Obama: fool me once,...

Barack Hussein Obama is not merely incompetent. He set out to destroy
America. To beat him, his opponents must make the American people
understand that.

Obama has this advantage over the American voter. Many of them cannot
intelligently and morally conceive of the destruction of traditional /
patriotic America. They cannot conceive that Obama is a corrupted
person and actually downright evil.

For 8 years the leftist liberal extremist media pummeled the G. W.
Bush presidency. Much of it was cheap propaganda which painted the
picture of a devil incarnate. Along comes Obama with a catchy “hope and
change” message. He set the stage and prepared the Democrat dinner. If
you criticized Obama, you were a racist pig according to the left’s
politically correct standards. Frankly, many people voted for Obama to
show their family members that they weren’t prejudiced and racist. [A
very moronic reason]

Voters could not resist voting for something and someone who sold
himself to them as a better future for America, than what the “evil”
Bush, Cheney and Halliburton had [supposedly] brought them. Hence,
enough voters helped form the majority that swept Obama into office.
Even most Christian Catholic voters voted for him, thinking him a
“Christian,” when he has proved otherwise. [1] But
what voters ended up receiving, to their frustrations and utter
disappointments, was not the “hope and change” he promised. Obama did
not change the corruption in Washington D.C. Instead, under his
“regime” the corruption and overreach exponentially increased. One has
no further to look than to note how the national debt has grossly
increased under Obama’s watch.

Voters who voted for Obama and expected their “hope and change,” soon
realized that BO was changing traditional America — not changing the
corruption overreach of bureaucratic elitist government. Not only have
many Independents and Libertarians abandoned him (as polling data
shows), but younger first time, (now, “experienced”) voters. The second
time around, they will be voting against the one who had snake charmed
them.

Barack H. Obama. Photo: Pete Souza, January 13, 2009

Barack Hussein Obama has a knack for playing the Chameleon-in-Chief.
He would not get away with this, if it were not for his accomplice
kiss-up mass liberal extremist media [2] and
gullible unpatriotic voter mass. By playing the game of continued
deceit, Obama zeros in on voter’s human nature to believe for the best —
or, at least, better. It’s called, that Christian virtue, of “hope.”

If Obama’s re-election campaign can spin his first four years of
failure to make it seem that he did all he could to gain a clear footing
out of the Republican G.W. Bush swamp, [blame Bush tactic] and that he
is now actually changing America for the better — then, he has a chance
to convince enough voters, dishonestly, that he deserves a 2nd term.

On the other hand, in order for Republicans, to be successful, they
must continually remind the electorate that Obama is a colossal failure
for traditional and conservative America. They need to continually
remind the electorate that unemployment is staggering and America is not
energy independent, under Obama’s failed and flaccid leadership. Also,
that BO has corrupted the federal government by his sweeping edicts,
regulation and appointment of czars. They also need to remind the voters
of all of Obama’s failed promises. [3]

If the Republicans can do all this, in the light that Obama kills
business, employment, and energy independence — they have a winning
formula — providing, they nominate someone competent [unlike McCain] who
will go all out in campaigning against Obama. Oh, yes – Republicans
need to remind the electorate of Obama bowing before foreign leaders.

Voters need to understand the depravity of human nature, when they
make their 2012 voting choice. They need to hold Obama responsible and
accountable for the utter mess he has created. But, [alas], voters,
often and mistakenly allow the virtue of “hope” to blind them. That’s
how Obama won in the first place. Voters didn’t want to bother with
Obama’s Illinois voting record; his questionable (people) associations
and, other multiple negatives. [4] [5] It
made little difference to them that Obama supported Infanticide as an
Illinois senator. And, it seems to make little difference to the mass of
voters that Obama does not meet the Constitutional requirement (for
president) of being a “natural born citizen.” And, I fear that the GOP
nominee will soft pedal and campaign like milquetoast, avoiding the
Achilles heel of Obama — that being his illegitimate presidency. [6]

Note: The “depravity of human nature,” was first referenced in
Genesis, chapter 3, of the Hebrew Scriptures, commonly known as the
first book of the “Bible.” It’s the “sin nature” of humanity. And, that
“sin nature” is on full display in the person and destructive actions
of the White House occupier, Barack Hussein Obama.

That's it. You need to recognize that human nature is basically bad, to understand just how bad a leader can be, and how bad this "leader" is.

Well? Do you get it yet?