Joe Biden, ticket and Vice President from The Weekly Standard, the must read magazine available in online edition.
Read More: http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/obama-has-22-d...
Top Opinion
-
GANGA~Patriotic Revolution ... 2012/08/16 21:07:43Yes






















Here is an Abe Lincoln thought on this one:
You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift.
You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong
You cannot help the poor man by destroying the rich.
You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred.
You cannot build character and courage by taking away man's initiative and independence.
You cannot help small men by tearing down big men.
You cannot lift the wage earner by pulling down the wage payer.
You cannot keep out of trouble by spending more than your income.
You cannot establish security on borrowed money.
You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they will not do for themselves.
So maybe, it is time to stop GIVING everyone, everything, and start EXPECTING people to PAY for things themselves, and PAY some taxes.
It is time to STOP giving so much to foreign governments and start paying off debt at home,.
It is time to STOP offering free everything for life, in exchange for voting support.
How about everyone living (lifestyle choice) on welfare PAY 15% of total benefits back in taxes, and NOT get a "earned income tax credit".
It's amazing what levels of delusion are possible when the media reduce themselves to be the servile Obama Ministry of Truth.
Bush and the Democrats combined (senators Obama and McCain included) did vote for the 750 billion TARP bailout.
But Obama, Reid and Pelosi alone are to blame for ramming through the 787 billion Stimulus, 550 billion Omnibus, trillion-dollar Obamacare bill (that a majority of Americans in multiple polls opposed, and two years later oppose in even higher numbers) and various other wastes of tax dollars and added debt, are the sole responsibility of the Democrats. There is absolutely no proof that ANY of these beyond TARP had the slightest economic benefit. These high-deficit legislations were an elitist liberal tax-and-spend wet dream, and a diversionary agenda from pursuit of jobs and the economy that Obama was elected to focus his priorities on.
Never forget!
Certainly there might be an intervening event that could explain Biden being dropped from the ticket, such as a health emergency, but I don't think anyone could, with a straight face, accuse a skeptic of cynicism for doubting that were the reason in most cases of "medical emergency". If he compared as well to Ryan as he currently does poorly, he'd likely have to have a stroke, die, and be cremated before Obama would drop him off the ticket - and even then, if the numbers were good enough, he might claim Joe had urned the right to stay on.
BURN THE WHITEY ! BURN BIDEN BURN
Wink.
http://www.thefix.com/content...
Worst President in my lifetime, right behind LBJ with his GREAT SOCIETY failure and useless war. Just like Obama's Welfare/Food Stamp, Section 8 fiasco and HIS useless war, Afghanistan. The both make Jimmy Carter and Bush, jr. look like saints.
And another comment about a Murphy Brown episode, where he said the title character presented a bad role model that encouraged women to pursue single motherhood as an "alternative lifestyle choice".
Which in the months and years after being touted as a political mistake, many experts in the field came out in pretty much a consensus that "Dan Quayle was right". But of course the liberal media ignored support of that opinion, and continued to portray Dan Quayle as stupid. For no real reason.
The only other thing Quayle was in that bordered on a gaff was his 1988 V.P. debate with Lloyd Bentson, who gave him the "I knew Jack Kennedy, Jack was a friend of mine... and Senator, you're no Jack Kennedy."
Which was just insult, with nothing to really back it up, but the Dems loved it.
But through media-orchestrated perception rather than fact, Quayle was smeared as an idiot.