Obama Has 21 Days to Drop Biden: Would Dumping Biden Signal Desperation?

And nothing will change the fact that you are a sorry-ass, idiotic, troll.

How long did it take for you to come up with that? Loser.

You are an IDIOT. Top idiot at that.

Brilliant!!!

You're still the biggest idiot ever. And that will never end.

I agree --great response !!

I feel sorry for you.

Why, because you're a tool.

Brilliant!!!

TJ, if Biden had gotten his way, you would be riding a bicycle instead of driving a car because gas would be costing us over $15/gallon. Biden voted against building the Alaska pipeline and creating tens of thousands of jobs and providing billions of barrels of oil to the global supply. See my post below...

Noooooooo! Don't dump good ol' "Plugs" Biden! He's the funniest thing running! (or limping)

Good 'Ol Plugs was the one of the handfull of Dumbass Senators, who way back in the 1970s actually voted AGAINST the Trans-Alaska Pipeline, an economic lifeline that would ultimately result in thousands of American jobs, 15 billion barrels of oil pumped into the economy to date, and a huge chunk of domestic energy production.

Google it and confirm this for yourself. Ol' Foot-n-Mouth Biden still believes in his lame tree hugging anti-energy crap.

With all of Jumpin' Joe Biden's recent discussions of energy, I've realized that he has not changed one bit.

He still seemed opposed to sensible innovations, from clean coal to nuclear energy to responsible new directional drilling techniques in places like ANWR.

On one issue after another, Obama's VP is loaded with "government experience" but still one of the dumbest senators ever to get elected to that esteemed body. He seems to have no understanding of logical steps we could take to safely capitalize on American energy and our natural resources.

WITH JOE BLOWING WIND . WE DO NOT NEED ALL THESE GIANT(UGLY) WIND MACHINES INSTALLED ALL OVER OUR NATION, JUST LET JOE KEEP ON BLOWING INTO THE TURBINES AND WE GET MEGA WATTS OF ELECTRICITY..FREE FREE FREE AT NO COST TO AMERICAN TAX PAYERS

Biden is a TOOL. And Hussein Obama sucks ass bad.

People with small vocabularies often resort to gutter language.

Maybe Hussein Obama should consider quitting because he really sucks ass bad.

Thank you for that bit of enlightening piece of wisdom. :)

YEA BUT ITS FUN FUN FUN

And you are out of touch with reality. Thank fox news. Then turn it off and actually get informed.

I never watch any news outlet on TV or the internet. Now, where do you get your facts? All I know is Hussein Obama sucks ass really bad as POTUS.

If you've never watched any news outlet on TV or the Internet then you know absolutely NOTHING! Good day.

LOL, you're the idiot. Why do I have to watch TV or the internet for news. You must be an idiotic dumbass liberal.

Brilliant!!!

Same to you!

You're an idiot, Tool.

LOL< I never watch news on TV TOOL. What an idiot you are.

Right.

I know I'm right, you are a tool. Crazy you agree.

Brilliant!!!

Yes, you probably are a pathetic American, thanks for pointing that out to us.

Brilliant!!!

Biden would not know how to debate a cat !!

WRONG WRONG WRONG..

Assuming for a moment that Hilary is/was a better choice for VP (something I strongly agree with) why would it be an act of desperation to choose her now? If it is true, it would be correcting a mistake. A GOOD thing. Sticking with Biden, after learning that, would be a foolish act.

Assuming that Hilary is/was not a better pick, then it would be a foolish act to choose her for VP and a smart move to stick with Biden.

Fact is, whether or not Obama is winning, if one VP candidate is better than the other, it is a smart move to go with that one. If neither is better, then it would be an act of desperation if he is losing and switches for the simple reason of trying something new. If he is winning and makes the switch for the same lack of reason, then it is being nonchalant with people's careers and lives.

In short, if one is clearly better than the other, choosing the better candidate is a smart move, regardless if he is winning or losing. If one is not clearly better than the other, changing candidates is not a good move, regardless if he is winning or losing.

Only one of these four conditions could even be interpreted as an act of desperation, and I doubt it's going to happen.

IS UR GLASS HALF FULL OR HALF EMPTY???????

Depends on which way the water's flowing.

Based on that, I'm willing to bet your glass is half empty.

The more relevant question is whether the Republican delegates will exercise their discretion and refuse to nominate Mitt Romney. Given how disastrous his campaign has been so far, and the fact that it is looking like the Romney-Ryan ticket will also cost the Republican Party their House majority, they seem to have no option left except a hail Mary pass. I hear Sarah Palin isn't doing anything significant.

But as to Vice President Biden, the President is not under any pressure to replace him. He has been an effective spokesman for the Administration and the thought of him tearing Paul Ryan to shreds in a debate is, I must admit, an exciting prospect. And THAT would be a B.F.D.